2024 Presidential Debate: A Disappointing Showdown - Trump and Biden's Debate Performances Criticized by Media and Experts

Chesapeake, Virginia United States of America
Biden attempted to reassure Democrats about his ability to win the election with an energetic speech in Raleigh, North Carolina.
Former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden faced off in the first presidential debate of the 2024 election in Atlanta.
MSNBC's Joy Reid suggested he failed to calm Democratic concerns, while CNN's Flash Poll showed Trump as the clear winner.
Several liberal media outlets turned against President Biden following his widely panned debate performance.
Todd Graham, a professor of debate at Southern Illinois University, analyzed both candidates' performances and concluded neither met expectations in terms of substance and presentation.
Trump criticized Biden's debate performance at a rally in Chesapeake, Virginia.
2024 Presidential Debate: A Disappointing Showdown - Trump and Biden's Debate Performances Criticized by Media and Experts

In the first presidential debate of the 2024 election, former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden faced off in Atlanta. The debate, which was widely anticipated to be a turning point in the race, left many questioning both candidates' abilities to lead. Here's a comprehensive look at the highlights from each source article.

According to an article published by The New York Times, Trump held a rally in Chesapeake, Virginia, where he criticized Biden's debate performance. Meanwhile, Biden gave an energetic speech in Raleigh, North Carolina, attempting to reassure Democrats about his ability to win the election.

Another article from Fox News reported that several liberal media outlets turned against President Biden following his widely panned debate performance. MSNBC's Joy Reid suggested that he failed to calm Democratic concerns about his ability to win, while CNN's Flash Poll showed Trump as the clear winner of the debate.

A third article from CNN featured an opinion piece by Todd Graham, a professor of debate at Southern Illinois University. Graham analyzed both candidates' performances and concluded that neither Biden nor Trump met expectations in terms of substance and presentation during the debate.

Lastly, The New Yorker published an article questioning whether Biden's debate performance marked the beginning of the end of his presidency. Online prediction markets showed a decline in Biden's chances after the debate, while social media was filled with celebrations from Republicans.

Despite these criticisms, it is essential to remember that all sources have their biases and should be approached with skepticism. It is crucial to consider multiple perspectives and verify information before drawing conclusions.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Fox News article does not mention any concrete evidence supporting their claim that liberal media outlets turned against Biden.
  • The New York Times article does not provide specific details about Trump's criticism of Biden's debate performance.

Sources

94%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Trump-Biden Presidential Debate Highlights and Analysis: Election Live Updates

The New York Times Rebecca Davis Friday, 28 June 2024 09:54
  • Unique Points
    • Biden campaign officials reassured party donors and fund-raisers that there are no internal conversations about replacing Biden on the ticket.
    • At this point in the race, a replacement for Biden would be decided on the floor of the Democratic National Convention in August.
  • Accuracy
    • Democratic leaders publicly backed President Biden but some pundits and political strategists expressed doubt in his ability to see the election through and called for him to make way for a new nominee.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

62%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Biden advocates in the liberal media turn on president and 'weep' following Trump debate: 'I've seen enough'

Fox News Channel Nikolas Lanum Friday, 28 June 2024 21:28
  • Unique Points
    • MSNBC's Joy Reid suggested that President Biden failed to reassure his party about his ability to win the 2024 election after his debate performance.
    • CNN's Flash Poll showed Trump as the clear winner of the first presidential debate.
    • Joe Scarborough, a longtime Biden defender, questioned whether Biden should run for re-election due to his debate performance.
  • Accuracy
    • Democratic leaders publicly backed President Biden but some pundits and political strategists expressed doubt in his ability to see the election through and called for him to make way for a new nominee.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The author quotes several individuals expressing their opinions about President Biden's debate performance. These opinions are not fallacies but rather the positions of the speakers. However, there is an informal fallacy called 'Bandwagon Appeal' present in this article. The author implies that because several liberal media figures have criticized President Biden, it means that his performance was truly poor and he should consider not running for re-election. This is a fallacious way of thinking as the opinions of these individuals do not necessarily reflect objective truth.
    • Scores of staunch Biden allies in the liberal media are turning against President Biden following his widely panned debate performance...
    • Reid also admitted that her phone did not stop buzzing throughout the debate as political operatives, campaign operatives and Democrats were approaching a state of panic.
    • If he were CEO and he turned in a performance like that, would any corporation in America, any Fortune 500 corporation in America, keep him on as CEO?
  • Bias (0%)
    The author expresses a clear bias against President Biden based on his analysis of the reactions of liberal media figures to Biden's debate performance. The author quotes Joy Reid and Joe Scarborough criticizing Biden and expresses agreement with their assessments.
    • If he were CEO and he turned in a performance like that, would any corporation in America, any Fortune 500 corporation in America, keep him on as CEO?
      • Joe Biden’s job was to reassure them tonight. His job was to calm his party, to make them feel that yes, I can do this. I have four more years in me. I have the ability and the stamina and the strength to do four more years. He did not do that.
        • Scores of staunch Biden allies in the liberal media are turning against President Biden following his widely panned debate performance
          • tragically did not rise to the occasion last night.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          56%

          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

          Opinion: I’m a champion debate coach. Here’s how they scored

          CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Friday, 28 June 2024 12:08
          • Unique Points
            • Todd Graham is a professor of debate at Southern Illinois University.
            • Graham's teams have won five national championships and he has been named the national debate coach of the year three times.
            • Biden was expected to leave the event with more knowledge about future policymaking than when it began, but his expectations were not met.
            • Trump failed to answer questions directly and often went off topic or lied during the debate.
            • Biden’s performance in the debate amplified criticisms of his lack of energy and mental fitness.
          • Accuracy
            • ][The first 2024 presidential debate in Atlanta on Thursday night featured performances by President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.][] In the NYTimes article, it is mentioned that former President Trump held a rally in Chesapeake, VA on Friday and there is no information about the debate.
            • [Biden was expected to leave the event with more knowledge about future policymaking than when it began, but his expectations were not met.]
          • Deception (30%)
            The article contains editorializing and pontification by the author as they analyze and score the performance of President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump in a debate. The author expresses their opinions on each candidate's substance, presentation, and overall performance. They also use emotional manipulation by describing Trump's statements as 'ridiculous hyperbole' and 'lies.'
            • Biden’s skills have diminished since their last debate four years ago.
            • Trump had good vocal quality and energy.
            • The boy who cried wolf can only be believed so many times.
          • Fallacies (65%)
            The author commits the 'Hasty Generalization' fallacy multiple times in this article by making broad assumptions about Trump's performance based on a few examples. The author states that 'Trump failed to answer the questions presented to him' and 'He rarely answered the questions.' However, these statements are not supported by evidence from the debate itself. Instead, the author provides examples of Trump going off-topic or making hyperbolic statements, but these do not necessarily demonstrate a failure to answer questions. Additionally, the author commits an 'Appeal to Authority' fallacy when stating that they are a debate coach and have won five national championships. This does not make their analysis any more valid or accurate.
            • ]The three most important aspects of a presidential debate are answering the questions presented to demonstrate the candidate's mastery of the subject, avoiding misinformation or outright lies and laying out plans for the future. In that regard, Trump failed.[
            • He rarely answered the questions.
            • Trump had good vocal quality and energy. While his answers may have strayed, his demeanor, presentation and style were miles better than Biden's.
          • Bias (15%)
            The author demonstrates clear bias against Donald Trump in this article by repeatedly criticizing his performance in the debate and labeling his statements as lies or hyperbole without providing evidence. The author also makes assumptions about Trump's position on issues without directly quoting him or providing context.
            • Biden had no real strategy to win this debate as far as I can tell, and that came through in his answers.
              • The boy who cried wolf can only be believed so many times.
                • Trump failed to answer the questions presented to him
                  • Trump talked about off-topic issues and used ridiculous hyperbole
                    • You simply can't lie in debates as often as Trump does if the activity is to be taken seriously.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    54%

                    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                    Was the Debate the Beginning of the End of Joe Biden’s Presidency?

                    The New Yorker Magazine Susan B. Friday, 28 June 2024 05:20
                    • Unique Points
                      • The upcoming quarterly refunding update from the US Treasury will provide information on how much bond supply there will be.
                      • Joe Biden had a debate that left many questioning his ability to continue in the presidency due to his shaky answers and struggles throughout the debate.
                      • Trump managed to appear healthier and louder than Biden during the debate.
                      • Online prediction markets showed a decline in Biden's chances after the debate, while social media was filled with Republicans celebrating Trump's performance.
                    • Accuracy
                      • Donald Trump and Joe Biden had a debate that left many questioning Biden’s ability to continue in the presidency due to his shaky answers and struggles throughout the debate.
                      • Biden campaign officials reassured party donors and fund-raisers that there are no internal conversations about replacing Biden on the ticket.
                      • Democratic leaders publicly backed President Biden but some pundits and political strategists expressed doubt in his ability to see the election through and called for him to make way for a new nominee.
                    • Deception (30%)
                      The author makes editorializing statements and uses emotional manipulation by describing Biden's performance as 'painful to watch' and 'agonizing'. She also engages in selective reporting by focusing on Biden's struggles during the debate while downplaying Trump's lies and untrue statements. The author does not provide any sources for her information.
                      • Biden struggled so much that even several scathing pre-planned lines failed to land with any force.
                      • Democrats were panicking; would they seek to replace Biden at the top of the ticket?
                      • The President of the United States, eighty-one years old and asking to be returned to office until age eighty-six, looked and sounded old.
                    • Fallacies (75%)
                      The author makes an appeal to authority by stating 'History suggests that the winner of a Presidential debate can expect a bounce' without providing any evidence or citation. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Trump as a 'defeated, criminally convicted ex-President' and Biden as looking and sounding 'old' and 'painful to watch'.
                      • History suggests that the winner of a Presidential debate can expect a bounce
                      • The President of the United States, eighty-one years old and asking to be returned to office until age eighty-six, looked and sounded old.
                      • It was Biden. The President of the United States, eighty-one years old and asking to be returned to office until age eighty-six, looked and sounded old.
                    • Bias (15%)
                      The author expresses a clear bias against President Biden's performance in the debate and repeatedly describes him as 'old' and 'painful to watch'. She also makes derogatory comments about his voice being muffled and losing his train of thought. The author does not make any similar comments about Trump, instead describing him as a 'defeated, criminally convicted ex-President' who was still leading in the polls. This bias is further demonstrated when the author states that 'Democrats were panicking' and 'Americans of different political persuasions found something they could agree on', implying that Biden's poor performance was a significant issue for Democrats and a source of agreement among people with different political views.
                      • Democrats were panicking; would they seek to replace Biden at the top of the ticket?
                        • The President of the United States, eighty-one years old and asking to be returned to office until age eighty-six, looked and sounded old. Too old.
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication