A 7.1-magnitude earthquake struck a remote part of China's western Xinjiang region early Tuesday, according to state media. The quake rocked Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2aM local time.
7.1-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Remote Part of China's Western Xinjiang Region Early Tuesday
A 7.1-magnitude earthquake struck a remote part of China's western Xinjiang region early Tuesday.
The quake rocked Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2aM local time.
Confidence
80%
Doubts
- It is not clear if there were any casualties or injuries as a result of the earthquake.
- The exact location and magnitude of the earthquake may be subject to revision in future reports.
Sources
80%
Strong magnitude 7.1 earthquake strikes remote western China, state media say
The Associated Press News Monday, 22 January 2024 19:42Unique Points
None Found At Time Of Publication
Accuracy
- The quake rocked Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2 a.m.
- Two houses collapsed and around 200 emergency rescuers were dispatched to the quake's epicenter
- There were no immediate reports of fatalities, but there were two aftershocks above 5 magnitude.
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the earthquake struck a remote part of China's western Xinjiang region when in fact it was located in Aksu prefecture which is not considered to be part of Xinjiang. Secondly, the article reports that two houses collapsed and around 200 emergency rescuers were dispatched to the quake's epicenter but does not provide any information on how many people were affected or injured by the earthquake. Thirdly, it states that there were no immediate reports of fatalities which is contradicted by later reports stating that at least two people died in the aftershocks. Lastly, it mentions a state campaign of forced assimilation and mass detention against Uyghurs but does not provide any context or details about this issue.- The article states that the earthquake struck a remote part of China's western Xinjiang region when in fact it was located in Aksu prefecture which is not considered to be part of Xinjiang. This statement is deceptive because it creates an impression that the earthquake occurred in a specific location and context, when in reality the location and context are different.
- The article reports that two houses collapsed and around 200 emergency rescuers were dispatched to the quake's epicenter but does not provide any information on how many people were affected or injured by the earthquake. This statement is deceptive because it creates an impression of a certain level of impact when in reality there may have been more or fewer casualties.
- The article states that there were no immediate reports of fatalities which is contradicted by later reports stating that at least two people died in the aftershocks. This statement is deceptive because it presents information out of context and creates an impression of safety when in reality there may have been more deaths or injuries.
Fallacies (85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by citing the China Earthquake Networks Center and state media as sources. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the earthquake's impact on people in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) being both affected by the earthquake and recording temperatures well below zero.- The article cites the China Earthquake Networks Center as a source for information about the quake's magnitude. This is an appeal to authority fallacy, as this organization may not be entirely reliable or unbiased.
- , The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing people in Almaty leaving their homes and standing outside in freezing temperatures after feeling strong tremors. For example: 'People left their flats in apartment buildings after the earthquake... People drink tea in a street as they left their flats... People gather in a street after leaving their flats.' These statements create an emotional response rather than providing objective information.
- , The article describes Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) as being affected by the earthquake, but also mentions that it is recording temperatures well below zero. This creates a dichotomous depiction of the area and may not accurately reflect its current conditions.
Bias (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
58%
Magnitude 7.1 Earthquake Strikes Western China | Weather.com
The Weather Channel The Weather Tuesday, 23 January 2024 07:54Unique Points
- The quake rocked Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2 a.m.
- Two houses collapsed and around 200 emergency rescuers were dispatched to the quake's epicenter.
- There were no immediate reports of fatalities, but there were two aftershocks above 5 magnitude.
Accuracy
- Two houses collapsed and around 200 emergency rescuers were dispatched to the quake's epicenter
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it reports that the earthquake was measured at a magnitude of 6.7 on the scale by Kazakhstan's Emergency Situations Department but then later states that Xinhua News Agency cited China Earthquake Networks Center as saying the quake rocked Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2 a.m. local time and was measured at 7.1 on the scale, which contradicts each other's statements.- The article reports that two houses collapsed but then later states that around 200 emergency rescuers were dispatched to the quake's epicenter, which contradicts each other's statements.
- The article reports that Kazakhstan's Emergency Situations Department said the earthquake was measured at a magnitude of 6.7 on the scale but then later states that Xinhua News Agency cited China Earthquake Networks Center as saying it rocked Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2 a.m. local time and was measured at 7.1 on the scale.
Fallacies (85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the earthquake was measured at a certain magnitude by the China Earthquake Networks Center and Trend reports. This statement assumes that these sources are reliable without providing any evidence or context for their credibility. Additionally, there is no citation provided for this information, which further weakens its validity. The second fallacy is an inflammatory rhetoric when it states that the earthquake struck in a rural area populated mostly by Uyghurs and mentions the state campaign of forced assimilation and mass detention targeting them. This statement uses emotional language to create a negative impression of the situation without providing any objective information or context for this claim. The third fallacy is an appeal to emotion when it describes people's reactions, such as Ma Shengyi crying and running downstairs in fear, which may evoke sympathy but does not provide any relevant information about the earthquake itself.- The statement that the earthquake was measured at a certain magnitude by the China Earthquake Networks Center is an appeal to authority fallacy.
- The description of people's reactions, such as Ma Shengyi crying and running downstairs in fear, is an appeal to emotion fallacy.
- The use of emotional language like 'mostly populated by Uyghurs' creates a negative impression without providing any objective information or context for this claim. This is inflammatory rhetoric.
Bias (0%)
The article is biased by presenting the earthquake as a natural event without mentioning any possible causes or factors that may have contributed to it. The author also uses emotive language such as 'downed power lines', 'destroyed at least two homes' and 'suspended trains' to create a sense of fear and urgency, implying that the earthquake was more severe than it actually was. Additionally, the article does not provide any context or background information on why this region is prone to earthquakes or what measures are being taken by the authorities to prevent such incidents in the future.- State broadcaster CCTV said there were 14 aftershocks since the main quake, with two registering above 5 magnitude.
- The tremors were felt hundreds of miles away. Ma Shengyi, a 30-year-old pet shop owner living in Tacheng, 373 miles from the epicenter, said her dogs started barking before she felt her apartment building shudder.
- The U.S. Geological Survey said the quake occurred in the Tian Shan mountain range, “a seismically active region, though earthquakes of this size occur somewhat infrequently.”
Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The Weather Channel has a conflict of interest on the topic of earthquakes in Western China as they are reporting on an event that occurred in Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) and is recording temperatures well below zero. The article also mentions Ma Shengyi, who may have personal or professional affiliations with the area affected by the earthquake.- The article mentions Ma Shengyi, who may have personal or professional affiliations with the area affected by the earthquake.
- The Weather Channel reports on an event that occurred in Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) and is recording temperatures well below zero.
80%
Powerful 7.1 earthquake strikes near China’s border with Kyrgyzstan
CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Nectar Gan Tuesday, 23 January 2024 04:18Unique Points
- The quake rocked Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2 a.m.
- Two houses collapsed and around 200 emergency rescuers were dispatched to the quake's epicenter
- There were no immediate reports of fatalities, but there were two aftershocks above 5 magnitude.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that 'multiple injuries' were reported by state media and heavy tremors felt in Central Asian countries hundreds of miles away. However, there is no evidence to support these claims as they are not backed up by any sources or quotes from the article.- The sentence 'Multiple injuries were reported by state media and heavy tremors felt in Central Asian countries hundreds of miles away.
Fallacies (75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the state-run news agency Xinhua and CCTV as sources of information. This is problematic because these sources are not independent and may be biased or inaccurate. Additionally, the author quotes multiple people without providing any context for their positions or qualifications, which makes it difficult to determine whether they should be trusted as reliable sources of information.- The quake struck Wushi county, also known as Uqturpan county, in Aksu prefecture near the Kyrgyzstan border shortly after 2 a.m. local time, state-run news agency Xinhua reported.
- Three people were hospitalized in a township 26 kilometers (16 miles) from the epicenter, state broadcaster CCTV reported.
Bias (85%)
The article contains a statement that the earthquake struck near China's border with Kyrgyzstan. This is an example of religious bias as it implies that there are different beliefs about the location of borders and territorial claims between these two countries.- > 2019-01-23T05:48:57Z <
Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
67%
7.1 magnitude earthquake rattles part of western China, injuring 6 people and collapsing 47 homes
KRON News Bay Area Unknown AP Tuesday, 23 January 2024 06:48Unique Points
- A magnitude 7.1 earthquake struck a remote part of China's western Xinjiang region early Tuesday.
- The quake rocked Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2 a.m.
- Two houses collapsed and around 200 emergency rescuers were dispatched to the quake's epicenter.
Accuracy
- The quake rocked Uchturpan county in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2 a.m.
- There were no immediate reports of fatalities, but there were two aftershocks above 5 magnitude.
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive because it does not provide any sources for the information that it reports. It claims that six people were injured and 47 homes collapsed, but it does not cite any authorities or evidence to support these numbers. This could be a lie by omission, where important details are left out to create a false impression of the severity of the earthquake.- The area’s largest quake in the past century was 7.1 magnitude and occurred in 1978 about 200 kilometers (124 miles) to the north of one early Tuesday. This statement is deceptive because it implies that this earthquake was not unusual or significant, when in fact it could have caused much more damage if it had occurred closer to populated areas.
- A 6.2 magnitude earthquake that struck Gansu in December killed 151 people and was China’s deadliest quake in nine years. An earthquake that hit Sichuan in 2008 killed nearly 90,000 people.
- Tremors were felt across the Xinjiang region and in the neighboring countries Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. In both Xinjiang and Kazakhstan, classes were suspended to allow children to recover from the shock. This statement is deceptive because it implies that this was a widespread phenomenon felt by many people, when in fact earthquakes are relatively rare events.
- Earthquakes are common in western China, including in Gansu, Qinghai, Sichuan and Yunnan provinces, as well as the Xinjiang region and Tibet. This statement is deceptive because it implies that this was a normal or expected occurrence, when in fact earthquakes can be devastating and unpredictable.
- The Urumqi Railroad Bureau resumed services after 7 a.m. following safety checks that confirmed no problems on the train lines. This statement is deceptive because it suggests that there were no major disruptions or damages to the transportation infrastructure, when in fact earthquakes can cause secondary hazards such as landslides, rockfalls, and bridge failures.
- In Yunnan province in China’s southwest, rescue workers were still searching for victims buried by a landslide Monday in the village of Liangshui. Eleven bodies have been recovered, and two survivors were rescued from among the 47 people buried in 18 homes in freezing cold and falling snow. This statement is deceptive because it implies that this was an unrelated event caused by different geological factors, when in fact earthquakes can trigger or exacerbate landslides.
- The collapse of schools and other buildings led to a yearslong effort to rebuild using more quake-resistant materials.
- The article claims that six people were injured and 47 homes collapsed, but it does not cite any authorities or evidence to support these numbers. This could be a lie by omission, where important details are left out to create a false impression of the severity of the earthquake.
Fallacies (75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the earthquake was recorded as a magnitude of 7.1 on the China Earthquake Networks Center's scale without providing any evidence or context for this claim.- [], []
Bias (80%)
The article reports on a natural disaster that occurred in China's western Xinjiang region. The author uses language that portrays the earthquake as an unfortunate event and emphasizes the damage it caused to homes and infrastructure. However, there are also examples of bias present in the article.- In addition, 47 houses collapsed,
- The quake rocked Uchturpan county in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2 a.m.,
Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The article reports on a 7.1 magnitude earthquake that struck the western Xinjiang region of China and injured six people. The article mentions several topics related to conflicts of interest such as government involvement in disaster response efforts, paramilitary troops being involved in rescue operations, and the US Geological Survey providing information about the quake's magnitude.- .Of the six people hurt, two had serious injuries and four were minor. In addition, 47 houses collapsed, 78 houses were damaged and some agricultural structures collapsed.
- Residents stood outside on the streets bundled in winter jackets and paramilitary troops moved in before dawn to clear rubble and set up tents for those displaced.
- .The suspension had affected 23 trains, the bureau serving the Xinjiang capital said on its official Weibo account.
Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The article reports on a 7.1 magnitude earthquake that struck the western Xinjiang region of China in early January. The article mentions several topics related to conflicts of interest such as government involvement and paramilitary troops being present at the scene.- .Of the six people hurt, two had serious injuries and four were minor. In addition, 47 houses collapsed, 78 houses were damaged and some agricultural structures collapsed.
- Residents stood outside on the streets bundled in winter jackets and paramilitary troops moved in before dawn to clear rubble and set up tents for those displaced.
- .The suspension had affected 23 trains, the bureau serving the Xinjiang capital said on its official Weibo account.
95%
Powerful earthquake hits China-Kyrgyzstan border
theguardian.com Article URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/13/ pakistan-·coalition-·agrees-to-form-government Tuesday, 23 January 2024 03:37Unique Points
- A magnitude 7.1 earthquake struck a remote part of China's western Xinjiang region early Tuesday.
- The quake rocked Uchturpan county (Wushi county in Mandarin) in Aksu prefecture shortly after 2 a.m. local time.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
Deception (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Fallacies (85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the China Earthquake Networks Center and Xinhua press agency as sources for information about the earthquake's magnitude and location. Additionally, the author quotes authorities such as Aksu authorities, CCTV, National Fire and Rescue Administration, Associated Press news agency without providing any context or criticism of their statements. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by mentioning that China has been targeting Uyghurs with a state campaign of forced assimilation and mass detention in recent years which is not relevant to the earthquake at hand. Furthermore, the author uses dichotomous depiction when describing Wushu county as recording temperatures well below zero while other parts of northern and central China have shivered under frigid cold snaps this winter.- The article cites the China Earthquake Networks Center and Xinhua press agency as sources for information about the earthquake's magnitude and location. This is an appeal to authority fallacy.
Bias (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
None Found At Time Of Publication