Biden campaign launches aggressive strategy against Trump's abortion stance
Overturning Roe v. Wade is a key issue for voters in November
The re-election effort said that over the last two days, it has mobilized every tool at its disposal to take the fight directly to Trump on an issue it believes will be most mobilizing for voters in November.
The Biden campaign quickly mobilized on Trump's abortion stance, launching an aggressive strategy to pin the presumptive Republican nominee down on his record and amplify his desire to take credit for overturning Roe v. Wade. The re-election effort said that over the last two days, it has mobilized every tool at its disposal to take the fight directly to Trump on an issue it believes will be most mobilizing for voters in November.
Trump's support for exceptions to anti-abortion laws is a position he arrived at out of political expediency.
The reality is a stark reversal from the last time Trump landed on Mike Pence for his running mate eight years ago in hopes the Indiana governor’s staunch opposition to abortion could assuage fears from the Christian right about the thrice-married Manhattan socialite who once declared himself ‘very pro-choice.’
Trump sees abortion as a potentially damaging issue for Republicans to navigate as he seeks a return to the White House.
Those familiar with the vice presidential search say Trump is closely studying how his potential picks have approached the divisive issue in the past, believing it’s one of the few issues Democrats could successfully exploit.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(80%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents Trump's stance on abortion as a new challenge for his potential running mates who have spent their political careers opposing the procedure and supporting anti-abortion policies. However, this statement is misleading because Trump has been clear about his support for exceptions to federal abortion bans in the past. Secondly, it presents Noem's stance on Trump's latest contortions around abortion as a model for other Republicans to follow when in reality she has also expressed opposition to exceptions and her state's ban is more restrictive than what Trump is advocating for. Thirdly, the article quotes Rubio saying he supports legislation that includes some exceptions because it recognizes that this position is not a majority position, but fails to mention that Rubio himself has been inconsistent in his stance on abortion and has previously supported bans without exceptions.
The statement 'Many of those records stand at odds with the presumptive Republican presidential nominee' implies Trump is changing his stance on abortion when he has been consistent in supporting exceptions for victims of rape and incest, as well as health of mother exceptions.
The statement 'This issue will ultimately be decided by voters across America' implies Trump supports federal abortion ban with no exceptions when he actually supports post-Roe v. Wade status quo where states like Texas are free to outlaw almost all abortions and others like California can legalize the procedure in all instances before viability.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several examples of an appeal to authority fallacy. The author cites the opinions and actions of other individuals without providing any evidence or reasoning for their own stance on the issue.
Steve Contorno cited Kristi Noem's support for Trump's position on abortion as proof that she is in agreement with him, despite her previous statements indicating otherwise. This is an example of an appeal to authority fallacy because it assumes that Noem's opinion should be accepted without question.
,
Bias
(85%)
The author Steve Contorno demonstrates bias by selectively quoting and characterizing the positions of those being discussed in a way that is favorable to his own perspective. He uses language that depicts those who support exceptions for rape and incest as extreme or unreasonable.
`For Noem, Scott and others in consideration to become Trump’s running mate, the former president’s latest contortions around abortion present a new challenge as they compete for his attention. Many of those in the mix have spent their political careers as unyielding opponents of the procedure and unflinching allies of the anti-abortion movement.`
`Trump angered several anti-abortion leaders this week by refusing to back a federal abortion ban while embracing exceptions that Republicans throughout the country have for years opposed as morally questionable.`
`Unaddressed in her social media post Monday, though, was the former president’s support for exceptions for rape and incest in anti-abortion laws – the kind left out of the ban she has defended in her own state.`
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Steve Contorno has conflicts of interest on the topics of abortion and Trump's stance on it. He mentions several politicians who have taken positions on this issue including Kristi Noem, Tim Scott, Mike Pence, Byron Donalds, J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio.
Contorno quotes Mike Pence saying that he would not have supported the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade
He also mentions Sen. Tim Scott balked at a reporter asking about Trump declining to endorse a federal abortion ban
Steve Contorno mentions South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem's support for Trump on abortion
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Steve Contorno has conflicts of interest on the topics of abortion and Trump's stance on it. He also mentions several politicians who have taken positions on this issue.
Kristi Noem, Tim Scott, Mike Pence, Byron Donalds and J.D. Vance all mentioned in the article.
Trump sees abortion as potentially damaging issue for Republicans to navigate as he seeks return to White House
Trump released a video about his abortion stance Monday morning
Biden had already shot a direct-to-camera response video within hours of Trump's statement
Harris emphasized the need to act quickly and organized an event in Tucson, Arizona with advocates for abortion rights
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(80%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that President Joe Biden's campaign was ready to pounce on Donald Trump's abortion stance as soon as it was released. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and appears to be an attempt at sensationalism.
The more aggressive strategy highlights how the Biden campaign plans to go on offense on reproductive freedom
Within hours of Trump's saying it should be up to the states to decide abortion policy while declining to say whether he would sign a national abortion ban if he is elected president, Biden had already shot a direct-to-camera response video
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the author states that overturning Roe v. Wade was a victory for Trump and his supporters, without providing any evidence or context about the decision itself or its impact on reproductive rights. This statement assumes that all those who support Trump also support anti-abortion policies, which is not necessarily true. The second fallacy is inflammatory rhetoric when the author uses phrases like
The Biden campaign quickly mobilized on Trump's abortion stance
Trump did this.
We’re not giving him an inch.
Bias
(85%)
The Biden campaign is using the Trump administration's abortion stance to their advantage by launching an aggressive strategy to pin down Trump on his record and amplify his desire to take credit for overturning Roe v. Wade. The more aggressive strategy highlights how the Biden campaign plans to go on offense on reproductive freedom, a larger effort that has publicly been led by Vice President Kamala Harris.
Harris emphasized the need to act quickly and her team scrambled to stand something up in Tucson on Friday with the mayor and advocates for abortion rights.
The Biden campaign shot a direct-to-camera response video within hours of Trump's saying it should be up to the states to decide abortion policy
The more aggressive strategy highlights how the Biden campaign plans to go on offense on reproductive freedom, a larger effort that has publicly been led by Vice President Kamala Harris.
Graham vowed to keep pressing for federal limits on abortion
The former president published multiple items attacking Graham's character and actions
Accuracy
Trump's goal was to make everyone happy, but critics noted all of the questions he left unresolved and the absurd lies included in the clip
Graham vowed to keep pressing for federal limits on abortion, despite Trump saying it would be left to states
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Trump's statement on abortion policy was a failure to make everyone happy when it clearly received pushback from both sides of the political spectrum. Secondly, the author presents Graham as disagreeing with Trump and pushing for federal limits on abortion despite not explicitly stating this in his comments. Finally, the article is deceptive by presenting Trump's defense of his latest approach to abortion policy as a call for Republicans to shut up and play election-season games when it clearly implies that he disagrees with Graham about reproductive rights.
The author claims that Trump's statement on abortion policy was a failure, but this is not supported by the article. In fact, the article notes pushback from both sides of the political spectrum.
The article is deceptive by presenting Trump's defense of his latest approach to abortion policy as a call for Republicans to shut up and play election-season games when it clearly implies that he disagrees with Graham about reproductive rights.
The author presents Graham as disagreeing with Trump and pushing for federal limits on abortion despite not explicitly stating this in his comments. This is deceptive because it implies that Graham disagrees with Trump when he does not.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by calling the senator's statement a 'great disservice to the Republican Party'. This is an example of an appeal to authority as it implies that Trump has some sort of power or influence over what constitutes a great service to the party. Additionally, there are examples of dichotomous depictions in statements such as
The former president's goal was to make everyone 'happy', he failed spectacularly.
<p>Sen. Lindsey Graham sparred with Donald Trump on Monday after the former president attacked Graham, R-S.C., for pushing his bill to outlaw abortion across the U.S.</p>
The senator used social media to say he 'respectfully' disagreed with Trump and intended to keep pursuing a national abortion ban at the federal level
<p>Within hours of Graham<sup>'s mild pushback,</sup> Trump used his own platform to effectively call Graham a warmonger who should focus his attention elsewhere.</p>
A minute later, the former president published another item, insisting that the senator was 'doing a great disservice to the Republican Party' by focusing attention on an issue that<sup>'s caused many Good Republicans</sup> to lose.
<p>A few hours later, Trump decided to keep going, publishing an item characterizing Graham as unreasonable, another item suggesting the senator doesn't understand the 10th Amendment, and another item that concluded: 'I blame myself for Lindsey Graham<sup>, because the only reason he won in the Great State of South Carolina is because I Endorsed him!</sup>'. </p>
Bias
(85%)
The author of the article is Donald Trump and he has a history of making false statements. He also has a history of attacking people who disagree with him. In this case, he attacked Sen. Lindsey Graham for pushing his bill to outlaw abortion across the U.S.
> The former president’s goal was to make everyone “happy,” he failed spectacularly.
Trump explicitly affirmed his support for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and emphasized his support for states determining their own laws for abortion so long as there are exceptions for rape, incest, and life of the mother.
The more aggressive strategy highlights how the Biden campaign plans to go on offense on reproductive freedom
Trump sees loyalty as something he expects to receive from his employees and not bestow upon them
Accuracy
The Biden-Harris campaign complained about a headline in USA Today that reportedly said Trump opposes national abortion ban and will leave it up to the will of the people.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the original headline was misleading and did not accurately reflect Trump's stance on abortion. The new headline also failed to include any sort of editor's note explaining the change or why it was made.
The new headline said, "Donald Trump says states should decide abortion policy, avoids talk of a national ban," but failed to include any sort of editor's note explaining the change.
On Monday, Biden-Harris campaign manager Julie Chavez Rodriguez, deputy communications director Brooke Goren and pro-abortion advocate Kaitlyn Kash held a press call to discuss media coverage of Trump announcing his position on whether abortion should be banned. (Getty Images)
Fallacies
(70%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Brian Flood has a conflict of interest on the topic of abortion stance as he is reporting for USA Today which has been criticized by pro-abortion advocates Kaitlyn Kash and deputy communications director Brooke Goren. The article also mentions Julie Chavez Rodriguez, who was campaign manager for Biden-Harris.
pro-abortion advocate Kaitlyn Kash
USA Today reportedly changes headline on Trump's abortion stance after Biden-Harris campaign complain
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Brian Flood has a conflict of interest on the topic of abortion stance as he is reporting for USA Today which has been criticized by pro-abortion advocates Kaitlyn Kash and deputy communications director Brooke Goren. The article also mentions Julie Chavez Rodriguez, who was campaign manager for Biden-Harris.
deputy communications director Brooke Goren
pro-abortion advocate Kaitlyn Kash
USA Today reportedly changes headline on Trump's abortion stance after Biden-Harris campaign complain
