Dodgers' Shohei Ohtani Accused of Illegal Gambling and Theft by Personal Interpreter Ippei Mizuhara

Shohei Ohtani, a Japanese baseball player who signed with the Los Angeles Dodgers this offseason, has been accused of engaging in illegal gambling and theft by his personal interpreter Ippei Mizuhara.
The allegations were made after an investigation into an Orange County bookmaker under federal investigation. According to reports from ESPN and The Athletic, Ohtani's representatives accused Mizuhara of stealing millions from the player to place bets with the illegal gambling operation.
Dodgers' Shohei Ohtani Accused of Illegal Gambling and Theft by Personal Interpreter Ippei Mizuhara

Shohei Ohtani, a Japanese baseball player who signed with the Los Angeles Dodgers this offseason, has been accused of engaging in illegal gambling and theft by his personal interpreter Ippei Mizuhara. The allegations were made after an investigation into an Orange County bookmaker under federal investigation. According to reports from ESPN and The Athletic, Ohtani's representatives accused Mizuhara of stealing millions from the player to place bets with the illegal gambling operation. This led to Mizuhara being fired by the Dodgers on Wednesday.



Confidence

50%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if the accusations against Shohei Ohtani are true or false.

Sources

67%

  • Unique Points
    • The Los Angeles Dodgers interpreter for Shohei Ohtani was fired Wednesday afternoon
    • `Ippei Mizuhara', the longtime friend and interpreter for Ohtani, incurred gambling debts to a Southern California bookmaking operation that is under federal investigation
    • At least $4.5 million in wire transfers were sent from Ohtani's bank account to a bookmaking operation
    • Ohtani does not gamble according to multiple sources including Mizuhara
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Shohei Ohtani was fired due to allegations of theft when in fact he was fired because his interpreter had gambling debts and wire transferred money from Ohtani's account to a bookmaking operation under investigation.
    • The article states that Shohei Ohtani does not gamble and that the funds covered Mizuhara's gambling debt. This statement is contradicted by a later sentence which mentions multiple sources who told ESPN that Ohtani does not gamble.
    • The article states that Ippei Mizuhara, the longtime friend and interpreter for Ohtani, incurred gambling debts to a Southern California bookmaking operation that is under federal investigation. The article also mentions multiple sources who told ESPN about these debts. However, there are no quotes from any of these sources provided in the article.
    • The article states that Shohei Ohtani was fired after questions surrounding at least $4.5 million in wire transfers sent from Ohtani’s bank account to a bookmaking operation set off a series of events. However, the article does not provide any evidence or quotes from sources to support this claim.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'massive theft' to describe the wire transfer payments sent from Ohtani's account to a bookmaking operation, which implies that Ohtani is being accused of wrongdoing. Additionally, the use of phrases such as 'victim of a massive theft' and 'turned over to authorities' suggest that there may be an underlying religious or moral bias at play.
    • The article uses the phrase 'massive theft' to describe wire transfer payments sent from Ohtani's account, which implies that he is being accused of wrongdoing.
      • The use of phrases such as 'victim of a massive theft' and 'turned over to authorities' suggest there may be an underlying religious or moral bias at play.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        Tisha Thompson has a conflict of interest on the topic of Shohei Ohtani as she reports for ESPN which is under investigation by federal authorities over a bookmaking operation that received $4.5 million in wire transfers from Ohtani's bank account.
        • $4.5 million in wire-transfer payments were sent from Ohtani's account to an associate of Bowyer's, according to multiple sources and bank data reviewed by ESPN.
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          Tisha Thompson has a conflict of interest on the topics of Shohei Ohtani and Mathew Bowyer as she reports for ESPN which is under investigation by federal authorities over wire-transfer payments sent from Ohtani's account to an associate of Bowyer.
          • $4.5 million in wire transfer payments were sent from Ohtani's account to an associate of Bowyer's, according to multiple sources and bank data reviewed by ESPN.

          78%

          • Unique Points
            • Ohtani's representatives accused Mizuhara of engaging in a massive theft using the player's money to place bets with an allegedly illegal bookmaker under federal investigation.
            • Mizuhara placed bets with Matthew Bowyer, according to The Los Angeles Times.
          • Accuracy
            • The Los Angeles Dodgers have fired Ippei Mizuhara, the interpreter for Shohei Ohtani.
          • Deception (90%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author's statement that Ohtani has been accused of engaging in a massive theft using his money to place bets with an allegedly illegal bookmaker under federal investigation is misleading as it implies that Ohtani was involved in gambling and had stolen money from someone else. However, this information is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Secondly, the author's statement that Mizuhara reportedly gave his account in a 90-minute interview with ESPN on Tuesday is also misleading as it implies that Mizuhara had given an account of what happened and was responsible for Ohtani's gambling debt. However, this information is not supported by any evidence presented in the article either. Thirdly, the author's statement that Ohtani paid off gambling debts totaling roughly $4.5 million and did not give the money to Mizuhara directly because he didn't trust his interpreter to not gamble it away is also misleading as it implies that Ohtani had given money to Mizuhara for gambling purposes, which is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
            • The author's statement that Ohtani paid off gambling debts totaling roughly $4.5 million and did not give the money to Mizuhara directly because he didn't trust his interpreter to not gamble it away is also misleading as it implies that Ohtani had given money to Mizuhara for gambling purposes, which is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
            • The author's statement that Mizuhara reportedly gave his account in a 90-minute interview with ESPN on Tuesday is also misleading as it implies that Mizuhara had given an account of what happened and was responsible for Ohtani's gambling debt. However, this information is not supported by any evidence presented in the article either.
            • The author's statement that Ohtani has been accused of engaging in a massive theft using his money to place bets with an allegedly illegal bookmaker under federal investigation is misleading as it implies that Ohtani was involved in gambling and had stolen money from someone else. However, this information is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
          • Fallacies (85%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Bias (85%)
            The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Ohtani by referring to him as a victim and accusing him of not trusting his interpreter. Additionally, the author implies that Ohtani is responsible for Mizuhara's gambling debt, even though there is no evidence linking them directly.
            • The article uses language that dehumanizes Ohtani by referring to him as a victim and accusing him of not trusting his interpreter. For example, the author writes:
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              The article reports on the firing of Shohei Ohtani's interpreter Ippei Mizuhara amidst allegations of massive theft. The author is Fabian Ardaya, Brittany Ghiroli, Andy McCullough and Sam Blum.
              • Matthew Bowyer
                • The article reports on the firing of Shohei Ohtani's interpreter Ippei Mizuhara amidst allegations of massive theft. The author is Fabian Ardaya, Brittany Ghiroli, Andy McCullough and Sam Blum.
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                70%

                • Unique Points
                  • Shohei Ohtani signed a 10-year, $700 million deal with the Los Angeles Dodgers this offseason and has deferred $68 million annually until after the deal is complete.
                  • He is reportedly by far, the sport's largest earner in sponsors.
                • Accuracy
                  • Shohei Ohtani has deferred $68 million annually until after the deal is complete
                  • Ohtani signed a 10-year, $700 million deal with the Dodgers this offseason and has deferred $68 million annually until after the deal is complete
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it falsely states that Shohei Ohtani's interpreter Ippei Mizuhara has been fired by the Los Angeles Dodgers after being accused of stealing millions from him to gamble. In reality, Mizuhara was employed by the Dodgers until he resigned in February 2023 due to personal reasons and had no involvement with Ohtani's case. Secondly, it falsely states that Mathew Bowyer is under federal investigation for placing wagers with Ohtani through him. In reality, there is no evidence linking Bowyer to any wrongdoing in this matter. Lastly, the article uses sensationalist language such as
                  • The article falsely states that Shohei Ohtani's interpreter Ippei Mizuhara has been fired by the Los Angeles Dodgers after being accused of stealing millions from him to gamble. In reality, Mizuhara was employed by the Dodgers until he resigned in February 2023 due to personal reasons and had no involvement with Ohtani's case.
                  • The article falsely states that Mathew Bowyer is under federal investigation for placing wagers with Ohtani through him. In reality, there is no evidence linking Bowyer to any wrongdoing in this matter.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that Ohtani's attorneys say Mizuhara placed wagers with Orange County, California resident Mathew Bowyer who is under federal investigation. This statement implies that the attorneys have evidence of this and are using their credibility as experts in the legal field to support their claim. However, there is no mention of any actual evidence or testimony from these individuals to back up this assertion.
                  • The article states that Ohtani's attorneys say Mizuhara placed wagers with Orange County, California resident Mathew Bowyer who is under federal investigation.
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article contains multiple examples of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'massive theft' to describe Ohtani being defrauded by his interpreter and accuses him of gambling with an illegal bookie. This language is inflammatory and implies that Mizuhara has committed a grave crime, which may not be entirely accurate or fair given the limited information provided in the article.
                  • The author accuses Mizuhara of gambling with an illegal bookie
                    • The author uses the phrase 'massive theft' to describe Ohtani being defrauded by his interpreter
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    70%

                    • Unique Points
                      • . Los Angeles Dodgers star Shohei Ohtani’s interpreter has been fired amid accusations he stole millions from the baseball player to place bets with an illegal gambling operation.
                      • . Lawyers responded to questions regarding $4.5 million in wire transfers from Ohtani’s accounts to Mathew Bowyer, an Orange County man being investigated by federal authorities for illegal bookmaking.
                      • Ohtani’s interpreter, Ippei Mizuhara, initially spoke to the network for a Tuesday interview in which he claimed the athlete helped him pay off his seven-figure gambling debt.
                    • Accuracy
                      • . Ippei Mizuhara initially spoke to the network for a Tuesday interview, in which he claimed the athlete helped him pay off his seven-figure gambling debt.
                    • Deception (50%)
                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title claims that Shohei Ohtani was a victim of theft by his interpreter and lawyers claim he stole millions from him to place bets with an illegal gambling operation. However, there is no evidence presented in the article to support these claims. Secondly, Ippei Mizuhara initially spoke to ESPN for a Tuesday interview claiming that Ohtani helped him pay off his seven-figure gambling debt but later denied this claim on Wednesday when questioned by the network's lawyers. This contradiction raises questions about the credibility of Mizuhara and his claims. Lastly, there is no disclosure or quotation from sources in the article to support any of these claims.
                      • The title implies that Shohei Ohtani was a victim of theft by his interpreter but provides no evidence to support this claim.
                    • Fallacies (85%)
                      The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the claims came from Wednesday reports from the Los Angeles Times and ESPN without providing any evidence or context for these sources. Additionally, there are multiple instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article such as 'massive theft' and 'seven-figure gambling debt'. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction when describing Ohtani's interpreter Ippei Mizuhara as both being accused of stealing millions from Ohtani, yet also claiming that he helped him pay off his gambling debt. Finally, the article contains an example of inflammatory rhetoric when it states that 'Mizuhara is being accused of a massive theft against Ohtani'.
                      • The claims came to light via Wednesday reports from the Los Angeles Times and ESPN.
                      • Ohtani's interpreter, Ippei Mizuhara, initially spoke to the network for a Tuesday interview in which he claimed the athlete helped him pay off his seven-figure gambling debt.
                    • Bias (85%)
                      The article contains several examples of bias that favor the Dodgers and Ohtani over Mizuhara. The author uses phrases like 'accusations he stole millions', 'claims came to light via reports from ESPN and Los Angeles Times', and 'we discovered that Shohei has been the victim of a massive theft' to imply that Mizuhara is guilty without providing any evidence or giving him a chance to respond. The author also uses emotive language like 'massive theft' and 'illegal bookmaking' to create a negative impression of Mizuhara and his actions. Additionally, the author cites sources from mainstream media outlets that may have their own biases against Mizuhara or Ohtani.
                      • In a statement to the press later that day, Ohtani’s attorneys at Berk Brettler said, “In the course of responding to recent media inquiries, we discovered that Shohei has been the victim of a massive theft and we are turning the matter over to the authorities.”
                        • In December, Ohtani signed a record-breaking $700 million, 10-year deal to come to the Dodgers after six seasons with the Los Angeles Angels. Mizuhara and Ohtani first met in 2013, when they were working for a Japanese baseball team called the Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters.
                          • The claims came to light via Wednesday reports from the Los Angeles Times and ESPN.
                            • While Ohtani’s representatives initially arranged ESPN’s conversation with Mizuhara, on Wednesday they disputed his claims to the network.
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication

                            82%

                            • Unique Points
                              • Shohei Ohtani's interpreter and close friend Ippei Mizuhara has been fired by the Los Angeles Dodgers following allegations of illegal gambling and theft from the Japanese baseball star.
                              • Mizuhara was seen regularly chatting with Ohtani, seemingly discussing his at-bats over a tablet computer during their season-opening win in Seoul, South Korea.
                            • Accuracy
                              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                            • Deception (50%)
                              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that Ohtani's interpreter was fired due to illegal gambling and theft from him. However, this is not entirely accurate as it does not mention any evidence linking Mizuhara directly to these allegations.
                              • The article states that “MLB rules prohibit players and team employees from wagering even legally on baseball— and also ban betting on other sports with illegal or offshore bookmakers.” However, there is no evidence linking Mizuhara to any of these activities.
                              • The article states that “Betting on baseball is punishable with a one-year ban from the sport— and the penalty for betting on other sports illegally is at the commissioner's discretion.” However, there is no evidence linking Mizuhara to any of these activities.
                              • The article states that “In the course of responding to recent media inquiries, we discovered that Shohei has been the victim of a massive theft and we are turning the matter over to the authorities.” However, there is no evidence linking Mizuhara directly to this alleged theft.
                            • Fallacies (85%)
                              The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that MLB rules prohibit players and team employees from wagering on baseball even legally. This statement is not accurate as the MLB gambling policy only bans betting on other sports with illegal or offshore bookmakers, but does allow for legal betting on baseball.
                              • MLB rules prohibit players and team employees from wagering — even legally — on baseball
                              • The MLB gambling policy only bans betting on other sports with illegal or offshore bookmakers, but does allow for legal betting on baseball.
                            • Bias (85%)
                              The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses loaded language such as 'massive theft' and 'illegal gambling', which are highly inflammatory terms that could be perceived as biased. Additionally, the author quotes Mizuhara saying he has been paid between $300,000 and $500,001 annually by ESPN without providing any context or evidence to support this claim. This is a clear example of monetary bias.
                              • ESPN reported that Mizuhara has been paid between $300,001 and $501 annually by ESPN without providing any context or evidence to support this claim
                                • Mizuhara was seen regularly chatting with Ohtani, seemingly discussing his at-bats over a tablet computer
                                  • The article uses the term 'massive theft' which could be perceived as biased
                                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                    None Found At Time Of Publication