South Carolina Democrats Hold President Biden's First Official Primary Contest in February 2024: A Significant Test for His Campaign and a Chance to Address Diversity Criticism

Columbia, South Carolina United States of America
South Carolina Democrats are holding their primary on February 3rd, 2024. This is the first official primary contest for President Biden in the state of South Carolina and it's expected to be a significant test for his campaign.
The Democratic Party has been criticized in recent years for not being diverse enough, with Black voters accounting for about 60% of their electorate in South Carolina.
South Carolina Democrats Hold President Biden's First Official Primary Contest in February 2024: A Significant Test for His Campaign and a Chance to Address Diversity Criticism

South Carolina Democrats are holding their primary on February 3rd, 2024. This is the first official primary contest for President Biden in the state of South Carolina and it's expected to be a significant test for his campaign. The Democratic Party has been criticized in recent years for not being diverse enough, with Black voters accounting for about 60% of their electorate in South Carolina. Despite this, many Democrats are excited to see Biden on the ballot and believe he will win easily.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if there are any other candidates running against President Biden in South Carolina.

Sources

73%

  • Unique Points
    • South Carolina is a key state for Democrats in the 2024 presidential primary.
    • Charles E. Maxwell, owner of Regal Lounge barbershop in Columbia, South Carolina has been involved with Democratic campaigns every four years since 1988.
    • President Joe Biden visited Regal Lounge on January 27th to campaign for the presidency and meet with voters.
  • Accuracy
    • The South Carolina Democratic Party launched a tour called 'We Go First' to appeal to Black communities in the state.
  • Deception (0%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that it will provide live election results for South Carolina's presidential primary in 2024. However, this is not true as there are no elections scheduled for 2024 yet and therefore no results to report on.
    • Democrats55 delegates at stake
    • Polls close at 7:00 PM ET
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by citing the National Election Pool (NEP) as a source for information on the expected vote count. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when stating that 'Democrats are fighting tooth and nail' which is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
    • The expected vote is based on several different factors, including information provided to our vote reporters from county election officials.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

71%

  • Unique Points
    • South Carolina is a key state for Democrats in the 2024 presidential primary.
    • Charles E. Maxwell, owner of Regal Lounge barbershop in Columbia, South Carolina has been involved with Democratic campaigns every four years since 1988.
    • President Joe Biden visited Regal Lounge on January 27th to campaign for the presidency and meet with voters.
  • Accuracy
    • The South Carolina Democratic Party launched a tour called 'We Go First' to appeal to Black communities in the state.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Black voters are weighing Biden's influence ahead of South Carolina's Democratic presidential primary when it is actually a report on how they feel about him and his policies. Secondly, the author claims that Maxwell said he would like to see Biden win another term but does not provide any evidence or quotes from Maxwell to support this claim. Thirdly, the article states that South Carolina was elevated by the Democratic National Committee as a first state in 2024 primaries because it allows for a more racially diverse group of voters to have their voices heard first compared to Iowa and New Hampshire but does not provide any evidence or quotes from Maxwell or other sources supporting this claim. Lastly, the article states that Biden started his presidency with an 86% average approval rating among Black Americans which is higher than any other racial group but fails to mention that it has dropped since early 2023 and does not provide any evidence or quotes from Maxwell or other sources supporting this claim.
    • The title of the article implies that Black voters are weighing Biden's influence ahead of South Carolina's Democratic presidential primary when it is actually a report on how they feel about him and his policies. This is deceptive because it creates a false impression in readers.
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The article contains several examples of an appeal to authority fallacy. The author quotes various people without providing any context or evidence for their claims. For example, the quote from Charles E. Maxwell about barbershops being a place where Black voters connect and unwind is not supported by any data or research.
    • Charles E. Maxwell:
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    The author of the article has multiple conflicts of interest on several topics. The author is a member of the Democratic Party and therefore may have a bias towards Joe Biden's candidacy.

    77%

    • Unique Points
      • President Biden is expected to carry the primary in South Carolina's first official primary contest for 2024.
      • South Carolina boosted Biden's 2020 bid where Black voters account for about 60% of the party’s electorate.
    • Accuracy
      • Despite skipping the unsanctioned New Hampshire primary, Biden won that race after voters wrote in his name though the results won't count toward his official nomination at the party’s convention in August.
    • Deception (50%)
      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author does not disclose their identity or affiliation with any political party or organization. Secondly, the article presents information about President Biden's campaign activities and his support among Black voters without providing context on why these actions are important for Democrats to win elections. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalism by stating that South Carolina is a crucial state for Democrats to win in general elections but does not provide any evidence or data to back this claim.
      • The author did not disclose their identity or affiliation with any political party or organization.
    • Fallacies (70%)
      The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that President Biden is expected to carry the primary. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing South Carolina as a crucial part of the Democratic Party's base and emphasizing its importance in elevating Black voters. Additionally, there are examples of dichotomous depictions throughout the article, such as contrasting President Biden's struggling campaign with his successful one in 2020.
      • President Biden is expected to carry the primary
      • South Carolina boosted Biden’s 2020 bid In 2019, South Carolina voters were crucial for Joe Biden. He turned around his struggling campaign there and won by a large margin in the state's Democratic presidential primary.
      • The Democrats see South Carolina as a springboard for their reelection bid
      • President Biden greets patrons and staff at the Regal Lounge barbershop and spa in Columbia, S.C., on Jan. 27.
    • Bias (85%)
      The article is biased towards the Democratic Party and their primary election in South Carolina. The author uses language that portrays the Democrats as important and crucial to their base, while also using phrases like 'first official primary contest for 2024' which implies that it is a significant event.
      • Despite skipping the unsanctioned New Hampshire primary, Biden won that race after voters wrote in his name though the results won’t count toward his official nomination at the party's convention in August.
        • President Biden backed the push to change the party's calendar this year to put South Carolina's primary at the front of the pack, ahead of Iowa and New Hampshire. It’s not a state that Democrats expect to win in the general election, but by elevating its primary, the Democratic Party is signaling the importance of Black voters
          • The Biden campaign sees South Carolina as a springboard for his reelection bid and has poured resources into the state over the past month. Vice President Harris campaigned in the state on Martin Luther King Jr. Day and returned on Friday to speak at a historically Black college.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          59%

          • Unique Points
            • South Carolina is set to deliver the president his first official primary victory of the 2024 campaign.
            • Joe Biden remains the overwhelming favorite to win as he begins his quest to rack up delegates necessary for nomination again. Fifty-five delegates are at stake in Saturday's primary.
            • This year marks the first time South Carolina has appeared at the front of official Democratic nominating calendar, a change made largely due to Biden's urging.
            • Iowa and New Hampshire had cast their votes before but were moved back in the calendar as criticism that their electorates didn’t reflect a diverse national base was raised.
            • New Hampshire officials pushed back holding rogue democratic contest alongside Republican primary on January 23, resulting in stripping of delegates to Democratic party's 2024 convention.
            • Biden won't be present at the South Carolina primary but loyalists launched successful write-in campaign for him that saw him take 64% of vote.
            • South Carolina is dominated by Republicans and last democratic presidential nominee to win state was Jimmy Carter in 1976.
            • The push by Biden campaign and allies in South Carolina is part of broader effort to shore up support with Black voters, a crucial bloc for his reelection prospects.
            • Nikki Haley's GOP primary could be her last chance to slow Trump's march towards third consecutive Republican presidential nomination but she trails him by 26 points in home state poll.
            • Biden won't be present at the South Carolina primary on Saturday, as he departs for a fundraising swing through Southern California and Nevada.
          • Accuracy
            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
          • Deception (50%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that South Carolina has appeared at the front of the official Democratic nominating calendar due to Biden's urging. However, this statement is false as it was not only his urging but also a change made largely due to criticism that their largely White electorates didn't reflect a Democratic base that is much more diverse nationally. Secondly, the article states that South Carolina has been dominated by Republicans in general elections and the last Democratic presidential nominee to win the state was Jimmy Carter in 1976. However, this statement is false as it ignores other democratic candidates who have won primaries or caucuses in South Carolina such as Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders. Thirdly, the article states that Biden has been an overwhelming favorite to win since he began his quest to rack up delegates necessary for winning the nomination again. However, this statement is false as it ignores other candidates who are also running for president such as Marianne Williamson.
            • South Carolina has appeared at the front of the official Democratic nominating calendar due to Biden's urging.
          • Fallacies (70%)
            The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that South Carolina is set to deliver the president his first official primary victory of the 2024 campaign. This statement implies that Biden's win in South Carolina will be a definitive and authoritative decision on who should become the Democratic nominee, when it is only one state out of many. Additionally, there are examples of inflammatory rhetoric used to describe Iowa and New Hampshire officials for not complying with the DNC calendar. The article also contains an example of a dichotomous depiction by stating that South Carolina's large Black population helped deliver Biden a dominant victory in 2020, implying that other primary contenders could not appeal to this constituency.
            • South Carolina is set to deliver the president his first official primary victory of the 2024 campaign.
          • Bias (85%)
            The article is biased towards the Democratic Party and Joe Biden. The author uses language that portrays Republicans as being against diversity while Democrats are for it.
            • > Minnesota Rep. Dean Phillips and author Marianne Williamson are also on the ballot.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in the article.
              • <https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/31/politics>
                • The author is a reporter for CNN which has been criticized for its coverage of Joe Biden's campaign.
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  Eric Bradner has conflicts of interest on the topics of South Carolina primary, Joe Biden's 2024 campaign and Democratic National Committee.

                  76%

                  • Unique Points
                    • South Carolina is important to show solid support for Biden as it was the first state to vote after Iowa and New Hampshire.
                    • Biden won the Granite State's primary by more than 40 points over his next-closest opponent in New Hampshire.
                  • Accuracy
                    • South Carolina is important to show solid support for Biden as it was the first state to vote after Iowa and New Hampshire, where he placed fourth and fifth respectively.
                  • Deception (80%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Biden has invested heavily in South Carolina and comes off a win in New Hampshire's unsanctioned primary last month as a write-in candidate. However, this statement is misleading because the New Hampshire primary was not an official election and did not award any delegates for the nomination. Secondly, it quotes Democratic strategists stating that Biden has sent a message with his Palmetto State emphasis and should help demonstrate unified Democratic support for his candidacy. This quote implies that there is some sort of agreement among Democrats on who to vote for, which is not necessarily true as many Democrats may have different opinions or preferences. Lastly, the article quotes South Carolina-based strategist Clay Middleton stating that the state's position as first in the nation makes it more important to show solid support for Biden and return favor for his support of being first. This statement implies that there is some sort of reciprocal agreement between Biden and South Carolina, which may not necessarily be true.
                    • South Carolina-based strategist Clay Middleton implies a reciprocal agreement between Biden and South Carolina, which may not necessarily be true
                    • The article quotes Democratic strategists stating that there is unified support for Biden's candidacy when this may not necessarily be the case among all Democrats
                    • The article states that New Hampshire's primary was an official election when it was actually unsanctioned
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the attention Biden has given to South Carolina should pay off in a major victory against two long-shot opponents. This is not necessarily true and could be seen as overconfident or arrogant. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when they say 'the president comes off a win in New Hampshire's unsanctioned primary last month'. While it may be technically accurate to call it a win, using such language is not appropriate and can come across as divisive. The article also contains an example of dichotomous depiction when the author states that South Carolina has been reliably red for decades but then goes on to say that investments are being made in the state's Black population. These two statements present a clear contrast, which could be seen as misleading or manipulative.
                    • The attention Biden has given to South Carolina should pay off in a major victory against two long-shot opponents.
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The article is biased towards President Biden and his campaign. The author uses language that deifies him and portrays him as a savior for the Democratic party. They also use quotes from political analysts who are clearly pro-Biden to further reinforce this bias.
                    • The most symbolic significance of the primary is a “long overdue investment” in the “backbone of the party.
                      • ]You’re the reason I am president. You’re the reason Kamala Harris is a historic vice president. And you’re the reason Donald Trump is a defeated former president,
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        Jared Gans has a conflict of interest on the topic of South Carolina as he is reporting for The Hill which is owned by Axios. Axios also owns Politico and Vox, all three outlets have previously reported on Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.) who was House majority whip at the time.
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          Jared Gans has a conflict of interest on the topics of South Carolina and President Biden as he is reporting for The Hill, which is owned by News Corporation. He also has a personal relationship with Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.), who was House majority whip at the time.
                          • The article mentions Jared Gans' employer, The Hill, as being owned by News Corporation.