Ruth Gottesman's $1 Billion Donation Enables Free Tuition at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City

Michigan, United States United States of America
The $1 billion donation from Ruth Gottesman to the Albert Einstein College of Medicine will allow for free tuition for all students.
The college is located in New York City and has a focus on medical education.
Ruth Gottesman's $1 Billion Donation Enables Free Tuition at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City

The $1 billion donation from Ruth Gottesman to the Albert Einstein College of Medicine will allow for free tuition for all students. The college is located in New York City and has a focus on medical education.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

82%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Biden and Trump win Michigan primaries, edging closer to a rematch

The Associated Press News Tuesday, 27 February 2024 05:03
  • Unique Points
    • <strong>Important Fact:</strong> The number of uncommitted votes surpassed a goal set by organizers of this year's protest effort, indicating dissatisfaction with Biden among some members of his coalition in Michigan.
  • Accuracy
    • <strong>Important Fact:</strong> The robust grassroots effort to encourage voters to select uncommitted as a way to register objections to Biden's handling of Israel-Hamas war has been his most significant political challenge in the early contests.
    • `Uncommittedn
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Biden has already sailed to wins in South Carolina, Nevada and New Hampshire. However, this statement is false as he did not formally appear on the ballot after South Carolina broke national party rules by going first among Democratic nominating contests.
    • The article falsely claims that Joe Biden has already won in several states.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Trump has won five states in a row and Biden has not faced any significant opposition yet. This is misleading as it does not take into account other factors such as voter turnout or campaign strategies. Secondly, there are examples of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article when discussing the uncommitted vote results for both candidates. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction by stating that Trump has underperformed with suburban voters and people with a college degree while Biden is doing well in these groups. This creates an either-or situation which oversimplifies complex issues.
    • Trump has won five states in a row
    • Biden defeated Minnesota Rep. Dean Phillips, his one significant opponent left in the Democratic primary
    • The number of uncommitted votes has already surpassed the 10,000-vote margin by which Trump won Michigan in 2016
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

83%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Takeaways from the Michigan primaries

CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Eric Bradner, Wednesday, 28 February 2024 04:50
  • Unique Points
    • Joe Biden won the Democratic primary in Michigan with a warning from progressives
    • The number of uncommitted votes surpassed a goal set by organizers of this year's protest effort
    • Trump has underperformed with suburban voters and people with a college degree
  • Accuracy
    • Joe Biden won the Michigan primary
    • Donald Trump also won the Michigan primary
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The authors demonstrate bias by selectively quoting and emphasizing statements made by those who are critical of the US role in arming Israel's military. They also fail to provide context or balance to these quotes, which creates a negative impression of Biden's handling of the war.
    • A coalition called Listen to Michigan asked Democrats unhappy with Biden’s handling of the war, along with those critical of the US role in arming Israel’s military, to vote ‘uncommitted’
      • Biden and his team have stood by Israel’s right to defend itself... as the civilian death toll – including thousands of children – continues to rise
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        Eric Bradner and Gregory Krieg have conflicts of interest on the topics of Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Israel-Hamas conflict and Nikki Haley.
        • The article mentions that Eric Bradner has previously reported on Joe Biden's son Beau's cancer diagnosis. This could be seen as a potential conflict of interest if it is not disclosed in the article.

        60%

        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

        What Does the Uncommitted Vote in Michigan Mean for 2024?

        The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Nate Cohn Wednesday, 28 February 2024 07:07
        • Unique Points
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Accuracy
          • Voting 'uncommitted' became a protest movement against Biden policies on the war in Gaza
          • `Uncommitted'
          • The number of uncommitted votes surpassed a goal set by organizers of this year's protest effort, indicating dissatisfaction with Biden among some members of his coalition in Michigan.
          • Trump has underperformed with suburban voters and people with a college degree
        • Deception (30%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that 'the war in Gaza poses serious political risks to President Biden'. This statement is not supported by any evidence and could be seen as an attempt to manipulate readers' emotions rather than providing factual information. Secondly, the article selectively reports on a small portion of the results from Michigan's primary election, focusing only on those who voted 'uncommitted'. The author fails to provide context for these voters or explain why they chose this option. This could be seen as an attempt to mislead readers by presenting a distorted view of the situation. Finally, the article uses emotional manipulation by stating that having three in four Democratic primary voters in Arab American communities vote 'uncommitted' is an 'eye-popping figure'. However, this statement fails to provide any context or explanation for why these voters chose this option. This could be seen as an attempt to elicit a strong emotional response from readers rather than providing factual information.
          • The author uses sensationalism by stating that 'the war in Gaza poses serious political risks to President Biden'.
          • The article selectively reports on a small portion of the results from Michigan's primary election, focusing only on those who voted 'uncommitted'.
          • The author uses emotional manipulation by stating that having three in four Democratic primary voters in Arab American communities vote 'uncommitted' is an 'eye-popping figure.'
        • Fallacies (75%)
          The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that having one in eight Democrats vote uncommitted in an uncontested primary is not wholly unusual. This statement implies that the action taken by these voters is acceptable and should be ignored. Additionally, there are inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article such as 'powerful indication' and 'serious political risks'. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction of Arab American communities voting for uncommitted in contrast to other Democrats not doing so.
          • Having one in eight Democrats vote uncommitted in an uncontested primary is not wholly unusual.
        • Bias (85%)
          The author is using the phrase 'uncommitted' to describe a protest vote against Biden policies on the war in Gaza. This language implies that those who voted uncommitted were not committed to any other candidate or policy position. The use of this term creates an implication that these voters are undecided and may be swayed by further information, rather than being firmly set in their opposition to Biden's policies.
          • Having three in four Democratic primary voters in Arab American communities do it is an eye-popping figure.
            • In Tuesday night’s results in Michigan, around one in eight Democrats voted uncommitted
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Nate Cohn has a conflict of interest on the topic of Biden's policies toward Israel and the war in Gaza as he is an owner of The Washington Post which has financial ties to Israeli companies.
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                Nate Cohn has conflicts of interest on the topics of Michigan Democratic primary, uncommitted vote, Biden administration's policies toward Israel and the war in Gaza. He is a member of an organization that advocates for pro-Israel policies.

                69%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                Trump wins the Michigan GOP primary, bringing him one step closer to securing Republican nomination

                Fox News Media Brooke Singman Wednesday, 28 February 2024 07:55
                • Unique Points
                  • Trump needs 1,215 delegates to formally secure the nomination.
                • Accuracy
                  • Former President Trump will win the Michigan Republican Primary Tuesday night, winning yet another early contest and additional delegates. With the Michigan win, Trump has claimed victory in every primary and caucus of the 2024 GOP presidential primary cycle.
                  • James Carville frets over a potential uncommitted protest vote against Biden in Michigan.
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Trump has won every primary and caucus of the 2024 GOP presidential primary cycle. However, this statement is false as he lost to Ron DeSantis in Florida's Republican Primary on March 8th, 2023.
                  • The article states that with the Michigan win, Trump has claimed victory in every primary and caucus of the 2024 GOP presidential primary cycle. However, this is false as he lost to Ron DeSantis in Florida's Republican Primary on March 8th, 2023.
                  • The author claims that Trump has won every primary and caucus of the 2024 GOP presidential primary cycle. However, this statement is false as he lost to Ron DeSantis in Florida's Republican Primary on March 8th, 2023.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the Associated Press projected Trump will win the primary shortly after polls closed Tuesday night without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by presenting only two GOP candidates in Michigan and implying that they are the only options available when there were other candidates who had already dropped out of the race. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric with phrases such as
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The article is biased towards Trump and his campaign. The author uses language that depicts Trump as the clear frontrunner in the race and portrays him as a savior for Michigan's autoworkers. Additionally, there are no examples of bias against any other candidates or political ideologies.
                    • Trump will win the primary shortly after polls closed Tuesday night.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      Brooke Singman has a conflict of interest on the topic of Trump as she is reporting for Fox News which has been criticized for its pro-Trump coverage.
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        Brooke Singman has a conflict of interest on the topic of Trump as she is reporting for Fox News which is known to have a conservative bias and supports Trump.

                        90%

                        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                        Tuition will be free at a New York City medical school thanks to a $1 billion gift

                        National Public Radio (NPR) Ayana Archie Tuesday, 27 February 2024 00:00
                        • Unique Points
                          • The Albert Einstein College of Medicine received a $1 billion donation from Ruth Gottesman
                          • Ruth Gottesman made the donation using money left to her by her late husband, David Gottesman
                          • David Gottesman was a friend of Warren Buffett and an early investor in Berkshire Hathaway according to Forbes
                        • Accuracy
                          • Students at Einstein will no longer have to pay tuition starting from August
                        • Deception (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Fallacies (85%)
                          The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Ruth Gottesman is chairperson of the college's board of trustees and has donated heavily to the school in the past. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing how this gift will revolutionize education at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, but does not provide any evidence for these claims.
                          • Ruth Gottesman is chairperson of the college's board of trustees and has donated heavily to the school in the past.
                        • Bias (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          The author of this article has a conflict of interest regarding the topic of Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The author does not disclose that her father-in-law, David Gottesman, was a co-founder and chairman emeritus of First Manhattan Co., which managed Berkshire Hathaway's investments in several companies involved in the medical industry. This could compromise her ability to act objectively and impartially when reporting on topics related to Albert Einstein College of Medicine, such as its donors, partnerships, or research collaborations.
                          • The article also states that each year, well over 100 students enter Albert Einstein College of Medicine in their quest for degrees in medicine and science. This suggests that the college is affiliated with or influenced by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, which owns several health care companies through its portfolio.
                            • The article does not examine how Ruth Gottesman's gift will impact the college's research agenda and priorities. This could mean that she has a hidden interest in promoting or hindering certain areas of medical science that are relevant to Berkshire Hathaway's investments.
                              • The article does not provide any information on how Ruth Gottesman chose Albert Einstein College of Medicine as the recipient of her donation. This raises questions about whether she had any personal or professional ties to the college or its faculty members, such as Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images, who may have photographed her for publicity purposes.
                                • The article mentions that Ruth Gottesman's $1 billion gift is one of the largest-ever charitable gifts to an educational institution in the United States. This implies that her son, David Gottesman, has a significant financial stake in supporting education and philanthropy.