Alec Baldwin's involuntary manslaughter case in 'Rust' shooting incident was dismissed due to withheld evidence.
Baldwin had been charged with involuntary manslaughter after Halyna Hutchins was killed by a live round from a prop gun during rehearsals for 'Rust' in 2021.
Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in prison, is planning to file a motion to have her case dismissed based on the same discovery violations.
New Mexico judge made the decision after an envelope of ammunition related to the case was revealed to have been withheld from the defense by law enforcement.
The dismissal means that the prosecution cannot refile charges against Baldwin in this matter.
In a surprising turn of events, the involuntary manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin in the fatal shooting on the set of 'Rust' was dismissed by a New Mexico judge due to withheld evidence. The dismissal came after it was revealed that an envelope of ammunition related to the case had been withheld from the defense by law enforcement.
The dismissal, which was with prejudice, means that the prosecution cannot refile charges against Baldwin in this matter. The judge's decision followed a dramatic trial where lead prosecutor Kari T. Morrissey took the stand to explain why a batch of ammunition that could have potentially exonerated Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the armorer on the set, was not disclosed to the defense.
Baldwin had been charged with involuntary manslaughter after Halyna Hutchins was killed by a live round from a prop gun during rehearsals for 'Rust' in 2021. He had been told that the gun was 'cold,' meaning it did not have any live ammunition.
The dismissal of Baldwin's case has significant implications for Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in March and sentenced to 18 months in prison. Her attorneys are now planning to file a motion to have her case dismissed based on the same discovery violations that led to Baldwin's dismissal.
The 'Rust' shooting incident has brought attention to gun safety protocols on film sets and the importance of transparency and communication between law enforcement, prosecutors, and defense teams in ensuring a fair trial.
The involuntary manslaughter case against actor Alec Baldwin was dismissed due to withheld evidence.
Hannah Gutierrez Reed, the convicted film armorer, may be released from prison as a result of the dismissal of Alec Baldwin’s case.
A man named Troy Teske, a friend of Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s father, turned over ammunition to authorities that they believed was connected to the case but failed to disclose it to the defense.
Accuracy
Hannah Gutierrez Reed may be released from prison as a result of the dismissal of Alec Baldwin’s case.
The judge found that the state committed a pattern of violations of discovery in this case.
Deception
(0%)
The article makes multiple statements that imply the release of Hannah Gutierrez Reed from prison due to the dismissal of Alec Baldwin's case. However, it is not clear that these two cases are directly related. The author quotes legal experts who believe that Reed's case should also be dismissed based on the withheld evidence in Baldwin's case, but this is an opinion and not a fact. The article also uses emotional language to describe the events and outcomes of both trials, which can manipulate readers' emotions.
Legal experts say.
It is abundantly clear that Hannah’s wrongful conviction be overturned immediately, ensuring that the legal system does not perpetuate this grave injustice.
The intentional withholding of crucial evidence by the state has compromised the integrity of the entire judicial process.
Fallacies
(85%)
The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting legal experts and former prosecutors who believe that Hannah Gutierrez Reed's case should be dismissed due to the mishandling of evidence in Alec Baldwin's case. This is a fallacy because the outcome of one case does not necessarily determine the outcome of another, especially when they involve different defendants and sets of evidence.
“Given the egregious misconduct that led to the dismissal of Alec Baldwin’s case, it is abundantly clear that Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s case must also be dismissed.”
“The intentional withholding of crucial evidence by the state has compromised the integrity of the entire judicial process. Justice demands that Hannah’s wrongful conviction be overturned immediately, ensuring that the legal system does not perpetuate this grave injustice.”
Bias
(95%)
The author expresses a clear bias towards the defense in the Alec Baldwin case by repeatedly stating that the prosecution 'lost' the case due to their failure to disclose evidence. The author also quotes legal experts who expect Hannah Gutierrez Reed's conviction to be overturned based on this same evidence being withheld. This bias is further demonstrated through the use of language such as 'egregious misconduct', 'grave injustice', and 'intentional and deliberate' when describing the actions of the prosecution.
Clearly, it was in the prosecution’s control. Clearly, it was brought to the prosecutor’s attention. And prosecutors don’t get to make a unilateral decision as to whether something’s relevant or important in the case. It’s shared and then assessed and analyzed.
I fully expect either the trial court or the appellate court to overturn that conviction.
The intentional withholding of crucial evidence by the state has compromised the integrity of the entire judicial process.
Prosecutors Erlinda Johnson and Kari T. Morrissey presented a compelling case against Alec Baldwin for the first two days of his involuntary manslaughter trial.
A man named Troy Teske, a friend of Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s father, turned over ammunition to authorities that they believed was connected to the case but failed to disclose it to the defense.
Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer agreed with Baldwin’s team and dismissed the case with prejudice due to a violation of the Brady rule, which requires prosecution to disclose material, exculpatory information in their possession.
Accuracy
Alec Baldwin’s defense team, led by Alex Spiro, argued that Baldwin was just acting as an actor when the fatal shooting occurred.
Prosecutors called several witnesses to testify against Baldwin, including gun manufacturer Alessandro Pietta who claimed the gun could not fire without pulling the trigger.
The prosecution seemed to be in control of the courtroom and had momentum until a surprise motion was made by Baldwin’s attorney Luke Nikas on Friday, July 12.
Deception
(0%)
The article is a case study in how not to prosecute a high-profile case. The prosecution seemed to be on the right track with their opening statements and witnesses, but then they failed to disclose crucial evidence as required by the Brady rule. This failure led to the dismissal of all charges against Alec Baldwin, which is a stunning indictment of the prosecution's handling of the case. The article clearly demonstrates how not disclosing material evidence can lead to a complete collapse of a case, even when it seems to be going well.
The stunning accusation of buried evidence turned the tide.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several informal fallacies and a potential appeal to authority. The author uses inflammatory language in describing the prosecution's opening statements as 'impressive and persuasive' and the defense's opening statement as 'longer than I thought, not as concise and pointed.' This is an example of loaded language, which is a type of informal fallacy. The author also quotes legal expert Emily D. Baker making subjective judgments about the prosecution's performance in court, which could be considered an appeal to authority if taken out of context. However, since the article clearly states that Baker is not involved in the case and is simply providing her analysis as an expert, this does not constitute a fallacy on its own. The score would be higher if there were no fallacies found.
][The author] found the prosecution's opening more compelling.'[[/],
Bias
(95%)
The article does not contain any clear examples of political, religious, ideological, or monetary bias. However, the author does use language that depicts the prosecution in a negative light and implies that they may have intentionally withheld evidence from the defense. This could be seen as an attempt to sway public opinion against the prosecution. The author also quotes legal expert Emily D. Baker making positive comments about the prosecutors' opening statements, but does not provide any counterbalancing perspective from the defense or neutral experts.
But shame on [prosecutors] for pursuing this against Alec personally. For grandstanding. For ignoring evidence. For ultimately trying to bury evidence.
]From then on, the prosecution seemed to be on a roll[
The defense had tried several times prior to get the case dismissed through motions, and now the judge was going to hear them out again rather than proceed with the trial.
Special prosecutor Erlinda Ocampo Johnson resigned from the case and accused the prosecution of being reckless, stating that some rounds had not been turned over to the defense.
Ocampo Johnson believed that the case should have been dismissed, but her resignation came before a hearing could be completed about whether the evidentiary issue meant that Baldwin’s case should be dismissed.
Baldwin’s attorneys asked for the case to be dismissed after it was revealed that Troy Teske, a former police officer and friend of Gutierrez-Reed’s stepfather, delivered Colt .45-caliber rounds to the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office on March 6.
The defense argued that they should have been informed about the rounds.
Accuracy
Alec Baldwin faced a count of involuntary manslaughter in the accidental shooting death of Halyna Hutchins.
The involuntary manslaughter case against actor Alec Baldwin was dismissed due to withheld evidence.
Hannah Gutierrez Reed was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in prison for the fatal shooting of Halyna Hutchins.
A man named Troy Teske, a friend of Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s father, turned over ammunition to authorities that they believed was connected to the case but failed to disclose it to the defense.
The judge found that the state committed a pattern of violations of discovery in this case.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(90%)
The authors make an appeal to authority when they mention that Baldwin's case should have been dismissed because the special prosecutor believed in the case. They also use inflammatory rhetoric by stating 'there was some reckless behavior on the set.' However, no explicit dichotomous depictions or formal fallacies were found.
]The authors make an appeal to authority when they mention that Baldwin's case should have been dismissed because the special prosecutor believed in the case.[
']They also use inflammatory rhetoric by stating 'there was some reckless behavior on the set.'[
Bias
(95%)
The authors use language that depicts the defense as withholding evidence intentionally, but they do not provide any evidence to support this assertion. They also quote Ocampo Johnson stating that she believes in the case against Baldwin and was prepared to show video evidence of Baldwin handling the firearm unsafely. However, they do not mention whether this video evidence was presented in court or if it supports their earlier assertion that the defense intentionally withheld evidence.
But she said it is up to defense attorneys, and not prosecutors, to decide if evidence is relevant to their defense or not.
I don't think it should impact her case, but it certainly should have been turned over in this case.
The disputed ammunition was not linked to the case or hidden from Baldwin's lawyers.
Hannah Gutierrez-Reed's attorney plans to file a motion to dismiss her case early next week.
The judge in Alec Baldwin’s trial dismissed the case due to prosecution misconduct and discovery violations.
A man named Troy Teske, a friend of Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s father, turned over ammunition to authorities that they believed was connected to the case but failed to disclose it to the defense.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority and inflammatory rhetoric. It heavily leans on the attorney's opinion without providing balanced reporting. The language used in describing the events is emotionally charged and sensational.
. . . absolutely shocking.
Things that I learned today that happened, absolutely shocking.
The judge absolutely made the right decision on the law and on the facts. ... The judge found the state committed misconduct.
A judge in New Mexico dismissed the involuntary manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin on Friday.
The dismissal was with prejudice, meaning that the prosecution of Alec Baldwin is over.
The state had withheld evidence that could have shed light on how live rounds got onto the 'Rust' film set where Halyna Hutchins, the cinematographer, was fatally shot.
Alec Baldwin was rehearsing with a gun on the 'Rust' film set in 2021 when it fired a live round, killing Halyna Hutchins.
Baldwin had been told the gun was 'cold', meaning it had no live ammunition.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(749x0:751x2)/Alec-Baldwin-Mary-Marlowe-Kari-Morrissey-case-071324-5008f378ac9a4fcc86b2941d37e505a4.jpg)