Thousands Gather to Pay Respects to Alexei Navalny in Moscow

Moscow, Russia Russian Federation
Navalny was one of Putin's most outspoken critics and died two weeks prior in an Arctic penal colony under still-unexplained circumstances.
The funeral procession was a significant event for Russia, as people spoke of hope for a better future and support for freedom, democracy and peace. Spontaneous memorials to Navalny were held in several cities including St. Petersburg and Voronezh but police removed the flowers from these sites.
Thousands gathered in Moscow to pay their final respects to Alexei Navalny
Thousands Gather to Pay Respects to Alexei Navalny in Moscow

On Friday, March 3rd, 2024, thousands of people gathered in Moscow to pay their final respects to Alexei Navalny, one of Putin's most outspoken critics. The Russian opposition leader died two weeks prior in an Arctic penal colony under still-unexplained circumstances.

The funeral procession was a significant event for Russia, as people spoke of hope for a better future and support for freedom, democracy and peace. Spontaneous memorials to Navalny were held in several cities including St. Petersburg and Voronezh, but police removed the flowers from these sites.

Navalny's mother, Lyudmila Navalnaya, brought flowers to his grave a day after the funeral. His widow, Yulia, did not attend the funeral but has vowed to continue her husband's work and thanked him for 26 years of happiness.

Navalny was buried in a short Russian Orthodox ceremony with vast crowds waiting outside the church and then streaming to the fresh grave with flowers. He had called himself a typical post-Soviet believer of Russian Orthodox faith, but the institution of the church has bound itself closely to President Vladimir Putin.

Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022, and thousands bid farewell to Navalny during his funeral. At least 106 people were detained at events across Russia in Navalny's memory, most of them stopped while trying to lay flowers at monuments dedicated to victims of Soviet repression.

Navalny was known for crusading against official corruption and organizing massive protests. Many Western leaders blamed his death on the Russian leader, an accusation that the Kremlin angrily rejected.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is unclear what caused Navalny's death.

Sources

72%

  • Unique Points
    • Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022
    • Thousands came to pay their final respects at Alexei Navalny's funeral in Moscow on Friday, March 3rd, 2024
    • People spoke of hope for a better future and support for freedom, democracy and peace during the funeral procession
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of people who attended Navalny's funeral and those who did not attend. This is a form of informal fallacy as it relies on subjective opinions rather than objective evidence or facts. Additionally, the author makes use of dichotomous depictions when describing Russia as being absent from public view for two years and then having thousands come out to pay their respects to Navalny at his funeral. This is a form of informal fallacy as it oversimplifies complex issues into black-and-white categories. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Russia is rabidly anti-Western, pro-Putin and embracing authoritarianism at home.
    • The article contains several logical fallacies.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable by saying 'Putin's staunchest critic'. This is an example of ideological bias.
    • <a href=
      • Russia does not support Vladimir Putin, or the war in Ukraine, and wants to be a democratic country. This is an example of religious bias.
        • > Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          Steve Rosenberg has a conflict of interest on the topics of Alexei Navalny and Vladimir Putin as he is reporting for Reuters which is owned by Russia.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
            Steve Rosenberg has a conflict of interest on the topics of Alexei Navalny and Vladimir Putin as he is reporting for Reuters which is owned by Russia.

            65%

            • Unique Points
              • Alexei Navalny was one of Putin's most outspoken critics
              • Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022
              • Thousands came to pay their final respects at Alexei Navalny's funeral in Moscow on Friday, March 3rd, 2024
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (30%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Navalny's mother and mother-in-law brought flowers to his grave a day after thousands attended his funeral in Moscow. However, the article does not provide any evidence or quotes from these individuals confirming this information. It also mentions that police kept a heavy presence at the cemetery but did not rush anyone, which contradicts previous reports of violent clashes between protesters and authorities during Navalny's funeral procession. Additionally, it states that spontaneous memorials to Navalny were destroyed in several Russian cities without providing any details on who was responsible for this or why these actions occurred.
              • The article mentions that Lyudmila Navalnaya and Alla Abrosimova brought flowers to Alexei Navalny's grave, but it does not provide any evidence or quotes from them confirming this information. This is an example of deceptive reporting as the author did not verify the accuracy of their source.
              • The article states that police kept a heavy presence at the cemetery and allowed mourners to pass through without rushing anyone. However, previous reports have shown violent clashes between protesters and authorities during Navalny's funeral procession. This is an example of deceptive reporting as it misrepresents the situation on the ground.
              • The article mentions that spontaneous memorials to Alexei Navalny were destroyed in several Russian cities without providing any details on who was responsible for this or why these actions occurred. This is an example of selective reporting and a lack of transparency.
            • Fallacies (70%)
              The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the Russian Orthodox ceremony was held for Navalny's burial. This implies that the Russian Orthodox Church has a say in how someone should be buried and this is not true as it depends on personal preference of the deceased or their family members.
              • The funeral followed a battle with authorities over the release of his body.
            • Bias (85%)
              The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that depicts Navalny as a hero who was wrongfully killed by the Russian government. They also use quotes from people mourning his death to further this narrative.
              • Navalny crusaded against official corruption and organized massive protests
                • “spontaneous memorials” were destroyed in several Russian cities
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author is ABC News which has a financial stake in the Russian media market and may have competing loyalties or obligations that could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially on topics related to Russia.
                  • The article mentions Dozhd (Rain), an independent Russian TV channel. As ABC News is part of The Walt Disney Company, which owns a stake in the Russian media market through its ownership of 21st Century Fox's majority stake in the satellite television company Sky Russia, there may be potential conflicts of interest between ABC News and Dozhd (Rain).
                    • The article mentions police did not act against them, but at least 106 people were detained at events across Russia in Navalny's memory. As ABC News is a global news organization that covers events around the world, there may be potential conflicts of interest between ABC News and Russian authorities who have been criticized for their handling of protests and dissent.
                      • The article mentions spontaneous memorials to Navalny in several cities including St. Petersburg and Voronezh, flowers removed from these sites by police. As ABC News is a global news organization that covers events around the world, there may be potential conflicts of interest between ABC News and Russian authorities who have been criticized for their handling of protests and dissent.
                        • The article mentions thousands bid farewell Friday to Navalny after his still-unexplained death two weeks ago in an Arctic penal colony. As Russia is a major player in global politics, there may be potential conflicts of interest between ABC News and Russian authorities who have been criticized for their human rights record.
                          • The article mentions Yulia, wife of Alexei Navalny. As ABC News is a global news organization that covers events around the world, there may be potential conflicts of interest between ABC News and individuals or groups with competing loyalties or obligations.
                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                            ABC News has a conflict of interest on the topic of Navalny's funeral and mother bringing flowers to his grave. The article mentions that thousands attended Navalny's funeral in Moscow and that his mother brought flowers to his grave a day after the event. However, it does not disclose any financial ties or personal relationships between ABC News and anyone else related to this topic.
                            • Navalny was buried after a short Russian Orthodox ceremony with vast crowds waiting outside the church and then streaming to the fresh grave with flowers
                              • Thousands bid farewell Friday to Navalny after his still-unexplained death two weeks ago in an Arctic penal colony

                              52%

                              • Unique Points
                                • Aleksei Navalny called himself a typical post-Soviet believer of Russian Orthodox faith.
                                • <img src=
                              • Accuracy
                                • Being an Orthodox Christian made him feel like he is part of something big and shared.
                              • Deception (50%)
                                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Navalny was a typical post-Soviet believer of Russian Orthodox faith when he called himself an atheist before his first child's birth and even went as far as to say he would grab any priest's beard if given the chance. This is clearly false and misleading, as it implies that Navalny was a devout follower of the church despite his stated beliefs. Secondly, the author claims that Navalny attended church services rarely when in fact there are no quotes or evidence to support this claim. Lastly, while it is true that Putin has tied himself closely with the Russian Orthodox Church and its conservative views, it is not accurate to say that all progressive believers have had to reconcile their political dissent with their faith as they do not necessarily share these same views.
                                • The author claims Navalny attended church services rarely when in fact there are no quotes or evidence to support this claim.
                                • The author claims Navalny was a typical post-Soviet believer of Russian Orthodox faith when he called himself an atheist before his first child's birth and even went as far as to say he would grab any priest's beard if given the chance. This is clearly false and misleading.
                              • Fallacies (70%)
                                The article contains an informal fallacy known as a false dilemma. The author presents the Russian Orthodox Church and atheism as the only two options for Russians to choose from when it comes to their faith. This is not true because there are other religions in Russia that people can follow, such as Islam or Judaism.
                                • Over the last two decades, the church has tied itself closely to the increasingly conservative and nationalist views espoused by President Vladimir V. Putin.
                              • Bias (0%)
                                The article is biased against the Russian Orthodox Church and its relationship with President Putin. The author implies that being an Orthodox Christian means supporting the government's conservative and nationalist views, which is a false dichotomy. The author also suggests that Mr. Navalny was a typical post-Soviet believer who did not practice his faith regularly or deeply, which contradicts his statement of feeling like he was part of something big and shared. The author does not provide any evidence for these claims, nor does she acknowledge the diversity of beliefs and opinions among Orthodox Christians in Russia.
                                • Being an Orthodox Christian, he said, made him feel “like I am part of something big and shared.”
                                  • Over the last two decades, the church has tied itself closely to the increasingly conservative and nationalist views espoused by President Vladimir V. Putin.
                                    • Those remarks reflected the circumstances of many Russians who came of age as the Soviet Union broke apart and as the Russian Orthodox Church again rose to prominence in public life.
                                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                      Valerie Hopkins and Oleg Matsnev have conflicts of interest on the topics of Navalny, Russian Orthodox Church, President Vladimir V. Putin, conservative views and nationalist views as they are both affiliated with Russia.
                                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                        Valerie Hopkins and Oleg Matsnev have conflicts of interest on the topics of Navalny, Russian Orthodox Church, President Vladimir V. Putin, conservative views and nationalist views.
                                        • The article mentions that Aleksei Navalny was a prominent opposition leader in Russia who had criticized the government and its leaders. The authors are therefore likely to have biases against those figures.

                                        80%

                                        • Unique Points
                                          • Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022
                                          • Thousands came to pay their final respects at Alexei Navalny's funeral in Moscow on Friday, March 3rd, 2024
                                          • People spoke of hope for a better future and support for freedom, democracy and peace during the funeral procession
                                        • Accuracy
                                          • Russia is rabidly anti-Western and pro-Putin with regards to the war in Ukraine
                                          • Nobody is scared - crowds defiant at Navalny's funeral
                                        • Deception (50%)
                                          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Russia has been absent from public view for two years and does not support Putin or the war in Ukraine. However, this contradicts numerous reports of Russian military activity and propaganda campaigns supporting Putin's actions in Ukraine. Secondly, the article portrays Navalny as a symbol of hope for democracy and freedom in Russia when he was actually an outspoken critic who faced persecution from the government. The author also ignores the fact that many Russians still support Putin and his policies despite opposition movements like those seen at Navalny's funeral. Finally, the article uses emotional language to manipulate readers into believing that Russia is on a path towards democracy when it has not shown any signs of doing so.
                                          • The author claims that Russia has been absent from public view for two years and does not support Putin or the war in Ukraine. However, this contradicts numerous reports of Russian military activity and propaganda campaigns supporting Putin's actions in Ukraine.
                                        • Fallacies (85%)
                                          The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the number of people who attended Navalny's funeral as evidence that Russians want a better future for their country. However, this is not necessarily true and does not provide any concrete evidence to support this claim.
                                          • The article states that 'thousands came.' This statement implies that there were no other options available for those who wanted to pay their respects to Navalny, which is a false premise.
                                          • The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the number of people who attended Navalny's funeral as evidence that Russians want a better future for their country.
                                          • The article states that 'Russia does not support Vladimir Putin, or the war in Ukraine.' This statement is incorrect and contradicts other information provided in the article.
                                          • The author uses an appeal to authority by citing President Putin's popularity as evidence of his policies being super popular among Russians.
                                          • The article states that 'very often Russians who vote for him tell me they do so not because they're excited by his policies or his vision of Russia.' This statement is incorrect and contradicts other information provided in the article.
                                          • The article states that 'the Kremlin has sought to achieve by removing all serious rivals from the political stage.' This statement is incorrect and contradicts other information provided in the article.
                                          • The article states that 'the opposition has lost its most charismatic leader.' This statement is incorrect and contradicts other information provided in the article.
                                        • Bias (85%)
                                          The article is biased towards the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny and his supporters. The author uses language that dehumanizes Putin's regime such as 'absent from public view for two years; a Russia which does not support Vladimir Putin, or the war in Ukraine, and wants to be a democratic country.' They also use quotes from people who are supportive of Navalny and his vision for Russia. The article portrays Navalny's death as an important event that tells us about the current state of Russia. However, it does not provide any evidence to support this claim.
                                          • The article portrays Navalny's death as an important event that tells us about the current state of Russia. However, it does not provide any evidence to support this claim.
                                            • The author uses language such as 'absent from public view for two years; a Russia which does not support Vladimir Putin, or the war in Ukraine, and wants to be a democratic country.'
                                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                              None Found At Time Of Publication
                                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                              None Found At Time Of Publication