AMD's Ryzen 9000 series launch delayed due to mislabeled CPUs and quality control issues.
Delay not due to silicon level issues but packaging or testing problems.
First batch of chips being recalled and replaced with fresh units.
Initial production units did not meet AMD's full quality expectations.
Intel still dealing with unstable 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors.
Ryzen 5 9600X also mislabeled as Ryzen 9 model, extent of issue unknown.
Ryzen 7 9700X mistakenly labeled as Ryzen 9 model, causing confusion but no performance impact.
AMD's highly anticipated Ryzen 9000 series desktop processors, powered by the Zen 5 architecture, have experienced a delay in their launch. The initial production units did not meet AMD's full quality expectations and were found to have issues that required replacement. AMD is recalling the first batch of chips and replacing them with fresh units to maintain high-quality experiences for every Ryzen user.
The Ryzen 7 9700X, a model in the Ryzen 9000 series, was mistakenly labeled as a Ryzen 9 model. This typo did not affect performance but could have caused unnecessary confusion and discussions. AMD decided to postpone the launch to ensure all CPUs were correctly labeled.
The delay is not due to any issues at the silicon level but rather packaging or testing-related problems that were discovered before faulty chips reached consumers.
The Ryzen 5 9600X was also found to have been mislabeled as a Ryzen 9 model. AMD has not yet confirmed whether other models in the Ryzen 9000 series were affected by this typo or any other quality issues.
AMD's competitors, Intel, are still dealing with the fallout from their unstable 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors. The root cause of these issues has been identified but a patch won't arrive until August. Some chips have reportedly been permanently degraded and will need to be returned to Intel for replacement.
Stay tuned for more updates on the Ryzen 9000 series launch.
AMD delayed the Ryzen 9000 Zen 5 processor launch due to a typo on the CPU itself.
The typo involved mislabeling the Ryzen 7 9700X as a Ryzen 9 model, resulting in the name Ryzen 9 9700X.
AMD is recalling everything that was impacted by the typo and presumably needs to reprint the heat spreaders.
Accuracy
Typo involved mislabeling the Ryzen 7 9700X as a Ryzen 9 model, resulting in the name Ryzen 9 9700X.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(95%)
The author is making an assumption about the cause of AMD's Ryzen 9000 processor delay based on a typo found in a review. This is an example of an 'Appeal to Ignorance' fallacy as the author is filling in the missing information with their own unproven theory. The author also uses inflammatory language when describing Intel's stability issue, which could be considered 'Inflammatory Rhetoric'.
]AMD delayed its July 31st Ryzen 9000 launch last week, curiously confirming there were no issues with the manufacturing process or CPUs themselves. [...][It was ironic that Intel was suffering from a potentially huge stability issue at the same time, potentially affecting millions of owners of its 13th and 14th Gen CPUs.]
AMD recently announced it was delaying the launch of its Zen 5-powered Ryzen 9000 processors for several weeks due to an issue with
Accuracy
AMD delayed the Ryzen 9000 Zen 5 processor launch due to a typo on the CPU itself.
The typo involved mislabeling the Ryzen 7 9700X as a Ryzen 9 model, resulting in the name Ryzen 9 9700X.
Deception
(80%)
The article reports on a typo error in the labeling of Ryzen processors as the reason for AMD's delayed launch. While this may be true, the author also speculates that there might be other reasons for the delay and mentions 'silkscreening' as part of the fix without explicitly stating it is related to this typo error. This could give readers an impression that there are more significant issues at play, which is not explicitly stated in the article.
An unsanctioned review posted to BiliBili shows AMD’s Ryzen 7 9700X mismarked as a Ryzen 9 9700X processor, an obvious error that would need to be corrected.
It’s also rational to assume that the labeling on AMD’s retail boxes could be impacted, too.
We have contacted AMD for comment about the reports of mismarked chips, but a representative has said the company cannot comment beyond its previous announcement yet.
Fallacies
(95%)
The author makes an assumption about the primary reason for AMD's Ryzen 9000 delay based on a single example of a mislabeled chip. This is an example of hasty generalization fallacy.
Initial production units of Ryzen 9000 series chips did not meet AMD’s full quality expectations.
AMD is recalling the first batch of chips and replacing them with ‘fresh units'
Quality issue is not at silicon level, likely packaging or testing related
Issue discovered before faulty chips reached consumers
Accuracy
AMD is delaying the launch of their Ryzen 9000 series desktop processors by 1-2 weeks due to quality issues.
Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X will launch on August 8th, while Ryzen 9 9950X and flagship Ryzen 9 9950X will launch a week later, on August 15th.
AMD is recalling the first batch of chips and replacing them with ‘fresh units’
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(95%)
The article contains a few minor informal fallacies in the form of exaggeration and an appeal to authority. The author states that “whatever the issue is, it’s not a design flaw or a fabrication flaw in the silicon itself.” This is an exaggerated claim as it assumes perfect knowledge about the cause of the issue. Additionally, there is an appeal to authority when quoting AMD’s SVP and GM of Computing and Graphics, Jack Huynh. He states that “AMD found the issue before any of the faulty chips made their ways into the hands of consumers.” This is an exaggeration as it implies that there were no faulty chips in consumer hands, when in reality, some may have already reached consumers before the recall.
The first Zen 5 architecture-based desktop chips were slated to launch next week, on July 31st. But citing quality issues that are significant enough that AMD is even pulling back stock already sent to distributors...
AMD found the issue before any of the faulty chips made their ways into the hands of consumers.
Importantly, however, this announcement is only for the Ryzen 9000 desktop processors, and not the Ryzen AI 300 mobile processors (Strix Point), which are still slated to launch next week.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25474479/Ryzen_9000_7.png)
:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25474484/amdryzen9000.png)
_678x452.jpg)