Apple TV+ Revives Terry Gilliam's 1981 Cult Classic: A New Look at

Apple TV+ has remade Terry Gilliam's 1981 cult classic 'Brazil'
The original film was released in 1981 and is a science fiction dystopian comedy.
Apple TV+ Revives Terry Gilliam's 1981 Cult Classic: A New Look at

In the world of streaming entertainment, Apple TV+ has recently unveiled its latest offering: a remake of Terry Gilliam's 1981 cult classic,



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

78%

  • Unique Points
    • Apple’s Time Bandits series is a remake of the 1981 film with the same name.
    • Kal-El Tuck plays the role of Kevin, an 11-year-old English boy who travels through history with a group of thieves called Time Bandits.
    • The show features anachronistic humor and historical recreations with impressive special effects.
  • Accuracy
    • The new series is designed to be more light-hearted and comedic than the original.
    • Kal-El Tuck plays Kevin, an 11-year-old English boy who travels through history with a group of thieves called Time Bandits.
    • The show features a group of five time bandits who have stolen a valuable map allowing them to travel through time and steal treasure.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as the author focuses on his personal experience with the original Time Bandits movie and compares it to the new series. He also uses emotional manipulation by describing his nightmares inspired by the ending of the original movie. The author's opinion is presented as fact, implying that his interpretation is universal.
    • The TV series from Taika Waititi and Jemaine Clement gets laughs, but lacks the memorable strangeness of the 1981 film
    • For weeks after, I had nightmares inspired by the ending, where our young hero’s parents blew up after touching a literal piece of Pure Evil (the film’s villain), leaving the boy utterly alone
    • But if this new Time Bandits comes closer in ambition to what I wanted all those years ago, its execution is spotty.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (80%)
    The author expresses a clear preference for the original 1981 film and its strange, dark elements over the new series, which he describes as 'sillier, jokier, and altogether lighter'. He also criticizes the new series for being 'forgettable' and lacking the ambition of the original. These statements demonstrate a bias towards the original film.
    • But if this new Time Bandits comes closer in ambition to what I wanted all those years ago, its execution is spotty.
      • The movie was more strange than funny.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      82%

      • Unique Points
        • The series focuses more on the 'romp' side of the original film, to the exclusion of its darker and weirder elements.
        • Kal-El Tuck plays Kevin, an 11-year-old history enthusiast who discovers a time portal in his bedroom wardrobe.
        • Fianna, portrayed by Rachel House, is a huntress who uses fire lasers from her eyes to retrieve the map.
      • Accuracy
        • The show adopts some elements of Mel Brooks and resembles the British and CBS versions of Ghosts.
      • Deception (70%)
        The article contains editorializing and selective reporting. The author expresses his personal experiences and opinions about the original 'Time Bandits' movie and the new Apple TV+ adaptation. He praises some aspects of the show while criticizing others, focusing on what he finds interesting or entertaining. However, he fails to provide a balanced analysis by ignoring negative aspects of the original movie that are relevant to understanding his criticism of the new version. For example, he mentions that 'most of those jagged edges have been sanded off for Apple TV+’s new take on Time Bandits,' but does not explain what these jagged edges were or why they were problematic in the original. This selective reporting creates a biased view of the shows and misleads readers by presenting an incomplete picture.
        • The series creators don’t feel the same pressure to avoid self-repetition, and the first half of the season plays like talented people content to do Monty Python karaoke.
        • Nobody, though, specialized in making movies that were ostensibly for kids but definitely weren’t for all kids like Terry Gilliam.
        • One needn’t take that comparison as an insult. Gilliam could sometimes benefit from bowling bumpers.
        • The film replicates the chaotic weirdness of childhood dreams, but resists any of the pat moralizing that often anchors kid-friendly storytelling.
      • Fallacies (80%)
        The author makes an appeal to personal experience and authority when describing his memories of Terry Gilliam's films and their impact on him. He also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing some of the films as 'traumatizing' for children. However, these fallacies do not significantly detract from the overall analysis of the Apple TV+ adaptation of 'Time Bandits'. The author provides a clear and concise description of the original film and its reception, as well as an evaluation of how Apple TV+ has adapted it.
        • ][author] Thanks to Steven Spielberg and his various acolytes, '80s kids didn't lack for entertainment made directly for us. But that doesn't mean we weren't periodically traumatized by a Gremlins or Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom or, in the case of my younger brother, The 'Burbs. Nobody, though, specialized in making movies that were ostensibly for kids but definitely weren't for all kids like Terry Gilliam. One of my first moviegoing memories is abruptly leaving a revival screening of Jabberwocky because it wasn't the movie my parents thought it was. Audiences experienced similar unease with The Adventures of Baron Munchausen and, before that, 1981’s Time Bandits, a frequently playful juvenile romp that's also nonstop dark imagery and narrative jagged edges. The film replicates the chaotic weirdness of childhood dreams, but resists any of the pat moralizing that often anchors kid-friendly storytelling.[/
      • Bias (90%)
        The author expresses a clear preference for the original 'Time Bandits' movie over the new Apple TV+ adaptation. He describes the original as having 'nonstop dark imagery and narrative jagged edges' that were not typical of kid-friendly storytelling. In contrast, he criticizes the new adaptation for sanding off those rough edges and focusing too much on 'the romp side of the original.' The author also uses language like 'bland efforts to replicate the movie almost exactly' and 'derivative chuckles' to describe the new series. These statements demonstrate a bias towards the original movie and a negative view of the new adaptation.
        • Most of those jagged edges have been sanded off for Apple TV+’s new take on Time Bandits, which concentrates on the 'romp' side of the original, very much to the exclusion of the weirdness.
          • The film replicates the chaotic weirdness of childhood dreams, but resists any of the pat moralizing that often anchors kid-friendly storytelling.
            • The series is very talk-heavy and even though it’s self-aware about its structure, the pattern of hopping into a portal, arriving in a new time, having Kevin lecture everybody about various historical personages, solving a minor problem and leaping into the next period becomes first familiar and then dull.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            98%

            • Unique Points
              • The team behind FX’s ‘What We Do In The Shadows’ are involved in creating and producing the TV version.
              • Lisa Kudrow stars as the leader of the new time bandits.
              • Kevin, an 11-year-old history buff, gets involved with the time bandits when they crash into his bedroom.
            • Accuracy
              • The major change is that the time bandits are no longer played by little people. Some have criticized this casting decision.
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            53%

            • Unique Points
              • Taika Waititi has remade Terry Gilliam’s 1981 film ‘Time Bandits’ as a 10-episode Apple TV+ series
              • Kal-El Tuck delivers a standout performance as Kevin in the series despite its overall lackluster reception
            • Accuracy
              • The new adaptation features average-sized actors instead of little people for the title roles
              • The original ‘Time Bandits’ was notable for its representation of little people as heroes and giving them significant roles
            • Deception (30%)
              The article contains selective reporting as the author only mentions the negative aspects of the Time Bandits remake and ignores any potential positive elements. The author also uses emotional manipulation by implying that it is a 'crime against little people' to recast little people with average-sized actors, which is an unfair and biased statement.
              • Despite their different professions and motivations (for example, Penelope occasionally refers to an ex-fiancé), these Bandits are equally airheaded and inept.
              • The new Apple TV+ adaptation of Terry Gilliam’s 1981 film is a crime against little people.
              • The following night, he receives additional unexpected guests: a group of ragtag thieves who are being pursued by a giant quasi-Zardoz head known as the Supreme Being that, upon appearing, compels everyone, including Kevin, to hastily flee through a portal that drops them on an 1810 Chinese pirate ship.
              • Yet leave it to Taika Waititi, he of the eternally noxious Jojo Rabbit, to do the one thing that should not be done.
              • Time Bandits concerns Kevin (Tuck), a contemporary 11-year-old who lives in the English town of Bingley with a mom (Felicity Ward) and dad (James Dryden) who don’t understand his nerdy love of history.
            • Fallacies (65%)
              The author makes an appeal to authority by referencing Terry Gilliam's original film and its success. They also make a dichotomous depiction by contrasting the original film's use of little people as heroes with the new adaptation's use of average-sized actors in those roles.
              • The new Apple TV+ adaptation of Terry Gilliam’s 1981 film is a crime against little people.
              • Devoid of condescension or clichéd mockery, and infused with its protagonists’ distinctive personalities, it was–and remains–one of the preeminent modern big-screen platforms for little people.
              • Yet leave it to Taika Waititi, he of the eternally noxious Jojo Rabbit, to do the one thing that should not be done.
              • With the same basic premise as its predecessor, Time Bandits concerns Kevin (Tuck), a contemporary 11-year-old who lives in the English town of Bingley with a mom (Felicity Ward) and dad (James Dryden) who don’t understand his nerdy love of history.
              • Thus, to remake it without them is creatively nonsensical to the point of being outright offensive, since it both misses the entire reason for the original’s existence (and success) and denies actors of short stature some of the most notable roles they’ve ever been given.
              • It's akin to, say, redoing The Wizard of Oz or Charlie and the Chocolate Factory with, respectively, 6-feet-tall munchkins and Oompa Loompas.
              • Except that in this case, it’s more objectionable, considering that unlike those supporting parts, the Time Bandits–funny, roguish, clever, and brave–are the heroes of their story.
            • Bias (15%)
              The author expresses a clear bias against the remake of 'Time Bandits' by Taika Waititi and Jemaine Clement, stating that it is 'wildly offensive and unfunny'. The author also implies that the decision to recast little people with average-sized actors is objectionable and creatively nonsensical. This bias is evident throughout the article as the author repeatedly criticizes the remake and expresses a preference for the original.
              • Anyone who’s ever felt even a hint of fondness for Gilliam’s saga is apt to instantly balk at such a fundamentally wrong-headed idea.
                • Devoid of condescension or clichéd mockery, and infused with its protagonists’ distinctive personalities, it was–and remains–one of the preeminent modern big-screen platforms for little people.
                  • Except that in this case, it’s more objectionable
                    • It’s akin to, say, redoing The Wizard of Oz or Charlie and the Chocolate Factory with, respectively, 6-feet-tall munchkins and Oompa Loompas.
                      • The following night, he receives additional unexpected guests: a group of ragtag thieves who are being pursued by a giant quasi-Zardoz head known as the Supreme Being that, upon appearing, compels everyone, including Kevin, to hastily flee through a portal that drops them on an 1810 Chinese pirate ship.
                        • The new Apple TV+ adaptation of Terry Gilliam’s 1981 film is a crime against little people.
                          • The same basic premise as its predecessor, Time Bandits concerns Kevin (Tuck), a contemporary 11-year-old who lives in the English town of Bingley with a mom (Felicity Ward) and dad (James Dryden) who don’t understand his nerdy love of history.
                            • Thus, to remake it without them is creatively nonsensical to the point of being outright offensive
                              • When he’s miraculously visited by Viking and Saxon warriors via his bedroom cupboard one evening, his parents dismiss it as just another of his stuck-in-the-past fantasies.
                                • Yet leave it to Taika Waititi, he of the eternally noxious Jojo Rabbit, to do the one thing that should not be done.
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication