Anne Applebaum argues that autocrats cement their bonds not through ideals but through deals.
Globalization has allowed autocratic states to become more integrated with one another, while American and European trade dependence on the autocratic world has been used as a weapon against the West.
Accuracy
Anne Applebaum is a historian
Autocrats around the world share deals and collaborate to evade sanctions and launder money through global finance.
Applebaum recommends reforms such as requiring companies to be registered in the name of their actual owners.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(95%)
The author expresses a clear bias against autocrats and their financial dealings, using language that depicts them as unscrupulous and deceitful. He also implies that they are colluding to evade American sanctions.
In short, the world system accommodated the needs of autocracy; the autocrats were not required to change.
Of course, they do share ideas if not ideologies, among them that liberal internationalism is an alibi for imperialism, the means by which Washington and Brussels impose their interests and decadent cultural mores (especially L.G.B.T.Q. tolerance) on the rest of the world.
Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine in 2014 was based on the false assumption that most Ukrainians would welcome Russian domination.
China’s suppression of political freedom in Hong Kong has darkened the 2020s.
Accuracy
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Narendra Modi, and Viktor Orbán run their countries according to their personal political interests.
Deception
(30%)
The author expresses his personal opinions and emotions throughout the article, making it biased. He uses emotional manipulation by describing the current state of the world as 'darkened' and 'disturbing'. The author also engages in selective reporting by focusing on negative aspects of certain countries and leaders while ignoring their positive attributes. He makes assumptions about China's intentions without providing any evidence, implying that they should prioritize peace for their economic success but fails to acknowledge that they have learned to master technology to control information and manipulate public opinion.
Anne Applebaum... is deeply disturbing; it couldn’t be anything else.
But instead of the technology mastering the autocrats, the autocrats have learned to master the technology.
Until around 2015, I tended to be moderately positive about the world... That pretty much ended in 2016.
Putin’s invasion of Ukraine... And so the kind of neo-Whig version of history, which taught that trade would bring us all closer together and economics would make war impossible, has collapsed.
Brexit damaged the European project, and Donald Trump shook the columns of American leadership.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several instances of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority without providing evidence to support the claims made. There are no formal logical fallacies present in the text. The author makes strong statements about the decline of democracy and rise of autocracy without providing empirical data to support these claims.
Until around 2015, I tended to be moderately positive about the world.
And so the kind of neo-Whig version of history, which taught that trade would bring us all closer together and economics would make war impossible, has collapsed.
In this new age of autocracy, men like Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Narendra Modi and Viktor Orbán run entire countries according to their own personal political interest.
Autocracy, Inc. is deeply disturbing; it couldn’t be anything else.
Bias
(90%)
The author expresses a clear bias towards the idea that the world has become more autocratic and less democratic since around 2015. He mentions specific leaders like Putin, Xi Jinping, Erdoğan, Modi and Orbán as examples of this trend. He also expresses disappointment in the US for not being able to exert influence on the global stage as it once did.
Anne Applebaum... is one of those we can trust.
Brexit damaged the European project, and Donald Trump shook the columns of American leadership... And so the kind of neo-Whig version of history, which taught that trade would bring us all closer together and economics would make war impossible, has collapsed.
Meanwhile the US, whose opinion used to matter just about everywhere on Earth, suddenly seems as intimidating as a scarecrow in a beet field.
Until around 2015, I tended to be moderately positive about the world... That pretty much ended in 2016.