First Human Case of Bird Flu in Texas: What You Need to Know

Texas, United States United States of America
Avian influenza has been detected in dairy herds in Texas, Kansas, Michigan, Idaho, New Mexico, Ohio and North Carolina. Movement of cattle from affected herds in these states to other states has been suspended. By law milk bought in North Carolina is required to be pasteurized -- a process that would kill bird flu should any milk from an infected herd make it into the supply.
A worker on a commercial dairy farm in Texas has developed a case of pink eye and later tested positive for the highly pathogenic avian influenza Type A H5N1, also known as bird flu or avian flu. This is the first time officials have confirmed that the virus has jumped from a cow to a human.
Researchers investigating dairy farm infections discovered cows and one human were not the only mammalian victims of HPAI. Cats can also contract bird flu if they interact with infected birds.
First Human Case of Bird Flu in Texas: What You Need to Know

A worker on a commercial dairy farm in Texas has developed a case of pink eye and later tested positive for the highly pathogenic avian influenza Type A H5N1, also known as bird flu or avian flu. This is the first time officials have confirmed that the virus has jumped from a cow to a human, and the line of transmission suggests it's easily transmitted between cows. The public health agency suspects that the patient got infected from a sick dairy cow.

Avian influenza has been detected in dairy herds in Texas, Kansas, Michigan, Idaho, New Mexico, Ohio, and North Carolina. Movement of cattle from affected herds in these states to other states has been suspended. By law, milk bought in North Carolina is required to be pasteurized -- a process that would kill bird flu should any milk from an infected herd make it into the supply.

Researchers investigating the dairy farm infections in Texas did discover that cows and one human were not the only mammalian victims of the virus. Cats can also contract bird flu if they interact with infected birds. In birds, HPAI is highly contagious and deadly. The big concern is that the more it jumps from animal to animal or animal to human, the more likely it is to mutate into better infecting humans.

The North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services and the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services are in close communication on this matter. Both agencies believe the overall risk to the general public remains low. There are no concerns with the safety of the commercial milk supply at this time because products are pasteurized before entering the market. People should not consume or prepare food with raw or unpasteurized milk.

The rapid identification of HPAI and the collaboration among local, state and federal agricultural and public health partners are examples of a unified, coordinated response and action plan to ensure the safety of people and families.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if this case is an isolated incident or if there are other cases of bird flu in humans.

Sources

91%

  • Unique Points
    • A worker on a commercial dairy farm in Texas developed a case of pink eye and later tested positive for the highly pathogenic avian influenza Type A H5N1.
    • The public health agency suspects that the patient got infected from a sick dairy cow. This is the first time officials have confirmed that the virus has jumped from a cow to a human, and the line of transmission suggests it's easily transmitted between cows.
  • Accuracy
    • A worker on a commercial dairy farm in Texas developed a case of pink eye and later tested positive for the highly pathogenic avian influenza Type A H5N1, also known as bird flu or avian flu. Though the farm worker had no symptoms other than eye inflammation and wasn't hospitalized, they were isolated and received an antiviral treatment.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The article discusses the recent case of a human infected with H5N1 in Texas. While this is not necessarily new, it is concerning that the virus has jumped from cow to human and there are concerns about its potential mutation into a more infectious form for humans. The author cites experts who express concern but also acknowledge that the risk of human-to-human transmission may be low at present. However, they emphasize the importance of monitoring this situation closely.
    • The fact that it jumped from cattle to human is unsettling
    • It seems clear that cows can present a risk to each other but what kind of risk this poses to cow health isn't completely understood and neither is what kind of risk this poses to human health.
    • Dr. Rajendram Rajnarayanan believes the virus transmitting to other mammals on a farm, such as pigs could make it easier for the virus to mutate into a new one that could more easily jump from mammal to mammal.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

52%

  • Unique Points
    • Highly pathogenic avian influenza, or bird flu, was recently detected in a dairy herd in North Carolina
    • <p>The avian flu had already been detected in dairy herds in Texas, Kansas, Michigan, Idaho, New Mexico, and Ohio</p>
  • Accuracy
    • The avian flu had already been detected in dairy herds in Texas, Kansas, Michigan, Idaho, New Mexico and Ohio
    • A worker on a commercial dairy farm in Texas developed a case of pink eye and later tested positive for the highly pathogenic avian influenza Type A H5N1
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author states that 'movement of cattle from affected herds in these states to North Carolina has been suspended'. However, this statement is not entirely accurate as it implies that no movement of cattle occurred after the suspension was put in place. This is not true as there may have been some movement before the suspension took effect. Secondly, when discussing pasteurization and its ability to kill bird flu, Dr Martin states 'any milk that's coming from an infected cow is getting disposed of'. However, this statement implies that all milk from infected cows in North Carolina is being discarded which may not be entirely accurate as some milk may have already been sold before the suspension was put in place. Lastly, when discussing the risk to humans, Dr Martin states 'The risk of human infection remains extremely low.' This statement is misleading as there are two cases of human infection recorded in the US after exposure to infected cows on dairy farms. Therefore, while it may be true that the overall risk remains low at this time, it would not be accurate to say that there is no risk whatsoever.
    • The article states 'movement of cattle from affected herds in these states to North Carolina has been suspended'. However, this statement implies that no movement occurred after the suspension was put in place. This may not entirely true as some movement may have occurred before the suspension took effect.
  • Fallacies (70%)
    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when citing the Food and Drug Administration's statement that there is no concern about the safety or availability of pasteurized milk products nationwide. This statement may be true, but it does not necessarily mean that all information provided by the FDA should be taken as fact without further investigation. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when stating that outbreaks of avian flu are being reported across multiple states and emphasizing the risk of human infection despite evidence suggesting otherwise. The article also contains a dichotomous depiction of raw milk consumption by warning consumers not to drink it while simultaneously acknowledging its prohibition in North Carolina.
    • The Food and Drug Administration has no concern about the safety or availability of pasteurized milk products nationwide.
  • Bias (10%)
    The article is biased towards the safety of pasteurized milk and downplays the risk of human infection from bird flu. The author uses quotes from experts to support their claim that there is no concern about the safety or availability of pasteurized milk products nationwide.
    • > Steve Troxler, North Carolina's agriculture commissioner, said <b>
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      The author WRAL has a conflict of interest on the topic of avian flu as they are reporting on highly pathogenic avian influenza found in NC dairy cows. The article also mentions National Veterinary Services Laboratory (NVSL) which is an organization that may have financial ties to the dairy industry.
      • The article also discusses the prohibition on raw milk sale in NC and how it may be related to avian flu outbreaks.
        • The article reports on the discovery of highly pathogenic avian influenza in NC dairy cows, which could pose a risk to human health. The author mentions National Veterinary Services Laboratory (NVSL) as being involved in testing for the virus, but does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

        86%

        • Unique Points
          • The H5N1 virus has been detected in six US states and one farm worker.
          • Ground-up waste from other animals, including birds, is still allowed to be fed to cattle in the United States.
          • Poultry litter feed used by cows may have passed the virus to them.
          • The development of H5N1 among cattle could increase opportunities for mutation and transmission between mammals via contaminated feed.
          • Infection with H5N1 in pigs presents a bigger threat due to their receptors on some cells that are similar to humans, making it more likely for the virus to jump from them to humans if they become infected.
          • Poultry litter is cheaper and more calorie-dense than other food sources like soy and grains, allowing farmers to bulk up herds quickly.
          • The FDA has stated that with respect to pathogenic microorganisms, drug residues, and contaminants in poultry litter, there is no data showing it poses human or animal health risks that warrant restrictions on its use.
          • Many experts argue the most likely route of infection for H5N1-infected cattle was via wild birds.
          • It is unclear if the virus is spreading from animal to animal on each farm, as multiple creatures have been infected but this could be due to a common source like feed or wild birds rather than passing it on.
          • The director of ruminant health for the USDA has suggested that contamination of workers' clothing during milking or suction cups attached to cow udders may also be potential sources of infection.
          • Poultry litter as a potential source of contamination cannot be ruled out, and it is possible that chickens infected with H5N1 are shedding live virus through their faces which the cattle then consume.
          • The BSE scandal showed us the reality of what happens when biosecurity is not prioritized, highlighting the need for prioritizing animal health in order to prevent human health risks.
        • Accuracy
          • Ground-up waste from other animals, including birds, is still allowed to be fed to cattle in the United States.
          • Infection with H5N1 in pigs presents a bigger threat due to their receptors on some cells that are similar to humans, making it more likely for the virus to jump from them to humans if they become infected.
          • Many experts argue the most likely route of infection for H5N1-infected cattle was via wild birds.
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of poultry litter feeding as it is mentioned in both the article and their bio. The author also mentions that regulations covering animal standards have been controversial in Europe which could be seen as an attempt to sway public opinion.
          • cattle feed
            • poultry litter

            42%

            • Unique Points
              • ,
              • A worker on a commercial dairy farm in Texas developed a case of pink eye and later tested positive for the highly pathogenic avian influenza Type A H5N1, also known as bird flu or avian flu. Though the farm worker had no symptoms other than eye inflammation and wasn't hospitalized, they were isolated and received an antiviral treatment.
              • The public health agency suspects that the patient got infected from a sick dairy cow. This is the first time officials have confirmed that the virus has jumped from a cow to a human, and the line of transmission suggests it's easily transmitted between cows.
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (0%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza has been detected in a dairy herd in North Carolina when there is no mention of any specific cases or outbreaks. Secondly, the author states that people should not consume or prepare food with raw or unpasteurized milk without providing any context on why this is necessary. Lastly, the article uses sensationalism by stating that HPAI has been detected in multiple states when there is no indication of a widespread outbreak.
              • The author claims that Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza has been detected in a dairy herd in North Carolina without providing any specific cases or outbreaks.
              • The article uses sensationalism by stating that HPAI has been detected in multiple states when there is no indication of a widespread outbreak.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services has detected Avian influenza in a dairy herd in North Carolina without providing any evidence or citation for this claim.
              • The article states 'Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza has been detected in a dairy herd in North Carolina, according to the N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.' However, there is no link provided or citation given for this claim.
            • Bias (10%)
              The article is biased towards the safety of commercial milk supply. The author states that there are no concerns with the safety of pasteurized milk and people should not consume or prepare food with raw or unpasteurized milk.
              • The rapid identification of HPAI and the collaboration among local, state and federal agricultural and public health partners are examples of a unified, coordinated response and action plan to ensure the safety of people and families.
                • ]You can view updated information and guidance from the CDC here[
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Avian influenza in North Carolina as they are reporting for WECT Staff which is part of Sinclair Broadcasting Group. The company owns and operates multiple television stations across the country including one in Texas where there have been cases reported.
                  • The article mentions that highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) was detected in a dairy herd in North Carolina, but does not disclose any information about how this came to be known. The author also fails to mention the company's ownership of multiple television stations across the country including one in Texas where there have been cases reported.

                  69%

                  • Unique Points
                    • Can cats contract bird flu? Yes, they can if they interact with infected birds.
                    • In birds, HPAI is highly contagious and deadly. The big concern is that the more it jumps from animal to animal or animal to human, the more likely it is to mutate into better infecting humans.
                  • Accuracy
                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                  • Deception (50%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the only symptom of bird flu in a human was conjunctivitis but fails to mention other symptoms such as fever and difficulty breathing which are common with this virus. Secondly, it claims that cows were infected via water and food sources contaminated by wild birds migrating through the area but does not provide any evidence or research to support this claim. Thirdly, it states that testing was done on dead birds found on the farm as well as one of three cats found dead at the facilities around the same time. However, there is no mention of whether these tests were positive for bird flu or if they confirmed infection in these animals.
                    • The article states that testing was done on dead birds found on the farm as well as one of three cats found dead at the facilities around the same time. However, there is no mention of whether these tests were positive for bird flu or if they confirmed infection in these animals. This statement is deceptive because it implies a direct link between bird flu and cat deaths without providing concrete evidence.
                    • The article claims that cows were infected via water and food sources contaminated by wild birds migrating through the area but does not provide any evidence to support this claim. This statement is deceptive because it implies a direct link between bird flu and the dairy cow infections without providing concrete evidence.
                  • Fallacies (75%)
                    The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the CDC still has the current health risk of bird flu listed as 'low'. This statement implies that the CDC's opinion on this matter should be taken as fact without any evidence or reasoning provided. Additionally, there are multiple instances where inflammatory rhetoric is used throughout the article to create a sense of urgency and fear around the topic of bird flu in cats. For example, phrases such as 'three cats found dead at the facilities prompted some further investigation into the spread' and 'the likelihood of your cat contracting bird flu is minimal but it can happen if your cat is often outside and ends up eating or getting too cozy with an infected bird, or hangs out in a contaminated environment' use fear tactics to create a sense of danger around the topic. Finally, there are several instances where dichotomous depictions are used throughout the article to present information in black and white terms without any nuance. For example, phrases such as 'bird flu is primarily considered a transmission risk between wild birds and domestic birds' and 'humans contracting the virus from their pets is very rare and unlikely but has happened as a result of prolonged, unprotected exposure' use extreme language to present information in an either/or manner without any context or explanation.
                    • The CDC still has the current health risk of bird flu listed as 'low'.
                    • Three cats found dead at the facilities prompted some further investigation into the spread.
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The article contains language that dehumanizes birds and portrays them as a threat to humans. The author also uses the phrase 'evolving situation' which implies uncertainty and fear.
                    • > Bird flu outbreak is an 'evolving situation.'
                      • The affected Texas dairy cows were infected via water and food sources contaminated by wild birds migrating through the area.
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication