Biden-Harris campaign raised over $53 million in February
campaign had a record $155 million in cash on hand for the highest total amassed by any Democratic candidate at this point in the cycle
marked its strongest month since the reelection campaign launched
The Biden-Harris campaign raised over $53 million in February, marking its strongest month since the reelection campaign launched. The campaign had a record $155 million in cash on hand for the highest total amassed by any Democratic candidate at this point in the cycle.
President Biden raised $53 million in fundraising receipts in February
Biden has received 3.4 million donations since the start of the campaign from 1.3 million donors
`The former president` is also confronting the financial pressure of his legal bills, which are being paid by one of his political action committees
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that President Biden has raised $53 million in February alone when he actually only raised $27 million. Secondly, the author states that Mr. Trump continues to spend on legal bills but fails to mention who pays for these legal bills or how much money is being spent on them each month. This information would be important as it affects the amount of money available for campaigning and fundraising efforts.
The title implies that President Biden raised $53 million in February alone when he actually only raised $27 million.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that President Biden's campaign has raised more than $53 million in February together with the Democratic Party and crediting strong support from small-dollar donors for its fundraising success. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or data presented in the article. Secondly, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used to describe President Trump's legal bills as a financial burden that he faces against Mr. Biden and his campaign team. This language is intended to create an emotional response from readers rather than providing objective information about the situation at hand.
President Biden’s re-election campaign said on Sunday that it had raised more than $53 million in February together with the Democratic Party, an influx of cash that is expected to widen the Democrats’ cash advantage in a general-election contest against former President Donald J. Trump.
Mr. Trump has been schmoozing with donors at Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Palm Beach, Fla., trying to lessen the financial disparity he faces against Mr. Biden.
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards the Democratic Party and President Biden. The author uses language that portrays Trump as being behind in fundraising efforts while ignoring any potential weaknesses of the Democrats' campaign.
Both campaigns must disclose details of their finances on March 20, with a more complete picture due on April 15.
> Mr. Biden’s re-election campaign said on Sunday that it had raised more than $53 million in February together with the Democratic Party, an influx of cash that is expected to widen the Democrats’ cash advantage in a general-election contest against former President Donald J. Trump.
The fact that we have $155 million in cash on hand — which is 100 percent going to building out the campaign and focused on the six or seven states that are going to determine the outcome of this election — is just a huge competitive advantage,
President Biden raised $53 million in fundraising receipts in February
Biden has received 3.4 million donations since the start of the campaign from 1.3 million donors
The strong results provided more evidence bolstering the Biden campaign's argument that grassroots energy will swell as the November election approaches and voters come to terms with the choice between Biden and Donald Trump
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that President Biden notched record fundraising receipts in February with donations from nearly half a million people. However, this statement is misleading because the total amount raised includes contributions to other party accounts as well as the campaign itself. According to the article, $53 million was raised between Biden's campaign and other party accounts in February 2024, which eclipses President Barack Obama's fundraising during a similar period in 2012 when inflation is taken into account. However, this comparison is also misleading because the article fails to disclose that Obama raised $61 million in current spending power due to inflation adjustments. Additionally, the article states that Biden clearly eclipsed Obama in another measure by receiving 3.4 million donations since the start of his campaign from 1.3 million donors, which is more than Obama received during a similar period in 2012. However, this comparison is also misleading because it fails to disclose that Obama raised $65 million in small contributions and individual gifts alone during the same period in 2012. Furthermore, the article states that Biden has sharpened his attacks against Trump since the State of the Union address and has launched a new advertising campaign focused on Trump's record. However, this statement is misleading because it fails to disclose that Biden's attacks have been criticized for being negative and divisive rather than focusing on issues or solutions.
The total amount raised in February 2024 includes contributions to other party accounts as well as the campaign itself, which makes the comparison with President Barack Obama during a similar period in 2012 misleading.
The article fails to disclose that Obama raised $65 million in small contributions and individual gifts alone during the same period in 2012, making the comparison with President Biden misleading.
President Biden's attacks against Trump have been criticized for being negative and divisive rather than focusing on issues or solutions.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that President Biden's strong fundraising results provide more evidence bolstering the campaign argument that grassroots energy will swell as the November election approaches and voters come to terms with the choice between Biden and Trump. This statement assumes that because a large number of people donated money, this means they are excited about voting for him. However, it is possible that these donations were made out of obligation or loyalty rather than genuine enthusiasm for his candidacy. The second fallacy is an inflammatory rhetoric when the article states that President Trump has been spending tens of millions on legal fees defending himself against multiple lawsuits and criminal prosecutions. This statement implies that Trump is guilty, which may not be true based on the evidence presented in court. Additionally, there are several examples throughout the article where comparisons are made between Obama's fundraising efforts in 2012 and Biden's current fundraising efforts without taking into account inflation or other factors that could affect these numbers.
President Biden notched record fundraising receipts in February with donations from nearly half a million people, overcoming poor polling to end the month with $155 million in the bank.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Trump supporters by referring to them as white supremacists and dog-whistling to far-right ideologies. Additionally, the author presents information in a way that favors Biden's campaign over Trump's, such as highlighting the number of donations received by Biden compared to Obama during the same period in 2012. The article also uses language that portrays Trump negatively and implies that he is not qualified for office due to his age.
The article presents information in a way that favors Biden's campaign over Trump's, such as highlighting the number of donations received by Biden compared to Obama during the same period in 2012.
The author refers to white supremacists as 'verified accounts on X' and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram who are celebrating the reference to the racist and antisemitic conspiracy.
The author uses language that dehumanizes Trump supporters by referring to them as white supremacists and dog-whistling to far-right ideologies.
The author uses language that portrays Trump negatively and implies that he is not qualified for office due to his age.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The article by Michael Scherer and Tyler Pager has multiple examples of conflicts of interest. The authors have a financial stake in the topic as they are reporting on Biden's fundraising efforts.
Michael Scherer is an owner of CQ Roll Call, which covers Congress and politics. He also owns a consulting firm that works with clients in the political and corporate sectors.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has conflicts of interest on the topics of Biden's fundraising and Trump's legal fees. The article does not disclose these conflicts.
Michael Scherer is a former campaign reporter for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
President Biden raised $53 million in fundraising receipts in February
The joint campaign effort pointed to big moments in the month as drivers for large cash hauls, including an email to donors from First Lady Jill Biden.
`Jeffrey Katzenberg`, a co-chair of the Biden campaign, said in an interview that `$155 million✴ cash on hand is a huge competitive advantage for Mr. Biden's campaign and it will be used to build out the campaign and focus on six or seven states that are going to determine the outcome of this election
`The former president✴ legal bills, which are being paid by one of his political action committees
Accuracy
`The former president✴ is also confronting the financial pressure of his legal bills, which are being paid by one of his political action committees
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Special Counsel Robert Hur concluded that no charges should be filed against President Joe Biden. However, this statement is not accurate as it implies that there were charges to be filed in the first place which was not true.
President Joe Biden’s campaign and its connected fundraising organizations raised $53 million in February
Special Counsel Robert Hur concluded that no charges should be filed against President Joe Biden.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that the Biden campaign raised $2 million from small-dollar contributors on February 29. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that these contributions are more valuable than larger ones.
>$100 donation to Joe Biden's presidential campaign in New York City
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in the article. Firstly, there is a financial tie between President Joe Biden and his campaign as they raised $25 million combined cash on hand for their campaigns. Secondly, Julie Chavez Rodriguez's statement about expanding state-level operations and investing in paid media with money raised could be seen as a conflict of interest if she has any personal or professional affiliations with the companies that will benefit from this investment. Lastly, First Lady Jill Biden's involvement in crafting an email to donors after the release of Special Counsel Robert Hur's report on her husband handling classified documents raises questions about potential bias and conflicts of interest.
President Joe Biden's campaign and its connected fundraising organizations raised $25 million increase over January combined cash on hand for Biden campaign, Democratic National Committee and Democratic state parties.
The Biden-Harris campaign raised over $53 million in February
As of Feb. 29, the campaign had a record $155 million in cash on hand for the highest total amassed by any Democratic candidate at this point in the cycle.
Julie Chavez Rodriguez, Biden-Harris 2024 campaign manager, said that they generated $1.6 million in grassroots revenue in the 48 hours following former President Donald Trump's victory in the GOP primary on Feb. 24.
Accuracy
The Biden-Harris campaign raised over $53 million in February, marking its strongest month since the reelection campaign launched in April 2024.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that is biased towards the Biden-Harris campaign. The author states that the campaign raised more than $53 million in February which marks its strongest month since launching in April 2024. This statement implies that the campaign has been successful and is gaining momentum, but it does not provide any context or comparison to other campaigns at this point in time.
The Biden-Harris campaign raised more than $53 million in February -- marking its strongest month since launching in April 2024.
