Bitcoin Traders Eye $60,000 Price Support as Futures Gap Opens and Selling Pressure Builds

United States, California United States of America
Bitcoin traders are closely watching the $60,000 BTC price support as a new futures gap opens. The latest Bitcoin rally has been fueled by large dollar-cost averaging (DCA) at the lows to provide bounces for short term gains. However, selling pressure has been building since the week's all-time highs were reached and some entities are engaging in large DCA to buy low and provide bounces for short term gains. Bitcoin ETFs have also played a role in driving BTC tumbling 10%.
Bitcoin Traders Eye $60,000 Price Support as Futures Gap Opens and Selling Pressure Builds

Bitcoin traders are closely watching the $60,000 BTC price support as a new futures gap opens. The latest Bitcoin rally has been fueled by large dollar-cost averaging (DCA) at the lows to provide bounces for short term gains. However, selling pressure has been building since the week's all-time highs were reached and some entities are engaging in large DCA to buy low and provide bounces for short term gains. Bitcoin ETFs have also played a role in driving BTC tumbling 10%.



Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if the $60,000 price support will hold or if it will be breached by sellers. Additionally, there may be other factors that could affect Bitcoin's price in the short term.

Sources

68%

  • Unique Points
    • Bitcoin (BTC) price is currently at $60,000
    • Selling pressure has been building on Bitcoin since the week's all-time highs were reached
    • Some entities are engaging in large dollar-cost averaging (DCA) to buy low and provide bounces for short term gains
  • Accuracy
    • Bitcoin price is currently at $60,000
    • . The already volatile crypto market faced a significant downturn today leaving investors and market analysts wondering what could be the possible reason behind this dip
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive because it uses emotional manipulation and sensationalism to attract readers. It implies that Bitcoin traders are expecting the price to reach $60K, which is a significant increase from the current level of around $57K. This creates a sense of urgency and excitement for potential investors who might be interested in buying Bitcoin at this price point. However, it does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim, nor does it mention the risks and volatility associated with cryptocurrency trading.
    • Waves of liquidity are going to rain down on the Bitcoin ETFs
    • Constant spot selling
    • Countering the bearish streak could be a job for the gap in CME Group☃Bitcoin futures market
    • Majority of the selling has been driven by takers (market selling)
  • Fallacies (75%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes white supremacists and extremist far-right ideologies by referring to them as 'dog whistling' and celebrating their actions on social media platforms. Additionally, the author quotes a verified account on X platform without providing any context or information about who they are or what their reputation is. This could be seen as an attempt to lend credibility to the statement made by this account without verifying its accuracy.
    • The majority of the selling has been driven by takers (market selling)
      • verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram were celebrating
        • Waves of liquidity are going to rain down on the Bitcoin ETFs. Real money hasn't even started allocating.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          William Suberg has a conflict of interest on the topic of Bitcoin price action as he is reporting for Cointelegraph Markets Pro and may have financial ties to companies or individuals involved in the market.
          • . $74K especially from coinbase and binance.
            • . constant spot selling since $74K especially from coinbase and binance.
              • . takers (market selling)
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                William Suberg has a conflict of interest on the topic of Bitcoin price action as he mentions his own DCA at the lows to provide bounces. He also reports on takers (market selling) and constant spot selling since $74K especially from coinbase and binance.
                • constant spot selling since $74K especially from coinbase and binance.
                  • DCA at the lows to provide bounces

                  64%

                  • Unique Points
                    • . The already volatile crypto market faced a significant downturn today leaving investors and market analysts wondering what could be the possible reason behind this dip.
                    • . With Bitcoin being the leading cryptocurrency having surged over $73000, it faced a notable drop from its all-time high.
                    • . Coinglass data unveiled that $246.66 million worth of Bitcoins were liquidated and long-term traders fueled over $666 million worth of crypto liquidations.
                  • Accuracy
                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                  • Deception (30%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Bitcoin faced a notable drop from its all-time high without providing any context or evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'liquidation issues' and 'panic selling' to create fear and uncertainty among readers without providing any concrete information about these issues. Thirdly, the author presents conflicting perspectives on Bitcoin's trajectory without citing any sources or evidence to support their claims.
                    • The article uses sensationalist language such as 'liquidation issues' and 'panic selling' without providing any concrete information about these issues.
                    • The article states that Bitcoin faced a notable drop from its all-time high but does not provide any context or evidence to support this claim.
                  • Fallacies (75%)
                    The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the author cites Captain Faibik as predicting a temporary dip before aiming for another all-time high. This statement implies that Captain Faibik's prediction should be taken at face value without any evidence or reasoning provided to support it.
                    • Captain Faibik foresees this correction as a precursor to Bitcoin’s halving, predicting a temporary dip before aiming for another all-time high.
                  • Bias (75%)
                    The article contains several examples of bias. The author uses loaded language such as
                    • liquidation issues
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      Zameer Attar has a conflict of interest on the topic of crypto market crash and Bitcoin drop as he is an author for Coinpedia.org which covers cryptocurrency news.
                      • $13.3 million sell-off on the OKX-BTC-USDT-SWAP platform.
                        • $246.66 million worth of Bitcoins were liquidated
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Bitcoin and its halving. The article mentions that Captain Faibik is an expert in cryptocurrency mining and trading, which could lead to bias towards certain aspects or opinions related to these topics.
                          • $246.66 million worth of Bitcoins were liquidated
                            • Bitcoin's halving

                            64%

                            • Unique Points
                              • Bitcoin has rallied past its all-time highs, reaching an unprecedented $72,000 on March 11.
                              • The current open interest in Bitcoin futures sits at a staggering $35.8 billion.
                            • Accuracy
                              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                            • Deception (30%)
                              The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the author claims that Bitcoin has reached an unprecedented $72,000 on March 11 when in fact it was only $64,895 according to CoinMarketCap. Secondly, the author states that open interest is a significant factor in determining price volatility but fails to mention other factors such as news events and regulatory changes. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalist language by stating that Bitcoin has reached an unprecedented high when it was only $64,895. Lastly, the author states that open interest is 27% lower than its October 2021 peak but fails to mention any other relevant data points.
                              • The article uses sensationalist language by stating that Bitcoin has reached an unprecedented high when it was only $64,895.
                              • The author states that open interest is a significant factor in determining price volatility but fails to mention other factors such as news events and regulatory changes.
                              • The article claims that Bitcoin has reached an unprecedented $72,000 on March 11 when in fact it was only $64,895 according to CoinMarketCap.
                            • Fallacies (75%)
                              The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Bitcoin has reached all-time highs without providing any context or evidence for this claim. Secondly, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either investors are cautious due to leverage or they aren't. This oversimplifies a complex issue and ignores other factors that may be influencing investor behavior. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Bitcoin as volatile without providing any evidence for this claim. Finally, the article contains an example of a fallacy in leverage through Bitcoin futures contracts.
                              • Bitcoin has reached all-time highs
                              • This data reflects investor interest but doesn't guarantee a bullish trend
                              • $325 million in leveraged positions was liquidated
                            • Bias (75%)
                              The article contains examples of monetary bias and religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'Bitcoin bulls remain cautious' which implies that Bitcoin is a religion rather than an investment. Additionally, the use of phrases such as 'marked by a 4.8% intraday jump followed by a 5.9% dip' suggests that Bitcoin has religious significance and not just financial value.
                              • Bitcoin bulls remain cautious
                                • This data reflects investor interest, but it doesn’t guarantee a bullish trend.
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication