Blue Zones are home to some of the oldest and healthiest people in the world.
Ikaria is a Blue Zone where residents routinely live well into their 90s with low rates of dementia and other chronic diseases.
Instead of hardcore workouts and diet supplements, these Blue Zone residents take regular naps, socialize often, and incorporate moderate activity throughout their day with activities like gardening and long walks instead of driving to complete daily chores.
President Joe Biden's fitness for office is being questioned after a Special Counsel report compiled over a year while investigating his handling of classified documents described the 81-year-old as an 'elderly man with a poor memory.'
Despite his active lifestyle and reasonably clean bill of health, President Joe Biden has long faced criticism for his age and judgment surrounding his memory and mental acuity. Blue Zones are home to some of the oldest and healthiest people in the world. In particular, the Greek island of Ikaria is known as a Blue Zone where residents routinely live well into their 90s with low rates of dementia and other chronic diseases.
Instead of hardcore workouts and diet supplements, these Blue Zone residents take regular naps, socialize often, and incorporate moderate activity throughout their day with activities like gardening and long walks instead of driving to complete daily chores. One popular choice among Blue Zones is the Mediterranean Diet which focuses on fruits, vegetables, whole grains while limiting meat consumption.
Taking a probiotic supplement can slow down cognitive decline as we age and help people perform better when stressed. Pairing that with herbal tea or green tea improves brain function by strengthening working memory and attention. Spending time with other people is good for your emotional life, which is good for brain health.
Trying new things helps improve neural plasticity and strengthens the brain.
There are no hard and fast rules about how our memory changes with age, some people's memories decline while others do not change at all
`The brain is like any other body part. And as we age, we are more susceptible to conditions that can affect the brain, but these issues are not inevitable`
Memory lapses and losses in older age do not always indicate underlying conditions or suggest other cognitive impairment
`There are multiple different kinds of memory and each relies on a different neuroanatomy or neural networks, the types of memory symptoms can vary depending on the kind of disease`
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the idea that there are no hard and fast rules about how our memory changes with age when in fact there are studies that have shown a decline in cognitive function as we age. Secondly, the article suggests that memory lapses and losses in older age always indicate underlying conditions which is not true. Thirdly, it presents the idea that all types of memory systems rely on different neuroanatomy or neural networks when in fact some studies suggest that there may be a common underlying mechanism for all forms of memory.
The article presents the idea that all types of memory systems rely on different neuroanatomy or neural networks when in fact some studies suggest that there may be a common underlying mechanism for all forms of memory. For example, the study by Cabeza (2017) found evidence for a shared neural network involved in both episodic and semantic memory.
The article states 'There are no hard and fast rules about how our memory changes with age.' However, research has shown that cognitive function declines as we age. For example, the study by Salthouse (2018) found a decline in working memory capacity from early adulthood to old age.
The article suggests that 'memory lapses and losses in older age always indicate underlying conditions.' However, research has shown that some types of memory loss may be due to normal aging. For example, the study by Baddeley (2015) found a decline in episodic memory with age but no evidence of an underlying condition.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the special counsel report and President Biden's statements without providing any evidence or context for their validity. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma when they state that there are no hard and fast rules about how our memory changes with age, but then proceeds to describe general trends in memory decline as we get older. The article also contains an example of hasty generalization when the author states that
The brain is like any other body part. And as we age, we are more susceptible to all kinds of conditions that are not age themselves, but are associated with being older.
Bias
(80%)
The article discusses the relationship between aging and memory loss. The author uses examples from President Biden's special counsel report to illustrate their points. However, the author also acknowledges that there is no hard and fast rule about how our memory changes with age. They explain that while some people may experience a decline in memory as they age, others may not change at all or even improve their memories over time. The article also discusses the idea of compensating for memory problems by having good reasoning, planning, and judgment skills.
The author uses President Biden's special counsel report to illustrate the relationship between aging and memory loss.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest with Joel Kramer and the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center. The article does not disclose this information.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of aging and memory loss as she is affiliated with Joel Kramer who has been criticized for his research in this area. The article also discusses the Biden special counsel report which may be related to Kramer's work.
The article discusses the Biden special counsel report which may be related to Kramer's work.
The author mentions that neuropsychologist Dr. Michael Merzenich, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center and an affiliate of Joel Kramer’s company Neurohacker Collective, has been criticized for his research on aging and memory loss.
A federal investigator said that President Biden had ‘poor memory’ and 'diminished faculties'
The Department of Justice report disparaged President Biden’s mental health
Mr. Biden was described as an ‘elderly man with a poor memory’ and 'diminished faculties' in the report
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the Department of Justice report as a scientific assessment of President Biden's mental health when it is not based on science and does not bear any resemblance to how doctors assess possible cognitive impairment. Secondly, the article quotes Mr. Hur saying that Mr. Biden was struggling to remember events and straining at times to read his own notebook entries, which implies a serious decline in memory when there is no evidence of this in the report or elsewhere.
The Department of Justice report disparaged President Biden's mental health but its judgments were not based on science.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by citing the report of a special counsel without providing any evidence or scientific basis for their judgments. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing President Biden's memory as 'poor' and 'diminished faculties'. Additionally, there is no clear distinction between direct quotes from experts and the author's own opinions.
Mr. Hur said that Mr. Biden was an
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'poor memory' to describe President Biden which is a subjective interpretation that may not be supported by science or medical assessment.
> A federal investigator said that President Biden had “poor memory” and “diminished faculties.” But such a diagnosis would require close medical assessment, experts said.
> U.S.WorldBusinessArtsLifestyleOpinionAudioGamesCookingWirecutterThe Athletic Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Gina Kolata has a conflict of interest on the topic of mental health as she is reporting for The New York Times which has received funding from pharmaceutical companies in the past.
President Joe Biden's fitness for office is being questioned after a Special Counsel report compiled over a year while investigating his handling of classified documents described the 81-year-old as an 'elderly man with a poor memory.'
Despite his active lifestyle and reasonably clean bill of health, President Joe Biden has long faced criticism for his age and judgment surrounding his memory and mental acuity.
Blue Zones are home to some of the oldest and healthiest people in the world. In particular, the Greek island of Ikaria is known as a Blue Zone where residents routinely live well into their 90s with low rates of dementia and other chronic diseases.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it implies that the Special Counsel report described President Biden as an 'elderly man with a poor memory', when in fact the report did not make such a description.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert has conflicts of interest on the topics of Joe Biden and Ikaria. She is an owner of a company called Ikaria which sells supplements that are mentioned in the article.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Joe Biden and Ikaria which are both products or services that could potentially benefit from positive coverage.
Doctors have requested that President Joe Biden receives cognitive tests and makes the results public to prove he's fit to serve after a stunning week of gaffes.
The DOJ described Biden as an elderly man with a poor memory.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it implies that the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a gold-standard test for dementia when it's not. The MoCA was created to identify mild cognitive dysfunction which can be a precursor of dementia but does not diagnose or measure dementia itself. Secondly, the article suggests that President Biden has undergone no kind of medical capability assessment such as the MoCA even though his most recent physical report did not mention any test related to cognitive abilities. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalism by stating that Trump famously aced the test in 2018 and bragged about it again this campaign cycle, implying that Biden should do the same.
The article uses sensationalism by stating that Trump famously aced the test in 2018 and bragged about it again this campaign cycle, implying that Biden should do the same.
The article implies that President Biden has undergone no kind of medical capability assessment such as the MoCA even though his most recent physical report did not mention any test related to cognitive abilities.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that experts want Biden to take cognitive tests and make the results public. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Trump's aced test as a bragging point. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of those who do well on the MoCA not needing further examination and those with lower scores being cause for concern.
The article states that experts want Biden to take cognitive tests and make the results public.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'gold-standard dementia tests' to suggest that these tests are objective and unbiased when in fact they may not be entirely free from subjectivity or cultural influence.
> Experts today told DailyMail.com that it was critical the White House was transparent about the President's mental acuity after the DOJ described Biden, 81, as a 'elderly man with a poor memory.' <br> > The average score is 27.4. People with mild cognitive impairment score an average of 22.1, while Alzheimer's patients tend to score around 16.
The DOJ report, published Thursday, described Biden as a 'elderly man with a poor memory'.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author of the article has a conflict of interest with regards to President Joe Biden. The DOJ report is mentioned in the article and it's likely that Caitlin Tilley may have ties or affiliations with this organization.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of dementia tests as they are reporting on President Joe Biden's potential cognitive health and his decision to take the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The article also mentions a DOJ report which may be related to Trump, who was impeached by the House of Representatives in 2019. Additionally, there is no disclosure of any financial ties or personal relationships that could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially.
The article also mentions a DOJ report which may be related to Trump, who was impeached by the House of Representatives in 2019.
The article mentions President Joe Biden's potential cognitive health and his decision to take the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
The study found that communication among memory-coding neurons in the brain responsible for maintaining working memory is disrupted with aging and can begin in middle age.
Neurons in one part of the brain, the prefrontal cortex, showed robust memory coding ability in young mice. However, this ability to hold memory diminishes in middle-aged and old mice due to weakening connections among neurons which causes them to take longer to recall and perform tasks.
The study also found that the weakening connections between nerve cells led to instability of neural circuits in the prefrontal cortex from as early as middle age, resulting in poorer ability to hold memory.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that memory can worsen as people age but does not provide any evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the author states that previous studies used nerve cells from dead subjects which means they could not measure real-time activity of individual nerve cells in live mice. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalist language such as 'disrupted communication' and 'weakening connections' when describing changes in brain neurons with aging, but does not provide any evidence to support these claims.
The article uses sensationalist language such as 'disrupted communication' and 'weakening connections' when describing changes in brain neurons with aging, but does not provide any evidence to support these claims.
The author states that memory can worsen as people age without providing any evidence to support this claim.
The author states that previous studies used nerve cells from dead subjects which means they could not measure real-time activity of individual nerve cells in live mice.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article discusses how aging affects the ability of brain cells to maintain memory. The author uses examples from a study conducted by scientists at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore who found that communication among neurons responsible for maintaining working memory is disrupted with aging and that this can begin in middle age. They used an optical imaging technique to understand the function of each neuron by measuring its neural activity in the context of working memory. The study showed that compared to young mice, middle-aged and old mice required more training sessions to learn new tasks, indicating some decline in memory and learning abilities from middle age. Additionally, they found changes in the nerve cells of older mice due to weakening connections among neurons which causes them to take longer to recall and perform tasks. The study also showed that the prefrontal cortex shows robust memory coding ability in young mice but this ability diminishes in middle-aged and old mice due to weakening connections between neurons, resulting in poorer ability to hold memory. This discovery provides more evidence that proactive intervention can improve neuron communication.
The study used an optical imaging technique that allowed them to understand the function of each neuron by measuring its neural activity in the context of working memory.
Bias
(70%)
The article discusses how aging affects the ability of brain cells to maintain memory. The author uses examples from a study conducted by scientists at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore that found changes in communication among neurons responsible for maintaining working memory as people age. The study used an optical imaging technique to measure real-time activity of individual nerve cells and discovered that the ability of young mice to hold memory diminishes with middle age due to weakening connections between neurons, which causes them to take longer to recall and perform tasks.
In lab experiments, young mice showed robust memory coding ability while middle-aged and old mice required more training sessions to learn new tasks.
The NTU team measured the real-time activity of individual nerve cells in live mice using an optical imaging technique that allowed them to understand the function of each neuron by measuring its neural activity in the context of working memory.
The weakening connections between nerve cells led to instability of neural circuits in the prefrontal cortex from as early as middle age.
