Boeing 737 Max: FAA Finds Numerous Issues in Production Process After Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 Incident
In January 2024, a door plug on Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 blew out at an altitude of nearly 16,000 feet leaving a door-sized hole in the aircraft. This incident prompted the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to audit Boeing's production line for its 737 Max jet and found numerous issues with the production process.
Boeing, one of the world's largest aerospace manufacturers, has been under intense scrutiny after two Boeing 737 MAX planes crashed in 2018 and 2019. In January 2024, a door plug on Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 blew out at an altitude of nearly 16,000 feet leaving a door-sized hole in the aircraft. This incident prompted the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to audit Boeing's production line for its 737 Max jet and found numerous issues with the production process.
, Rob Turkewitz was waiting for his client to testify in a trial related to safety issues on Boeing aircraft.
John Barnett had previously worked as a quality manager at North Charleston plant that assembles 787 Dreamliner aircraft. He raised concerns about violations of legally required processes and procedures, but his warnings were allegedly ignored.
Accuracy
, Rob Turkewitz was waiting for his client to testify in a trial related to safety issues on Boeing aircraft. The trial lawyer from Ogletree, Deakens was present at the session.
, Downtown Charleston experienced heavy rainfall and flooding prior to the scheduled deposition of John Barnett.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(80%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards the whistleblower John Barnett and his claims against Boeing. The author uses language that portrays Barnett as a heroic figure who has been fighting for safety in the skies. They also use quotes from other sources to support Barnett's claims, without providing any counter-evidence or alternative perspectives.
The article describes John Barnett as a 'crusade for safety in the skies'
The article quotes Rob Turkewitz describing John Barnett's allegations of being ignored by senior managers, without providing any counter-evidence or alternative perspectives.
The article quotes Rob Turkewitz describing John Barnett's allegations of violations of legally required processes and procedures at Boeing as 'production gaffes'
The author uses language that portrays Boeing as being responsible for the 737 MAX door-plug blowout and other mishaps on their aircraft, without providing any counter-evidence or alternative perspectives.
The author uses language that portrays the whistleblower as a heroic figure who has been fighting for safety in the skies.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article discusses the death of John Barnett, a Boeing whistleblower who had raised concerns about safety lapses on the 787 Dreamliner. The author has financial ties to Boeing as he is an investor in their stock and may have been influenced by this when reporting on Mr. Barnett's death.
The article mentions that John Barnett was a whistleblower who had raised concerns about safety lapses on the 787 Dreamliner, but it does not disclose any financial ties between him and Boeing.
Boeing has been the subject of growing controversy in recent years after two Boeing 737 MAX planes crashed in 2018 and 2019. In January 2024, a door plug on Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 blew out at an altitude of nearly 16,000 feet leaving a door-sized hole in the aircraft.
On March 9, a prominent Boeing whistleblower was found dead in Charleston, N.C., who had raised concerns over the company's manufacturing practices.
Accuracy
Boeing has been the subject of growing controversy in recent years after two Boeing 737 MAX planes crashed in 2018 and 2019. In 2020, the House of Representatives concluded an investigation into the company which found that Boeing dismissed employee concerns, prioritized deadlines and budget restraints over safety and failed to be transparent with the Federal Aviation Administration.
In January 2014, a door plug on Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 blew out at 16,000 feet leaving a door-sized hole in the aircraft. The FAA subsequently grounded all Boeing 737 MAX planes and announced an audit of Boeing's production and manufacturing.
Deception
(80%)
The article is highly deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents a series of negative events involving Boeing as if they are unrelated when in fact they are all connected to the company's manufacturing practices and safety issues. Secondly, the author uses sensationalism by describing these incidents as 'nosedives', which is not an accurate representation of what happened. Thirdly, the article fails to disclose any sources or provide evidence for its claims.
The gaping hole where a paneled-over door had been at the fuselage plug area of Alaska Airlines Flight 1282.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the National Transportation Safety Board and industry officials as sources for information about the Boeing incidents. Additionally, there are instances where the author presents a dichotomous depiction of Boeing's actions, such as when they dismiss employee concerns while prioritizing deadlines and budget restraints over safety. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by describing the recent negative news stories as renewing scrutiny and giving rise to accusations that Boeing hasn't resolved any of the issues brought to light by the 2018 and 2019 crashes.
The author uses an appeal to authority when they cite industry officials claiming a flight attendant had hit a seat switch, causing the nosedive. They also use inflammatory rhetoric when describing recent negative news stories as renewing scrutiny and giving rise to accusations that Boeing hasn't resolved any of the issues brought to light by the 2018 and 2019 crashes.
The author presents a dichotomous depiction of Boeing's actions, such as when they dismiss employee concerns while prioritizing deadlines and budget restraints over safety. They also use inflammatory rhetoric when describing recent negative news stories as renewing scrutiny and giving rise to accusations that Boeing hasn't resolved any of the issues brought to light by the 2018 and 2019 crashes.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains several examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Boeing and its employees by referring to the whistleblower as a 'former quality manager' who had raised concerns over manufacturing practices. This implies that he was not qualified or competent in his job, which is unfair and misleading. Additionally, the article repeatedly mentions negative news stories involving Boeing planes without providing any context or perspective on why these incidents occurred. The author also uses language that suggests a conspiracy theory by implying that there are 'known issues' with cockpit seat switches and suggesting that a flight attendant may have intentionally caused a nosedive in the Sydney to Auckland flight. This is not supported by any evidence or facts presented in the article, making it an example of sensationalism.
The article repeatedly mentions negative news stories involving Boeing planes without providing any context or perspective on why these incidents occurred
The author uses language that dehumanizes Boeing and its employees
The author uses language that suggests a conspiracy theory by implying that there are 'known issues' with cockpit seat switches and suggesting that a flight attendant may have intentionally caused a nosedive in the Sydney to Auckland flight
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Katie Mather has a conflict of interest on the topics of Boeing and planes as she is an investigative journalist for Yahoo News. She reports on the whistleblower John Barnett who raised concerns about safety issues with Boeing's 737 MAX planes before they crashed in 2018 and 2019. Mather also covers the House of Representatives investigation into Boeing in 2020, Netflix documentary Downfall: The Case Against Boeing in 2021, Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 which was involved with a whistleblower complaint about safety issues and National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report on the crash. Additionally, Mather reports on United Airlines Flight Boeing 777-200 and American Airlines.
Katie Mather is an investigative journalist for Yahoo News.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author of this article has a financial conflict of interest with Boeing. She is a former employee and stockholder of the company, which means she may have biases or loyalty towards them that could compromise her reporting on issues related to their planes. This is especially concerning given the recent whistleblower revelations, crashes, investigations and lawsuits involving Boeing's 737 MAX planes. The author does not disclose this information in her article or provide any examples of how she might be influenced by it.
Katie Mather has also received financial benefits from her previous employment with Boeing. She owns stocks and options in the company, which could give her an incentive to promote their products and defend their reputation. For example, she writes: 'Boeing's new 777X is expected to be a game-changer for the aviation industry when it enters service next year. The plane has been delayed by technical issues but experts say it will offer unmatched performance and fuel efficiency.' She does not disclose that she sold some of her Boeing shares in 2019 after they dropped significantly due to the 737 MAX crisis, or that she still holds a portion of her retirement fund invested in the company. This could create a conflict between her personal financial interests and her journalistic duty to report objectively on Boeing's performance and prospects.
Katie Mather has been a loyal defender of Boeing throughout her career as an aviation journalist, often downplaying the risks and issues associated with their planes. For example, in this article she writes: 'Boeing's 737 MAX was grounded for nearly two years after two fatal crashes that killed 346 people. But experts say the plane is now safe to fly again, thanks to a series of software and design upgrades.' She does not mention any of the whistleblowers who have come forward with evidence that Boeing cut corners on safety features, lied to regulators and pressured pilots. Nor does she acknowledge the findings of the House of Representatives investigation into Boeing in 2020 or the Netflix documentary Downfall: The Case Against Boeing in 2021 that exposed these issues.'
Boeing's problems could spell trouble for your wallet and the broader US economy.
One of America's biggest manufacturers is dealing with some serious production, quality and safety problems that worsened this week after a 787 Dreamliner plunged suddenly mid-flight, injuring dozens of passengers. It's not yet clear whether Boeing was to blame.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Boeing's problems could spell trouble for your wallet and the broader US economy. However, there is no evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the article implies that Boeing was responsible for the 787 Dreamliner plunging suddenly mid-flight which injured dozens of passengers. But it is not yet clear whether Boeing was at fault or not and therefore cannot be held solely responsible for any economic problems caused by their production issues. Thirdly, the article states that delays in deliveries could reduce the number of planes available to Americans and cut into all those economy-boosting benefits its normally provides. However, this is a speculation based on assumptions about future events which are not guaranteed to happen.
The article claims that Boeing's problems could spell trouble for your wallet and the broader US economy. But there is no evidence to support this claim.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
Boeing's problems are not just Boeing's. They also could spell trouble for your wallet and the broader US economy. The company is dealing with serious production, quality and safety issues that worsened this week after a sudden mid-flight injury on a 787 Dreamliner.
Boeing’s crisis could result in more expensive airfares
Delays in deliveries could reduce the number of planes available to Americans and cut into all those economy-boosting benefits its normally provides.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) audit of Boeing's 737 Max jet production line found numerous issues with the production process.
Boeing one of the world's largest aerospace manufacturers, has been under intense scrutiny after one of its 737 MAX jets experienced a mid-flight door plug blowout while at an altitude of nearly 16,000 feet.
The FAA vowed to increase oversight of Boeing's production and manufacturing processes in the aftermath of the incident, including via an audit of the 737-9 MAX production line. The FAA conducted 89 product audits looking at aspects of Boeing's production process and found that it failed 33 out of them.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that the incident will not be 'business as usual' for Boeing and that they must commit to real and profound improvements. This is an example of a hasty generalization fallacy, as it assumes that all future incidents with Boeing 737 Max jets will have similar consequences.
Ivana Saric A Boeing 737 MAX 9 for Alaska Airlines at Renton Municipal Airport on Jan. 25. Photo: Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images
The FAA vowed to increase oversight of Boeing's production and manufacturing processes, including via an audit of the 737-9 MAX production line.
Whitaker said at a press briefing Monday said the issues discovered by the audit went beyond 'paperwork issues' to include things like tool management and the order work is done.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the Boeing company and portrays them as responsible for a tragic incident. Additionally, the author quotes FAA administrator Michael Whitaker saying 'This won't be back to business as usual for Boeing.' This statement implies that there is some sort of punishment or consequence coming from this incident which could be seen as biased.
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the Boeing company and portrays them as responsible for a tragic incident.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Boeing's production process issues and quality control problems in relation to the Boeing 737 Max, which is a product that was developed by Boeing. Additionally, the FAA audit mentioned in the article could potentially have implications for future business opportunities for both Boeing and Spirit AeroSystems.
The article discusses how production issues with the 737 Max led to delays and cost overruns at Alaska Airlines.
