Boeing Faces Criticism Over Proposed Plea Deal in Wake of 737 Max Crashes

Seattle or Chicago, Washington or Illinois United States of America
Boeing faces criminal charges from the US Justice Department over its involvement in two fatal crashes of its 737 Max planes in Indonesia and Ethiopia in 2018 and 2019 that claimed the lives of 346 people.
Boeing has until the end of this week to decide whether it will accept the plea deal or go to trial. If it chooses to reject the offer, prosecutors will take the case to trial on July 7.
The company is being offered a plea deal by the Justice Department, but families of the victims have criticized it as a 'sweetheart deal' due to its lack of accountability for the deaths.
The victims' families are urging the department to reject this new plea deal and instead hold the company accountable for its actions.
Under this proposed agreement, Boeing would plead guilty to one count of fraud and pay additional financial penalties. The company would also submit to oversight by an independent monitor for three years and face probation.
Boeing Faces Criticism Over Proposed Plea Deal in Wake of 737 Max Crashes

Boeing, the aerospace giant, is facing criminal charges from the US Justice Department over its involvement in two fatal crashes of its 737 Max planes in Indonesia and Ethiopia in 2018 and 2019 that claimed the lives of 346 people. The company is being offered a plea deal by the Justice Department, but families of the victims have criticized it as a 'sweetheart deal' due to its lack of accountability for the deaths.

Under this proposed agreement, Boeing would plead guilty to one count of fraud and pay additional financial penalties. The company would also submit to oversight by an independent monitor for three years and face probation. However, families of the victims have expressed their objections to this deal, hoping for more justice and accountability.

The Justice Department reached a controversial agreement with Boeing in 2021 that protected the company from criminal conspiracy charges related to these crashes. This previous deal was criticized by many as being too lenient towards Boeing. The victims' families are now urging the department to reject this new plea deal and instead hold the company accountable for its actions.

Boeing has until the end of this week to decide whether it will accept the plea deal or go to trial. If it chooses to reject the offer, prosecutors will take the case to trial on July 7. The outcome of this decision could significantly impact Boeing's reputation and financial situation.

The families of victims from both crashes have formed a united front in their opposition to this plea deal, with one attorney representing them describing it as a 'no-accountability-deal.' They argue that the agreement fails to acknowledge the dignity of the victims and does not hold Boeing fully accountable for its role in their deaths.

The Justice Department has yet to comment on these criticisms. Boeing, too, has remained silent on the matter.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • How will this decision impact Boeing's reputation and financial situation?
  • Is there enough evidence to support the criminal charges against Boeing?
  • Will the Justice Department reject the plea deal as demanded by victims' families?

Sources

96%

  • Unique Points
    • The Justice Department is proposing a settlement for Boeing over the 737 Max crashes involving a nearly $244 million fine, new safety investments, three years of external monitoring, and a meeting with Boeing’s board and victims’ families.
    • Boeing declined to comment on the proposed settlement.
    • Two fatal crashes of Boeing 737 Max occurred in Indonesia and Ethiopia in late 2018 and early 2019, resulting in the deaths of 346 people.
  • Accuracy
    • The offer was shared with victims' families on Sunday afternoon before being presented to Boeing.
    • The deal falls short of what victims' families had sought as they find it 'outrageous'
    • Boeing is facing multiple federal investigations and criticism from regulators, airlines, customers, and lawmakers following safety failures and production problems.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

76%

  • Unique Points
    • Boeing is facing criminal charges from the US Justice Department and is being offered a plea deal that includes a fine, probation, and a corporate monitor.
    • The families of victims from two fatal Boeing 737 Max crashes have criticized the proposed plea deal as a ‘sweetheart deal’ due to lack of accountability for the deaths of their loved ones.
    • Boeing has until the end of the week to decide whether to accept the plea deal or go to trial, with a deadline for criminal charges being July 7.
  • Accuracy
    • The families of victims find the proposed plea deal to be 'outrageous'
    • Boeing has until the end of the week to decide whether to accept the plea deal or go to trial.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position of the victims' families being upset about a potential plea deal. The author does not provide any counter-arguments or mention any potential benefits of a plea deal for the victims or society as a whole. Additionally, there is emotional manipulation through the use of phrases like 'sweetheart deal', 'harshly rebuked', and 'furious' to elicit an emotional response from readers.
    • The deal would include a small fine and a monitor to ensure safety compliance, Cassell told CNN.
    • The families were furious that Boeing may avoid trial, saying the government is letting the company off the hook for the deaths of their loved ones.
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by quoting the lawyers representing the victims' families as saying that the proposed plea deal is a 'sweetheart deal.' This is an appeal to emotion and can be considered an informal fallacy.
    • “sweetheart deal.”
  • Bias (80%)
    The author expresses the families' anger and dissatisfaction towards the potential plea deal between Boeing and the US Justice Department, implying that they believe it to be too lenient. This can be considered as an example of bias against perceived corporate favoritism or leniency towards large corporations.
    • The deal will not acknowledge, in any way, that Boeing’s crime killed 346 people.
      • The families were furious that Boeing may avoid trial, saying the government is letting the company off the hook for the deaths of their loved ones.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      76%

      • Unique Points
        • US Department of Justice is setting to charge Boeing with fraud
        • Boeing will be offered a plea deal by the US Department of Justice
        • Justice department reached controversial deal with Boeing in 2021 protecting company from criminal conspiracy charge related to crashes
        • Relatives of victims will object to the plea deal described as ‘no-accountability-deal’
      • Accuracy
        • US Department of Justice is set to charge Boeing with fraud
        • Relatives of victims accused government of cooking up ‘sweetheart deal’ with Boeing
      • Deception (30%)
        The article contains selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author focuses on the anger of families towards the proposed plea deal between Boeing and the US Department of Justice, while omitting important context about the previous controversial deal reached in 2021 that protected Boeing from a criminal conspiracy charge. This creates a biased narrative that may mislead readers into believing that this new plea deal is an unfair sweetheart deal without providing all relevant information. Additionally, the author uses emotional language to describe the families' reactions and their demands for justice, which can manipulate readers' emotions and potentially influence their perception of the situation.
        • The memory of 346 innocents killed by Boeing demands more justice than this.
        • The families will make the case to a judge, and the wider public, for this deal to be rejected
        • Relatives were briefed on the terms of the proposed deal during the call: Boeing would pay a fine, face a three-year term of probation, and work under a corporate monitor
        • Attorneys representing the relatives accused the federal government of cooking up 'another sweetheart plea deal' with Boeing.
      • Fallacies (80%)
        The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by quoting relatives and their attorneys calling the proposed plea deal a 'sweetheart deal' and 'no-accountability-deal'. This is an appeal to emotion and can be considered an informal fallacy.
        • ]The memory of 346 innocents killed by Boeing demands more justice than this.[/
        • And when there is inevitably another Boeing crash and DoJ seeks to assign blame, they will have nowhere else to look but in the mirror.[
      • Bias (80%)
        The author expresses anger and disapproval towards the US Department of Justice for offering a plea deal to Boeing despite the fatal crashes that killed 346 people. The author quotes attorneys representing families of victims who accuse the federal government of cooking up 'another sweetheart plea deal' with Boeing, and describe it as 'shameful' and a 'no-accountability-deal'. These statements demonstrate a clear bias against the US Department of Justice.
        • Relatives were briefed on the terms of the proposed deal during the call: Boeing would pay a fine, face a three-year term of probation, and work under a corporate monitor, according to two sources. The terms unleashed a wave of anger.
          • The families will make the case to a judge, and the wider public, for this deal to be rejected, Applebaum said. And when there is inevitably another Boeing crash and DoJ seeks to assign blame, they will have nowhere else to look but in the mirror.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          94%

          • Unique Points
            • Boeing is facing potential charges for violating a 2021 settlement regarding the 2018 and 2019 crashes of its best-selling 737 Max planes
            • Boeing admitted to defrauding the Federal Aviation Administration by concealing the addition of a new flight-control system to its planes before they were flown commercially in 2021
          • Accuracy
            • The guilty plea would require Boeing to pay an additional fine of about $247 million and install an outside monitor on the company
          • Deception (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Fallacies (80%)
            The author presents some accurate information but uses inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority. They use the phrase 'sweetheart deal' which is inflammatory and not a formal logical fallacy, but it still influences readers negatively. The author also quotes an attorney's opinion without counter-opinions, which can give a one-sided view of the situation. Additionally, they refer to Boeing's 2021 admission as if it were a recent event when it was actually over two years ago.
            • The author uses the term
          • Bias (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          80%

          • Unique Points
            • The Justice Department is pushing Boeing to plead guilty over its involvement in airplane crashes in Indonesia in 2018 and Ethiopia in 2019 that killed 346 people.
            • Under the deal, Boeing would plead guilty to one count of fraud, submit to oversight by an independent monitor for three years, and pay additional financial penalties or face trial.
            • If Boeing rejects the terms, prosecutors will take the case to trial.
            • A guilty plea by Boeing could complicate its ability to receive government contracts unless it gets a waiver.
            • The deal includes just over $487 million in penalties, the statutory maximum, although Boeing would only have to pay half because it is receiving credit for payments it made as part of a previous agreement.
            • Families of crash victims were briefed on the plea deal and objected to its terms, hoping for more justice and accountability.
            • Last week, federal prosecutors recommended to senior Justice Department officials that Boeing face criminal charges for failing to meet the terms of a January 2021 agreement that would have shielded it from prosecution in connection with those fatal crashes.
          • Accuracy
            • Boeing would plead guilty to one count of fraud, submit to oversight by an independent monitor for three years, and pay additional financial penalties or face trial.
          • Deception (30%)
            The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position of the families being angry about a potential plea deal between Boeing and the Justice Department. The article also uses emotional manipulation by quoting family members expressing their anger and disappointment. Lastly, there is sensationalism in the title 'Justice Department pushes Boeing to plead guilty in 737 Max crash case' which implies that a guilty plea is imminent and that Boeing is being forced into it.
            • Many had hoped that new scrutiny of the company’s operations following the midair blowout of a door panel from one of its 737 Max jets in January would prompt the government to prosecute the company and the executives who were at Boeing at the time of the fatal crashes.
            • The deal drew angry responses and objections from the families of crash victims, who were briefed on Sunday during a two hour call.
            • The families reiterated their desire that an independent monitor be appointed to oversee Boeing’s operations and asked that Boeing be fined more than $24 billion in additional penalties. They also have pushed the Justice Department to prosecute Boeing and company executives criminally.
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The authors make an appeal to authority by quoting Paul Cassell, a former federal judge and professor at the University of Utah College of Law, who is representing the families of crash victims. They also quote Erin Applebaum, a partner at Kreindler & Kreindler LLP who has worked with Cassell in representing family members. This appeal to authority does not detract from the validity of their reporting but it does lower the score due to rule violation.
            • The company would plead guilty to one count of fraud, submit to oversight by an independent monitor for three years, and pay additional financial penalties or face trial, according to Paul Cassell
            • Many had hoped that new scrutiny of the company’s operations following the midair blowout of a door panel from one of its 737 Max jets in January would prompt the government to prosecute the company and the executives who were at Boeing at the time of the fatal crashes.
            • The families reiterated their desire that an independent monitor be appointed to oversee Boeing’s operations and asked that Boeing be fined more than $24 billion in additional penalties.
          • Bias (95%)
            The authors express anger and disappointment towards the Justice Department for potentially offering a lenient plea deal to Boeing despite the company's involvement in crashes that resulted in 346 deaths. They quote family members of crash victims who are critical of the potential deal and express their own agreement with their sentiments. This demonstrates a clear bias against what they perceive as an overly lenient approach by the Justice Department towards Boeing.
            • Many had hoped that new scrutiny of the company following the midair blowout of a door panel from one of its 737 Max jets in January would prompt the government to prosecute the company and the executives who were at Boeing at the time of the fatal crashes.
              • Relatives contend that had it not been for the dramatic blowout aboard the California-bound Alaska Airlines flight in January, Boeing likely would have avoided further scrutiny.
                • The deal will not acknowledge, in any way, that Boeing’s crime killed 346 people. The memory of 346 innocents killed by Boeing demands more justice than this.
                  • The families had not been consulted during the Justice Department’s negotiations with Boeing about the agreement. Many learned the news from media reports.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication