Celtics Steal Game 3 and Pacers Seek Vengeance: Pivotal Moments in the Eastern Conference Finals

Indianapolis, Indiana United States of America
Celtics and Pacers are in the Eastern Conference Finals
Game 3 had two pivotal moments: Jrue Holiday's steal and Coach Carlisle's determination for vengeance
The series stands at 3-0 in favor of the Celtics
Celtics Steal Game 3 and Pacers Seek Vengeance: Pivotal Moments in the Eastern Conference Finals

IN THE EXCITING AND INTENSE EASTERN CONFERENCE FINALS MATCHUP BETWEEN THE BOSTON CELTICS AND INDIANA PACERS, TWO CRITICAL MOMENTS IN GAME 3 LEFT A LASTING IMPACT ON THE OUTCOME OF THE SERIES.

The first pivotal moment occurred with just 3.3 seconds remaining on the clock and the Pacers trailing by a single point. In possession of the ball, Andrew Nembhard was looking to create a game-winning opportunity for his team when Jrue Holiday, of the Celtics, intercepted the pass in an impressive display of defensive prowess.

Holiday's steal not only denied the Pacers a chance at victory but also granted the Celtics valuable possession time to secure their win. The incident left many questioning whether Coach Rick Carlisle should have called a timeout earlier in the sequence, as his decision to hold off on using one proved costly.

The second significant moment came from Coach Carlisle himself, who expressed his determination for vengeance following the loss. In an emotional post-game interview, he declared that “we are going after them,” indicating a strong resolve to bounce back in Game 4.

With the series now standing at 3-0 in favor of the Celtics, it remains to be seen whether Coach Carlisle's vow of retaliation will translate into a successful comeback for the Pacers. The pressure is on as they prepare to face their rivals once more.

The Eastern Conference Finals have proven to be an intense and closely contested series, with both teams demonstrating impressive resilience and determination. As the stakes continue to rise, fans eagerly anticipate what twists and turns this thrilling matchup will bring next.



Confidence

75%

Doubts
  • Are there any inaccuracies or missing information in the article?

Sources

69%

  • Unique Points
    • Rick Carlisle vowed vengeance after Game 3 loss
    • Andrew Nembhard had the ball stolen from him by Jrue Holiday with 3.3 seconds left and Pacers down by one point
    • No team in NBA history has ever recovered from a 3-0 deficit
  • Accuracy
    • Indiana Pacers are trailing 3-0 in the Eastern Conference finals against Boston Celtics
    • Rick Carlisle, coach of Pacers, vowed vengeance after Game 3 loss
    • Pacers led by as many as 18 points in Game 3 but lost due to late-game mistakes
  • Deception (20%)
    The author uses emotional manipulation by quoting the coach's statement 'We are going after them' multiple times and implying a sense of vengeance. The author also engages in selective reporting by focusing on the late-game mistakes made by the Pacers without mentioning any errors or advantages gained by the Celtics.
    • A crucial turnover in the closing seconds of Game 1 cost the Pacers a chance to win in regulation, and they fell in overtime...Carlisle could have called timeout with Nembhard racing up the floor against Holiday, but said he didn’t this time because 'with 8 or 9 seconds left, and you’re in transition after a miss, I trust our players to be able to create a better shot than calling timeout and having them set their defense...'
    • The Celtics trailed by 18 in the third quarter and closed the game on a 13-2 run...And believe me when I tell you we are going after them.'
    • With the Pacers trailing 3-0 to the Boston Celtics in the Eastern Conference finals, thanks to two blown leads late in two games, Indiana coach Rick Carlisle vowed vengeance Saturday night. 'Believe me when I tell you, we are going after them,' Carlisle said about the Celtics...
    • Carlisle was incensed, demanding a foul be called in real time and then while play was stopped to review a foul the Pacers took after the steal. He snapped, 'I just rewatched the ending, so you don’t need to remind me – I saw everything that happened.'
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by quoting the coach's statement 'We are going after them' multiple times, implying a desire for revenge against the Celtics. This is an appeal to emotion and a form of informal fallacy.
    • Believe me when I tell you, we are going after them.
    • We're going to be back here Monday night, looking to extend the series, and we’re going to come at them even harder.
  • Bias (80%)
    The author, Joe Vardon, demonstrates a clear bias towards the Pacers in this article. He repeatedly expresses the coach's desire for 'vengeance' against the Celtics and describes their losses as being stolen from them. The author also emphasizes the mistakes made by the officials and Boston players while downplaying any errors made by his team.
    • Believe me when I tell you, we are going after them
      • everything that happened
        • If the same situation happens next game, we’ll use something a little bit different and hope we get the same kind of look.
          • I trust our players to be able to create a better shot than calling timeout and having them set their defense, run our end-of-game stuff on their video and show their players.
            • We're going to be undeterred
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            92%

            • Unique Points
              • I trust our players to create a better shot than calling a timeout and having them set their defense.
            • Accuracy
              • Indiana Pacers are currently trailing 3-0 in the Eastern Conference Finals against Boston Celtics.
              • During Game 3, with less than 10 seconds remaining and trailing by a point, Carlisle had a timeout but chose not to call it.
              • Celtics trailed by 18 points against the Pacers in Game 3.
            • Deception (80%)
              The author does not make any clear attempts at emotional manipulation or sensationalism. The article reports facts about the Pacers' losses and Carlisle's decision-making during those games. However, there is selective reporting as the author only mentions instances where Carlisle did not call a timeout and the negative consequences that followed. The author also quotes an external source to support their argument against Carlisle, but does not disclose this until later in the article.
              • In game 2 of the eastern conference finals for the 2024 NBA playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: David Butler II-USA TODAY Sports / David Butler II-USA TODAY Sports
              • Three games have been played in the Eastern Conference Finals between the Boston Celtics and Indiana Pacers. Indiana has been close, but has yet to notch anything in the win column.
              • Carlisle again kept the timeout in his pocket, and it backfired. Andrew Nembhard turned the ball over, which essentially sealed the win for Boston.
              • Carlisle on not calling timeout: "I trust our players to create a better shot than calling a timeout and having them set their defense."
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            96%

            • Unique Points
              • Jrue Holiday had a late-in-the-night steal off Andrew Nembhard in Game 3 of the Eastern Conference finals.
              • Celtics coach Joe Mazzulla urged his team to keep playing and not focus on the scoreboard when they were down.
            • Accuracy
              • Andrew Nembhard scored 32 points for the Pacers before Holiday’s steal.
              • The Celtics had been struggling with missed or clanking 3-point attempts during the game.
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication