Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's Winery Dispute: He Fights Her Sale to Russian Oligarch, She Wants Relevant Communications

Chateau Miraval, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur, France France
Angelina Jolie sold her share of the winery to Tenute del Mondo, a subsidiary of Stoli Group controlled by Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler, without Brad Pitt's consent.
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are embroiled in a legal dispute over the sale of their jointly owned French winery, Château Miraval.
Brad Pitt sued Angelina Jolie and her former company Nouvel LLC in February 2022 for unlawfully selling her stake in the winery.
Jolie requested that Pitt turn over third-party communications related to a 2016 plane incident, but Pitt's attorneys argue they are not relevant to the case.
The former couple have a history of allegations of abuse during their marriage, with Pitt being investigated by the FBI in 2016.
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's Winery Dispute: He Fights Her Sale to Russian Oligarch, She Wants Relevant Communications

In the latest development in the ongoing legal battle between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, Pitt has pushed back against Jolie's request to disclose third-party communications related to a 2016 plane incident. The former couple, who were married from 2014 to 2019 and have six children together, have been embroiled in a dispute over the sale of their jointly owned French winery, Château Miraval.

According to court documents obtained by multiple media outlets, Jolie sold her share of the winery to Tenute del Mondo, a subsidiary of Stoli Group controlled by Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler, in October 2021 without Pitt's consent. Pitt sued Jolie and her former company Nouvel LLC in February 2022, alleging that she had unlawfully sold her stake in the winery.

In response to Pitt's lawsuit, Jolie requested that he turn over third-party communications related to the plane incident. However, Pitt's attorneys argue that these communications are not relevant to the case and are an attempt by Jolie to re-litigate their divorce proceedings.

Pitt's attorneys also accused Jolie of trying to punish and control him by demanding an expanded NDA in a past offer to buy her stake in the winery. They claimed that this demand was related to Pitt's personal misconduct and abuse, which Jolie denies.

Jolie's legal team has argued that these communications are necessary to prove Pitt's allegations wrong. However, Pitt's attorneys have called the request intrusive and a sensationalist fishing expedition. The case is ongoing, with both sides continuing to exchange discovery requests and filings.

This business dispute between the former couple comes after their highly publicized divorce proceedings in which allegations of abuse were made on both sides. Pitt was investigated by the FBI over an incident on a private jet in 2016, but no charges were filed. Jolie has also accused Pitt of physical and emotional abuse during their marriage.

The sale of Château Miraval to Tenute del Mondo has raised concerns about the involvement of a Russian oligarch in the winery, which is located in Provence, France. The case is being closely watched by media outlets and fans of the former couple.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Are there any potential conflicts of interest with the Russian oligarch's involvement in the winery sale?
  • Is it confirmed that the third-party communications requested by Jolie are directly related to the case?

Sources

94%

  • Unique Points
    • Angelina Jolie has requested Brad Pitt to turn over third-party communications related to a 2016 plane incident.
    • Pitt sued Jolie in February 2022, alleging that she had unlawfully sold her stake in Miraval without his consent.
    • Jolie sold her share of the winery to Tenute del Mondo, a subsidiary of Stoli Group, controlled by Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler, in October 2021.
  • Accuracy
    • Jolie wants these communications as part of her efforts to re-litigate the former couple’s divorce case.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting Paul Murphy, Angelina Jolie's attorney, and describing potential evidence as 'central to these proceedings'. This is not a logical fallacy on its own but it can be misleading if the context is not clear. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Pitt's request for a non-disclosure agreement as a 'failed proposal' and Jolie's sale of her stake in the winery to a Russian oligarch as 'vindictive'.
    • ][The author] We are not at all surprised Mr. Pitt is afraid to turn over the documents demonstrating these facts. While Angelina again asks Mr. Pitt to end the fighting and finally put their family on a clear path toward healing, unless Mr. Pitt withdraws his lawsuit, Angelina has no choice but to obtain the evidence necessary to prove his allegations wrong.[/]
    • [Paul Murphy] We are not at all surprised Mr. Pitt is afraid to turn over the documents demonstrating these facts.
    • [The author] vindictive
    • [The author] Russian oligarch
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

77%

  • Unique Points
    • Brad Pitt sued Angelina Jolie after she sold her half of the Châтеau Miraval winery for $67 million in October 2021, arguing that the sale went against a verbal agreement they had.
    • Angelina Jolie didn’t want to sign Brad Pitt’s NDA as part of the deal to let him buy her out of the business.
    • Jolie formally requested that Pitt disclose third-party communications he had after the 2016 plane ride incident, which led to their divorce. Pitt’s lawyers called this request ‘intrusive’ and a ‘sensationalist fishing expedition’.
    • Jolie’s lawyer, Paul Murphy, claimed that in Pitt’s past offer to buy Jolie’s stake in the winery, he tried to punish and control her by demanding an expanded NDA to cover his personal misconduct and abuse.
    • According to Pitt’s lawyers, the third-party communications Jolie’s team is requesting deal with sensitive issues, including therapy that Pitt voluntarily undertook after the flight incident in an effort to better himself. They claimed Jolie wants these communications ‘anyway as part of her efforts to turn this business dispute into a re-litigation of the former couple’s divorce case.’
  • Accuracy
    • Angelina Jolie sold her share of the winery to a Russian oligarch without Brad Pitt's consent.
    • Brad Pitt sued Angelina Jolie after she sold her half of the Château Miraval winery for $67 million in October 2021.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support Jolie's position and omits Pitt's side of the story. The author also uses emotional manipulation by implying that Pitt is trying to 'punish and control Angelina' and 'cover up his personal misconduct.' There is no disclosure of sources in the article.
    • Angelina Jolie's lawyer Paul Murphy claims Pitt, in his past offer to buy Jolie’s stake in the winery, tried to punish and control Angelina by demanding a newly expanded NDA to cover his personal misconduct and abuse.
    • A source close to Pitt tells PEOPLE that his recent filing speaks for itself.
    • The latest development, Jolie formally requested that Pitt disclose third-party communications he had in the aftermath of the 2016 plane ride incident that led to their divorce. Pitt’s lawyers called her request intrusive and a sensationalist fishing expedition, asking the judge to deny it.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting Jolie's lawyer and a source close to Pitt without providing any context or analysis. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Pitt's lawsuit as a 'business dispute' when it is actually a legal matter between two parties.
    • ]Angelina Jolie’s lawyer Paul Murphy claims Pitt, in his past offer to buy Jolie’s stake in the winery, ‘tried to punish and control Angelina by demanding a newly expanded NDA to cover his personal misconduct and abuse.’[
    • A source close to Pitt tells PEOPLE that his recent filing speaks for itself.
    • The author describes Pitt’s lawsuit as a ‘business dispute’.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

78%

  • Unique Points
    • Angelina Jolie sold her shares of the French property they purchased together in 2008 to a Russian oligarch without Brad Pitt's consent.
    • Brad Pitt has asked the judge to deny Angelina Jolie’s request for him to release third-party communications about their infamous 2016 plane incident.
  • Accuracy
    • Angelina Jolie sold her shares of the French property they purchased together in 2008 to a Russian oligarch without Brad Pitt’s consent.
    • Angelina Jolie requested access to Brad Pitt’s private, third-party communications about the plane ride incident.
    • Brad Pitt has already offered to produce documents related to the flight incident that precipitated their divorce.
    • Jolie rejected Pitt’s compromise and moved to compel his communications with third parties as part of her efforts to turn the business dispute into a re-litigation of their divorce case.
  • Deception (30%)
    The author uses the words 'intrusive' and 'sensationalist fishing expedition' to describe Jolie's request for Pitt to release third-party communications. These are editorializing opinions that go beyond reporting the facts. The article also reports on new details of alleged abusive behavior during a private jet ride, but does not provide any evidence or citations for these allegations.
    • Jolie rejected Pitt’s compromise and moved to compel his communications with third parties – including his most trusted advisors – about such sensitive issues as the therapy he voluntarily undertook after the flight incident in an effort to better himself, ‘drug and alcohol testing’ he has allegedly undergone, his alleged ‘overuse or abuse of alcohol,’ and other actions taken in the aftermath of the flight.
    • The bombshell FBI documents also included allegations that he was verbally and physically abusive to one of their children.
    • The former couple have been entangled in a legal battle over Jolie’s shares of their jointly purchased winery since 2022 when she ‘secretly’ sold her part of the French Château Miraval to a Russian oligarch. In the most recent development in the case, Pitt asked for the judge to strike down a request from Jolie’s legal team, which asked him to release third-party communications about the pair’s infamous 2016 plane incident. Pitt’s lawyers called Jolie’s request ‘wide-ranging and intrusive,’ as well as a ‘sensationalist fishing expedition.’
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Jolie's request as 'wide-ranging and intrusive,' 'sensationalist fishing expedition,' and a 're-litigation of the former couple's divorce case.' These are subjective opinions that do not add to the factual information presented in the article.
    • ][The author] The former couple have been entangled in a legal battle over Jolie’s shares of their jointly purchased winery since 2022... In the most recent development in the case, Pitt asked for the judge to strike down a request from Jolie’s legal team, which asked him to release third-party communications about the pair’s infamous 2016 plane incident. Pitt’s lawyers called Jolie’s request ‘wide-ranging and intrusive,’ as well as a ‘sensationalist fishing expedition.’[[/]
  • Bias (95%)
    The author uses the term 'intrusive' to describe Jolie's request for Pitt to release third-party communications about their private jet incident. This language implies that Jolie is overstepping boundaries and invading Pitt's privacy, potentially creating a negative impression of her. However, it is important to note that the context of the dispute and the relevance of these communications to the winery lawsuit are not considered in this analysis.
    • The former couple have been entangled in a legal battle over Jolie’s shares of their jointly purchased winery since 2022. In the most recent development in the case, Pitt asked for the judge to strike down a request from Jolie’s legal team, which asked him to release third-party communications about the pair’s infamous 2016 plane incident. Pitt’s lawyers called Jolie’s request ‘wide-ranging and intrusive.’
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication