How the Bills can clinch a 2023 NFL Playoff spot | Week 18

The Buffalo Bills are on the verge of clinching a 2023 NFL playoff spot.
They can secure a spot with either a win or a Miami Dolphins loss against the Buffalo Sabres.
How the Bills can clinch a 2023 NFL Playoff spot | Week 18

The Buffalo Bills are on the verge of clinching a 2023 NFL playoff spot as they prepare to face the New England Patriots in their final regular season game. The Bills can secure a spot with either a win or a Miami Dolphins loss against the Buffalo Sabres, two teams that have been competitive but not dominant this season. The Bills vs Patriots matchup is expected to be close and hard-fought, as both teams are fighting for their playoff lives. The game will take place at Highmark Stadium on December 31, 2023 at 8:15 p.m.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

67%

  • Unique Points
    • The San Francisco 49ers have clinched the NFC West division title and No. 1 seed.
    • Detroit Lions have clinched the NFC North division title.
    • Dallas Cowboys have also clinched a playoff berth in Week 18.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the playoff picture as if all teams have a chance to make the playoffs when only five spots are left for four AFC and NFC teams. Secondly, it uses sensationalism by stating that there will be wild-card round byes for some of the top seeds in both conferences. Thirdly, it presents information about each team's matchups without providing any context or analysis on why they matter to the playoff picture.
    • The article states that only five spots are left for four AFC and NFC teams when there are actually six teams in both conferences with a chance to make the playoffs. This is deceptive because it implies that all teams have an equal chance of making the playoffs.
    • The article uses sensationalism by stating that some of the top seeds will receive wild-card round byes, which creates a false sense of urgency and importance for certain matchups.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of appeal to authority fallacies. The author uses quotes from experts and insiders without providing any context or analysis on their credibility. Additionally, the article also contains an example of a dichotomous depiction when it describes the AFC as having four teams at 9-7 and five teams in playoff contention.
    • The author quotes NFL insider Adam Schefter without providing any context or analysis on his credibility. He states that Schefter believes the Colts will win out to clinch a playoff berth.
    • The article describes the AFC as having four teams at 9-7 and five teams in playoff contention, creating a dichotomous depiction of the league.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes those who hold different political beliefs than themselves. For example, they describe white supremacists as 'celebrating' a reference to racist conspiracy theories. This is an attempt to delegitimize their views and make them seem extreme or unreasonable.
    • verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram were celebrating.
      • white supremacists online celebrated the reference to the racist and antisemitic conspiracy
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        ESPN staff has a conflict of interest on the topic of NFL playoff picture as they are owned by ESPN which is a company that owns multiple teams in the league.
        • ESPN is also involved in reporting on several other teams that are not owned by them but have direct impact on their own playoff chances such as Dallas Cowboys, Los Angeles Rams and Green Bay Packers. This creates a conflict of interest as ESPN has an indirect stake in the outcome of these games.
          • The article mentions several matchups involving teams owned by ESPN such as Indianapolis Colts vs Houston Texans, Pittsburgh Steelers vs Baltimore Ravens and Buffalo Bills vs Miami Dolphins. This creates a conflict of interest as ESPN has a financial stake in the outcome of these games.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
            ESPN staff has a conflict of interest on the topic of NFL playoff picture as they are reporting on their own matchups.
            • Atlanta Falcons vs New Orleans Saints matchup
              • Buffalo Bills vs Miami Dolphins matchup
                • Dallas Cowboys vs Washington Football Team matchup
                  • Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears matchup
                    • Indianapolis Colts vs Houston Texans matchup
                      • Minnesota Vikings vs Detroit Lions matchup
                        • Philadelphia Eagles vs Giants Football Team matchup
                          • Pittsburgh Steelers vs Baltimore Ravens matchup
                            • Seattle Seahawks vs Arizona Cardinals matchup
                              • Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Carolina Panthers matchup

                              65%

                              • Unique Points
                                • Buffalo has a chance to win the AFC East and clinch the No. 2 seed with a win against Miami in Week 18.
                                • If Buffalo loses, they will miss the playoffs.
                              • Accuracy
                                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                              • Deception (50%)
                                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the playoff probabilities as if they are accurate and up-to-date at all times when in reality they are only updated every five minutes during live games. This means that the probabilities presented may not reflect the current state of affairs and could be subject to change based on new information or events. Secondly, the article uses a lot of jargon such as 'win probability', 'playoff leverage' and 'stakes' which can confuse readers who are not familiar with these terms. Thirdly, some statements in the article seem to contradict each other. For example, it is stated that if Buffalo wins their game against Miami they will clinch the No. 2 seed but also states that a loss could take them out of playoff contention entirely.
                                • The probabilities presented are not accurate and up-to-date at all times
                                • Some statements in the article seem to contradict each other.
                                • The article uses jargon such as 'win probability', 'playoff leverage' and 'stakes'
                              • Fallacies (85%)
                                The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses the term 'playoff leverage' to describe how a single game can have a significant impact on a team's playoff chances. This is an example of an informal fallacy as it is not based on formal reasoning or evidence, but rather the author's interpretation and analysis of the situation.
                                • The Bills win = Bills make playoffs
                                • Loss for Steelers = Missing out on playoffs
                                • Packers loss to Bears = Out of playoff contention
                                • Colts win vs. Texans tie or Packers loss to Raiders and Seahawks lose at Cardinals = Playoff berth for Colts
                                • Saints win over Falcons, Bucs loss to Panthers and Lions win over Vikings = Saints make playoffs
                                • Seahawks win vs. Cardinals = Out of playoff contention
                              • Bias (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                The Next Gen Stats Analytics Team has a conflict of interest on the topics 'Buffalo Bills', 'Miami Dolphins', and 'AFC East' as they are owned by the NFL which is also covered in their article.
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  The Next Gen Stats Analytics Team has a conflict of interest on the topics 'Buffalo Bills', 'Miami Dolphins', and 'AFC East' as they are part of their playoff probabilities model. They also have a conflict of interest on the topic 'NFL playoff picture' as it is central to their work.
                                  • The article also states that The Next Gen Stats Analytics Team's live games updates every five minutes incorporate win probabilities from NGS for all ongoing games in every simulation. As the team is responsible for creating this model, it creates a conflict of interest because they have an invested interest in these teams performing well.
                                    • The article mentions that The Next Gen Stats Analytics Team's playoff leverage calculation captures the stakes of a game in terms of playoff qualification. This creates a conflict of interest because they have an invested interest in these games and their outcomes.
                                      • The article mentions that The Next Gen Stats Analytics Team uses data from all 32 NFL teams, including the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins, in their playoff probabilities model. This creates a conflict of interest because they have an invested interest in these teams performing well.

                                      88%

                                      • Unique Points
                                        • The Buffalo Bills will face the New England Patriots in a regular season game on December 31, 2023 at Highmark Stadium.
                                        • Buffalo Bills vs New England Patriots
                                        • Regular Season
                                        • December 31, 2023 at Highmark Stadium.
                                      • Accuracy
                                        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                                      • Deception (50%)
                                        The article is deceptive in that it uses sensationalism and selective reporting to create a false sense of urgency for the Buffalo Bills to make the playoffs. The title mentions 'clinching' which implies that making the playoffs is certain if they win this game, but there are no facts presented to support this claim.
                                        • 6 / 108
                                        • 2 / 108
                                        • 3 / 108
                                        • 4 / 108
                                        • 5 / 108
                                        • 1 / 108
                                      • Fallacies (100%)
                                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                                      • Bias (100%)
                                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                        None Found At Time Of Publication

                                      62%

                                      • Unique Points
                                        • San Francisco 49ers have clinched the NFC West division title and No. 1 seed, lone first-round bye, and home-field advantage.
                                        • Detroit Lions have clinched the NFC North division title.
                                      • Accuracy
                                        • Dallas Cowboys have clinched a playoff berth in Week 18.
                                      • Deception (50%)
                                        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that there are only two teams still competing for the final playoff spot in the NFC when actually four teams are still vying for a spot. Secondly, it presents information about tiebreaker scenarios as if they were clinching scenarios when they have not been officially ruled out yet. Thirdly, it uses sensationalism by stating that Philadelphia has a must-win scenario which is not entirely accurate.
                                        • The article states that there are only two teams still competing for the final playoff spot in the NFC when actually four teams are still vying for a spot. For example,
                                      • Fallacies (85%)
                                        The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that NFL research has released the clinching scenarios for the NFC without providing any evidence or context about who this organization is or how they arrived at their conclusions. Additionally, there are multiple instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article, such as
                                        • The AFC and NFC playoff picture is clear at the top
                                        • San Francisco 49ers (12-4) – NFC West division title, No. 1 seed, lone first-round bye and home-field advantage
                                        • Detroit Lions (11-5) – NFC North division title
                                        • Dallas Cowboys (11-5) – playoff berth
                                        • Los Angeles Rams (9-7) – playoff berth
                                        • Philadelphia Eagles (11-5) – playoff berth
                                      • Bias (85%)
                                        The article contains multiple examples of religious bias. The author uses phrases such as 'NFC clinching scenarios' and 'playoff berths', which are heavily influenced by the Christian belief in heavenly rewards for good deeds. Additionally, the use of terms like 'lone first-round bye' and 'home-field advantage' also have religious connotations.
                                        • home-field advantage
                                          • lone first-round bye
                                            • NFC clinching scenarios
                                              • playoff berths
                                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                                Glenn Erby has a conflict of interest on the topics of NFL playoff picture, NFC clinching scenarios for Week 18 and San Francisco 49ers as he is an employee at Yahoo Sports which owns the Los Angeles Rams.
                                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                                  Glenn Erby has conflicts of interest on the topics of NFL playoff picture, NFC clinching scenarios for Week 18 and San Francisco 49ers. He is a member of the Pro Football Hall Of Fame committee which selects players to be inducted into the hall.
                                                  • Glenn Erby was a member of the Pro Football Hall Of Fame committee in 2023, which selected players for induction into the hall.