Modern Warfare 3 was developed in less than a year and a half, compared to the usual three years for previous iterations
The game's campaign mode has been criticized for being boring and lacking cohesion
The multiplayer mode has been criticized for its dated UI and inconsistent time-to-kill
The latest installment in the Call of Duty franchise, Modern Warfare 3, has been met with a wave of criticism from various gaming outlets. The game, which is the first major release since Microsoft Corp.'s acquisition of Activision, was developed in less than a year and a half, a significant reduction from the usual three-year development cycle for previous iterations.
The rushed development process has resulted in a number of issues, with critics pointing out flaws in both the campaign and multiplayer modes. The campaign mode has been likened to a Hollywood depiction of war, with some critics comparing it to a James Bond film. However, the narrative has been criticized for being boring and lacking cohesion, failing to captivate fans. The game's exploration of world affairs and politics within the narrative has also been described as shallow.
The multiplayer mode has not fared much better. While the new game mode, Cutthroat, has received some praise, the overall experience feels like a rehash of Modern Warfare 2 with new maps. The user interface (UI) has been criticized for looking dated and for its focus on a storefront-first layout. The game's inconsistent time-to-kill and the reuse of maps and assets from Warzone in the new 'Open Combat' mission type have also been points of contention.
Despite these criticisms, there have been some positive aspects noted. The graphics have been praised for their improvement, and the gunplay and visuals have been commended. However, these positive points seem to be overshadowed by the overall negative reception of the game.
Confidence
95%
No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication
Sources
97%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The game's focus on a storefront-first UI layout
The game's inconsistent time-to-kill
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
92%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The game's new mission type, 'Open Combat', is criticized as a lazy attempt to reuse maps and assets from Warzone
The narrative is also criticized for its shallow exploration of world affairs and politics
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(80%)
It is painfully obvious that development on the Modern Warfare 3 campaign was rushed.
The campaign in Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is a disaster.
The Modern Warfare 3 campaign treads a thin line between mediocrity and sheer disappointment.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
98%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The new game mode, Cutthroat, is praised
The author also criticizes the menus and the constant pushing of the battle pass
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
98%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
90%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The game was developed in less than a year and a half, compared to the usual three years for previous iterations
This is the first major release since Microsoft Corp.'s acquisition of Activision
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
98%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The author compares the game to a Hollywood depiction of war and likens it to a James Bond film
The game's release, despite ongoing real-world conflicts, is also noted
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication