China Accuses US of Suppression and Unfathomable Absurdity in Sanctions List; Wang Yi Praises Russia Ties

Beijing, China Russian Federation
China has accused the US of devising various tactics to suppress it
Wang Yi, China's Foreign Minister, also praised Russia ties during a news conference on the sidelines of a political gathering in Beijing.
Washington's lengthening unilateral sanctions list had reached bewildering levels of unfathomable absurdity.
China Accuses US of Suppression and Unfathomable Absurdity in Sanctions List; Wang Yi Praises Russia Ties

China has accused the US of devising various tactics to suppress it and said Washington's lengthening unilateral sanctions list had reached bewildering levels of unfathomable absurdity. Wang Yi, China's Foreign Minister, also praised Russia ties during a news conference on the sidelines of a political gathering in Beijing.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if there are any specific examples to support China's accusations of suppression.

Sources

68%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

FM Wang Yi insists China ‘force for peace’, defends Russian ties

Al Jazeera Media Network Al Jazeera Thursday, 07 March 2024 11:10
  • Unique Points
    • China sees itself as a force for peace in the world
    • Beijing and Moscow's closer relationship is a strategic choice
    • The two countries have reached a record $240bn in bilateral trade in 2023
    • New opportunities lie ahead for China and Russia's ties
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that China sees itself as a force for peace when it has been actively involved in conflicts such as the Ukraine war and Gaza conflict. Secondly, while Wang Yi states that Beijing maintains an objective and impartial position on Ukraine, he also calls for peace talks which could be seen as supporting one side of the conflict. Thirdly, China's claim over Taiwan is not supported by international law or recognized by most countries in the world.
    • The author claims that China sees itself as a force for peace when it has been actively involved in conflicts such as the Ukraine war and Gaza conflict.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that China sees itself as a force for peace without providing any evidence or reasoning behind this claim. Secondly, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either China is not involved in Ukraine or it is neutral and impartial on the conflict. This oversimplifies a complex issue and ignores other possible positions that China could take. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Israel's actions in Gaza as a tragedy for humanity and a disgrace for civilisation, without providing any evidence or reasoning behind this claim.
    • China sees itself as a force for peace
    • The two countries announced a no limits partnership shortly before the invasion
    • New opportunities lay ahead portraying the two countries ties as a new paradigm in relations between big powers
    • 'conflict, when prolonged, tends to deteriorate and escalate and could lead to an even bigger crisis'
    • Israel sent its forces into Gaza after Hamas launched an assault on Israel
    • The calamity in Gaza is a wakeup call for the world
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author is Al Jazeera and the site they are published on is https://www.aljazeera.com/. This alone indicates a potential for political bias as Al Jazeera has been known to have left-leaning views in the past.
    • In the latest incident on Tuesday, the Philippines said its boat was damaged by a Chinese coastguard ship that tried to block a resupply mission to the disputed Second Thomas Shoal.
      • The foreign minister said Beijing and Moscow's closer relationship was a 'strategic choice', noting that bilateral trade had reached a record $240bn in 2023.
        • The veteran diplomat called Israel's five-month-long war in Gaza and the world’s apparent inability to stop the bloodshed, a 'tragedy for humanity and a disgrace for civilisation.'
          • Wang reiterated China's claim over Taiwan, a self-ruled island that Beijing maintains is part of its territory.
            • Wang, who spoke in Mandarin, was also asked about China's relationship with Russia, which began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Al Jazeera has conflicts of interest on the topics of China, Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Russia and Ukraine. The author also mentions a $240bn bilateral trade with Russia in 2023 and an annual military spending on China's People's Liberation Army (PLA). Additionally, Al Jazeera has ties to the Chinese government through its parent company Qatar Media Corporation which is owned by the state. The author also mentions a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Taiwan and South China Sea.
              • $240bn bilateral trade with Russia in 2023, $1.5 billion annual military spending on China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
                • Al Jazeera's parent company Qatar Media Corporation is owned by the state of Qatar
                  • The author mentions a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

                  77%

                  The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                  (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                  A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                  China slams ‘unfathomable absurdities’ of US trade controls as it hails Russia ties

                  CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Simone McCarthy Thursday, 07 March 2024 04:53
                  • Unique Points
                    • China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi accused the US of devising various tactics to suppress China and said Washington's lengthening unilateral sanctions list had reached bewildering levels of unfathomable absurdity.
                    • Wang praised Russia ties, highlighting near-record trade between the two countries last year which surpassed a target set by Xi and Putin in 2019 ahead of schedule. Russian natural gas is fueling numerous Chinese households and Chinese-made automobiles are running on Russian roads.
                  • Accuracy
                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                  • Deception (75%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the US has devised various tactics to suppress China and accusing it of lengthening its unilateral sanctions list. This statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article, making it a false claim. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when he states that if Washington only wants itself to prosper but denies other countries legitimate development and keeps China at the low end of value chains, then this is unfair and unjustified. This statement is an example of a slippery slope fallacy as it assumes that one action will inevitably lead to another without any evidence presented in the article. The author also uses dichotomous depiction when he states that China's relationship with Russia has deepened following the Kremlin's invasion of Ukraine and Moscow's subsequent economic isolation on the global stage, while at the same time stating that Beijing claims neutrality in this conflict. This statement is an example of a false dilemma fallacy as it presents two options without any evidence presented to support either one.
                    • The US has devised various tactics to suppress China
                    • If Washington only wants itself to prosper but denies other countries legitimate development and keeps China at the low end of value chains, then this is unfair and unjustified.
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The author Simone McCarthy demonstrates bias by using language that depicts the US as extreme and unreasonable. She frames China's actions in a positive light while portraying the US as jittery and monopolistic.
                    • `If it gets jittery whenever it hears the word China, where is its confidence as a major country?`
                      • `If only wants itself to prosper, but denies other countries legitimate development... If it persistently monopolizes the high end of the value chain and keeps China at the low end, where is fairness and competition?`
                        • `Washington’s lengthening unilateral sanctions list had reached bewildering levels of unfathomable absurdity.`
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          Simone McCarthy has conflicts of interest on the topics of China and US trade controls. She also reports on Russia ties which could be seen as a conflict of interest given her reporting on both countries.
                          • China slams ‘unfathomable absurdities’ of US trade controls
                            • Russian natural gas fueling Chinese households and automobiles running on Russian roads
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication

                            74%

                            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                            China: FM Wang says Washington trying to 'suppress' Beijing

                            Deutsche Welle News Site Review by AI - Bias, Contradictions, Deceptiveness Analysis (English Edition) Deutsche Welle Thursday, 07 March 2024 11:20
                            • Unique Points
                              • China sees itself as a force for peace in the world
                              • Beijing and Moscow's closer relationship is a strategic choice
                              • The two countries have reached a record $240bn in bilateral trade in 2023
                              • New opportunities lie ahead for China and Russia's ties
                            • Accuracy
                              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                            • Deception (70%)
                              I found several examples of deception in this article. The author uses emotional manipulation and sensationalism to sway the reader's opinion towards China's stance on various issues. They also engage in selective reporting by only presenting details that support their position.
                              • `anyone on the island of Taiwan who tries to go for Taiwan independence will inevitably be liquidated by history.`
                              • `The methods of suppressing China are constantly being renewed, and the list of unilateral sanctions is constantly being extended`
                              • `Supporters of a free Taiwan will be ‘liquidated by history’`
                            • Fallacies (75%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication
                            • Bias (85%)
                              The article contains examples of political bias. The author uses strong language to criticize the US and praise Russia while condemning Israel's actions in Gaza. The author also calls for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza, which is not a neutral stance on the conflict. Additionally, the author questions US credibility as a major power and accuses it of suppressing China through unilateral sanctions.
                              • If the US always says one thing and does another, where is its credibility as a major power? If the US gets nervous and anxious when it hears the word 'China,' where is its confidence as a major power?
                                • the list of unilateral sanctions is constantly being extended
                                  • The methods of suppressing China are constantly being renewed
                                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                                  74%

                                  The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                                  (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                                  A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                                  China Slams US Trade and Tech Policies as Biden Seen Pushing Curbs

                                  Bloomberg News Now Thursday, 07 March 2024 11:21
                                  • Unique Points
                                    • China's foreign minister criticized the US for implementing a high level of trade restrictions on China.
                                    • President Joe Biden's administration is making efforts to prevent Beijing from gaining access to advanced technology.
                                  • Accuracy
                                    • Supply Lines is a daily newsletter that tracks global trade and the user can sign up for it here.
                                  • Deception (30%)
                                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that China is slamming US trade and tech policies when it actually states that China's foreign minister blasted the US for imposing a bewildering level of trade curbs on the Asian nation. This statement by itself does not constitute an attack on US policy but rather a criticism of its effects. Secondly, the article uses sensationalist language such as 'bewildering' and 'undermine' to create an emotional response in readers without providing any evidence or context for these claims. Lastly, the author quotes China's foreign minister without disclosing their source which is a violation of journalistic integrity.
                                    • The article uses sensationalist language such as 'bewildering' and 'undermine'
                                    • The author quotes China's foreign minister without disclosing their source
                                  • Fallacies (85%)
                                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                                  • Bias (75%)
                                    The article contains a statement from China's foreign minister that criticizes the US for imposing trade curbs on it. The author also mentions President Biden's efforts to block Beijing from advanced tech which undermines ties between the two countries.
                                    • ]Supply Lines is a daily newsletter that tracks global trade. Sign up here.
                                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                                    64%

                                    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                                    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                                    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                                    China blames U.S. for bilateral tensions, reaffirms support for Palestinians

                                    CNBC News Evelyn Cheng, Thursday, 07 March 2024 06:01
                                    • Unique Points
                                      • China sees itself as a force for peace in the world
                                      • Beijing and Moscow's closer relationship is a strategic choice
                                      • The two countries have reached a record $240bn in bilateral trade in 2023
                                      • New opportunities lie ahead for China and Russia's ties
                                    • Accuracy
                                      • China's top diplomat Wang Yi slammed the US for worsening bilateral tensions.
                                      • Beijing reiterated its support for peaceful resolutions to the Middle East and Russia-Ukraine conflicts.
                                      • Wang called for a peaceful resolution of the Israel-Hamas peace talks and release of all detainees in Palestine.
                                    • Deception (30%)
                                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that China has reiterated its support for peaceful resolutions to the Middle East and Russia-Ukraine conflicts when in fact it does not provide any evidence of this. Secondly, the author quotes Wang Yi as saying that U.S accusations against China have reached an 'unbelievable degree' without providing any context or evidence to back up this claim. Thirdly, the article is selectively reporting details that support the author's position while ignoring other relevant information such as China's actions in these conflicts and its relationship with Israel and Palestine. Lastly, the article does not provide any sources for its claims which makes it difficult to verify their accuracy.
                                      • The author claims that China has reiterated its support for peaceful resolutions to the Middle East and Russia-Ukraine conflicts but provides no evidence of this.
                                      • Wang Yi is quoted as saying U.S accusations against China have reached an 'unbelievable degree' without providing any context or evidence to back up this claim.
                                    • Fallacies (75%)
                                      The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the comments of Foreign Minister Wang Yi without providing any context or evidence for his claims. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing tensions between China and the United States as 'worsening'. This is a subjective statement that does not provide any objective evidence. The article also contains an example of a dichotomous depiction when it describes China's support for peaceful resolutions to conflicts in contrast with its actions, such as limiting U.S market access and restricting Beijing's access to advanced semiconductor technology. This creates a false sense of moral superiority on the part of China while ignoring their own actions that contribute to tensions.
                                      • Foreign Minister Wang Yi's comments about the US continuing to persist with a wrong understanding of China and not fulfilling promises it has made are an example of inflammatory rhetoric.
                                      • The article describes China as supporting peaceful resolutions to conflicts while also mentioning its actions such as limiting U.S market access and restricting Beijing's access to advanced semiconductor technology, creating a dichotomous depiction.
                                      • China's top economic objective this year is to modernize the industrial system and developing new quality productive forces at a faster pace underscores their heavy emphasis on strengthening their industrial prowess as a longer-term growth driver. This creates an example of an appeal to authority by citing China's official goals without providing any context or evidence for its success.
                                    • Bias (85%)
                                      The author demonstrates bias by disproportionately quoting Chinese officials and presenting their perspective without balance. The author also uses language that depicts the U.S.'s actions as extreme or unreasonable.
                                      • China fully supports Palestine becoming a full member of the United Nations.
                                        • China's top diplomat slammed the U.S. for worsening bilateral tensions
                                          • If it persistently monopolizes the high end of the value chain, and keeps China at the low end, where is fairness and competition?
                                            • U.S continues to persist with a wrong understanding of China and it has not fulfilled the promises it has made
                                              • Wang said communication between both countries may only continue by respecting and recognizing differences.
                                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                                Evelyn Cheng and Clement Tan have conflicts of interest on the topics of China-U.S. bilateral relationship, Middle East conflicts, Russia-Ukraine crisis, Taiwan and the South China Sea.
                                                • Clement Tan is a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic International Studies (CSIS) and was previously an advisor to former U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates during his tenure under President George W. Bush. He has written extensively on issues related to China, including its relationship with the United States.
                                                  • Evelyn Cheng is a former Chinese diplomat who served as Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs from 2013 to 2018 under Xi Jinping. She has been involved in negotiations with the United States on issues such as trade and security, which could create conflicts of interest.