Class-action lawsuit filed against Poppi for misleading gut health claims
Each can of Poppi soda contains only two grams of prebiotic fiber
Excessive consumption of agave inulin can have adverse health effects
A class-action lawsuit has been filed against Poppi, the makers of a popular prebiotic soda, alleging that the company's advertising claims about the product's gut health benefits are misleading. The lawsuit was filed by Kristin Cobbs on behalf of herself and other similarly situated consumers. According to the complaint, each can of Poppi soda contains only two grams of prebiotic fiber, which is not enough to provide meaningful gut health benefits for most consumers. To realize any potential health benefits from the prebiotic fiber in Poppi soda, a consumer would need to drink more than four cans in a day. However, the high sugar content of the sodas could offset any gut health benefits that might be gained from consuming more prebiotic fiber. The lawsuit also notes that excessive consumption of agave inulin, the type of prebiotic used in Poppi soda, can have adverse health effects such as inflammation and liver damage.
Poppi has gained popularity for its promise of gut health benefits and is sold at retailers like Whole Foods, Target, and Costco. The company's website claims that each can contains agave inulin, a prebiotic fiber extracted from the agave tequilana plant. However, the lawsuit alleges that these claims are false or misleading.
The lawsuit seeks financial damages for consumers who purchased Poppi sodas based on the company's advertising claims about their gut health benefits. The case is currently pending in a California district court.
Poppi soda is being sued over claims that it does not contain enough prebiotic fiber to provide meaningful gut health benefits for the consumer.
The lawsuit was filed by San Francisco, California woman Kristin Cobbs against VNGR Beverage LLC.
Poppi sodas only contain two grams of prebiotic fiber which means a consumer would need to drink more than four cans in a day to realize any potential health benefits.
Consumers believed Poppi sodas contained prebiotics that would make them 'gut healthy' based on labeling, but they contain only two grams of prebiotic fiber.
Excessive consumption of Poppi sodas could negatively impact health due to high sugar content and potential adverse effects from consuming too much inulin.
Accuracy
The high sugar content in Poppi offsets most, if not all, of the purported gut health benefits from the prebiotic fiber.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy in the form of a nutritionist's statement that 'Poppi's products are basically sugared water.' This statement is used to support the argument that Poppi sodas do not provide meaningful gut health benefits due to their low prebiotic fiber content. However, this statement is not a valid reason for why the sodas do not provide these benefits, as it does not address the underlying issue of whether or not consuming Poppi sodas in sufficient quantities would actually result in any health benefits. Additionally, there is an example of an inflammatory rhetorical device used in the statement 'Poppi's sales topped $100 million as of 2024, and those numbers continue to grow as the drink represents 19% of the U.S. market share, surpassing Coke but 1.5 times.' This statement is intended to create a negative impression of Poppi and its popularity.
Poppi prebiotic sodas may have misled consumers about their gut health benefits.
Poppi's website claims that each can of its soda contains agave inulin, a prebiotic fiber extracted from the agave tequilana plant.
The lawsuit states that the sodas contain only 2 grams of prebiotic fiber per serving, which may not provide significant health benefits to consumers.
Consumers would need to drink more than four cans of Poppi soda in a day to realize any potential health benefits from its prebiotic fiber.
The high sugar content of Poppi sodas may offset any gut health benefits that could be gained from the prebiotic fiber.
Accuracy
Poppi sodas only contain two grams of prebiotic fiber which means a consumer would need to drink more than four cans in a day to realize any potential health benefits.
Poppi sodas have gone viral since their appearance on Shark Tank in 2018 and currently hold a 19% market share.
Deception
(30%)
The article makes selective reporting by focusing only on the small amounts of prebiotic fiber in Poppi sodas and ignoring the potential health benefits that can be achieved with regular consumption. The author also uses emotional manipulation by implying that consumers have been misled and may have experienced negative health effects from drinking Poppi sodas. Additionally, there is a lack of disclosure regarding the sources of the information in the article.
If you tried Poppi prebiotic sodas in hopes that the trendy drinks … would help your gut health, you may have been misled
Related stories
However, even if a consumer were to do this, Poppi’s high sugar content would offset most, if not all, of these purported gut health benefits.
Fallacies
(85%)
The author makes an appeal to authority by mentioning that Kylie Jenner and J-Lo have endorsed Poppi prebiotic sodas on social media. This is a fallacy because the truth or falsehood of a claim is not determined by who endorses it.
]If you tried Poppi prebiotic sodas in hopes that the trendy drinks — touted by A-listers like Kylie Jenner and J-Lo in social media posts — would help your gut health, you may have been misled[.
The colorful cans of apple cider vinegar-infused sodas have become so popular that the suit noted Forbes reporting from March that the brand sits at a 19% market share
Poppi is facing a lawsuit for false and misleading advertising.
The lawsuit alleges that Poppi soda contains only two grams of prebiotic fiber per can, which is insufficient for meaningful gut health benefits.
High sugar content in four sodas a day could offset the purported gut health benefits.
The specific type of prebiotic used in Poppi, agave inulin, can lead to adverse health results like gas build-up and inflammation.
Accuracy
Poppi sodas only contain two grams of prebiotic fiber which means a consumer would need to drink more than four cans in a day to realize any potential health benefits.
The high sugar content of Poppi sodas may offset any gut health benefits that could be gained from the prebiotic fiber.
Deception
(35%)
The article reports on a class-action lawsuit against Poppi for false and misleading advertising regarding the prebiotic effects of their soda. The author quotes the plaintiff's claims that Poppi only contains two grams of prebiotic fiber, an amount too low to cause meaningful gut health benefits from just one can. The author also mentions that a consumer would need to drink more than four sodas in a day to realize any potential health benefits, which would offset most of the purported gut health benefits due to the high sugar content. These statements are examples of selective reporting and sensationalism as they only report details that support the plaintiff's position and create an exaggerated impression of the issue.
The suit continues that a consumer would need to drink more than four Poppi sodas in a day to realize any potential health benefits from its prebiotic fiber.
Poppi only contains two grams of prebiotic fiber, an amount too low to cause meaningful gut health benefits for the consumer from just one can.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy in the form of quotes from the Cleveland Clinic and Dr. Gail Cresci regarding the benefits of prebiotics. The article also makes a hasty generalization by stating that 'studies show' that consuming agave inulin can lead to adverse health effects without providing specific studies or context.
“The number of benefits prebiotics may have is complex,” digestive disease researcher and registered dietitian Dr. Gail Cresci, PhD, told the Cleveland Clinic. “So much is always continually being discovered.”
“Studies show that taking as little as 2.5 grams of prebiotic supplements, including agave inulin, can lead to a build-up of gas, causing abdominal discomfort.”
A class-action consumer-fraud lawsuit has been filed against Poppi, the company behind a viral prebiotic soda alternative.
Poppi does not warn consumers about the health risks of its brand of prebiotic.
Plaintiff Kristin Cobbs filed the suit on behalf of herself and similarly situated Poppi consumers.
Accuracy
Poppi contains two grams of prebiotics per can, which is not enough to reap significant gut health benefits according to the suit.
Poppi sodas only contain two grams of prebiotic fiber which means a consumer would need to drink more than four cans in a day to realize any potential health benefits.
Consumers believed Poppi sodas contained prebiotics that would make them ‘gut healthy’ based on labeling, but they contain only two grams of prebiotic fiber.
A consumer would need to drink more than four Poppi sodas in a day to realize any potential health benefits from its prebiotic fiber.
Poppi has gained popularity in the beverage industry with its ‘gut healthy’ promises and is sold at retailers like Whole Foods, Target, and Costco.
The lawsuit claims that Poppi only contains two grams of prebiotic fiber which is not enough to provide meaningful gut health benefits.
Deception
(30%)
The author makes editorializing statements and uses emotional manipulation by expressing sadness for Poppi fans and herself. The article also engages in selective reporting by only mentioning the negative aspects of Poppi's prebiotic content without providing context or acknowledging potential benefits. The author quotes a nutritionist making a sensational claim about the health risks of agave inulin without disclosing that it is just one perspective and not peer-reviewed.
Sad news for my fellow Poppi heads: The company behind the viral prebiotic soda alternative is facing a class-action consumer-fraud lawsuit alleging that it misrepresents the beverage’s gut-health benefits.
One nutritionist quoted in the suit calls Poppi ‘basically sugared water.’
The suit claims that a consumer would have to down four cans of Poppi for positive gut effects, which would then be offset by the drink’s high sugar content.
Fallacies
(85%)
The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting a nutritionist's opinion that Poppi is 'basically sugared water'. This statement is not a logical fallacy on its own, but it does not add any value to the analysis and lowers the overall quality of the article. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by referring to Poppi as 'sad news' and 'basically sugared water', which is unnecessary and biased.
The nutritionist quoted in the suit calls Poppi ‘basically sugared water.’
A lawsuit was filed against Poppi prebiotic soda alleging that it did not contain enough prebiotic fiber to provide meaningful gut health benefits.
Plaintiff Kristin Cobbs and other consumers are representing themselves and others in the lawsuit against VNGR Beverage LLC, the parent company of Poppi based in Austin, Texas.
Poppi has gained popularity in the beverage industry with its 'gut healthy' promises and is sold at retailers like Whole Foods, Target, and Costco.
The lawsuit claims that Poppi only contains two grams of prebiotic fiber which is not enough to provide meaningful gut health benefits.
Consuming more than four Poppi sodas in a day would be required to realize any potential health benefits from its prebiotic fiber.
Accuracy
Poppi only contains two grams of prebiotic fiber which is not enough to provide meaningful gut health benefits.
The high sugar content in Poppi offsets most, if not all, of the purported gut health benefits.
Deception
(35%)
The article makes selective reporting by focusing only on the plaintiff's allegations against Poppi's prebiotic fiber content and its health benefits without mentioning any counterarguments or responses from Poppi. The author also uses emotional manipulation by implying that consumers have been deceived and paid a 'substantial price premium' for a product that does not deliver on its promises.
Ms. Cobbs said that she 'reasonably relied' on Poppi’s promise of gut healthy soda and decided to pay the 'substantial price premium.'
Poppi has quickly climbed the ranks in the beverage world – capitalizing on relevant marketing and scoring shelf-space at popular retailers like Whole Foods, Target and Costco. Poppi’s ‘gut healthy’ promises are false since the soda ‘only contains two grams of prebiotic fiber, an amount too low to cause meaningful gut health benefits.’
The lawsuit filed against the wildly popular Poppi prebiotic soda alleges that the drink was not as 'gut healthy' as it's advertised to be.
Fallacies
(85%)
The author makes an appeal to authority by citing a lawsuit and the plaintiff's claims without providing any context or evaluation of the validity of the lawsuit. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Poppi as a 'wildly popular Shark Tank phenomenon' and 'capitalizing on relevant marketing'.
The lawsuit filed against the wildly popular Shark Tank phenomenon Poppi prebiotic soda alleges that the drink was not as 'gut healthy' as it's advertised to be.
Poppi has quickly climbed the ranks in the beverage world – capitalizing on relevant marketing and scoring shelf-space at popular retailers like Whole Foods, Target and Costco.
The lawsuit also cited studies that showed consuming too much agave inulin – the type of prebiotic found in Poppi – can actually have adverse health effects.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(780x211:782x213)/poppi-soda-Fraud-060324-tout-887935c7aa3d423c98bdab55eaf210c9.jpg)