New Breakthrough in 40-Year-Old Cold Case: Infant's Identity and Parents Identified Through Genetic Genealogy

Northfield, Vermont, Vermont United States of America
Infant named Matthew Isaac Doe identified in 40-year-old cold case
Mother admitted to delivering baby alone and losing consciousness, causing infant's death
No criminal charges filed against parents
Parents located through genetic genealogy technology
New Breakthrough in 40-Year-Old Cold Case: Infant's Identity and Parents Identified Through Genetic Genealogy

In a groundbreaking development, Vermont State Police have announced the resolution of a cold case that has puzzled investigators for over 40 years. The case in question involves the death of an infant boy, who was found near a roadside in Northfield, Vermont on April 1, 1982. For decades, the identity and circumstances surrounding the baby's death remained a mystery.

Thanks to advancements in genetic genealogy technology and partnerships with various law enforcement agencies and DNA technology companies, investigators were able to identify the infant as Matthew Isaac Doe. Through extensive research, they were also able to locate his parents, who have since been confirmed through DNA testing.

According to police reports, the mother admitted to delivering the baby alone during labor and losing consciousness shortly after giving birth. The umbilical cord was wrapped around the infant's neck, causing his death. Overwhelmed by fear and lack of resources, she disposed of the deceased infant in the woods but later lost consciousness and dropped him, causing him to fall from her arms.

The father had left Vermont in 1982 and was unaware of the pregnancy or the infant's death. No criminal charges will be filed against either parent as this case is now considered resolved.

This resolution brings closure to those who have been following this case closely, including Ernest Caswell, one of the individuals who discovered the baby's remains back in 1982. The investigation into Baby Doe's death marks a significant milestone in the use of genetic genealogy technology to solve cold cases and bring families closure.



Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • Is the mother's account of events accurate?
  • Were there any other potential suspects or leads in this case?

Sources

100%

  • Unique Points
    • The infant was identified as Matthew Isaac Doe through genealogy analysis in 2021.
    • Matthew Isaac Doe’s parents were located and confirmed through DNA testing.
    • The mother admitted to delivering the baby alone and losing consciousness during labor. The baby did not survive due to the umbilical cord being wrapped around his neck.
    • The mother disposed of the deceased infant in the woods out of fear, but later lost consciousness and dropped him, causing him to fall from her arms.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

96%

  • Unique Points
    • The mother admitted to unlawfully disposing of the infant but claimed she had no knowledge of her pregnancy and was alone when she gave birth.
    • The father said he left Vermont in 1982 and had no knowledge of either the pregnancy or the deceased infant.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when the Vermont State Police and Captain Jeremy Hill make statements about the advancement of technology and their inability to solve the case without outside help. Additionally, there is a potential false dilemma fallacy when Donnelly states that 'The evidence that was developed in the case didn’t point to any intentional act that would point to a murder case.' This statement implies that if there had been intentional acts, then it would have been considered a murder case.
    • The technology has advanced to the point where we’re able to do this now.
    • We couldn’t have done it alone…without the nonprofits that raised money.
    • The evidence that was developed in the case didn’t point to any intentional act that would point to a murder case.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

  • Unique Points
    • The parents of the baby were identified through genetic genealogy analysis and confirmed through DNA testing.
    • The mother did not know she was pregnant until she went into labor and delivered the baby alone. The umbilical cord was wrapped around his neck, causing his death.
    • The mother disposed of the deceased infant in the woods out of fear, but later lost consciousness and dropped him, causing him to fall from her arms.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states 'Police said DNA tests of both parents proved they were the baby's biological parents.' This statement implies that the results of the DNA test are definitive proof and beyond question, but this is not necessarily true. The article also contains a potential hasty generalization fallacy when it states 'Given the statements from the parents, ... murder charges were not warranted.' This statement infers that because no murder charges were filed in this case, it can be assumed that all cases with similar circumstances would not result in murder charges.
    • ]Police said DNA tests of both parents proved they were the baby's biological parents.[
    • Given the statements from the parents, ... murder charges were not warranted.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • An infant's body was found near a road in Northfield, Vermont on April 1, 1982.
    • The dead body was identified as that of a recently born male infant.
    • Matthew Isaac was named by Rev. Frank E. Wisner III in late April 1982.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

98%

  • Unique Points
    • The Vermont State Police have closed the 42-year-old investigation into the death of a newborn child found in Northfield.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication