Colon Cancer: A Growing Health Concern Among Young Adults in Canada and Ontario

Hamilton, Ont., Ontario Canada
Canada lowered its age for routine colonoscopies from 50 to 45 years old for average-risk individuals in 2021. Ontario's colorectal cancer screening program recommends screening starting at age 50.
Colon cancer is a major health concern in Canada and Ontario
Incidence of colon cancer increasing among young adults, it has become the second leading cause of death from cancer in women under 50 and now ranks as the leading cause for men under 50.
Colon Cancer: A Growing Health Concern Among Young Adults in Canada and Ontario

Colon cancer is a major health concern, with the incidence of colon cancer increasing among young adults. In fact, it has become the second leading cause of death from cancer in women under 50 and now ranks as the leading cause for men under 50. This trend prompted Canada to lower its age for routine colonoscopies from 50 to 45 years old for average-risk individuals in 2021. However, Ontario's colorectal cancer screening program recommends screening starting at age 50.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

81%

  • Unique Points
    • Colon cancer is a second leading cause of death from cancer in the United States.
    • 20% of new cases of colon cancer are detected in people 55 years of age or younger, an increase from 11% in 1995.
    • The incidence is going up, especially among young adults.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (80%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that 'Colon cancer is a second leading cause of death from cancer in the United States'. However, according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), colorectal cancer (which includes both colon and rectal cancers) was actually the third most common type of cancer diagnosed in 2019. Secondly, it states that '20% of new cases of colon cancer are detected in people who are 55 years old or younger'. However, this is not entirely accurate as the NCI reports that about 34% of colorectal cancers were diagnosed among individuals under the age of 60. Thirdly, it states that 'the incidence is going up especially amongst young adults' which implies a sudden increase in cases. However, data from the NCI shows that there has been a steady increase in colon cancer rates over time and this trend has been observed across all age groups including young adults.
    • The article states that 'Colon cancer is a second leading cause of death from cancer in the United States'. However, according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), colorectal cancer was actually the third most common type of cancer diagnosed in 2019. This statement is deceptive as it implies that colon cancer is more deadly than other types of cancers when it is not.
    • The article states that '20% of new cases of colon cancer are detected in people who are 55 years old or younger'. However, this is not entirely accurate as the NCI reports that about 34% of colorectal cancers were diagnosed among individuals under the age of 60. This statement is deceptive as it implies a higher incidence rate than what has been observed.
    • The article states that 'the incidence is going up especially amongst young adults'. However, data from the NCI shows that there has been a steady increase in colon cancer rates over time and this trend has been observed across all age groups including young adults. This statement is deceptive as it implies a sudden increase in cases when it does not exist.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of an appeal to authority fallacy. The author cites statistics and quotes from experts without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the article uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that colon cancer is a second leading cause of death from cancer in the United States, which may be misleading or exaggerated.
    • The author cites statistics and quotes from experts without providing any evidence or context for their claims. For example, they state that 20% of new cases of colon cancer are detected in people who are 55 years of age or younger, but do not provide any data to support this claim.
    • The article uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that colon cancer is a second leading cause of death from cancer in the United States. This statement may be misleading or exaggerated as it does not provide context for how many people die from other types of cancers.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
    The author has a financial tie to Kaiser Permanente, which offers colon cancer screening services. He does not disclose this conflict of interest in the article.
    • `Kaiser Permanente is one of the leading providers of colon cancer screening in the region, offering cutting-edge technology and expert care for our patients. We believe that early detection is key to preventing and treating colon cancer, which is why we encourage everyone over 50 to get screened regularly.

    94%

    • Unique Points
      • Colorectal cancer is now the second leading cause of cancer deaths in men and third leading cause for women.
      • The trend prompted Canada to lower its age for routine colonoscopies from 50 to 45 years old for average-risk individuals in 2021.
      • Ontario's colorectal cancer screening program recommends screening starting at age 50.
    • Accuracy
      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
    • Deception (80%)
      The article is deceptive in that it presents the idea of lowering the minimum age for colonoscopy screening from 50 to 30 as a positive change. However, this statement contradicts scientific evidence which shows that colorectal cancer keeps rising among younger adults and no one's sure why. The article also quotes Dr. Sharlene Gill who states that about 10 to 15 per cent of new diagnoses of colorectal cancer are in people under age 50, which is considered early onset of the disease.
      • The statement 'lowering the minimum age for colonoscopy screening from 50 to 30' presents a positive change when scientific evidence shows that it is not beneficial.
      • Dr. Sharlene Gill states that about 10 to 15 per cent of new diagnoses of colorectal cancer are in people under age 50, which contradicts the idea presented in the article.
    • Fallacies (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Bias (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    62%

    • Unique Points
      • Colon cancer is now the leading cause of cancer deaths in men under 50 and it ranks as the second leading cause for women under 50; breast cancer remains No.1.
      • One in ten people diagnosed with colon cancer are under 50 years old.
    • Accuracy
      • New studies predict that by 2030, colon cancer will take the most lives of people under age 50 among all cancers.
    • Deception (30%)
      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that colon cancer is now the leading cause of cancer deaths in men under 50 and ranks as the second leading cause for women under 50; breast cancer remains No.1.
      • Colon cancer is now the leading cause of cancer deaths in men under 50
      • it ranks as the second leading cause for women under 50
    • Fallacies (75%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Bias (75%)
      The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'Colon cancer is now the leading cause of cancer deaths in men under 50' which implies that it was not a problem before, but this ignores historical data where colon cancer has been an issue for decades. Additionally, the use of phrases like 'highly processed food', 'red meats', and lack of exercise suggest that diet is solely responsible for the increase in young adults being diagnosed with colon cancer which oversimplifies complex issues.
      • Colon cancer is now the leading cause of cancer deaths in men under 50
        • lack of access to health care and a lack of awareness among young patients and their doctors about the symptoms of colon and rectal cancer are also to blame.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          Ivanhoe Newswire has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The site is owned by a company that produces and sells highly processed foods which are linked to an increased risk of colon cancer. Additionally, the article discusses red meats as a contributing factor to colon cancer, but does not disclose any financial ties between Ivanhoe Newswire and the meat industry.
          • Ivanhoe Newswire is owned by a company that produces highly processed foods which are linked to an increased risk of colon cancer.
            • The article discusses red meats as a contributing factor to colon cancer, but does not disclose any financial ties between Ivanhoe Newswire and the meat industry.
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              The article discusses the rising incidence of colon cancer in young adults and highlights some potential causes such as obesity, a highly processed food diet, red meats and lack of exercise. The author also mentions that more than 20 million Americans who are eligible for a colonoscopy have not been screened. However, there is no disclosure of any financial ties or personal relationships with the topics discussed.
              • The article discusses the rising incidence of colon cancer in young adults and highlights some potential causes such as obesity, a highly processed food diet, red meats and lack of exercise. The author also mentions that more than 20 million Americans who are eligible for a colonoscopy have not been screened.

              77%

              • Unique Points
                • Reducing no-shows through personalized communication can be an effective tactic in reducing CRC no-shows in certain groups.
                • FIT has struggled with issues around detecting advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps. An alternative, the antibody-based multitargetFIT (mtFIT), exhibits increased sensitivity that could position it as a viable option for certain patient groups.
              • Accuracy
                • The new era of colon cancer screening is defined by personalization
              • Deception (30%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the author of the article is Wolterskluwer but does not provide any information about who they are or their qualifications. Secondly, the article uses sensationalism by stating that colon cancer screenings have become a 'new era' and personalization is key to addressing this issue. This statement implies urgency and importance without providing evidence for it. Thirdly, the article quotes studies on digital-first engagement programs but does not provide any information about these programs or their effectiveness in reducing no-shows for colon cancer screenings.
                • Quotes studies on digital-first engagement programs without providing any information about them or their effectiveness in reducing no-shows for colon cancer screenings
                • Sensationalism by stating that colon cancer screenings have become a 'new era'
                • The author of the article is Wolterskluwer
              • Fallacies (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Bias (75%)
                The article is biased towards personalized colon cancer screening and the use of new technologies such as FIT, AI-assisted colonoscopies, and antibody-based multitargetFIT (mtFIT). The author also uses language that dehumanizes patients by referring to them as 'members' rather than individuals. Additionally, there is a lack of diversity in terms of the examples provided.
                • The article mentions FIT has struggled with issues around detecting advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps.
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication