Columbia University: A Battlefield of Protests - Free Speech vs. Antisemitic Rhetoric

New York City, New York United States of America
At least 108 students were taken into custody during a pro-Palestinian protest on April 18, 2024
Columbia University protests began following a hearing in Congress about antisemitic rhetoric on campus
Protests continued despite arrests and dismantling of encampment, with some waving flags and chanting slogans in support of Palestine or criticizing Israel's actions in Gaza
Rep. Ilhan Omar questioned university president about an incident involving anti-Israel activists using a non-toxic flatulence spray
University president Nemat Shafik faced criticism for her handling of the situation and pledged to crack down on unauthorized student protests
Columbia University: A Battlefield of Protests - Free Speech vs. Antisemitic Rhetoric

Title: Protests at Columbia University: A Clash of Perspectives

Columbia University, located in New York City, has been the site of intense protests in recent days. The unrest began following a hearing in Congress where university president Nemat Shafik testified about antisemitic rhetoric on campus.

On April 18, 2024, at least 108 students were taken into custody by the police during a pro-Palestinian protest on Columbia University's campus. The demonstrators had erected a tent encampment and refused to dismantle it despite university leaders' calls for action.

Columbia University President Nemat Shafik faced criticism from Congress over her handling of the situation, leading to her pledge to crack down on unauthorized student protests. However, this decision sparked further outrage among students who saw it as an infringement on their right to free speech.

The protests continued despite the arrests and dismantling of the encampment. Some protesters were seen waving flags and chanting slogans in support of Palestine, while others criticized Israel's actions in Gaza.

Meanwhile, Rep. Ilhan Omar questioned Columbia University's president about an incident involving anti-Israel activists protesting and the use of a non-toxic flatulence spray. The university president clarified that no students were hospitalized as a result of the incident and reached out to all affected students who wanted support.

The ongoing protests at Columbia University have highlighted tensions between pro-Palestinian and pro-Israeli student groups, as well as broader debates about free speech and campus safety. The situation remains fluid, with both sides expressing strong convictions and demonstrating their commitment to their respective causes.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Was the use of non-toxic flatulence spray during an anti-Israel protest a significant enough incident to warrant questioning by Rep. Ilhan Omar and media attention?

Sources

76%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Columbia anti-Israel protests turn violent: Provactoeur arrested for repeatedly hitting officer, cops say

New York Post Joe Marino, Thursday, 18 April 2024 13:24
  • Unique Points
    • A protester at Columbia University was arrested for repeatedly hitting and scratching an NYPD cop, causing cuts.
    • At least three other people were also arrested during the ongoing anti-Israeli protest on the Morningside Heights campus.
    • Christopher Briones, 30, was charged with assault on a police officer, resisting arrest and obstructing governmental administration.
    • Jessica Knapp, 35, was charged with resisting arrest and reckless endangerment for waving a 15-foot pole and not putting it down when ordered.
    • Miranda Levine, 26, was also charged with resisting arrest and obstructing governmental administration during the protest.
    • A minor was taken into custody but then released without being formally arrested or charged.
  • Accuracy
    • At least three other people were also arrested during the ongoing anti-Israel protest on the Morningside Heights campus.
    • Jessica Knapp was charged with resisting arrest and reckless endangerment for waving a 15-foot pole and not putting it down when ordered.
  • Deception (20%)
    The article reports on arrests made during a protest at Columbia University, but it also includes emotional manipulation and selective reporting. The authors quote a protester exclaiming 'De arrest!' and another asking 'Why are you doing this to me, I'm just standing on the sidewalk?!?' These statements are presented in a way that elicits an emotional response from readers, making them more likely to support the protesters and view the police as heavy-handed. Additionally, while reporting on three arrests made during the protest, the authors only mention charges against two of them - Briones for assault on a police officer and Knapp for resisting arrest and reckless endangerment. They do not mention any charges against Levine or provide details about why she was arrested. This selective reporting gives readers an incomplete understanding of the situation.
    • Israel is a fake state.
    • At least three people have been arrested in connection with the ongoing tent protest on Columbia University’s Morningside campus.
    • Israel is a s—t state.
    • He then struck and scratched the cop on the arm, causing cuts, the sources said.
    • One person standing outside the campus gates at 116th Street and Broadway can be heard yelling at officers in a dramatic video shared by Status Coup News. Multiple people wearing Palestinian keffiyehs were seen being grabbed by NYPD officers who appeared to be holding zip ties or other restraints, the footage showed.
    • They tackled one to the ground. There were two guys and three girls.
    • Why are you doing this to me, I’m just standing on the sidewalk?
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority and a few instances of inflammatory rhetoric. The author quotes NYPD officers and their actions without questioning the validity of their reasons for arresting protesters, which is an appeal to authority. Additionally, phrases like 'pro-Palestinian protesters showing solidarity' and 'aggressive' cops indicate a charged tone that inflames the situation without providing evidence or analysis.
    • ]At 7 a.m. outside the gates of the Columbia University student encampment protest for Gaza, NYPD arrested pro-Palestinian protesters showing solidarity with Columbia students protesting.[
  • Bias (90%)
    The article reports on an anti-Israel protest at Columbia University that turned violent, resulting in several arrests. While the article does not explicitly express any bias towards Israel or Palestine, the language used to describe the actions of the protesters and their chants could be perceived as biased by some readers. For example, phrases like 'Israel is a fake state' and 'Israel will fall' could be seen as anti-Israeli sentiments. Additionally, there are no counterarguments or perspectives presented in the article to balance out these statements. However, it is important to note that the article does not make any overtly biased statements itself and simply reports on the events as they unfolded.
    • Israel is a fake state.
      • Israel will fall.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      96%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Columbia University Students Arrested in Pro-Palestinian Protests: Live Updates

      The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Sharon Otterman, Thursday, 18 April 2024 15:53
      • Unique Points
        • At least 108 protesters at Columbia University were taken into custody by the police on April 18, 2024.
        • Columbia University leaders pledged to crack down on unauthorized student protests tied to the war in Gaza following criticism from Congress.
      • Accuracy
        • At least three other people were also arrested during the ongoing anti-Israeli protest on the Morningside Heights campus.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (95%)
        The article contains several instances of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority. However, no formal or blatant logical fallacies were found. The authors provide a factual account of the events at Columbia University and offer differing opinions from various sources.
        • ] Jerrold Nadler, the longest-serving Jewish member of the House and a Columbia alumnus, defended his alma mater on Thursday afternoon: [
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      76%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Ilhan Omar questions college president about 'Wet Farts' attack on anti-Israel Columbia students

      Fox News Media Hannah Grossman Thursday, 18 April 2024 21:53
      • Unique Points
        • Rep. Ilhan Omar questioned Columbia University’s president about an incident involving anti-Israel activists protesting and a non-toxic flatulence spray being used.
        • The incident at Columbia University involved pro-Israel students being suspended for releasing a non-toxic flatulence spray called ‘Liquid A--’ and ‘Wet Farts.’
        • Columbia University president, Dr. Nemat Shafik, refuted Rep. Ilhan Omar’s claim that many students were hospitalized due to the incident and clarified that they reached out to all affected students who wanted support.
        • A lawsuit filed by one of the pro-Israel students who was suspended for releasing the non-toxic flatulence spray stated that it was purchased on Amazon for $26.11 and contained a novelty ‘fart’ spray.
      • Accuracy
        • ]Rep. Ilhan Omar questioned Columbia University's president about an incident involving anti-Israel activists protesting and a non-toxic flatulence spray being used.[
        • Columbia University president, Dr. Nemat Shafik, stated that the substance believed to be used in the incident was an odorous rather than a toxic chemical substance.
        • Dr. Nemat Shafik refuted Rep. Ilhan Omar's claim that many students were hospitalized due to the incident and clarified that they reached out to all affected students who wanted support.
      • Deception (30%)
        The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position. The author repeats unverified claims made by Rep. Ilhan Omar about a 'toxic chemical substance' being used at an anti-Israel protest without providing any evidence to support this claim. The article also implies that the students who were affected did not receive support from the school administrators, but this is not verified in the article.
        • Rep. Ilhan Omar sounded the alarm about what she called an ‘attack’ with a ‘toxic chemical substance’ at an anti-Israel protest at Columbia University...
        • One of the students who released the spray filed a lawsuit against the university on April 16. The university took swift action against the student who allegedly used the foul-smelling spray at the anti-Israel protest.
        • Claims that students were admitted to hospitals for further observation and advanced medical treatment have yet to be verified.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting the lawsuit filed by one of the students and repeating their claims without questioning their validity. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the substance as a 'toxic chemical substance' and 'room-evacuating emissions' without providing evidence that it was actually toxic or harmful. The author also makes an assumption about the university's response time, stating 'it took you guys more than four days to reach out to students', but there is no evidence provided to support this claim.
        • This is still with the police. And, as far as we know, it was an odorous substance. And we did reach out to all of those students who said they were affected. Many of them didn’t want support.
        • Almost instantly, the University rushed to silence Plaintiff, place him on interim suspension from the University, and published a statement to the University community which accused Plaintiff of a hate crime and placed Plaintiff in grave jeopardy.
        • We hope that Columbia investigating the attack means the administration will take meaningful, serious steps towards accountability. This hateful assault came after months of Columbia viciously targeting and repressing Palestinian student advocacy, contributing to a hostile environment that dangerously emboldens violent attacks like these.
      • Bias (95%)
        The author repeats unverified claims made by Rep. Ilhan Omar that the substance used at Columbia University was a 'toxic chemical substance' when it was actually a non-toxic fart spray. The author also uses language that depicts the pro-Israel students as being in grave jeopardy and victimized, while not providing any evidence to support this claim.
        • Rep. Ilhan Omar sounded the alarm about what she called an ‘attack’ with a ‘toxic chemical substance’ at an anti-Israel protest at Columbia University
          • The university took swift action against the student who allegedly used the foul-smelling spray at the anti-Israel protest. Anti-Israel protesters took over the main lawn on Columbia University’s campus in New York City, Wednesday, April 17, 2024. (WNYW) The Students for Justice in Palestine at Columbia released a statement about the incident. ‘We hope that Columbia investigating the attack means the administration will take meaningful, serious steps towards accountability. This hateful assault came after months of Columbia viciously targeting and repressing Palestinian student advocacy, contributing to a hostile environment that dangerously emboldens violent attacks like these.’
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          59%

          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

          Opinion | Why the GOP’s Columbia University antisemitism hearing should trouble everyone

          MSNBC News Thursday, 18 April 2024 21:54
          • Unique Points
            • Columbia University was grilled by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce on Wednesday
            • Nemat Shafik, Columbia’s president, performed better than her predecessors during the hearing
            • Pro-Palestinian activists are unhappy with Shafik’s performance on campus
          • Accuracy
            • Since Oct. 7, Hamas attack on Israel led to protests on American college campuses with rising death toll in Gaza exceeding 34,000
            • Jewish students accuse these demonstrations of fostering antisemitic rhetoric, intimidation and violence
          • Deception (30%)
            The article contains selective reporting as the author only reports examples of antisemitic incidents at Columbia University without mentioning any instances where Jewish students have been the perpetrators or where antisemitic incidents have occurred at other universities. The author also uses emotional manipulation by describing the death toll in Gaza and the number of Jewish students charging that demonstrations are fostering an environment rife with antisemitic rhetoric, intimidation and even violence.
            • Since Hamas’ attack on Israel on Oct. 7, and Israel’s subsequent onslaught on Gaza, American college campuses have been seized by protests as the death toll in Gaza has risen past 34,000.
            • Jewish students charge that these demonstrations are fostering an environment rife with antisemitic rhetoric, intimidation and even violence.
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting and referencing the opinions of Republican representatives and Columbia professors. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the situation on Columbia's campus as 'dire' and 'rebuilding.'
            • “Columbia beats Harvard and UPenn!” - Rep. Aaron Bean, R-Fla.
            • “Columbia’s Middle Eastern, South Asian and African Studies department has been extremely hostile to both Israel and Jewish students.” - Rep. Michelle Steel, R-Calif.
            • “Many of these scholars are thinkers of high quality. But this does not change the fact that conservative and, yes, even liberal researchers are greatly outnumbered at elite schools by the far left.” - Author
          • Bias (5%)
            The article expresses a clear bias against the GOP and their handling of the Columbia University antisemitism hearing. The author implies that the GOP representatives' solutions to Columbia's antisemitism woes are problematic and not in line with what is best for higher education. The author also criticizes the GOP representatives for their questioning tactics during the hearing, implying that they were intrusive and unreasonable.
            • But the hearing itself also highlights how entrenched antisemitism has become at this school. The Republican representatives raised countless examples of how dire the situation has become.
              • Some inquired in great detail about course listings and class sizes. Naturally, there were queries about critical race theory and DEI initiatives on campus.
                • The Republican representatives, for their part, gave us a glimpse into another problem.
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                83%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                Columbia University President Faces Difficult Road Ahead as Students Protest on Campus

                The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Sharon Otterman Wednesday, 17 April 2024 23:51
                • Unique Points
                  • Columbia University President, Nemat Shafik, testified in Congress about antisemitic rhetoric on campus
                  • Dr. Shafik agreed to remove the professor from the role after some hesitation during the hearing
                • Accuracy
                  • At least 108 protesters at Columbia University were taken into custody by the police on April 18, 2024.
                  • Rep. Elise Stefanik questioned Dr. Shafik about removing a professor who praised Hamas attack from academic review committee
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in its portrayal of the congressional hearing and the university's response to antisemitism. It selectively reports details that support its narrative while omitting important context.
                  • Republican lawmakers on the House Committee on Education and the Work Force had come ready to pounce. They tested for weaknesses and prodded vulnerabilities, while their witnesses, a group of Columbia leaders, seemed conciliatory.
                  • In Congress, Columbia’s Leaders Try to Please. At Home, They Face Anger. For Columbia’s president, Nemat Shafik, a hearing on antisemitism went relatively well. But on campus, intense protests suggest a difficult road ahead for the university.
                  • U.S.WorldBusinessArtsLifestyleOpinionAudioGamesCookingWirecutterThe Athletic Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority. It also presents a dichotomous depiction of the protesters and the university's response.
                  • . . . intense protests suggest a difficult road ahead for the university.
                  • . . . pro-Palestinian students erected an encampment with dozens of tents on a central campus lawn, vowing not to move until Columbia divested from companies with ties to Israel and met other demands.
                  • Republican lawmakers on the House Committee on Education and the Work Force had come ready to pounce. They tested for weaknesses and prodded vulnerabilities, while their witnesses, a group of Columbia leaders, seemed conciliatory.
                • Bias (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication