Democratic Donors Divided: Should Biden Drop Out After Poor Debate Performance?

Washington D.C., District of Columbia United States of America
A second faction calls for assessing damage caused by Biden's debate performance before taking drastic steps, considering options like rallying behind Vice President Kamala Harris or another prominent Democrat.
Former DNC vice chair R.T. Rybak has urged leading Democrats to push Biden to withdraw from the race, suggesting Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer as a potential replacement.
High-profile Hollywood donors have threatened to stop giving to the Democratic Party if Biden does not step aside as the presidential candidate.
Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi has expressed concerns about chaos that could ensue if another nominee is chosen.
The first faction argues against a pressure campaign to urge Biden to drop out, believing he should be given the opportunity to continue his presidency.
The third group of donors is calling for Democrats to begin the process of seeking out a new nominee with less than four months until the general election.
Three factions have emerged among Democratic donors regarding President Joe Biden's debate performance and how to proceed with the campaign.
Democratic Donors Divided: Should Biden Drop Out After Poor Debate Performance?

In recent days, there has been growing anxiety among Democratic donors regarding the performance of President Joe Biden in the presidential debates. According to multiple reports, three factions have emerged within the donor class regarding how to proceed with the campaign.

The first faction argues against a pressure campaign to urge Biden to drop out, stating that it would be a waste of time and resources. They believe that Biden should be given the opportunity to continue his presidency and focus on policy initiatives.

A second faction calls for a middle-of-the-road approach, assessing the damage caused by Biden's debate performance before taking drastic steps. They are considering various options, including rallying behind Vice President Kamala Harris or another prominent Democrat.

The third group of donors is calling for Democrats to begin the process of seeking out a new nominee with less than four months until the general election. They argue that Biden's debate performance was so poor that he cannot win against former President Donald Trump in November.

Former DNC vice chair R.T. Rybak has publicly urged leading Democrats to push Biden to withdraw from the race, stating that history will judge them harshly if they do not take action. He believes that Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is one of several Democrats who could do well in the election if Biden steps down.

Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi has expressed concerns about the chaos that could ensue if another nominee is chosen, stating that there is no clear frontrunner within the party. However, some Democratic strategists and commentators believe that it is necessary for the party to replace Biden in order to have a chance of winning in November.

High-profile Hollywood donors have also threatened to stop giving to the Democratic Party if Biden does not step aside as the presidential candidate. They are reportedly disillusioned with his performance and want someone else at the top of the ticket.

Despite these concerns, some prominent liberal columnists have defended Biden's debate performance and called for him to continue his campaign. However, many Americans were left disappointed by his inability to articulate clear and coherent responses during the debate.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • It is unclear how representative the opinions of these donor factions are of the broader Democratic Party.
  • The article does not provide specific details about the damage caused by Biden's debate performance.

Sources

95%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Ex-DNC vice chair: Biden must be pushed to drop out

Politico News Site Name: POLITICO Full Legal Name of News Site: Politico LLC Location of News Site: Washington D.C., USA Sunday, 30 June 2024 00:00
  • Unique Points
    • Former DNC vice chair R.T. Rybak wrote that leading Democrats should urge President Joe Biden to withdraw from the 2024 presidential race
    • Rybak listed Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer as one of five Democrats who could do well in the election if Biden steps down
    • Biden has yet to be officially nominated for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination
  • Accuracy
    • High-profile Hollywood donors have stated they will not continue supporting President Biden’s re-election bid if he does not step aside as the Democratic candidate
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority and a dichotomous depiction. It quotes former Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak's opinion on why President Joe Biden should withdraw from the 2024 presidential race, implying that other Democrats are more suitable candidates.
    • A former Democratic National Committee vice chair wrote Sunday that leading Democrats must be pushed to urge President Joe Biden to withdraw from the 2024 presidential race or history will judge them harshly.
    • They fear political retribution but they should really fear that if we lose this election because they didn’t have the guts to do what they know needs to be done, holy hell and history will come down on them like an anvil.
    • It is absolutely not too late to pick a new candidate.
    • Rybak wrote that Biden “deserves tremendous praise” for his time as president, but said people should not confuse gratitude for what he has accomplished with the need to win the 2024 presidential election over Trump.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

77%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Top Hollywood donors threaten to stop giving to Dems if Biden not replaced as candidate: report

Fox News Channel Gabriel Hays Sunday, 30 June 2024 16:13
  • Unique Points
    • High-profile Hollywood donors have stated they will not continue supporting President Biden’s re-election bid if he does not step aside as the Democratic candidate, according to Variety.
    • Following Biden’s debate performance on Thursday, major liberal donors have become disillusioned with the former president and want someone else as the top of the ticket.
    • Democratic Party donors in Hollywood are reportedly saying they will stop donating to the party if Biden is not replaced as the presidential candidate.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article reports on the disillusionment of some high-profile Hollywood donors with President Biden's debate performance and their potential withdrawal of support for the Democratic Party if Biden does not step down as a presidential candidate. This is an example of selective reporting, as it only reports details that support the author's position without mentioning any counterarguments or opposing viewpoints. The article also uses emotional manipulation by describing Biden's debate performance as 'disastrous' and 'hard to see how we keep supporting him'.
    • With all the text chains I’m on, people are basically like, 'If he doesn’t drop out, we’re not giving any more money to Democrats or the Democratic Party.' It’s like super intense.
    • It’s just really hard to see how we keep supporting him. He needs to dig deep about whether he can in good conscience be our nominee.
    • High-profile Hollywood donors said they’ll not be giving any more money to the Democratic Party if President Biden doesn’t end his re-election bid, Variety reported
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority by reporting the statements of several Hollywood insiders without providing any evidence or context as to why these individuals are credible or expert in the matter. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Biden's debate performance as a 'disaster' and quoting anonymous sources who express their disillusionment with Biden. However, no formal fallacies were identified.
    • High-profile Hollywood donors said they'll not be giving any more money to the Democratic Party if President Biden doesn’t end his re-election bid, Variety reported
    • Anonymous Hollywood donor: 'If he doesn’t drop out, we’re not giving any more money to Democrats or the Democratic Party.'
  • Bias (80%)
    The author expresses a clear bias against President Biden's debate performance and quotes several anonymous sources expressing their disillusionment with him as the Democratic nominee. The article also implies that major liberal donors are considering stopping their donations to the Democratic Party if Biden is not replaced.
    • Anonymous Hollywood donor: 'If he doesn’t drop out, we’re not giving any more money to Democrats or the Democratic Party.'
      • High-profile Hollywood donors said they’ll not be giving any more money to the Democratic Party if President Biden doesn’t end his re-election bid, Variety reported
        • There is a sense that the money dried up last night about 10 minutes into the debate.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        92%

        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

        Pelosi: Choosing another nominee ‘could be chaotic’

        CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Sunday, 30 June 2024 15:43
        • Unique Points
          • Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi expressed that choosing another nominee could be chaotic
        • Accuracy
          • ]Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi expressed that choosing another nominee could be chaotic[
          • Choosing another nominee could be chaotic
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        37%

        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

        Democrats gaslighted Americans about Biden's cognitive decline. The debate exposed the truth.

        USA Today Sunday, 30 June 2024 00:00
        • Unique Points
          • The debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump revealed that Biden struggled to speak in coherent sentences.
          • Republicans had expressed concerns about Biden’s cognitive abilities since at least 2022, but their concerns were dismissed or met with indifference and smears by the Democratic Party and the White House.
          • The Democratic Party had known about Biden’s decline for months before the debate, but chose not to tell the American people.
          • Prominent liberal columnists expressed disappointment in Biden’s performance and called for him to step down after the debate.
        • Accuracy
          • ]The debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump revealed that Biden struggled to speak in coherent sentences.[
          • Biden’s performance raised questions about his well-being and qualification for another term.
        • Deception (0%)
          The article contains editorializing, pontification, and author opinions. The author expresses her opinion that Biden is not fit to be president based on his performance in the debate. She also makes emotional appeals to readers by stating that 'Americans deserve better.' The article also contains selective reporting as the author only reports details that support her position and ignores any counterarguments or evidence that may contradict it.
          • Americans deserve better.
          • The debate Thursday between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump was full of surprises, revelations and disappointments. The first, most important revelation: It took only 10 minutes to realize Biden is not fit to be commander in chief for another term.
          • Biden's not qualified to be president
        • Fallacies (15%)
          The author makes several appeals to authority by referencing columns from The New York Times and expressing disappointment from liberal columnists. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Democrats lied to the American people and gaslighted them about Biden's cognitive decline.
          • The New York Times, a fortress of liberal opinions, ran not one, not two, but multiple columns from progressives...
          • Democratic leaders had to have known that Biden was in cognitive decline long before the debate and chose not to tell us.
          • It’s rare that liberals would even say such a thing about their nominee, let alone all at once.
        • Bias (0%)
          The author expresses clear bias against President Joe Biden and implies that he is unfit to be president due to his age and perceived cognitive decline. The author also accuses the Democratic Party of lying to the American people about Biden's condition and gaslighting them.
          • Americans deserve answers. It seems clear now the Democratic Party’s leaders lied to the American people, and to members of their own party who could have chosen an alternative candidate during the primaries.
            • Biden’s not qualified to be president
              • Democrats had to have known that Biden was in cognitive decline long before the debate and chose not to tell us.
                • It took only 10 minutes to realize Biden is not fit to be commander in chief for another term.
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                98%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                Donors stress over path forward after Biden’s debate performance

                CNN News Network Gregory Krieg, Sunday, 30 June 2024 00:17
                • Unique Points
                  • Democratic donors are expressing anxiety over President Joe Biden’s debate performance
                  • Three factions have emerged among Democratic donors regarding how to proceed with the campaign
                  • One faction argues against a pressure campaign to urge Biden to drop out as it would be a waste of time and resources
                  • Another faction calls for a middle-of-the-road approach, assessing the damage before taking drastic steps
                  • A third group of donors is calling for Democrats to begin the process of seeking out a new nominee with less than four months until the general election
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Fallacies (95%)
                  The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when Dmitri Mehlhorn states 'Biden alone controlled his fate as the Democratic nominee.' This statement implies that Mehlhorn, who is not Biden and does not have control over the nomination process, knows for certain what Biden's intentions are. Additionally, there are instances of inflammatory rhetoric such as 'alarming debate performance,' 'crisis,' and 'drastic steps.' However, these phrases do not directly relate to logical fallacies committed by the author.
                  • 'Biden alone controlled his fate as the Democratic nominee.',
                • Bias (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication