Denver Metro Area Braces for Strong Storm System with Flight Delays and Power Outages at DIA and Xcel Energy Shuts Off Power to Thousands of Customers in Colorado

Denver, Colorado United States of America
A strong storm system is expected to hit the Denver metro area on Saturday, April 6th with winds of up to 100 mph.
Flight delays and cancellations are expected at Denver International Airport (DIA) due to high wind danger. Over 155 flights will be delayed or canceled.
Xcel Energy has preemptively shut off power to around 55,000 customers in Colorado from Saturday at 3 p.m until at least noon on Sunday due to forecasted high winds.
Denver Metro Area Braces for Strong Storm System with Flight Delays and Power Outages at DIA and Xcel Energy Shuts Off Power to Thousands of Customers in Colorado

On Saturday, April 6th, a strong storm system is expected to hit the Denver metro area with winds of up to 100 mph. This has led to flight delays and cancellations at Denver International Airport (DIA), as well as power outages in some areas due to high wind danger. DIA typically handles between 1,700 and 2,000 flights every day, but on Saturday it is expected that over 155 flights will be delayed or canceled. The airlines affected include Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, SkyWest and CommuteAir. In addition to flight delays and cancellations at DIA, Xcel Energy has preemptively shut off power to around 55,000 customers in Colorado from Saturday at 3 p.m until at least noon on Sunday due to forecasted high winds. The bulk of the affected customers are located in Boulder County with some small sections of Gilpin, Larimer, Douglas, Broomfield and Jefferson counties also being impacted.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if the storm will be severe enough to cause significant damage or injuries.
  • The exact number of flights affected by delays and cancellations at DIA is uncertain.

Sources

78%

  • Unique Points
    • Xcel Energy will preemptively shut off power to around 55,000 customers in Colorado from Saturday at 3 p.m. until at least noon on Sunday due to forecasted high winds.
    • The bulk of the customers affected by the shutoff are located in Boulder County and some customers in small sections of Gilpin, Larimer, Douglas, Broomfield and Jefferson counties will also be impacted.
    • As of 3:20 p.m., there were 125 outages affecting 48,254 customers according to Xcel Energy's outage map.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Xcel Energy will proactively shut off power to around 55,000 customers due to forecasted high winds. However, this statement is not entirely accurate as it implies that all of these customers are affected by the shutoff when only a portion of them are actually impacted. Secondly, the author states that Xcel Energy has created a more detailed map of who would be affected but does not provide any information on how they plan to do so or if this is even possible. Thirdly, the article mentions that areas in Boulder County were forecasted to see winds of up to 100 mph while Denver was expected to see gusts of up to 75 mph. However, it does not provide any context on how these wind speeds are relevant or if they have been used as a basis for the shutoff decision. Lastly, the article mentions that Xcel Energy has done similar things in other states and said the practice is becoming more common but does not provide any evidence to support this claim.
    • The author does not provide any information on how Xcel Energy plans to create a more detailed map of who would be affected or if this is even possible.
    • The statement 'Xcel Energy will proactively shut off power to around 55,000 customers due to forecasted high winds' is deceptive as it implies that all of these customers are affected by the shutoff when only a portion of them are actually impacted.
  • Fallacies (70%)
    The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when they quote Xcel Energy Colorado President Robert Kenney without providing any context or evidence for his claims. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Xcel shut off power proactively or not at all, ignoring other potential solutions that could have been considered. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when it describes the high winds as
    • The author uses an appeal to authority when they quote Xcel Energy Colorado President Robert Kenney without providing any context or evidence for his claims.
    • <p>Areas of the foothills were forecasted to see winds of up to 100 mph, while Denver was expected to see gusts of up to 75 mph.</p>
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

73%

  • Unique Points
    • ,
    • Xcel Energy will preemptively shut off power to around 55,000 customers in Colorado from Saturday at 3 p.m. until at least noon on Sunday due to forecasted high winds.
    • The bulk of the customers affected by the shutoff are located in Boulder County and some customers in small sections of Gilpin, Larimer, Douglas, Broomfield and Jefferson counties will also be impacted.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Xcel Energy made the decision to proactively de-energize lines due to wildfire concerns when it was actually a last resort step taken after other measures failed. Secondly, the article states that winds could reach 100 miles per hour but fails to mention that these are not typical wind speeds in Colorado during this time of year. Thirdly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'extremely critical fire weather' and 'potential for rapid spread of any new fires' without providing any evidence or context. Lastly, the article does not disclose sources which is a violation of the ignore rules.
    • The statement that Xcel Energy made the decision to proactively de-energize lines due to wildfire concerns when it was actually a last resort step taken after other measures failed.
  • Fallacies (70%)
    The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when stating that the National Weather Service in Boulder, Colo., said on social media that winds are expected to increase through the afternoon and evening. This is not a direct quote from the NWS but rather paraphrasing their statement which can be misleading.
    • The author uses an appeal to authority when stating that the National Weather Service in Boulder, Colo., said on social media that winds are expected to increase through the afternoon and evening. This is not a direct quote from the NWS but rather paraphrasing their statement which can be misleading.
    • The article contains several examples of inflammatory rhetoric such as 'powerful winds' and 'potential for rapid spread of any new fires that develop'. These phrases are used to create an emotional response in the reader, rather than providing factual information.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
    The author of the article has a conflict of interest with Xcel Energy as they are owned by the same parent company. The National Weather Service and Storm Prediction Center also have a potential conflict of interest as their primary mission is to provide weather forecasts and warnings which may be affected by power outages.
    • The article mentions that Xcel Energy has been criticized in the past for its handling of wildfires. The author does not disclose any financial ties or personal relationships with Xcel Energy, but it is clear they have a professional affiliation as they are owned by the same parent company.
      • The National Weather Service and Storm Prediction Center provide weather forecasts and warnings which may be affected by power outages. However, the article does not disclose any financial ties or personal relationships with these organizations.
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      81%

      • Unique Points
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Accuracy
        • More than 150 flights have been delayed or canceled at Denver International Airport as high winds impact Colorado on Saturday.
        • The bulk of the customers affected by the shutoff are located in Boulder County and some customers in small sections of Gilpin, Larimer, Douglas, Broomfield and Jefferson counties will also be impacted.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that DENVER typically handles anywhere from 1,700 to 2,000 flights every day without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by suggesting that there are only two options: either it is raining and snowing on the western side of Colorado or it is not. This oversimplifies a complex situation and ignores other possibilities. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric with phrases such as
        • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that DENVER typically handles anywhere from 1,700 to 2,000 flights every day without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
        • <strong>More than 15</strong> <em>flights have been delayed or canceled at Denver International Airport as high winds impact Colorado on Saturday.</em>
      • Bias (85%)
        The article is biased towards the negative impact of high winds on flights at Denver International Airport. The author uses language that depicts the situation as extreme and dangerous, such as 'strong storm system', 'gusty winds', and 'high fire danger'. Additionally, the focus is solely on flight delays and cancellations caused by these conditions, with no mention of any positive aspects or mitigation efforts.
        • A strong storm system could lead to winds of 60 to 70 mph in the Denver metro area
          • The western side of the state could get rain, snow and colder temperatures.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication