Ahmad also asked what would happen to civilians in Rafah if Israel invaded Gaza, which was met with silence from White House officials.
Dr. Thaer Ahmad walked out of a meeting with President Biden to protest his stance on the conflict in Gaza and shared his concerns about the well-being of residents there.
The Biden administration's handling of the Israel-Hamas war has been met with criticism from Palestinian Americans, Muslim Americans, and Arab Americans.
The Biden administration's handling of the Israel-Hamas war has been met with criticism from Palestinian Americans, Muslim Americans, and Arab Americans. Dr. Thaer Ahmad walked out of a meeting with President Biden to protest his stance on the conflict in Gaza and shared his concerns about the well-being of residents there.
Ahmad also asked what would happen to civilians in Rafah if Israel invaded Gaza, which was met with silence from White House officials. The doctor's departure from the meeting prompted a response from President Biden who acknowledged Ahmad's absence and thanked him for his service.
Dr. Thaer Ahmad walked out of a meeting with President Biden and other Arab and Muslim leaders and activists on Tuesday.
Ahmad left the meeting "out of respect for my community."
He detailed his experiences in Khan Younis and Rafah, telling Mr. Biden there was no way Israel could safely invade the southern Gaza city where more than one million Palestinians have fled since the war began.
Ahmad gave Mr. Biden a letter from an 8-year-old orphan in Rafah, asking the president not to allow an invasion.
He feels Mr. Biden is not doing enough to stop Israel from going ahead with its planned invasion, and he says he's not alone.
Ahmad plans to return to Gaza despite the enormous risks involved.
Accuracy
The White House held a pared-down meal just for staff members and a separate meeting for Muslim community leaders like Dr. Ahmad.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an example of a dichotomous depiction. The author describes the situation in Gaza as dire and tragic while also stating that there are innocent civilians who have been displaced multiple times. This creates a contrast between the suffering of Palestinians and their perceived innocence, which could be seen as inflammatory rhetoric.
The author describes the situation in Gaza as dire and tragic while also stating that there are innocent civilians who have been displaced multiple times.
Bias
(85%)
The author of the article is a Palestinian American doctor who walked out of a meeting with President Biden and other Arab and Muslim leaders. The reason for walking out was to express his community's hurt and pain over Israel's plans for an invasion in Rafah. He also spoke about the dire situation in Gaza, including Israeli military raids on hospitals where families were sheltering. The author is clearly biased towards Palestine and against Israel.
Ahmad said he felt comfortable leaving because he knew the other attendees would also be able to impress upon Mr. Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris the dire situation in Gaza.
He detailed his experiences in Khan Younis and Rafah
The president asked him to speak first
<u>I can list hospital after hospital.</u>
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of President Biden's meeting with Palestinian American doctor Thaer Ahmad and other Arab and Muslim leaders and activists. The article mentions that Dr. Ahmad is an outspoken critic of Israel's actions in Gaza Strip, which could compromise his ability to act objectively when discussing this topic.
Dr. Thaer Ahmad is an outspoken critic of Israel's actions in Gaza Strip.
Dr. Thaer Ahmad walked out of a meeting with President Biden to protest his administration's actions on the Israel-Hamas war.
Ahmad shared his concerns about the well-being of Gaza residents in light of possible invasion by Israel and asked what would happen to civilians in Rafah.
Biden acknowledged Ahmad's departure from the meeting.
Accuracy
Dr. Thaer Ahmad walked out of a meeting with President Biden at the White House to protest his administration's actions on the Israel-Hamas war.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that Dr. Thaer Ahmad walked out of a meeting with President Biden because he was not satisfied with his stance on Israel-Hamas war. However, this is not entirely accurate as it only mentions that Ahmad walked out and does not provide any context or explanation for why he did so.
The article states that Dr. Thaer Ahmad walked out of a meeting with President Biden to protest the administration's actions on the Israel-Hamas war, but it does not mention what specific actions were taken by the administration that led to this decision.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the president's acknowledgement of Ahmad leaving the meeting as evidence that he understands and respects their concerns. This is a false premise as it does not necessarily mean that Biden agrees with or will act on their demands. Additionally, the article contains inflammatory rhetoric when describing Gaza residents as
I spoke first and I let him know that I am from a community that's reeling,
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards the Palestinian and Muslim communities. The author uses language that dehumanizes Israelis by referring to them as 'walked out' of a meeting with Biden instead of saying they left on their own accord. He also quotes Dr Thaer Ahmad who says he walked out in protest, which implies that his actions were justified and necessary when it was not clear if the president had invited him or not. The author uses language like 'reeling', 'grieving' and 'broken hearts' to elicit sympathy for the Palestinian community without providing any context about their actions leading up to this point. He also quotes Ahmad saying that he shared his concerns with Biden, which implies that the president was responsible for what had happened in Gaza when it is not clear if he has any control over it.
Dr Thaer Ahmad walked out of a meeting with President Biden at the White House to protest his administration's actions on the Israel-Hamas war.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Dr. Thaer Ahmad and his work with MedGlobal, which is a non-profit organization that provides medical aid to people in need around the world including Gaza residents. This creates a conflict of interest as it may compromise Dr. Ahmad's ability to act objectively and impartially on the topic of Israel-Hamas war.
Dr. Thaer Ahmad is mentioned multiple times throughout the article, specifically in relation to his work with MedGlobal which provides medical aid to people in need around the world including Gaza residents.
Dr. Thaer Ahmad expressed his concerns about attending an iftar meal with the president while Palestinians were under siege
`Jake Sullivan`, the national security adviser, was present at the meeting with Muslim community leaders
Accuracy
Many invitees declined the invitation due to President Biden's support for Israel's war in Gaza
`Dr. Thaer Ahmad`, a Palestinian American doctor who was in Gaza in January, expressed his concerns about attending an iftar meal with the president while Palestinians were under siege
Ahmad left the meeting −out of respect for my community.∝
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that President Biden's White House gathering for Ramadan was controversial due to his support for Israel's war in Gaza. However, it does not mention any controversy surrounding the event itself until later on in the article when it states that many Muslim community leaders declined to attend an iftar meal with President Biden while so many Palestinians were under siege. This implies that there was no controversy surrounding the event initially and only became controversial after some Muslims refused to attend, which is not true.
The title implies that President Biden's White House gathering for Ramadan was controversial due to his support for Israel's war in Gaza.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by citing the opinions of Muslim community leaders without providing any evidence or reasoning for their stance. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the situation in Gaza as a 'siege' and portraying it as a humanitarian crisis.
Many of the invitees, distressed over President Biden’s support for Israel’s war in Gaza, said they would not attend an iftar meal with the president on Tuesday evening while so many Palestinians were under siege.
The moment epitomized just how problematic the war in Gaza has become for Mr. Biden, who is increasingly critical of Israel but still resisting calls from within his party to set conditions on weapons sales to the country.
Bias
(85%)
The author has a clear bias against Israel and its actions in Gaza. The article mentions the war in Gaza multiple times and portrays it as an ongoing crisis that is causing suffering for Palestinians. The author also quotes Dr. Ahmad, who says that he cannot talk to Biden about famine and starvation over bread and steak while so many Palestinians are under siege. This statement implies a moral superiority of the Palestinian cause over Israel's actions in Gaza.
Dr. Ahmad says that he cannot talk to Biden about famine and starvation while so many Palestinians are under siege
The article mentions the war in Gaza multiple times
Dr. Thaer Ahmad left the meeting after getting emotional when talking about the many Palestinians he cared for in Gaza
Ahmad handed a letter to the president from an 8-year-old orphan in Rafah, the southernmost city in Gaza
Salima Suswell, founder and chief executive of Black Muslim Leadership Council, felt like Biden and Harris both listened closely to attendees and understood their perspectives
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(75%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards Israel and its actions in the Gaza Strip. The author uses language that dehumanizes Palestinians by describing them as 'terrorists' and their deaths as a result of their own actions. The author also quotes Biden saying he will not call for a permanent cease-fire until all hostages are released, which implies that Israel is the victim in this conflict and ignores the suffering of Palestinian civilians. Additionally, the article mentions that seven aid workers were killed by an Israeli airstrike, but does not mention any deaths or injuries caused by Hamas attacks on Israelis.
Dr. Thaer Ahmad walked out of a meeting with President Biden to discuss the ongoing crisis in Gaza.
,
Accuracy
Ahmad left the meeting "out of respect for my community."
He detailed his experiences in Khan Younis and Rafah, telling Mr. Biden there was no way Israel could safely invade the southern Gaza city where more than one million Palestinians have fled since the war began.
Ahmad gave Mr. Biden a letter from an 8-year-old orphan in Rafah, asking the president not to allow an invasion.
He feels Mr. Biden is not doing enough to stop Israel from going ahead with its planned invasion, and he says he's not alone.
Ahmad plans to return to Gaza despite the enormous risks involved.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from Dr. Thaer Ahmad that he walked out of the meeting with President Biden because he was not satisfied with the outcome. This is an example of political bias as it implies that one side (the doctor) has a particular viewpoint on the issue and believes it to be correct, while another side (President Biden) does not share this same viewpoint.
