Donald Trump Found Guilty on All 34 Felony Counts in New York Hush-Money Case: President Biden's Response

Greenwich, Connecticut, Connecticut United States of America
Former President Donald J. Trump found guilty on all 34 felony counts in New York hush-money case.
President Biden ramped up criticism of Trump's criminal conviction during a fund-raiser.
Donald Trump Found Guilty on All 34 Felony Counts in New York Hush-Money Case: President Biden's Response

In a dramatic turn of events, former President Donald J. Trump was found guilty on all 34 felony counts in his New York hush-money case, a verdict that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape. As President Biden ramped up his criticism of Trump's criminal conviction during a fund-raiser in Connecticut for his re-election campaign and the Democratic Party, he called Trump an



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Is there any possibility of a mistrial or appeal?
  • Were all the jurors impartial and unbiased?

Sources

95%

  • Unique Points
    • President Biden spoke about former President Trump’s criminal conviction at a fund-raiser in Connecticut for his re-election campaign and the Democratic Party.
    • Jury found Donald J. Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts in his New York hush-money case.
    • Biden called Trump ‘unhinged’ and said he was undermining the American system of justice with his vitriol after the verdict.
  • Accuracy
    • Trump campaign responded by attacking Biden and diverting attention from Hunter Biden’s federal gun charge trial.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The author uses derogatory language towards Trump by calling him 'unhinged' and 'disturbing'. He also makes a comparison between Trump being a convicted felon and an assault on the American system of justice.
    • “But as disturbing as that is, more damaging is the all-out assault Donald Trump is making on the American system of justice,”
      • “It’s reckless and dangerous for anyone to say that’s rigged just because they don’t like the outcome,”
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      71%

      • Unique Points
        • President Joe Biden called out Donald Trump as a
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (30%)
        The article contains selective reporting as it focuses on the legal troubles of both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, but only mentions the conviction of Trump and the ongoing trials of Biden's son Hunter. This creates an imbalance in reporting that could potentially mislead readers. Additionally, there are instances of emotional manipulation through phrases like 'stunning turn,' 'significant hardening,' and 'disturbing as that is.' These phrases are used to elicit strong emotions from the reader without providing any new or significant information.
        • But as disturbing as that is, more damaging is the all-out assault Donald Trump is making on the American system of justice.
        • The decision to call out his predecessor Donald Trump as a ‘convicted felon’ for the first time represents a significant hardening of his rhetoric against his Republican general election foe.
        • It was ‘reckless … dangerous … and irresponsible’ for his opponent to say the verdict was rigged.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting President Biden's statement that Trump is a 'convicted felon.' However, the author also mentions that some Democrats have used similar language before Biden. This does not constitute a fallacy as long as the author is only reporting on what was said and not endorsing or condemning it.
        • ]President Joe Biden[s] decision to call out his predecessor Donald Trump as a 'convicted felon' for the first time represents a significant hardening of his rhetoric against his Republican general election foe.[
        • But as disturbing as that is, more damaging is the all-out assault Donald Trump is making on the American system of justice.[
      • Bias (75%)
        The author uses loaded language when referring to Trump as a 'convicted felon' multiple times, implying that this is a significant and damning fact. While it is true that Trump was convicted in a criminal trial, the author's repeated use of this term may be intended to sway readers against Trump.
        • But as disturbing as that is, more damaging is the all-out assault Donald Trump is making on the American system of justice.
          • For the first time in American history a former president that is a convicted felon is now seeking the office of the presidency.
            • President Joe Biden’s decision to call out his predecessor Donald Trump as a ‘convicted felon’ for the first time represents a significant hardening of his rhetoric against his Republican general election foe.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            88%

            • Unique Points
              • Former President Donald Trump raised over $70 million in campaign contributions within 72 hours after the verdicts in his Manhattan trial.
              • Enormous numbers of ordinary Americans were disgusted by the verdicts and sent money to press forward with Trump’s campaign.
              • Trump supporters saw the verdicts as a ‘last straw.’
            • Accuracy
              • Trump supporters saw the verdicts as a ‘last straw’.
              • Former US President Donald Trump was found guilty of falsifying business records to conceal hush money paid to former adult-film star Stormy Daniels.
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            74%

            • Unique Points
              • Israeli-American casino billionaire Miriam Adelson is expected to donate a multi-million dollar boost to Trump’s campaign this week.
              • Silicon Valley investor David Sacks posted on X that there is now only one issue in this election: whether the American people will stand for the USA becoming a Banana Republic.
              • Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman is expected to make an announcement on X in the coming days about supporting Trump.
            • Accuracy
              • Former US President Donald Trump was found guilty of falsifying business records to conceal hush money paid to former adult-film star Stormy Daniels.
              • Trump's campaign announced it raised nearly $53 million in just 24 hours after the verdict of his conviction.
              • On 6 June, Sacks and fellow investor Chamath Palihapitiya are planning to host a fundraiser for Trump in San Francisco with attendees being asked to contribute as much as $300,000.
              • Blackstone Group CEO Steve Schwarzman has already announced he will support Trump in the election.
              • The Biden campaign had a record $192 million cash-on-hand by the end of April compared to Trump’s $93.1 million.
              • In April, the Trump campaign raised $76 million surpassing their Democratic rivals for the first time in this election cycle. The Biden campaign raised $51 million in April, sharply down from the $90 million-plus raised a month earlier.
              • Professor Justin Buchler, a campaign finance expert from Case Western Reserve University in Ohio, stated that money is not going to be determinative in this election.
            • Deception (30%)
              The article reports on the financial support for Trump's campaign from various billionaires after his conviction. While it does not make any editorializing statements or use emotional manipulation, it does engage in selective reporting by only mentioning the billionaires who are supporting Trump and ignoring those who are not. It also uses sensationalism by implying that the support from these billionaires injected new life into Trump's electoral bid.
              • Another potential donor, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, is expected to make an announcement on X in the coming days about supporting Trump.
              • Billionaire investor Nelson Peltz - who said after the US Capitol riot that he regretted voting for Trump in 2020 - has had a change of heart and hosted the former president at his oceanfront Florida mansion in March.
              • While it is unclear how much she plans to spend, Politico and other US news outlets have reported that the contribution is expected to exceed the $90m donation to Preserve America by Mrs Adelson and her late husband, Sheldon, ahead of the 2020 election.
              • Among them was Silicon Valley investor David Sacks, who posted on X, formerly Twitter, that there ‘is now only one issue in this election: whether the American people will stand for the USA becoming a Banana Republic.’
            • Fallacies (75%)
              The article contains a few instances of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority, but no formal logical fallacies. The author provides a balanced report on the fundraising efforts of both Trump and Biden campaigns without making any value judgments or assertions that would lead to scoring lower. The author simply reports on the facts related to billionaires supporting Trump after his conviction.
              • The Republican candidate for this November's White House election, the conviction injected new life into his electoral bid - with his campaign announcing that it raised nearly $53m (£41.6m) in just 24 hours after the verdict.
              • Among them was Silicon Valley investor David Sacks, who posted on X, formerly Twitter, that there "is now only one issue in this election: whether the American people will stand for the USA becoming a Banana Republic."
              • According to US media reports, Mrs Adelson will donate to a political action committee called Preserve America. Political action committees can spend unlimited sums of money backing candidates for elected office.
            • Bias (80%)
              The author uses language that depicts Trump supporters as standing up against a 'Banana Republic' and being unfairly treated by the justice system. This implies a bias towards Trump and his supporters.
              • I believe our justice system is being weaponised against him.
                • There is now only one issue in this election: whether the American people will stand for the USA becoming a Banana Republic
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                90%

                • Unique Points
                  • A New York jury found Donald J. Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.
                  • Rahim Buford, a person with a felony conviction, expressed mixed feelings about Trump’s conviction and its potential impact on the criminal justice system.
                • Accuracy
                  • Jury found Donald J. Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts in his New York hush-money case.
                  • Trump campaign responded by attacking Biden and diverting attention from Hunter Biden’s federal gun charge trial.
                • Deception (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains an appeal to authority and a dichotomous depiction. The appeal to authority is present when the author states that 'Democratic leaders are eager to make former President Donald J. Trump's new identity as a convicted criminal central to their pitch to voters on why he is unfit for office.' This statement relies on the credibility of these Democratic leaders rather than presenting evidence or logical reasoning. The dichotomous depiction is found in the description of reactions among Americans with felony convictions, portraying their feelings as 'complex and personal' and suggesting they either identify with Trump or are contrasted to him, when in reality the range of emotions and thoughts may be more nuanced than this binary presentation.
                  • Democratic leaders are eager to make former President Donald J. Trump's new identity as a convicted criminal central to their pitch to voters on why he is unfit for office.
                • Bias (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication