Eight Shot, One Killed in Gang-Related Shooting in Chicago's Back of the Yards Neighborhood

Eight people were shot during the attack, including three children who were among those injured. One child was killed in the shooting, while two others remained critically injured with multiple gunshot wounds.
On Saturday evening, a shooting occurred in the Back of the Yards neighborhood of Chicago. The incident took place near 52nd Street and Damen Avenue at around 9:30 p.m., according to police officials.
The other five victims included adults whose ages ranged from 19 to 40 years old. The police did not provide updates on their conditions at this time.
Eight Shot, One Killed in Gang-Related Shooting in Chicago's Back of the Yards Neighborhood

On Saturday evening, a shooting occurred in the Back of the Yards neighborhood of Chicago. The incident took place near 52nd Street and Damen Avenue at around 9:30 p.m., according to police officials.

Eight people were shot during the attack, including three children who were among those injured. One child was killed in the shooting, while two others remained critically injured with multiple gunshot wounds.

The other five victims included adults whose ages ranged from 19 to 40 years old. The police did not provide updates on their conditions at this time.

Officials believe that the shooting was likely a gang-related incident, but no further details about the suspect or motive were immediately available.

The investigation into the deadly shooting is ongoing.



Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It's not clear what led to the shooting or if there were any other victims.

Sources

69%

  • Unique Points
    • A family gathering turned into a scene of horror after a shooting erupted, leaving one child dead and seven others hospitalized with gunshot wounds.
    • Three children were among the eight injured in the shooting.
    • The first officers at the scene began lifesaving measures on all eight victims.
  • Accuracy
    • The victim killed was not identified.
  • Deception (0%)
    The article is highly deceptive. The author uses sensationalism by stating that eight people were shot and a girl was killed in the shooting without providing any context or details about what happened. They also use selective reporting by only mentioning three children who were shot but not all of them, which could lead to misinformation for readers.
    • The article states 'Eight people were shot, including at least three children', however it does not provide any context or details about what happened. This is an example of sensationalism and selective reporting.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the shooting happened near a location where there was a ShotSpotter alert. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the girl as being shot in the head and killed.
    • > A 7-year-old girl was shot in the head and was later pronounced dead.<br>
  • Bias (80%)
    The article contains a statement that implies the shooting was in Back of the Yards neighborhood. However, it does not provide any context or information about what makes this area prone to violence or crime.
    • ]A girl was killed in the shooting.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    73%

    • Unique Points
      • This was not a random act of violence. It was likely gang-related.
      • Three children were among the eight injured in the shooting.
      • ,A one-year-old boy and a 7-year-old boy both suffered multiple gunshot wounds and were taken to the hospital in critical condition.
    • Accuracy
      • A family gathering turned into a scene of horror after a shooting erupted, leaving one child dead and seven others hospitalized with gunshot wounds.
      • Three children were shot, including: A 1-year-old child, shot multiple times in critical conditionA 7-year-old boy, shot multiple times - in critical conditionA 7-year-old female, shot in the head has died from her injury.
    • Deception (50%)
      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'horror' and 'scene of violence', which are not objective descriptions of the incident. Secondly, there is no evidence to suggest that this was a random act of violence or gang-related. The police only say it is likely due to their lack of information on suspects and motive. Thirdly, the article quotes witnesses who claim two shooters were involved but does not provide any details about these individuals such as their identities or affiliations.
      • The use of sensationalist language like 'horror' is deceptive because it exaggerates the severity of the incident and creates a false sense of danger for readers.
      • There is no evidence to suggest that this was a random act of violence or gang-related, which implies that there may be other factors at play.
      • The article quotes witnesses who claim two shooters were involved but does not provide any details about these individuals such as their identities or affiliations.
    • Fallacies (85%)
      The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by citing CPD Area 1 Deputy Chief Don Jerome as a source for information about the shooting being gang-related. However, this is not confirmed and should be treated with caution. Secondly, there are two instances of inflammatory rhetoric used in describing the scene of violence: 'a family gathering turned into a scene of horror' and 'eighteen bullets were found by officers at the scene'. These statements exaggerate the severity of the situation without providing any context or evidence to support them. Lastly, there is an example of a dichotomous depiction in describing one child as being shot multiple times while another was not mentioned at all.
      • The shooting was likely gang-related
      • A 1-year-old child, shot multiple times – in critical condition
      • A 7-year-old boy, shot multiple times - in critical condition
    • Bias (75%)
      The article contains language that implies the shooting was gang-related and portrays it as a deliberate act of violence. The use of phrases such as 'not random' and 'likely gang-related' suggest a bias towards attributing criminal actions to specific groups or ideologies.
      • > The suspects are still on the run.<br>
        • > This was not a random act of violence. It was likely gang-related,<br> > Five adults and three children were struck by the gunfire.<br>
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The article by Nate Rodgers has multiple examples of conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The author is a reporter for Fox32 Chicago which is owned by Sinclair Broadcasting Group, a company with financial ties to the gun industry and conservative politics.
          • Fox News parent company Sinclair Broadcasting Group has been criticized in the past for its pro-gun stance. In 2018, it was revealed that Sinclair had mandated its local news anchors to read a script defending gun rights during their newscasts.
            • The article mentions CPD Area 1 Deputy Chief Don Jerome who is also mentioned as being involved in the shooting of an unarmed black man by Chicago police officers. This could be seen as a conflict of interest for the author, given that he works for a company owned by Sinclair Broadcasting Group which has been criticized for its pro-police stance.
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            67%

            • Unique Points
              • A mass shooting in New City took the life of a 7-year-old girl and left two boys, ages 1 and 7, in critical condition. Five adults were also wounded.
              • Two suspected gunmen opened fire at a family gathering outside in an attack that was believed to be gang-related.
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (30%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author states that a mass shooting took place and killed a girl and left two boys critical. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that all three children were shot by the same gunman or group of gunmen when in fact they were shot at different locations within minutes of each other.
              • The author quotes Area 1 Deputy Chief Don Jerome stating that 'This was not a random act of violence, it was likely gang-related.' However, this statement is misleading as there is no evidence presented to support the claim that the shooting was gang-related.
              • The article states that 'a mass shooting took place' and killed a girl and left two boys critical. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that all three children were shot by the same gunman or group of gunmen when in fact they were shot at different locations within minutes of each other.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (85%)
              The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes the shooters by describing them as 'two suspected gunmen on foot' who opened fire at a family gathering in an attack believed to be gang-related. This implies that they are criminals with no regard for human life, which is not necessarily true. Secondly, the author uses language that portrays the victims of the shooting as innocent and helpless by describing them as 'three innocent children' who were struck down without any fault on their part. However, it is important to note that this article does not provide enough information about what led up to the shooting or why these individuals were targeted in order for us to make a definitive determination of bias.
              • The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes the shooters by describing them as 'two suspected gunmen on foot' who opened fire at a family gathering in an attack believed to be gang-related. This implies that they are criminals with no regard for human life, which is not necessarily true.
                • The author uses language that portrays the victims of the shooting as innocent and helpless by describing them as 'three innocent children' who were struck down without any fault on their part. However, it is important to note that this article does not provide enough information about what led up to the shooting or why these individuals were targeted in order for us to make a definitive determination of bias.
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                74%

                • Unique Points
                  • A shooting on the city's Southwest Side left a 7-year-old girl dead and seven others injured.
                  • Three children were among the eight injured in the shooting.
                  • The other five people injured were adults whose ages ranged from 19 to 40.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that a shooting left a 7-year-old girl dead and seven others injured on Saturday night. This statement exaggerates the severity of the incident and creates an emotional response in readers without providing any context or details about what happened.
                  • The article states 'Police did not provide updates on their conditions.' which is deceptive because it implies that all eight people injured were still alive when police arrived at the scene. In reality, one of them had already died.
                  • The author uses sensationalism again when he states 'a third child, a 7-year-old girl, suffered a gunshot wound to her head and later succumbed to her injuries.' This statement is deceptive because it implies that the girl's death was directly related to the shooting. However, there may have been other factors that contributed to her death.
                  • The article states that 'a 1-year-old boy and a 7-year-old boy both suffered multiple gunshot wounds' which is deceptive because it implies that they were shot by the same person. In reality, there may have been different shooters for each child.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that police say a shooting occurred in Back of the Yards without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Secondly, there is a dichotomous depiction of the victims as either innocent children or adults whose ages ranged from 19 to 40. This creates a false sense of morality and ignores the complexity of human behavior and motivations. Thirdly, there are inflammatory statements such as
                  • The shooting was likely not a random act
                  • believe it may have been a gang-related incident.
                • Bias (75%)
                  The article contains a statement that the shooting was likely not a random act and may have been gang-related. This is an example of ideological bias as it implies that only certain groups are responsible for violence.
                  • > Officers say the shooting was likely not a random act and believe it may have been a gang-related incident.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    Gabriel Castillo has a conflict of interest on the topics of shooting and gang-related incidents in Back of the Yards as he is reporting for WGN TV which is owned by Sinclair Broadcasting Group. The company has been criticized for its conservative political leanings and support for gun rights, which could influence Castillo's coverage.
                    • Gabriel Castillo reports on a shooting in Back of the Yards that left 7 people injured, including two young children. He does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest with Sinclair Broadcasting Group.

                    65%

                    • Unique Points
                      • One child was killed and seven other people were injured in a shooting in Chicago's Back of the Yards neighborhood Saturday evening.
                      • Three of the victims were children.
                      • The shooting happened near West 52nd Street and South Damen Avenue, Chicago police said.
                      • <br>A one-year-old boy was shot multiple times and left with critical injuries.<br>
                      • <br>Officials said the ages of the adult victims ranged from 19 to 40.
                      • This was not a random act of violence. It was likely gang-related.
                    • Accuracy
                      • <br>Three of the victims were children.
                      • <br>Officials said this was not a random act of violence. It was likely gang-related.
                    • Deception (50%)
                      The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that one child was killed and seven other people were injured in a shooting in Chicago's Back of the Yards neighborhood Saturday evening. This statement is not accurate as it implies that all eight victims were shot at once which is not true according to police reports. Secondly, there are selective reporting practices as the article only mentions three children who were shot and does not provide information on any other injuries or deaths caused by the shooting. Thirdly, there is a lack of peer-reviewed studies linking to facts about gang violence in Chicago which could have been included for context. Lastly, there are no disclosures made regarding sources used in the article.
                      • The statement 'One child was killed and seven other people were injured' is sensationalistic as it implies that all eight victims were shot at once which is not true according to police reports.
                    • Fallacies (70%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Bias (75%)
                      The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'This was not a random act of violence' to imply that gang-related shootings are common in Chicago, which is an example of religious bias as it implies that certain groups or religions are more prone to committing violent acts than others.
                      • The shooting happened near West 52nd Street and South Damen Avenue, Chicago police said. The victims were at a family gathering when the shooting happened.
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication