Elon Musk Accused of Insider Trading: Selling $7.5 Billion in Tesla Stock Before Disappointing Q4 Numbers

San Francisco, California United States of America
Elon Musk accused of insider trading in Tesla stock sale worth over $7.5 billion
Lawsuits claim Musk had inside knowledge of lower-than-expected numbers
Musk has faced previous insider trading allegations and SEC investigations
Musk sold shares before potentially disappointing production and delivery numbers were made public
Tesla's stock price plummeted after release of Q4 numbers, Musk could have netted less if he waited to sell
Two lawsuits filed against Musk by investor Michael Perry alleging breach of fiduciary duties and insider trading
Elon Musk Accused of Insider Trading: Selling $7.5 Billion in Tesla Stock Before Disappointing Q4 Numbers

Elon Musk, the enigmatic CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has been making headlines once again. This time, it's not for his groundbreaking innovations or ambitious projects but for allegations of insider trading.

Two separate lawsuits have been filed against Musk by Tesla investor Michael Perry. The suits allege that Musk sold over $7.5 billion worth of Tesla stock in late 2022, before potentially disappointing production and delivery numbers were made public in early 2023.

According to the lawsuits, Musk had inside knowledge of the lower-than-expected numbers and sold his shares before this information was released to shareholders. The suits also claim that Musk breached his fiduciary duties by selling these shares.

Musk's alleged insider profits for his November and December sales were approximately $3 billion based on the January 3, 2023 closing price of $108.10 per share.

The first lawsuit was filed on May 31, 2024, in Delaware Chancery Court. The second lawsuit was filed a few hours later with identical allegations.

Tesla's stock price plummeted after the company's fourth-quarter numbers were made public on January 2, 2023. Had Musk waited to make these sales until after the release of material adverse news, his sales would have netted him less than 55% of the amounts realized from his November and December 2022 sales.

Musk has not yet responded to these allegations.

This is not the first time Musk has faced accusations of insider trading. In 2018, he tweeted that he had 'funding secured' to take Tesla private, only for this to be proven false. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigated this matter and Musk was required to pay a fine.

Musk is also currently in the middle of a regulatory probe by the SEC regarding his purchase of stock in social media platform Twitter, which he later renamed X.

These allegations come at a time when Musk is facing opposition from some Tesla shareholders who are set to vote on whether to ratify his $56 billion pay package. The Delaware judge who voided the pay package in January found that Musk improperly controlled the process.

It's important to note that these allegations are just that - allegations. Musk has not yet been charged with any crime, and it remains to be seen how this situation will unfold.

Despite these challenges, Musk continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in technology and space exploration. Only time will tell if his latest venture into social media will be as successful as his previous endeavors.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if Musk had inside knowledge of the lower-than-expected numbers or if he simply made a lucky guess.
  • The lawsuits have not been proven in court and Musk has not yet responded to the allegations.

Sources

83%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Tesla investor accused Elon Musk of insider trades worth $7.5B

Business Insider Lloyd Lee Saturday, 01 June 2024 08:23
  • Unique Points
    • Tesla investor Michael Perry filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, accusing him of using insider information to sell $7.5 billion worth of Tesla stock in 2022 before the financial report was made public in 2023.
    • Musk knew Tesla would miss fourth-quarter expectations on vehicle deliveries that year and sold the stock before the information was released to shareholders.
    • Musk's alleged insider profits for his November and December sales were approximately $3 billion based on the January 3, 2023 closing price of $108.10 per share.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the allegation of insider trading against Elon Musk. The author does not provide any context or counter-evidence to balance out the information presented. Additionally, there is emotional manipulation through the use of phrases like 'accused of insider trading worth $7.5B' and 'Musk netted himself less than 55% of the amounts realized had he sold after the quarter results were released'. These phrases are designed to elicit a strong emotional response from readers.
    • A Tesla investor accused Elon Musk of using insider information on his company to sell $7.5 billion worth of Tesla stock in 2022, according to a lawsuit filed Thursday in Delaware Chancery Court.
    • Perry alleged that Musk must have had access to information on his company that was not yet available to the public, which led to his stock sales.
    • Musk's trades 'would have netted him less than 55% of the amounts realized' had they been made after the quarter results were released to shareholders.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority by referencing the Larry Ellison case and stating that these lawsuits are not uncommon but often dismissed at an early stage. This is a fallacy as it does not provide any evidence or reasoning for why Musk's alleged insider trading should be considered valid based on the Ellison case.
    • ][author]: The Ellison lawsuit is cited as an example of these types of cases, but it does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support the claim that Musk's alleged insider trading is similar to Ellison's case.[[/]
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

86%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

X User Says Elon Musk Never Aimed To Be CEO, Tech Mogul's Reply Surprises

NDTV News Saturday, 01 June 2024 05:23
  • Unique Points
    • Elon Musk worked diligently and rewrote the code of engineers working at Zip2 after they went home.
    • Elon Musk used to work 120 hours a week.
    • Elon Musk confirmed on social media that this was true when a user shared a throwback photo of him working long hours.
  • Accuracy
    • Elon Musk had inside knowledge of Tesla's upcoming miss on production and delivery numbers in the fourth quarter of 2022
    • Elon Musk sold over $7.5 billion in Tesla stock based on this nonpublic information
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an informal fallacy - anecdotal evidence. The revelation about Elon Musk's supposed wishes regarding his career is based on a single user's claim and their interpretation of past events. Additionally, there are appeals to authority in the form of comments from users who admire Musk's perseverance and work ethic.
    • Elon Musk, the boss at Tesla and SpaceX, is one of the richest people in the world.
    • However, a surprising revelation has come to light. On social media platform X, a user shared a throwback photo of Musk working diligently and claimed,
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

82%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Musk Accused of $7.5 Billion of Insider Trades in Investor Suit

Bloomberg News Now Jef Feeley Saturday, 01 June 2024 08:24
  • Unique Points
    • Elon Musk had inside knowledge of Tesla Inc.’s upcoming miss on production and delivery numbers in the fourth quarter of 2022
    • Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, sold over $7.5 billion in Tesla stock based on this nonpublic information
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (10%)
    The author is making assertions based on a lawsuit filed by a Tesla investor. The author is not providing any evidence or facts to support these assertions beyond the lawsuit itself. This selective reporting of information and reliance on unproven allegations in a legal complaint constitutes deception.
    • Elon Musk had inside knowledge of a miss on production and delivery numbers that Tesla Inc. was facing when he sold more than $7.5 billion in stock in 2022
    • Tesla investor Michael Perry alleged in the suit, filed Thursday in Delaware Chancery Court.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

79%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Tesla shareholder sues Musk for alleged $7.5 billion insider trading

AOL News Unknown Reuters Saturday, 01 June 2024 08:25
  • Unique Points
    • Elon Musk sold over $7.5 billion worth of Tesla shares before potentially disappointing production and delivery numbers were made public.
    • Musk is accused of improperly benefiting from these sales by about $3 billion in insider profits.
    • Musk found out about the lower-than-expected numbers mid-November and sold his shares before the information was made public.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (10%)
    The article reports on a lawsuit filed against Elon Musk for alleged insider trading. While the article itself is not deceptive, it does contain selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author chooses to focus on the negative implications of Musk's actions without providing any context or balance. Additionally, the author uses emotionally charged language such as 'plummeted,' 'potentially disappointing,' and 'improperly benefited.' These words are used to manipulate the reader's emotions and create a negative perception of Musk.
    • The lawsuit said that Tesla’s share price plummeted after the company’s fourth-quarter numbers were made public on Jan. 2, 2023
    • Musk exploited his position at Tesla, and he breached his fiduciary duties to Tesla
    • Following news of vehicle price discounts that sparked demand concerns and the release of the numbers in January, Tesla’s stock tanked
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an accusation against Elon Musk of insider trading without providing any concrete evidence other than the shareholder's lawsuit. This is an appeal to authority fallacy as the author relies on a third party's claim without evaluating its merit. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Musk 'exploited his position at Tesla' and 'breached his fiduciary duties'. These are strong accusations that require evidence to support them.
    • ]The lawsuit says Musk sold the shares on various dates in November 2022 and December 2022.[
    • Musk is also in the middle of a regulatory probe to determine whether he broke federal securities laws in 2021 when he bought stock in social media platform Twitter, which he later renamed X. [
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

83%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Tesla investor accused Elon Musk of insider trades worth $7.5B

Business Insider Lloyd Lee Saturday, 01 June 2024 08:28
  • Unique Points
    • Tesla investor Michael Perry filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, accusing him of using insider information to sell $7.5 billion worth of Tesla stock in 2022 before the financial report was made public in 2023.
    • Musk knew Tesla would miss fourth-quarter expectations on vehicle deliveries that year and sold the stock before the information was released to shareholders.
    • The lawsuit alleges Musk misled shareholders about the fourth quarter of 2022, claiming 'Q4 is looking extremely good' and expecting to sell every car that was produced.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the allegation of insider trading against Elon Musk. The author does not provide any context or counter-evidence to balance the information presented. Additionally, there is emotional manipulation through the use of phrases like 'accused of insider trading worth $7.5B' and 'Musk's profits were approximately $3 billion'. These phrases are designed to elicit strong emotions from readers and may influence their perception of the situation.
    • A Tesla investor accused Elon Musk of using insider information on his company to sell $7.5 billion worth of Tesla stock in 2022, according to a lawsuit filed Thursday in Delaware Chancery Court.
    • Musk's trades 'would have netted him less than 55% of the amounts realized' had they been made after the quarter results were released to shareholders.
    • Perry alleged that Musk must have had access to information on his company that was not yet available to the public, which led to his stock sales.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority by referencing the Larry Ellison case and stating that these lawsuits are not uncommon but often dismissed at an early stage. This is a fallacy as it does not provide any evidence or reasoning for why Musk's alleged insider trading should be considered valid based on the Ellison case.
    • ][author]: The Ellison lawsuit is cited as an example of these types of cases, but it does not provide any evidence or reasoning for why Musk's alleged insider trading should be considered valid based on the Ellison case.[/
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication