Elon Musk's Decision to Hide Likes on X: Promoting Privacy or Decreasing Engagement?

Beverly Hills, California United States of America
Elon Musk, CEO of X, announced hiding likes on the platform on May 25, 2023.
Instagram also made similar changes by removing Following Activity tab and giving users the ability to hide like counts.
Musk believes this change will lead to more authentic engagement and better user experience.
Users will still be able to see their own likes and who liked their posts but not others' posts.
Elon Musk's Decision to Hide Likes on X: Promoting Privacy or Decreasing Engagement?

Elon Musk, the CEO of X, formerly Twitter, announced on May 25, 2023, that the platform would begin hiding likes from other users. This change was made to protect users' privacy and eventually plans to only show view count instead of like and retweet counts in the future. The update follows a series of policy changes Musk has introduced since taking over X in 2022.

On June 12, 2024, both Musk and X's engineering account confirmed the change through posts on the platform. According to these announcements, users will still be able to see which posts they have liked themselves and who liked their own posts but not who liked someone else's posts.

This decision has received mixed reactions from users, with some expressing concerns about potential negative consequences such as decreased engagement and the loss of a way to gauge public opinion. Others argue that hiding likes will help protect users from retaliation and harassment.

Musk's reasoning for the change is that public likes are incentivizing the wrong behavior, leading people to fear retaliation or protecting their public image before liking content. He believes this will lead to more authentic engagement on the platform and a better user experience overall.

This update follows a trend of other social media platforms making likes more private. For example, Instagram removed its Following Activity tab, which showed users which posts others had liked, and gave users the ability to hide like counts on their own posts.

However, it's important to note that this change may not be without its challenges. Some argue that hiding likes could lead to an increase in spam and platform manipulation as there will no longer be a clear way to gauge public opinion or engagement with a post. Additionally, some users may feel less connected to the platform without the ability to see who has liked their content.

Despite these concerns, Musk remains committed to his vision of making X a digital public square where people can engage in open and honest discussions without fear of retaliation or harassment. Only time will tell if this change will have the desired effect.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • It's unclear how this change will affect user engagement and public opinion measurement.
  • There are concerns that hiding likes could lead to an increase in spam and platform manipulation.

Sources

65%

  • Unique Points
    • Elon Musk is removing the ability for users to see who liked a post on Twitter, making it anonymous to all but the person who sent the post and the person who pressed the like button.
    • Elon Musk argues that this update is a matter of encouraging free expression and protecting users from retaliation from trolls.
    • The change is more likely driven by an increase in spam, bots, and platform manipulation on Twitter under Musk’s ownership.
  • Accuracy
    • Likes serve two functions: informing the platform about user preferences and providing a passive vehicle for expressing appreciation or approval. Their removal makes it harder to build online communities.
    • Twitter has fewer frequent users now than before Musk took over, making it more difficult for advertisers to reach their target audience and increasing the incentive for accounts of questionable origin to engage with posts.
    • Foreign governments and motivated politicians or pundits can more easily create an impression that an inflated number of people on the internet support their ideas with the removal of public likes.
  • Deception (30%)
    The author makes editorializing statements and uses emotional manipulation by implying that Elon Musk's decision to hide likes on Twitter is a move to cater to thin-skinned users who cannot handle social blowback for indicating a belief. The author also engages in selective reporting by focusing on the negative implications of the change, while ignoring potential benefits such as reducing harassment and encouraging free expression.
    • It really isn’t, though; it instead allows people to indicate approval of a post (and add to that post’s stats) without having to personally stand up for anything.
    • Musk has every reason to lower that barrier.
    • But what’s really happening is more nefarious than Musk anonymizing a key feature of the platform to protect some posters’ feelings. The much likelier driver of the change is the embarrassing morass of spam, bots, and platform manipulation filling the void on Musk’s X.
  • Fallacies (65%)
    The author commits the following fallacies: 1. Ad Hominem: Musk is portrayed as having a history of edgy ideas and not implementing them, which is irrelevant to the argument about hiding likes on Twitter. 2. False Dilemma: The author presents two options - Musk's argument for anonymity or catering to thin-skinned users - but fails to consider other possibilities. 3. Slippery Slope: The author suggests that allowing anonymous likes will lead to more spam and platform manipulation, but this is not necessarily the case.
    • ][The author] Elon Musk has a history of floating edgy ideas for Twitter and not implementing them or, at the least, slow-walking them.[][
    • ][The author] That rationale is, obviously, silly. Musk portrays concealing the identity of tweet-likers as a way to let people adhere to their convictions. It really isn't, though; it instead allows people to indicate approval of a post (and add to that post’s stats) without having to personally stand up for anything.[][
  • Bias (50%)
    The author expresses a clear bias against Elon Musk and his decisions regarding Twitter. The author argues that Musk's decision to hide likes on Twitter is not about protecting users' feelings but rather about making it easier to obscure platform manipulation and spam.
    • But what's really happening is more nefarious than Musk anonymizing a key feature of the platform to protect some posters’ feelings. The much likelier driver of the change is the embarrassing morass of spam, bots, and platform manipulation filling the void on Musk’s X.
      • Musk has every reason to lower that barrier. Yet the main argument against trusting him is that perhaps his most frequent area of dishonesty since buying Twitter has been platform manipulation.
        • Twitter appears to have fewer frequent users now than before Musk’s reign, so the advertisers still on the site are preaching to a smaller congregation. But what if you didn’t need to engage? What if accounts of questionable origin, ones without regular people behind them, could backfill that engagement? That's a bit easier to pull off when the general public can’t see who’s behind the accounts juicing the numbers.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        77%

        • Unique Points
          • Mary Trump criticized Elon Musk on social media for hiding likes on Twitter
          • Elon Musk bought Twitter in 2022 and renamed it X
          • Mary Trump’s post about Musk’s decision had received over 245,500 views
        • Accuracy
          • Mary Trump criticized Elon Musk for hiding likes on Twitter
          • Since purchasing Twitter, Musk has rolled out various changes including hiding likes from users' public-facing profiles on June 12, 2024
        • Deception (30%)
          The author makes editorializing statements by expressing her opinion about Elon Musk being 'stupider than I thought' and quoting Mary Trump's tweet with the same sentiment. She also uses emotional manipulation by implying that Musk is hiding his likes to avoid criticism or attack, which may not be the case.
          • Mary Trump has taken to social media to criticize Elon Musk, slamming him for his recent decision to hide likes on X, formerly Twitter. I didn’t think it was possible, but the latest ‘improvement’ to Twitter shows that @elonmusk is even stupider than I thought.
          • At the time of writing, Trump’s post had been viewed more than 245,500 times.
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting and attributing opinions to various social media users without providing any context or evidence that these opinions are valid or representative. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by using the word 'stupider' twice in reference to Elon Musk, which is not a logical argument but an emotional one.
          • I didn’t think it was possible, but the latest ‘improvement’ to Twitter shows that @elonmusk is even stupider than I thought.
          • He is hiding that he can possibly like a porn tweet, a racist tweet, or whatever it is that he doesn’t want everyone to see. My take, he only has access to it and he will in the future use it against anyone who goes after and against him.
          • What if everybody were to post ‘like [heart emoji]’ in every single post they like? I’m sure that wouldn’t mess up everyone’s feed! [laugh crying emoji]
          • I wish we could sue him for this platform he destroyed.
        • Bias (80%)
          The author expresses her personal opinion about Elon Musk being stupider than she thought based on his decision to hide likes on Twitter. She also quotes and shares the opinions of others who agree with her assessment. This demonstrates a clear bias against Elon Musk.
          • He is hiding that he can possibly like a porn tweet, a racist tweet, or whatever it is that he doesn’t want everyone to see. My take, he only has access to it and he will in the future use it against anyone who goes after and against him.
            • I didn’t think it was possible, but the latest ‘improvement’ to Twitter shows that @elonmusk is even stupider than I thought.
              • I wish we could sue him for this platform he destroyed.
                • What if everybody were to post ‘like [heart emoji]’ in every single post they like? I’m sure that wouldn’t mess up everyone’s feed! [laugh crying emoji]
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                100%

                • Unique Points
                  • Elon Musk announced that X is now hiding users’ likes from other users in a post on May 25, 2023.
                  • Users will no longer see which posts other users have liked.
                  • Musk plans for X to eventually only show view count instead of like and retweet counts in the future.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Fallacies (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Bias (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                80%

                • Unique Points
                  • X will hide who liked a post
                  • Elon Musk and X engineering account announced the change in-app
                  • The move is to better protect users' privacy on the app
                • Accuracy
                  • Users can still see like count in notifications but won't be able to see who tapped the little heart
                • Deception (30%)
                  The article contains selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author mentions the past scandal involving Senator Ted Cruz's account liking a sexually explicit tweet but fails to mention that Cruz denied any involvement and blamed it on a staffer. This is an example of selective reporting as the author only reports details that support their position. Additionally, the article uses emotional manipulation by implying that hiding likes will prevent 'gotcha' news stories and protect users from embarrassment, creating a sense of fear and urgency.
                  • For instance, an account linked to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) liked a sexually explicit tweet in 2017.
                  • Reactions on X were mixed, with some users saying the platform had bigger fish to fry and others celebrating the end of ‘gotcha’ news stories when a public figure likes something offensive.
                • Fallacies (90%)
                  The author does not make any formal logical fallacies in the article. However, there are a few instances of informal fallacies and dichotomous depictions. The author seems to blame Elon Musk for changes they do not like and presents the change as confusing without providing context on X's past scandals involving powerful people liking questionable content. Additionally, the author makes a sweeping generalization about users' reactions to the change by stating 'Reactions on X were mixed', without providing specific examples or quotes from different users with varying opinions. There is also an appeal to authority when citing research done by David Yeager on adolescent development and mental health effects of social media.
                  • . . . this latest adjustment is part of a series of changes Musk and his team have made to the app since he bought the platform in 2022.
                  • Reactions on X were mixed, with some users saying the platform had bigger fish to fry and others celebrating the end of “gotcha” news stories when a public figure likes something offensive.
                  • The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the change.
                • Bias (95%)
                  The author expresses a negative opinion towards Elon Musk and his decisions regarding X, implying that they are detrimental to the platform. The author also quotes users who share similar sentiments and uses language that depicts Musk's actions as damaging or sinking the ship. This demonstrates a clear bias against Elon Musk.
                  • Chau compared the trajectory of X to ‘slowly removing parts from a car while you’re trying to drive it.’
                    • Elizalde called the app a ‘sinking ship.’
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication