Emma Stone won the Best Actress award at the 2024 Oscars for her performance in Poor Things.
The decision to run Lily Gladstone in Lead instead of Supporting made sense as it emphasized how the film's script had been revamped in preproduction to better center on Osage point of view. Stone was at the center of everything and her character's journey was all about self-discovery.
Emma Stone won the Best Actress award at the 2024 Oscars for her performance in Poor Things. The decision to run Lily Gladstone in Lead instead of Supporting made sense as it emphasized how the film's script had been revamped in preproduction to better center on Osage point of view. Stone was at the center of everything and her character's journey was all about self-discovery.
DaVine Joy Randolph won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for her role in The Holdovers
Billie Eilish won Best Original Song for 'What Was I Made For'
Justine Triet and Arthur Harari won Best Original Screenplay for Anatomy of a Fall
Accuracy
Emma Stone won the Best Actress award at the 2024 Oscars
Lily Gladstone was also a contender for Best Actress at the 2024 Oscars
The decision to run Lily Gladstone in Lead instead of Supporting made sense in the context of Killers of the Flower Moon's Oscar campaign, which emphasized how the film's script had been revamped in preproduction to better center the Osage point of view
International voters may have swung it toward Emma Stone as they were not emotionally distant from genocide and perhaps responded differently than U.S. counterparts
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Emma Stone's performance of a cliched character was brilliant and feminist when it clearly promotes harmful stereotypes about women and their sexuality. Secondly, the article ignores any criticism or controversy surrounding Greta Gerwig's snub for Best Director despite acknowledging her nomination for Best Picture. Lastly, the author uses emotional language to manipulate readers into believing that Stone's acceptance speech was heartfelt when it is clear she was simply reading from a script.
The article claims that Emma Stone's performance of Bella Baxter in Poor Things promotes feminist ideals, but the film clearly perpetuates harmful stereotypes about women and their sexuality. For example, the character is portrayed as learning to embrace her independence through sex.
Despite acknowledging Greta Gerwig's nomination for Best Director, the article ignores any criticism or controversy surrounding it. This deception misleads readers into believing that Gerwig was fairly considered for the award when she clearly faced significant backlash and scrutiny.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the positive reviews of Poor Things as evidence that it is a good film. However, this does not necessarily mean that the movie is actually good or worth watching. Additionally, there are instances where the author makes assumptions about people's motivations and intentions without providing any evidence to support these claims.
The positive reviews of Poor Things as evidence that it is a good film
Assumptions about people's motivations and intentions
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards Emma Stone's performance in Poor Things. The author uses language that dehumanizes the character of Bella Baxter and implies that her sexuality is a cliché. Additionally, the author compares Stone's win to previous male winners for Best Director, implying that women are not capable of winning this award.
I saw more than one TikTok saying it was the feminist film Barbie wishes it was.
Emma Stone won the Best Actress award at the 2024 Oscars
Lily Gladstone was also a contender for Best Actress at the 2024 Oscars
The decision to run Lily Gladstone in Lead instead of Supporting made sense in the context of Killers of the Flower Moon's Oscar campaign, which emphasized how the film's script had been revamped in preproduction to better center the Osage point of view
International voters may have swung it toward Emma Stone as they were not emotionally distant from genocide and perhaps responded differently than U.S. counterparts
Emma Stone was at the center of everything in a film that was all about her character's journey of self-discovery
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
Emma Stone's win for Best Actress over Lily Gladstone was unexpected and can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, the move of running Gladstone in Lead instead of Supporting made sense in the context of Killers of the Flower Moon's Oscar campaign but also undercut their core message that she was on equal footing with co-star Leonardo DiCaprio. Secondly, international voters may have swung it towards Stone as they had more emotional distance from the genocide of Native Americans and perhaps didn't respond to Killers in the same way as U.S counterparts did. Lastly, Emma Stone's performance in Poor Things was heralded as a career-best achievement which turned out to matter more than anything else.
Emma Stone beating Lily Gladstone for Best Actress
International voters may have swung it towards Stone as they had more emotional distance from the genocide of Native Americans and perhaps didn't respond to Killers in the same way as U.S counterparts did.
The move of running Gladstone in Lead instead of Supporting made sense in the context of Killers of the Flower Moon's Oscar campaign but also undercut their core message that she was on equal footing with co-star Leonardo DiCaprio.
Emma Stone won the Oscar for Best Actress for her performance in Poor Things
Stone dealt with a wardrobe malfunction just moments before accepting her trophy, which appeared to be a broken zipper or seam on the back of her Louis Vuitton gown
Jennifer Lawrence took a tumble when accepting her Oscar for Best Actress in 2013 due to the hemline on her cascading Dior Haute Couture gown
Accuracy
The actor was dressed by top fashion and celebrity stylist Petra Flannery
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(70%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(80%)
The author has used the phrase 'sartorial snafu' to describe Emma Stone's wardrobe malfunction. This is an example of language that dehumanizes one side as extreme or unreasonable.
