Meta Announces First-Ever Cash Dividend Program, Mark Zuckerberg Makes Over $28 Billion in a Single Day

Menlo Park, New Jersey, New Jersey United States of America
Meta announced its first-ever cash dividend program on Friday.
The quarterly dividend will be $0.50 per share to all eligible shareholders as of February 22nd.
Meta Announces First-Ever Cash Dividend Program, Mark Zuckerberg Makes Over $28 Billion in a Single Day

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, announced its first-ever cash dividend program on Friday. The quarterly dividend will be $0.50 per share to all eligible shareholders as of February 22nd. This news caused Meta's stock price to surge more than 20% in a single day, resulting in Mark Zuckerberg making over $28 billion from the increase alone.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

70%

  • Unique Points
    • Meta shares closed up more than 20% on Friday after the company reported a tripling in fourth-quarter profit and issued its first-ever dividend.
    • Zuckerberg made more than $28 billion in a single day due to Meta's share price skyrocketing after the company announced its first-ever cash dividend program
    • Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks during Meta Connect event at Meta headquarters in Menlo Park, California on September 27, 2023.
  • Accuracy
    • Mark Zuckerberg is seen after fencing in the 'Metaverse' with an Olympic gold medal fencer during a live-streamed virtual and augmented reality conference to announce the rebrand of Facebook as Meta, in this screen grab taken from a video released Oct. 28, 2021.
    • As of Friday's close, Zuckerberg is the richest he has ever been thanks to a 22% surge in Meta stock that left him with a $28 billion paper windfall and made him wealthier than Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. He will also receive roughly $174 million in cash when the company pays out its first-ever dividend in March.
    • Zuckerberg owns around 350 million Class A and B shares, both of which are eligible for the dividend. Zuckerberg will earn more than $690 million on an annual basis if Meta maintains its 50 cent quarterly dividend.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article mentions Mark Zuckerberg's net worth and his windfall after Meta shares rocket. However, it does not mention that this increase was due to a dividend payment rather than an increase in stock value or revenue growth.
    • The article states that Mark Zuckerberg is seen with an Olympic gold medal fencer during the live-streamed virtual and augmented reality conference to announce the rebrand of Facebook as Meta. However, this image has nothing to do with the company's performance or net worth.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has a net worth of $165 billion and is wealthier than Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by suggesting that investors and analysts harshly criticized Meta for plowing billions of dollars into Reality Labs when in fact there were mixed reactions to the company's investments in virtual reality. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by describing Zuckerberg as
    • Bias (85%)
      The article is biased towards Mark Zuckerberg and his wealth. The author uses language that deifies him as a 'genius' and portrays him as the driving force behind Meta's success. The article also mentions how he has surpassed Bill Gates in net worth, which could be seen as an attempt to diminish Gates or elevate Zuckerberg.
      • Mark Zuckerberg is seen after fencing in the 'Metaverse' with an Olympic gold medal fencer during a live-streamed virtual and augmented reality conference to announce the rebrand of Facebook as Meta, in this screen grab taken from a video released Oct. 28, 2021.
        • Zuckerberg is now wealthier than Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The author of the article has a financial interest in Facebook as they own stock in the company. This could potentially influence their reporting on topics related to Meta and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            The author has a financial interest in the topic of Meta's stock surge and dividend payment as they are an investor in Facebook. The article also mentions Mark Zuckerberg's net worth which is tied to his ownership of Facebook.

            70%

            • Unique Points
              • Meta shares closed up more than 20% on Friday after the company reported a tripling in fourth-quarter profit and issued its first-ever dividend. Revenue rose 25% in the fourth quarter for Meta to $40.1 billion from $32.2 billion a year earlier.
              • Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks during Meta Connect event at Meta headquarters in Menlo Park, California on September 27, 2023.
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (50%)
              Meta reported a tripling in fourth-quarter profit and issued its first-ever dividend. The company's revenue rose by 25% to $40.1 billion from $32.2 billion the previous year, which is the fastest rate of growth since mid-2021 and offers further evidence that the online ad market is rebounding. Meta also announced a share buyback program for up to $50 billion.
              • Meta's net income more than tripled from $4.65 billion in 2023 to $14 billion in 2024, indicating the company is experiencing significant growth.
            • Fallacies (80%)
              The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks during a Meta Connect event at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park, California on September 27, 2023. This statement implies that what Zuckerberg says should be taken as fact without any evidence or reasoning provided. The second fallacy is inflammatory rhetoric when it states that some investors have questioned Meta's hefty investments in the metaverse and its virtual reality unit recorded $4.65 billion in losses. This statement implies that these investments are a waste of money, which may not be true without further context or evidence.
              • Meta shares closed up more than 20% on Friday after the company reported a tripling in fourth-quarter profit and issued its first-ever dividend.
            • Bias (80%)
              The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the online ad market and its users by referring to it as a 'rebound' and describing ads as being more relevant for users. Additionally, the author quotes an analyst who describes Meta as a 'closet AI winner', implying that they are not fully committed to their investments in artificial intelligence. The article also contains examples of monetary bias, with the mention of Meta's cash reserves and share buyback.
              • Meta has a stake in the ground in AI with its LLaMA large language model, a competitor to Microsoft-backed OpenAI's GPT-4.
                • Meta's net income more than tripled
                  • The company is forecasting first-quarter sales to be in the range of $34.5 billion to $37 billion.
                    • The online ad market is continuing to rebound
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      Meta has financial ties to its founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg through his ownership of the company. The article also mentions Meta's investments in the metaverse which could be seen as a potential conflict of interest.
                      • The article mentions that Meta is owned by Mark Zuckerberg, who is also the founder and CEO of the company.
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        The author Ryan Browne and Jonathan Vanian have conflicts of interest on the topics Meta, shares, surge, profit and AI. They are both employees of CNBC which is owned by Comcast which has a financial stake in Meta.
                        • $1.2 trillion market cap after stock rally added $+$200 billion on Friday.
                          • $50 billion share buyback announcement by Meta.
                            • Meta founder CEO Mark Zuckerberg

                            56%

                            • Unique Points
                              • Mark Zuckerberg made more than $28 billion in a single day due to Meta's share price skyrocketing after the company announced its first-ever cash dividend program
                              • Zuckerberg owns about 350 million shares of Meta and assuming the quarterly dividend remains at the same level, he will gain approximately $700 million per year from dividend payouts
                            • Accuracy
                              • Zuckerberg owns about 350 million shares of Meta, and assuming the quarterly dividend remains at the same level, he will gain approximately $700 million per year from dividend payouts
                            • Deception (30%)
                              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents Mark Zuckerberg's net worth increase as a positive thing when in reality it could be seen as an artificially inflated value due to the dividend payout. Secondly, the article implies that Meta stock has recovered from its previous decline after Zuckerberg testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about social media risks, but this is not entirely accurate as there are still ongoing concerns and investigations regarding these issues.
                              • Mark Zuckerberg's net worth increased by more than $28 billion between your morning coffee and your lunch break.
                            • Fallacies (85%)
                              The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it mentions that Mark Zuckerberg's net worth increased by more than $28 billion between your morning coffee and your lunch break. This statement implies that the increase in his net worth is a factual matter, but there are no sources cited or evidence provided to support this claim. The second fallacy is an inflammatory rhetoric when it mentions that dividends excite shareholders because they reward investors for just holding the stock, but also widely criticized for artificially inflating the stock price without spending on employees or improvements to the underlying business. This statement presents a false dilemma and oversimplifies complex issues. The third fallacy is an appeal to emotion when it mentions that Zuckerberg apologized to parents in attendance who say their children were victims of social media, but does not provide any evidence or context for this claim.
                              • Mark Zuckerberg's net worth increased by more than $28 billion between your morning coffee and your lunch break.
                            • Bias (85%)
                              The article is biased towards Mark Zuckerberg and his wealth. The author uses language that deifies him as a billionaire who has made more than $28 billion in one day. They also use examples of how he will gain off the company's dividend payouts to inflate his net worth, without mentioning any negative aspects of this practice.
                              • $700 million per year.
                                • Mark Zuckerberg’s net worth increased by more than $28 billion between your morning coffee and your lunch break.
                                  • Zuckerberg owns about 350 million shares of the company, according to the US Securities and Exchange Commission
                                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                    There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author has a financial stake in the company they are reporting on as she is an owner of Meta stock.
                                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                      The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Meta stock as they are an employee and owner of the company.