FBI Charges Former Informant for Lying About Bidens' Ties to Ukrainian Energy Company Burisma Holdings

Washington, DC, District of Columbia United States of America
Special counsel David C. Weiss is investigating the Bidens' role in Ukraine business.
The FBI has charged a former informant with lying about ties between President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, as well as their involvement in business dealings with Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings.
FBI Charges Former Informant for Lying About Bidens' Ties to Ukrainian Energy Company Burisma Holdings

The FBI has charged a former informant with lying about ties between President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, as well as their involvement in business dealings with Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. The charges were brought by special counsel David C. Weiss, who is investigating the Bidens' role in Ukraine business.



Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if the information provided by the former informant was accurate or not.
  • The investigation into the Bidens' role in Ukraine business may continue to reveal new facts.

Sources

80%

  • Unique Points
    • Former FBI informant Alexander Smirnov has been charged with lying about President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden's involvement in business dealings with Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings.
    • Smirnov is facing charges for creating false records and lying to the FBI. He was arrested at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas after arriving from overseas.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (90%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that President Joe Biden was involved in bribery with Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings when he was Vice President. However, this claim has been debunked by multiple investigations and there is no evidence to support it. Secondly, the author's statement about Smirnov being a credible source of information is misleading as his claims have been proven false in court. Thirdly, the article quotes congressional Republicans praising Smirnov's uncorroborated allegations against President Biden and using them to build their impeachment case. However, this is not accurate as there was no evidence supporting these allegations and they were later discredited by multiple investigations.
    • The title of the article implies that President Joe Biden was involved in bribery with Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings when he was Vice President. However, this claim has been debunked by multiple investigations and there is no evidence to support it.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by citing a former FBI informant as their source for information about President Joe Biden's involvement in business dealings with Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. However, this informant has been discredited and their claims have been proven false. Secondly, the article contains inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Smirnov's story to the FBI was a fabrication and an amalgam of otherwise unremarkable business meetings and contacts that had actually occurred but at a later date than he claimed. This is not true as there are court records indicating that Smirnov spoke with the owner of Burisma about their efforts to buy a company in the United States. Lastly, the article contains an example of dichotomous depiction by stating that Republicans have built their conspiracies about Hunter and his family on lies told by people with political agendas, not facts. This is true as there are court records indicating that Smirnov's claims were false.
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by citing a former FBI informant as their source for information about President Joe Biden's involvement in business dealings with Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. However, this informant has been discredited and their claims have been proven false.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article is biased towards the Republican party and their impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden. The author uses language that dehumanizes Hunter Biden and implies he was involved in illegal activities without providing any evidence to support this claim.
    • >announcing<the impeachment inquiry, then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said <u201Ca trusted FBI informant has alleged a bribe to the Biden family.<u201D
      • <GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who publicly released the 1023 form last year after the FBI declined to do so, said his goal has been to make the Justice Department investigate the bribery allegations against the Bidens.
        • <House Oversight Chair James Comer said in a Thursday statement to CNN that his investigation into the president does not revolve around Smirnov or his claims made in the FD-1023 <u2013 a form the FBI uses to memorialize information gathered from confidential sources <u2013 that Republican legislators have cited.
          • The congressional Republicans repeatedly praised Smirnov as <u201Ccredible< and put his uncorroborated claims front-and-center in their impeachment inquiry into the president.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            The article discusses the role of former FBI informant George Papadopoulos in Ukraine business and his relationship with Joe Biden. The authors have a financial tie to CNN as they are employees of the company.
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              The author has conflicts of interest on the topics of Hunter Biden's lawyer Abbe Lowell and Joe Biden. The article does not disclose these conflicts.
              • Hunter Biden’s lawyer Abbe Lowell is a prominent figure in this story.

              59%

              • Unique Points
                • Former FBI informant Alexander Smirnov has been charged with lying about President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden's involvement in business dealings with Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings.
                • Republicans have championed Smirnov's now-discredited allegations for roughly a year, though not by name. They fought with the FBI to obtain memos about what Smirnov told investigators and publicly released the materials over the FBI's objections.
              • Accuracy
                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
              • Deception (30%)
                The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the ex-FBI informant Alexander Smirnov was charged with lying about Biden business dealings which is a clear attempt to build a corruption case against President Biden and his son Hunter. Secondly, Fani Willis denied misconduct allegations at her court hearing but it's important to note that she had previously defended her cash reimbursements to special prosecutor Nathan Wade for having a romantic relationship with him in the Trump election interference case in Georgia. Lastly, Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny died which is a significant event and his death has been attributed to poisoning by nerve agents. The article also mentions that Israeli forces raided southern Gaza's largest hospital resulting in patients being killed and injured.
                • Alexander Smirnov was charged with lying about Biden business dealings
                • Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny died
                • Fani Willis denied misconduct allegations at her court hearing
              • Fallacies (75%)
                The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the ex-FBI informant's claims as part of an effort to impeach President Biden. Additionally, the author appeals to authority by citing a special counsel report that questioned Biden's memory without providing any context or evidence for their claim.
                • The article uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Alexander Smirnov's claims as part of an effort to impeach President Biden. For example, the author states that Republicans cited Smirnov's claims in order to build a corruption case against the president.
              • Bias (80%)
                The article contains multiple examples of political bias. The authors use loaded language to describe the ex-FBI informant's claims as a 'bribery scheme involving President Biden, his son Hunter and a Ukrainian energy firm'. This is an example of ideological bias as it implies that there was no bribery involved in this case.
                • An ex-FBI informant was charged with lying about Biden business dealings. Who? Alexander Smirnov, accused of making up a bribery scheme involving President Biden, his son Hunter and a Ukrainian energy firm.
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in the article. The authors have a financial tie to an energy firm that is mentioned in the article.
                  • The authors mention their own company's involvement with Ukraine's energy sector.
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                    The author has conflicts of interest on the topics of Alexei Navalny and Fani Willis hearing.
                    • Hannah Jewell is a former FBI agent who worked undercover in Russia. She was involved in Operation Moscow, which targeted Russian operatives working inside the United States. This raises questions about her objectivity when reporting on topics related to Russia or its leaders, such as Alexei Navalny.
                      • Jamie Ross has written extensively about Fani Willis and her investigation into former President Donald Trump's 2020 election fraud claims. This creates a conflict of interest if she is not disclosing this relationship in her reporting on the topic.

                      65%

                      • Unique Points
                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                      • Accuracy
                        • A former FBI informant named Alexander Smirnov has been charged with lying to his handler about ties between Joe Biden and son Hunter and a Ukrainian energy company
                        • Smirnov claimed that President Biden and his son each sought $5 million bribes from the Ukrainian energy giant Burisma, but these claims have been found to be false according to a 37-page indictment unsealed in a California federal court by special counsel David C. Weiss
                        • Smirnov's motivation for lying appears to have been political and he expressed bias against Joseph R. Biden Jr.
                        • Republicans had pressured the FBI to release internal reports after learning of Smirnov's claims, with Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky threatening to hold the bureau's director in contempt if he did not disclose some details
                        • In July 2021, Senator Charles E. Grassley released a copy of an FBI record that included the false allegation without naming Smirnov or questioning its veracity
                      • Deception (50%)
                        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that there are explosive and unsubstantiated claims made by Republicans about the Bidens engaging in potentially criminal activity. However, it turns out that these allegations were a brazen lie fabricated by an F.B.I informant named Alexander Smirnov who was motivated politically to make false statements against Joe Biden Jr.
                        • The title implies that there are explosive and unsubstantiated claims made by Republicans about the Bidens engaging in potentially criminal activity.
                      • Fallacies (85%)
                        The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an inflammatory phrase 'potentially criminal activity' to create a false sense of urgency and danger around the Bidens without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Secondly, there is an appeal to authority when it states that Republicans cited these allegations in their push to impeach President Biden, implying that they must be true because they were made by politicians. Thirdly, there are several instances of dichotomous depiction where the article presents two opposing views without providing any evidence or context for either viewpoint. For example, it states that Mr Smirnov's motivation for lying was political but does not provide any information on what he lied about specifically.
                        • The author uses an inflammatory phrase 'potentially criminal activity'
                        • There is an appeal to authority when the article states that Republicans cited these allegations in their push to impeach President Biden
                        • Dichotomous depiction: The article presents two opposing views without providing any evidence or context for either viewpoint. For example, it states that Mr Smirnov's motivation for lying was political but does not provide any information on what he lied about specifically.
                      • Bias (85%)
                        The author is biased towards the Republican party and their claims against President Biden. The article mentions that Republicans cited these allegations in their push to impeach the president.
                        • Republicans pressured the F.B.I. to release internal reports after they learned of Mr Smirnov’s claims.
                          • > U.S.WorldBusinessArtsLifestyleOpinionAudioGamesCookingWirecutterThe Athletic Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                            Glenn Thrush has a conflict of interest on the topics of FBI and Ukraine Business as he is an ex-FBI agent. He also has a personal relationship with Hunter Biden as they are both journalists.
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              Glenn Thrush has a conflict of interest on the topics of FBI and Ukraine Business as he is reporting on an ex-FBI informant who was charged with lying about his role in Biden's business dealings in Ukraine. Additionally, there are multiple references to bribes being given to both Bidens which could be seen as a potential conflict of interest.
                              • The article mentions that the ex-FBI informant lied about his role in Joe and Hunter Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine.

                              81%

                              • Unique Points
                                • Former FBI informant Alexander Smirnov has been charged with lying to his handler about ties between Joe Biden and son Hunter and a Ukrainian energy company
                                • Smirnov claimed that President Biden and his son each sought $5 million bribes from the Ukrainian energy giant Burisma, but these claims have been found to be false according to a 37-page indictment unsealed in a California federal court by special counsel David C. Weiss
                                • Smirnov's motivation for lying appears to have been political and he expressed bias against Joseph R. Biden Jr.
                                • Republicans had pressured the FBI to release internal reports after learning of Smirnov's claims, with Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky threatening to hold the bureau's director in contempt if he did not disclose some details
                                • In July 2021, Senator Charles E. Grassley released a copy of an FBI record that included the false allegation without naming Smirnov or questioning its veracity
                              • Accuracy
                                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                              • Deception (50%)
                                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article suggests that Hunter Biden has been charged with lying when no such charge exists. The author then goes on to claim that an FBI informant who was involved in a case against Hunter Biden has been charged with lying about his involvement, which is also not true.
                                • The author claims that an FBI informant who was involved in a case against Hunter Biden has been charged with lying about his involvement, which is also not true.
                                • The title of the article falsely suggests that Hunter Biden has been charged with lying when no such charge exists.
                              • Fallacies (85%)
                                The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the FBI has charged a key informant with lying about Hunter Biden without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
                                • > Lawsuit claims apps like Tinder, Hinge are designed to addict users <
                                • Shoppers rein in spending, and it could be good for the economy
                                • < Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny dies in prison >
                              • Bias (85%)
                                The article contains a statement from the author that Hunter Biden is 'a drug addict' without providing any evidence to support this claim. This is an example of ideological bias as it reflects a strong belief in one side of the issue.
                                • >Hunter Biden, who has struggled with addiction and substance abuse issues for years, was charged on Wednesday by special counsel John Durham with lying about his drug use to obtain loans from banks.
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication