Conviction stemmed from influence scheme aimed at illegally impacting 2016 election through hush money payment to Stormy Daniels
Former President Trump convicted on 34 felony counts in hush money trial
Sentencing scheduled for July 11, before Republican National Convention where Trump expected to be nominated as party's presidential candidate
Trump remains active in campaign with surge in donations after conviction
In a stunning turn of events, former President Donald Trump faced a historic conviction on 34 felony counts in the hush money trial. The verdict came as a result of an influence scheme aimed at illegally impacting the 2016 election through a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels. Trump's lead attorney, Todd Blanche, reacted to the verdict, expressing his thoughts on the matter. This conviction has brought forth mixed reactions from gubernatorial candidates in New Hampshire, with Republicans leaning towards politically motivated claims while Democrats urge for accountability and withdrawal of endorsements. The sentencing for Trump's conviction is scheduled for July 11, just before the Republican National Convention where he is expected to be nominated as the party's presidential candidate. Despite the conviction, Trump remains active in his campaign with a surge in donations totaling over $34.8 million from the time of the verdict through midnight. The case will now move to appeal strategy as Trump's legal team plans to vigorously fight against the verdict, with an unpredictable outcome that may or may not be concluded before November's election.
Donald Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts in a scheme to illegally influence the 2016 election through a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.
Trump falsely claimed the trial was rigged and attacked the criminal justice system during a speech at Trump Tower.
The sentencing for Trump’s conviction is scheduled for July 11, just before the Republican National Convention where he is expected to be nominated as the party’s presidential candidate.
Trump may still be able to vote in the November election even if he remains in Florida and is convicted and resides in New York state.
The conviction has energized Trump’s base and led to an influx of campaign donations, totaling over $34.8 million from the time of the verdict through midnight.
Accuracy
Former President Trump’s legal team began outlining appeal strategy hours after conviction in New York.
Deception
(30%)
The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Trump is quoted making false statements about the nature of the hush money payment and its legality. He also attacks the judge, star witness, and criminal justice system as a whole without providing evidence to support his claims. This constitutes emotional manipulation, selective reporting, and pontification.
He's really a devil.
The theory is you never testify because as soon as you testify – anybody, if it were George Washington – don’t testify because they’ll get you on something that you said slightly wrong.
It's not hush money. It's a nondisclosure agreement.
Totally legal, totally common.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(80%)
The author attacks the criminal justice system as a whole and suggests that Trump's conviction was rigged without providing evidence. This is an example of monetary bias as the author is attempting to generate support and donations for Trump by portraying him as a victim.
Defiant as ever, he insisted without evidence that the verdict was ‘rigged’ and driven by politics.
Donald Trump sought to move past his historic criminal conviction on Friday and build momentum for his bid to return to the White House with fierce attacks on the judge who oversaw the case, the prosecution’s star witness and the criminal justice system as a whole.
The felony conviction of former President Donald Trump has come in the middle of competitive races for Congress and governor in New Hampshire.
Republican candidate for governor Chuck Morse believes the trial and convictions were orchestrated by a politically motivated district attorney.
Democratic candidate for governor Cinde Warmington urges Ayotte to withdraw her endorsement of Trump.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(75%)
The author presents a balanced report of the reactions to Trump's guilty verdict from gubernatorial candidates, allowing readers to form their own opinions on the fairness of the trial and political motivations. There are no formal or informal fallacies present in this article. However, it does present dichotomous depictions by quoting each candidate's reaction to the verdict and highlighting their party affiliation.
Republican candidate for governor Chuck Morse said...
Democratic gubernatorial candidate Joyce Craig also used the verdicts against Trump to criticize Ayotte.
Bias
(95%)
The author does not demonstrate any clear bias in the article. However, there are instances where the author reports on candidates' statements that could be perceived as biased based on their political affiliations. The Democratic candidates criticize Republican candidates for supporting Trump despite his conviction, while Republican candidates downplay the significance of the conviction and suggest it is politically motivated.
]They basically put someone out there that lied constantly and made this happen with those citizens that were on the jury[,
Former President Trump’s legal team began outlining appeal strategy hours after conviction in New York
Judge Juan Merchan gave both parties until June 13 to file motions in the case
Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche has said defense will ‘vigorously fight'
Sentencing is set for July 11, after which Trump would have 30 days to file an appeal
The case will go to the New York Appellate Division once an appeal is filed
Supreme Court could only get involved if some element of the appeal relates to the Constitution or federal law
Appeal process will take several months, making it very unlikely to conclude before November
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority and inflammatory rhetoric. It also uses a dichotomous depiction of the situation.
Appeals can be unpredictable, but given the timeline and the high bar to overturn the verdict, Trump will almost certainly still be a convicted felon on election day.
Bias
(95%)
The author expresses a low opinion of Trump's chances of overturning the verdict and implies that the defense arguments during appeal may be novel but not necessarily invalid. The author also mentions that some legal analysts believe probation is more likely than prison for Trump.
]"Most appeals are denied."
The only potential area of appeal which might work is that this was something of a novel use of the statute involved."
