Former President Donald Trump was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records in a Manhattan criminal court.
The sentencing for Trump's hush money conviction is scheduled for July 11, just days before the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.
Trump expressed concerns about the public's reaction if he is sentenced to house arrest or imprisonment.
Trump maintained that the proceedings were 'rigged' and promised to appeal the jury's verdict.
Former President Donald Trump, who was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records in a Manhattan criminal court last week, expressed his concerns about the public's reaction if he is sentenced to house arrest or imprisonment. In an interview with Fox News' 'Fox & Friends Weekend,' Trump maintained that the proceedings were 'rigged' and promised to appeal the jury's verdict. The sentencing for Trump's hush money conviction is scheduled for July 11, just days before the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.
Trump stated that if he is put under house arrest or imprisoned, it would be a 'breaking point' for the American public who 'would not stand for it.' He added that it would be tougher on his family than himself, specifically mentioning his wife Melania and son Barron. Trump also claimed to be leading over President Biden in the polls despite his legal battles.
The Manhattan jury's verdict made Trump the first former U.S. president to become a convicted felon. The charges stemmed from reimbursements made to Trump's onetime fixer and attorney, Michael Cohen, for a hush money payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.
Trump's comments come in response to President Biden's campaign assertion that Trump is a danger to democracy. The Biden campaign held its first-ever press conference outside the Manhattan courthouse where Trump's trial took place, reminding the American people of the 'unique, persistent, growing threat Donald Trump poses to the American people and towards democracy.'
Despite his mounting legal battles, Trump maintains his innocence and plans to appeal. Sentencing for Trump's hush money conviction is scheduled for July 11.
Former President Donald Trump expressed concern about the public's reaction if he is sentenced to house arrest or imprisonment after being found guilty on all counts in the hush money trial.
Trump maintains that the proceedings were ‘rigged’ and has promised to appeal the jury’s verdict.
Accuracy
Trump maintains that the proceedings were 'rigged' and has promised to appeal the jury’s verdict.
Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the location of the trial, stating that it took place in an area where Republicans get little to no votes.
Judge Juan Merchan set sentencing for Trump on July 11, with a potential sentence of probation to up to 20 years in prison per count.
Deception
(30%)
The article contains editorializing and sensationalism. The author implies that Trump's comments could incite violence towards the judge and district attorney, but does not provide any evidence of this. The title itself is sensationalized with the use of the word 'breaking point'. Additionally, there are multiple instances where the author quotes Trump making unsubstantiated claims about the trial being rigged.
In the interview with Fox & Friends Weekend, Trump said he is not allowed to talk about the hush money case, referring to the partial gag order that Merchan imposed earlier this year, and repeated his claims without evidence that the prosecution was part of an effort led by the Biden White House to interfere with his election prospects.
Trump is gagged from speaking about the hush money case and has maintained that the proceedings were 'rigged'.
The former president’s comments come just days after a Manhattan jury found him guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records. But some experts told NBC News they think it’s unlikely the former president will face time behind bars because of his age, his lack of a criminal record and other reasons.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains an appeal to authority when quoting Trump's claims that there would be a 'breaking point' for the public if he is sentenced to house arrest or imprisonment after his hush money conviction. Additionally, there are inflammatory rhetorics present in the quotes from Trump where he refers to the trial as 'rigged' and 'a scam', and claims that President Joe Biden and Democrats are responsible for his conviction. However, no formal or informal fallacies were found in direct statements made by NBC News.
]In clips of a 90-minute interview with “Fox & Friends Weekend” that aired Sunday, Trump was asked about the possibility of Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over the case, sentencing him to house arrest or jail.
Bias
(80%)
The author does not demonstrate any bias in the article. However, Trump's statements about the trial being rigged and his belief that there would be a 'breaking point' for the public if he is imprisoned can be seen as implying a negative view of the legal system and potential violence from his supporters. This could be interpreted as a subtle form of bias towards Trump and against the rule of law.
But I’m not allowed to talk – I’m gagged.
I guess the first presidential nominee and the leader, leading crooked Joe [Biden] by a lot, that’s not allowed to talk, maybe they’re doing me a big favor. Who knows?
Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the location of the trial, stating that it took place in an area where Republicans get little to no votes.
Trump's fundraising page saw record-breaking donations following his conviction.
Accuracy
Former President Trump was found guilty of all 34 counts of falsifying business records.
Trump maintains that the proceedings were 'rigged'
Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the location of the trial
Legal team has vowed to appeal Trump’s conviction and it is now in the hands of the New York appeals court.
Deception
(50%)
The authors use emotional manipulation by using the phrase 'scam' to describe the trial and implying that it is a weaponization of the Justice Department and FBI. They also engage in selective reporting by only mentioning details that support Trump's position, such as his fundraising success following the conviction.
And the Republican Party... they see it's a weaponization of the Justice Department of the FBI and that's all coming out of Washington.
It's a scam.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(95%)
The authors use loaded language when they describe the guilty verdict as a 'scam' and refer to the Manhattan jury and the Justice Department as being 'weaponized'. They also quote Trump stating that Republicans see it as a 'weaponization of the Justice Department of the FBI', implying bias in these institutions.
And the Republican Party... they've stuck together in this. They see it's a weaponization of the Justice Department of the FBI and that's all coming out of Washington.
But, the good news is that I think we've set a record beyond all records for fundraising.
It's a scam.
We had probably, maybe the worst area in the whole country for me in terms of the vote... and they always bring them [charges] in these sections. They're places where Republicans get virtually no votes.
Former President Donald Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.
Trump maintains his innocence and believes the public may not accept him serving jail time or being under house arrest.
Judge Juan Merchan set sentencing for Trump on July 11, with a potential sentence of probation to up to 20 years in prison per count.
Trump’s wife Melania has been affected by the trial and its coverage in the media.
Accuracy
Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the location of the trial, stating that it took place in an area where Republicans get little to no votes.
Deception
(10%)
The author uses emotional manipulation by implying that the people involved in Trump's conviction are 'evil'. This is a clear attempt to elicit an emotional response from readers and sway their opinion. The author also engages in selective reporting by only mentioning the potential punishments for Trump without providing any context or information about the nature of his crimes or the evidence presented at trial.
These people are so evil, and at the same time the country can come together.
Fallacies
(85%)
The author, Kit Maher, presents a factual account of Donald Trump's response to his conviction without making any logical fallacies. However, there is an appeal to authority and inflammatory rhetoric present in direct quotes from Trump.
. . . making him the first former president to be found guilty of a felony and the first major-party presidential nominee to be convicted of a crime in the midst of a campaign for the White House.
But, Trump added, “I don’t think the public would stand it. I’m not sure the public would stand for it.”
Speaking specifically of his wife, former first lady Melania Trump, the former president said, “She’s fine, but I think it’s very hard for her. I mean, she’s fine. But it’s … you know, she’s has to read all this crap.
Asked about the prospect of seeking political retribution should he win the 2024 presidential election, Trump said that while just succeeding sounds “beautiful,” it’s “awfully hard when you see what they’ve done.”
This story has been updated with additional information.
Former President Trump was found guilty of all 34 counts of falsifying business records in New York
Trump’s conviction makes him the first former U.S. president to become a convicted felon
Sentencing for Trump’s hush money conviction is scheduled for July 11, four days before the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee
Accuracy
Despite his mounting legal battles, Trump maintains a razor-thin lead of 1.5 points over Biden in polls
Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the location of the trial, stating that it took place in an area where Republicans get little to no votes
Deception
(10%)
The author makes editorializing statements and uses emotional manipulation by portraying Biden in a negative light and labeling him as 'the worst president in the history of this country' and a 'danger to the country'. The author also selectively reports information by only mentioning Trump's conviction for falsifying business records without providing context or mentioning any potential consequences or implications of the conviction. Lastly, there is a lie by omission as the author fails to mention that Trump was convicted of all 34 counts related to the hush money payment.
But it’s like their slogan, ‘I’m a threat to democracy.’ I’m the opposite. They’re the threat to democracy.
He’s the worst president in the history of this country, and he’s a danger to the country
Former President Trump on Sunday claimed he is the ‘opposite’ of a threat to democracy
Fallacies
(85%)
The author Miranda Nazzaro commits the following fallacies in her article:
1. Dichotomous Depiction: The author presents a false dichotomy between Trump and Biden, implying that one is the opposite of a threat to democracy while the other is a threat, without providing any evidence or reasoning to support this claim.
2. Appeal to Authority: The author quotes Trump making statements about himself being the opposite of a threat to democracy and Biden being a danger to the country without providing any evidence or context as to why these statements are true or authoritative.
3. Inflammatory Rhetoric: The author uses inflammatory language when describing Biden, calling him 'the worst president in the history of this country' and a 'danger to the country'.
Therefore, based on the analysis rules provided, I cannot give a score higher than 85.
Former President Trump on Sunday claimed he is the ‘opposite’ of a threat to democracy...
And you know, they have misinformation … ‘Donald Trump is a threat to democracy.’ I’m the opposite. They’re the threat to democracy…
We want to remind the American people ahead … of the unique, persistent, growing threat Donald Trump poses to the American people and towards democracy…
Bias
(80%)
The author, Miranda Nazzaro, demonstrates bias by repeatedly referring to President Biden as 'the worst president in the history of this country' and a 'danger to the country'. These statements are not factual and reflect a negative opinion towards President Biden.
'he’s the worst president in the history of this country, and he’s a danger to the country'
'I’m leading over this guy (Biden)... That can’t put two sentences together, that’s destroying our country. Look, he’s the worst president in the history of this country', 'He's a danger to democracy.'
