Former Trump Controller Testifies: No Personal Direction for Cohen Payments in Manhattan Trial

New York City, New York United States of America
Former Trump controller Jeffrey McConney testified that Donald Trump did not personally direct payments to Michael Cohen for hush money for Stormy Daniels.
McConney served as the Trump Organization's controller for over two decades.
Payments were considered legal expenses.
Trump was held in contempt of court and fined $1,000 after violating a gag order during a press conference.
Former Trump Controller Testifies: No Personal Direction for Cohen Payments in Manhattan Trial

Former President Donald Trump's criminal trial in Manhattan is making headlines as the defense and prosecution present their cases. In one notable development, a witness testified that Trump did not personally direct payments to Michael Cohen related to hush money for Stormy Daniels. Jeffrey McConney, a former controller for the Trump Organization, took the stand and stated that such payments were legal expenses. However, Trump's trial has been marked by several controversies and rulings from Judge Juan Merchan. The judge fined Trump $1,000 for violating his gag order during the trial and warned of potential jail time if he continues to do so. Meanwhile, the defense team has argued that the case is an interference with Trump's constitutional rights.

According to McConney's testimony on May 7, 2024, in the fourth week of the trial, Trump did not personally direct him to set up reimbursement payments to Cohen. Michael Cohen was a lawyer for the Trump Organization and such payments were considered legal expenses. Jeffrey McConney served as the Trump Organization's controller for over two decades.

In another development on May 7, 2024, Judge Merchan held Trump in contempt of court after he made comments about certain individuals related to the trial during a press conference. Trump suggested that he is willing to go to jail to keep talking about his case and complained about the gag order preventing him from discussing these individuals. The judge warned that further violations could result in imprisonment.

The Manhattan criminal trial against Donald Trump, which began on March 28, 2024, accuses him of falsifying business records to cover up a sex scandal. He has pleaded not guilty.

New York State's court system is releasing transcripts from each day of the trial for public access. The trial is expected to last several more weeks.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Was there any documentation or evidence presented in court other than McConney's testimony to support this claim?
  • Were there any contradictory testimonies or evidence presented during the trial?

Sources

99%

  • Unique Points
    • Trump suggested he is willing to go to jail to keep talking about his case.
    • Trump complained about the gag order preventing him from discussing certain individuals related to the trial.
    • Constitution is more important than jail for Trump.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

94%

  • Unique Points
    • New York State's court system is releasing transcripts from each day of the Manhattan criminal trial against former President Donald J. Trump
    • Trump is accused of falsifying business records to cover up a sex scandal
    • He has pleaded not guilty
  • Accuracy
    • Prosecution’s case is proceeding ahead of schedule and they estimate being finished with witnesses in two weeks.
    • Former President Trump did not personally direct Jeffrey McConney to set up reimbursement payments to Michael Cohen.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Former President Trump did not personally direct Jeffrey McConney to set up reimbursement payments to Michael Cohen.
    • Michael Cohen was a lawyer for the Trump Organization and payments to lawyers are legal expenses.
    • Jeffrey McConney served as the Trump Organization’s controller for over two decades.
    • Cohen was initially reimbursed through a trust before switching to payments from Trump’s personal account.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

94%

  • Unique Points
    • Judge Juan Merchan is presiding over Donald Trump’s criminal trial with a no-nonsense approach and full control over the proceedings.
    • Trump sat silently in the courtroom as former Trump Organization controller Jeffrey McConney testified about reimbursing Michael Cohen for $130,000 paid to Stormy Daniels.
    • Judge Merchan fined Trump $1,000 for violating his gag order during the trial and warned of potential jail time if he continues to do so.
    • Trump left the courtroom when it adjourned without commenting on the proceedings or interacting with reporters.
  • Accuracy
    • ][article.facts[1]] Trump sat silently in the courtroom as former Trump Organization controller Jeffrey McConney testified about reimbursing Michael Cohen for $130,000 paid to Stormy Daniels.[
    • ][otherArticles[3].facts[5]] Prosecutors allege that the Trump Organization reimbursed Michael Cohen and falsely logged these payments as legal expenses.[
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The author does not demonstrate any clear bias in the article. However, there are a few instances where the author seems to be taking a neutral tone towards Trump and his actions during the trial. For example, when describing Trump's violation of the gag order and subsequent fines, the author states that 'Trump sat and listened, saying nothing.' This could be seen as an attempt to remain impartial. However, later in the article, when quoting a retired judge's opinion on Trump's behavior and potential consequences for violating the gag order again, there is a slight tone of criticism towards Trump. The author states that 'He [Trump] tries to say he is being treated differently. He is being treated differently: He’s being given more leeway than the average defendant.' This implies that Trump may be receiving preferential treatment due to his former position as president, which could be seen as a subtle criticism. However, this does not rise to the level of significant bias and would not affect the overall score.
    • ]any other defendant with these repeated violations would already be put in jail for contempt[
      • He [Trump] tries to say he is being treated differently. He is being treated differently: He’s being given more leeway than the average defendant.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication