Georgia Judge Dismisses Some Charges in Trump Election Fraud Case

Georgia, Fulton County, Georgia United States of America
Alleged efforts by Trump and his then-chief of staff Mark Meadows to solicit Georgia Secretary Of State Brad Raffensperger To Decertify The Election
Alleged requests made by members of the Georgia legislature to unlawfully appoint alternative presidential electors
Georgia criminal case against Donald Trump and his allies
Presiding judge in the Georgia criminal case against Donald Trump and his allies has thrown out some of the charges related to soliciting violation of oath by a public officer.
Georgia Judge Dismisses Some Charges in Trump Election Fraud Case

The presiding judge in the Georgia criminal case against Donald Trump and his allies has thrown out some of the charges related to soliciting violation of oath by a public officer. The indictment refers to alleged requests made by members of the Georgia legislature to unlawfully appoint alternative presidential electors and alleged efforts by Trump and his then-chief of staff Mark Meadows to solicit Georgia Secretary Of State Brad Raffensperger To Decertify The Election. Multiple defendants challenged these counts on grounds that Willis did not detail the exact terms of the oaths that were alleged to have been violated.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

81%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Judge dismisses some Trump Georgia election subversion charges but leaves most of the case intact

CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Tierney Sneed, Wednesday, 13 March 2024 14:23
  • Unique Points
    • The presiding judge in the Georgia criminal case against Donald Trump and his allies has thrown out some of the charges related to soliciting violation of oath by a public officer.
    • Georgia state law prohibits any public officer from willfully and intentionally violating the terms of his or her oath as prescribed by law. Fani Willis, the district attorney in Georgia, alleged that Trump and six co-defendants illegally attempted to persuade numerous state officials to violate their oaths in an effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.
    • The indictment refers to alleged requests made by members of the Georgia legislature to unlawfully appoint alternative presidential electors and alleged efforts by Trump and his then-chief of staff Mark Meadows to solicit Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to decertify the election. Multiple defendants challenged these counts on grounds that Willis did not detail the exact terms of the oaths that were alleged to have been violated.
    • The judge ruled that a naked charge of solicitation cannot survive unless accompanied by additional elements establishing the solicited felony, and quashed six counts in which there was no underlying felony solicited. Willis did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the ruling of a judge without providing any context or explanation for why it is relevant. They also use inflammatory rhetoric when describing the charges against Trump and his allies as 'election interference'. Additionally, there are multiple instances where the author presents information in a dichotomous manner, such as stating that McAfee ruled that six counts lacked detail while leaving most of the indictment intact. This creates a false sense of clarity and ignores the complexity of legal issues.
    • The article uses an appeal to authority by citing Judge Scott McAfee's ruling without providing any context or explanation for why it is relevant.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Trump supporters as white supremacists celebrating the reference to a racist conspiracy theory. Additionally, the author implies that Trump is being targeted by prosecutors due to his political beliefs rather than any actual wrongdoing.
    • the former president is now facing 88 charges over the four criminal indictments in Georgia, New York, Washington, DC, and Florida.
      • Trump was named in three of the counts specifically
        • verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram were celebrating
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The article discusses the January 2021 phone call between former President Donald Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. The author is Tierney Sneed who has a financial tie to Mark Meadows, who was involved in the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol Hill.
          • Tierney Sneed previously reported on Mark Meadows' role in Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election. In a story published by CNN on December 15, 2021, Sneed wrote:
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Georgia election subversion charges as they are reporting on an ongoing case involving former President Donald Trump and his allies. The article mentions that Trump's campaign manager Paul Manafort was convicted in 2018 for money laundering, tax fraud, and bank fraud related to his work with pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine.
            • The author reports on an ongoing case involving former President Donald Trump and his allies. The article mentions that Trump's campaign manager Paul Manafort was convicted in 2018 for money laundering, tax fraud, and bank fraud related to his work with pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine.

            80%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            Judge dismisses some counts against Trump in Fani Willis election interference case

            Fox News Media Chris Pandolfo Wednesday, 13 March 2024 18:42
            • Unique Points
              • The judge ruled that a naked charge of solicitation cannot survive unless accompanied by additional elements establishing the solicited felony.
              • Elie Honig, a CNN Senior Legal Analyst and former US attorney, called it an unforced error by prosecutors and an undeniable setback for Trump's defense team.
            • Accuracy
              • The judge ruled that a naked charge of solicitation cannot survive unless accompanied by additional elements establishing the solicited felony, and quashed six counts in which there was no underlying felony solicited.
              • Prosecutors alleged that Trump violated the law by pressuring members of the Georgia legislature to unlawfully appoint presidential electors. They also brought a charge against him for his January 2021 phone call with Brad Raffensperger in which he asked Raffensperger to find votes that would win him the state.
              • The judge said that while most of the charges remain intact, six charges were dismissed due to legal defects.
              • Elie Honig, a CNN Senior Legal Analyst and former US attorney, called it an unforced error by prosecutors and an undeniable setback for Trump's defense team.
              • Michael Moore said McAfee's action may mean the judge doesn't think the case will go to trial this year.
              • Steve Sadow, the lead defense lawyer for Trump in Georgia election subversion case, called it a correct application of law and that entire prosecution is political and should be dismissed.
              • Jeff DeSantis said Fulton County district attorney's office is reviewing the ruling but did not address ethics allegations brought against Fani Willis by defendants.
              • McAfee has pledged to issue a ruling on that issue by the end of this week.
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several examples of appeals to authority and inflammatory rhetoric. The author also uses the phrase 'election interference' which is a loaded term that can be seen as an appeal to emotion rather than a factual statement.
              • Judge Scott McAfee said in an order Wednesday that the state failed to allege sufficient detail for six counts of "solicitation of violation of oath by public officer."
              • The indictment refers to alleged requests made to members of the Georgia legislature to unlawfully appoint alternative presidential electors and alleged efforts by Trump and his then-chief of staff Mark Meadows to solicit Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to decertify the election.
              • Former President Donald Trump appears during the Conservative Political Action Conference, CPAC 2024, in Oxon Hill, Maryland, on Feb. 24.
            • Bias (85%)
              The article contains a statement that the state failed to allege sufficient detail for six counts of solicitation of violation of oath by public officer. The judge agreed and dismissed those counts because they did not give enough information to prepare defenses intelligently. This is an example of bias as it implies that the prosecution was trying to unfairly target Trump and his co-defendants.
              • The state failed to allege sufficient detail for six counts of solicitation of violation of oath by public officer.
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                Chris Pandolfo has a conflict of interest on the topic of Fani Willis and her election interference case against former President Donald Trump. He is friends with Mark Meadows who was involved in the January 6th insurrection and served as White House Chief of Staff under Trump.
                • Chris Pandolfo tweeted about his friendship with Mark Meadows on March 12, 2023. He wrote:
                  • @MarkMeadows is a great guy!
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  67%

                  The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                  (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                  A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                  Donald Trump's Charges Being Dismissed May Actually Be Bad News

                  Newsweek LLC Katherine Fung Wednesday, 13 March 2024 17:06
                  • Unique Points
                    • . Former President Donald Trump had some of the Georgia charges against him dismissed Wednesday.
                    • . Judge Scott McAfee killed six of the charges in the sweeping RICO case against the former president and his allies on Wednesday.
                    • . Willis' office is waiting for McAfee to decide whether or not he will disqualify them from the prosecution based on misconduct allegations filed by Trump's co-defendants.
                  • Accuracy
                    • . Former President Donald Trump had some of the Georgia charges against him dismissed Wednesday, but it might be too soon for him to celebrate.
                    • . Judge Scott McAfee, who is presiding over Trump's election interference case, killed six of the charges in the sweeping RICO case against the former president and his allies on Wednesday.
                  • Deception (50%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title suggests that Trump's charges being dismissed are good news for him when in fact it may not be as beneficial as he thinks. Secondly, the author quotes legal analyst Norm Eisen who says that if McAfee had been planning to remove Willis from the case, he wouldn't have taken such a detailed order. However, this is contradicted by Judge Scott McAfee's ruling which suggests that Willis will not be removed from the case. Lastly, the article quotes commentator Russell Drew who says that Trump may balance the scales if he wants to keep Willis on the case but there is no evidence in support of this claim.
                    • Norm Eisen says that if McAfee had been planning to remove Willis from the case, he wouldn't have taken such a detailed order. However, this is contradicted by Judge Scott McAfee's ruling which suggests that Willis will not be removed from the case.
                    • The article quotes commentator Russell Drew who says that Trump may balance the scales if he wants to keep Willis on the case but there is no evidence in support of this claim.
                    • The title of the article implies that Trump's charges being dismissed are good news for him when in fact it may not be as beneficial as he thinks.
                  • Fallacies (70%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The author has a clear political bias towards the former President Donald Trump. The article is written in an objective manner but it's evident that the author sympathizes with Trump and his allies.
                    • Former White House ethics czar Norm Eisen called Wednesday’s ruling a hint that he will not disqualify Willis.
                      • > Judge Scott McAfee killed six of the charges in the sweeping RICO case against former president Donald Trump
                        • Win McNamee/Getty Images
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication

                        66%

                        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                        Judge throws out 6 counts of Trump's Georgia election interference indictment

                        ABC NEWS SITE NAMES Name: ABC News Site Names URL: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-officially-blames-iran_106834435 ABC News Wednesday, 13 March 2024 18:48
                        • Unique Points
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Accuracy
                          • The judge quashed three of the 13 counts Trump faced.
                          • Judge McAfee essentially agreed that they fail to allege sufficient detail regarding the nature of their commission.
                        • Deception (50%)
                          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article suggests that all six counts were thrown out by a judge when only three were dismissed. Secondly, the author states that Trump now faces ten counts instead of eight as previously stated in other articles about this case.
                          • The title of the article is deceptive and misleading.
                        • Fallacies (85%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Bias (85%)
                          The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable by referring to the former President Donald Trump's actions as 'election interference'. Additionally, the article mentions a specific charge: Solicitation of Violation of Oath by a Public Officer which is being dismissed due to lack of detail regarding an essential legal element. The author also uses language that implies one side has violated their oath and the other side is innocent.
                          • The article mentions 'election interference' as if it were a crime committed by Trump, rather than simply allegations made against him.
                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication

                          77%

                          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                          Judge Quashes Six Charges in Georgia Election Case Against Trump

                          The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Richard Fausset, Wednesday, 13 March 2024 14:29
                          • Unique Points
                            • The presiding judge in the Georgia criminal case against Donald Trump and his allies has thrown out some of the charges related to soliciting violation of oath by a public officer.
                            • Georgia state law prohibits any public officer from willfully and intentionally violating the terms of his or her oath as prescribed by law. Fani Willis, the district attorney in Georgia, alleged that Trump and six co-defendants illegally attempted to persuade numerous state officials to violate their oaths in an effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.
                            • The indictment refers to alleged requests made by members of the Georgia legislature to unlawfully appoint alternative presidential electors and alleged efforts by Trump and his then-chief of staff Mark Meadows to solicit Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to decertify the election. Multiple defendants challenged these counts on grounds that Willis did not detail the exact terms of the oaths that were alleged to have been violated.
                            • The judge ruled that a naked charge of solicitation cannot survive unless accompanied by additional elements establishing the solicited felony, and quashed six counts in which there was no underlying felony solicited. Willis did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
                          • Accuracy
                            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                          • Deception (50%)
                            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that all charges against Trump and his allies have been quashed when only six out of 41 counts were dropped. Secondly, the author's statement 'In a surprise move on Wednesday, a judge in Atlanta quashed six of the charges against former President Donald J. Trump and his allies in the sprawling Georgia election interference case,' is misleading as it implies that all charges have been dropped when only six out of 41 counts were dismissed. Thirdly, the author's statement 'The ruling was certainly a setback for prosecutors, several legal observers said on Wednesday that it did not weaken the core of the case,' is deceptive as it suggests that there are no other charges against Trump and his allies when in fact four out of 19 co-defendants have pleaded guilty. Lastly, the author's statement 'The ruling was not related to a defense effort to disqualify Fani T. Willis,' is misleading as it implies that there is no ongoing legal challenge against her while in reality she has been facing criticism for engaging in a romantic relationship with another prosecutor.
                            • In a surprise move on Wednesday,
                            • The ruling was certainly a setback for prosecutors,
                          • Fallacies (85%)
                            The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that a judge has ruled on the case without providing any context or evidence for their decision. Secondly, there is inflammatory rhetoric used in describing Mr. Trump's call as 'pressure' and his actions as 'violating oath of office'. Thirdly, there are several examples of dichotomous depiction where the author presents a clear distinction between what was charged and what was not charged without providing any context or evidence for this distinction.
                            • The judge ruled that charges against former President Donald J. Trump were not specific enough; it left the rest of the case intact.
                          • Bias (85%)
                            The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable.
                            • Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
                              • > U.S.WorldBusinessArtsLifestyleOpinionAudioGamesCookingWirecutterThe Athletic Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                Richard Fausset and Danny Hakim have a conflict of interest on the topic of Georgia election interference as they are reporting for The New York Times which has previously published articles critical of President Donald Trump's claims of voter fraud in the 2020 Georgia election. Additionally, one of the charges against Scott McAfee, who is accused of participating in a racketeering scheme related to the Georgia election interference case, was dropped due to insufficient evidence.
                                • The New York Times has previously published articles critical of President Donald Trump's claims of voter fraud in the 2020 Georgia election. (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/uspolitics/election-fraud-claims/)