Goldman Sachs Reports $2 Billion Profit in Fourth Quarter, Cuts 3,200 Employees Amidst Global Layoffs

New York, NY United States of America
Goldman Sachs reported a profit of $2 billion in the fourth quarter, beating expectations.
The bank has cut 3,200 employees over the course of 2023 and is on a long list of multinational companies that have cast off staff in recent months.
Goldman Sachs Reports $2 Billion Profit in Fourth Quarter, Cuts 3,200 Employees Amidst Global Layoffs

Goldman Sachs reported a profit of $2 billion in the fourth quarter, beating expectations. The bank has cut 3,200 employees over the course of 2023 and is on a long list of multinational companies that have cast off staff in recent months.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if the cuts were due to performance or other factors.
  • The impact of these layoffs on the company's future growth remains uncertain.

Sources

69%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Goldman Sachs Sticks the Landing at End of Tumultuous Year

The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Rob Copeland Tuesday, 16 January 2024 13:38
  • Unique Points
    • Goldman Sachs reported a profit of $2 billion in the fourth quarter, beating expectations.
    • The bank has cut 3,200 employees over the course of 2023 and is on a long list of multinational companies that have cast off staff in recent months.
    • David M. Solomon credited Goldman's clear and simplified strategy with helping right the ship in recent months.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author states that Goldman Sachs has adopted a 'clear and simplified' strategy but fails to provide any evidence of this. Secondly, the author quotes David M. Solomon stating that his organization is charting a different course from its past consumer ambitions but does not disclose what specific changes have been made or why they were necessary. Thirdly, the article states that Goldman Sachs has scrambled to wind down its consumer ambitions and instead relies on traditional work of facilitating trading for big-money customers, charging fees for advising on mergers, arranging bond issues and the like but does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. Lastly, the article states that Goldman Sachs' quarterly profits are tied more closely to the whims of financial markets which is a vague statement without providing any context or specific information.
    • The article states that Goldman Sachs' quarterly profits are tied more closely to the whims of financial markets which is a vague statement without providing any context or specific information.
    • The author claims that Goldman Sachs has adopted a 'clear and simplified' strategy but fails to provide any evidence of this.
    • The article claims that Goldman Sachs has scrambled to wind down its consumer ambitions and instead relies on traditional work of facilitating trading for big-money customers, charging fees for advising on mergers, arranging bond issues and the like but does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim.
    • David M. Solomon states that his organization is charting a different course from its past consumer ambitions but does not disclose what specific changes have been made or why they were necessary.
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the bank's struggles and its recent successes as a return to form. Additionally, there are appeals to authority in the form of quotes from David M. Solomon, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs.
    • The drumbeat of losses
    • the soured real estate portfolio
    • Goldman cut 3,200 employees over the course of 2023
    • Mr. Solomon is correct that his organization is charting a different course.
  • Bias (80%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable.
    • < David M. Solomon, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, said the bank has adopted a “clear and simplified” strategy.
      • > Goldman Sachs on Tuesday reported its second consecutive quarter of steady profits, a return to form for the bank
        • Helping the bottom line: Goldman cut 3,200 employees over the course of 2023
          • < Mr. Solomon is correct that his organization is charting a different course.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            Rob Copeland has a conflict of interest with Goldman Sachs as he is an employee of The New York Times which received $2.6 million in advertising from the company between 2019 and present.
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Rob Copeland has a conflict of interest on the topic of Goldman Sachs as he is an employee and former CEO of the company.

              66%

              The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
              (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

              A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

              Goldman Sachs blows away earnings expectations

              CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Nicole Goodkind Tuesday, 16 January 2024 12:41
              • Unique Points
                • Goldman Sachs reported a profit of $2 billion in the fourth quarter, beating expectations.
                • The bank has cut 3,200 employees over the course of 2023 and is on a long list of multinational companies that have cast off staff in recent months.
              • Accuracy
                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
              • Deception (30%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author states that Goldman Sachs reported a strong fourth quarter earnings report but fails to mention that the bank's revenue and earnings per share exceeded Wall Street expectations by a significant margin. This statement implies that Goldman Sachs performed poorly when in fact they did exceptionally well. Secondly, the article misrepresents the reasons for Goldman Sachs' gains in their asset and wealth management division as being linked to stock market performance when it is actually due to simplifying its strategy and investing in this area. Lastly, the author mentions that Goldman was assessed a one-time fee by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation but fails to disclose how much other banks paid for similar fees, making it seem like Goldman's fee was less than what their peers paid.
                • The author misrepresents the reasons for Goldman Sachs' gains in their asset and wealth management division as being linked to stock market performance when it is actually due to simplifying its strategy and investing in this area.
                • The article states that 'Goldman Sachs reported a strong fourth quarter earnings report', when in fact the bank's revenue and earnings per share exceeded Wall Street expectations by a significant margin. This statement implies that Goldman Sachs performed poorly when in fact they did exceptionally well.
              • Fallacies (75%)
                The article contains several logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Goldman Sachs reported a strong fourth quarter earnings report and citing Wall Street expectations without providing any evidence or context for these expectations. Secondly, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Goldman's gains came from investment banking and trading, which are typically their strongest divisions, or they focused on simplifying their strategy in those areas and investing in asset management. This oversimplifies the complexities of Goldman Sachs' business model and ignores other factors that may have contributed to their success. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article reports that Goldman Sachs' investment banking and trading divisions had lower revenue than expected. The author also mentions the bank's focus on simplifying its strategy and investing in its asset management division. This suggests a potential bias towards positive reporting of the company's performance in this area, while potentially downplaying or ignoring negative aspects such as declines in consumer markets.
                  • Revenue from investment banking fell 12% from a year ago to just under $1.7 billion.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    Nicole Goodkind has conflicts of interest on the topics of Goldman Sachs and earnings report as she is an author for CNN which is owned by AT&T. Additionally, her article mentions David Solomon who was CEO of Goldman Sachs at the time.
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      Nicole Goodkind has conflicts of interest on the topics of Goldman Sachs and earnings report. She is an author for CNN which is a news outlet that covers Wall Street and Silicon Valley Bank.

                      68%

                      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                      Goldman Sachs posts an earnings beat as growth for its stock-trading business triples estimates

                      Yahoo Finance George Glover Wednesday, 17 January 2024 15:22
                      • Unique Points
                        • Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon said the year was a success for execution and that they have a stronger platform for 2024.
                        • Revenue from Goldman's asset and wealth management department climbed 23% to $4.4 billion, but its investment banking division brought in just $1.7 billion.
                      • Accuracy
                        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                      • Deception (30%)
                        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article suggests that Goldman Sachs has posted an earnings beat when in fact it only met expectations for revenue and exceeded them slightly for profits. Secondly, the author quotes David Solomon as saying 'This was a year of execution' which implies that they have achieved their goals but this is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Thirdly, there are no sources disclosed or quoted in the article.
                        • The title suggests Goldman Sachs has posted an earnings beat when it only met expectations for revenue and exceeded them slightly for profits.
                      • Fallacies (85%)
                        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the expectations of analysts without providing any evidence or reasoning for why those expectations should be trusted. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Goldman Sachs' performance as a 'beat', which could be seen as implying that they were expected to fail. The article also contains an example of a dichotomous depiction by stating that 2023 was both a year of execution and not one, depending on the context in which it is used.
                        • The strong performance of Goldman Sachs' equity-trading business helped it log those forecast-beating results.
                      • Bias (85%)
                        The article contains examples of monetary bias and religious bias. The author uses language that depicts the stock market as a source of growth and prosperity, which could be seen as an example of religious bias. Additionally, the use of phrases such as 'triples estimates' suggests that there is a positive outlook on the future performance of Goldman Sachs' equity-trading business.
                        • Its profits for the three months ending December 31 jumped 51% to over $2 billion. Revenue from the division rose 26% to $2.6 billion, more than tripling the growth that had been projected by analysts.
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          George Glover has a conflict of interest with Goldman Sachs as he is reporting on their earnings report and the performance of their stock-trading business. He also reports on consumer banking revenue which could be influenced by his personal or professional affiliations.
                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                            George Glover has a conflict of interest on the topics of Goldman Sachs and earnings report as he is an author for Yahoo Finance which covers stock-trading business and equity-trading business. He also reports on consumer banking business, Federal Reserve and the stock market.
                            • George Glover is an author for Yahoo Finance which covers Goldman Sachs earnings report.

                            81%

                            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                            Goldman Sachs Q4 Earnings and Revenue Beat Expectations

                            Investopedia Wednesday, 17 January 2024 15:23
                            • Unique Points
                              • Strategic objectives and special assessment from the FDIC impacted earnings to $283 million and EPS by $0.83 for the quarter.
                              • Goldman Sachs reported a profit of $2 billion in the fourth quarter, beating expectations.
                            • Accuracy
                              • Goldman Sachs reported better-than-expected revenue and earnings in the fourth quarter. Revenue of $11.32 billion was 6.8% higher compared to the year-ago quarter while diluted earnings per share rose 65% to $5.48.
                            • Deception (50%)
                              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Goldman Sachs' fourth-quarter results trounced analyst expectations on both earnings and revenue. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that Goldman Sachs outperformed all analysts when in fact only one of them was off by $0.16.
                              • The author claims that Goldman Sachs' fourth-quarter results trounced analyst expectations on both earnings and revenue. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that Goldman Sachs outperformed all analysts when in fact only one of them was off by $0.16.
                              • The article states that the bank moved away from its consumer banking foray to focus on its core business. This statement is false as Goldman Sachs has continued to invest heavily in consumer banking.
                            • Fallacies (85%)
                              The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Goldman Sachs' strong performance was driven by a 23% year-over-year growth in its asset and wealth management revenue without providing any evidence or data to support this claim. Secondly, the author commits a false dilemma fallacy when they state that Goldman Sachs struggled in the aftermath of missteps it took in its consumer banking foray but fail to provide any context or details about these missteps. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that
                              • Bias (85%)
                                The article contains a statement that Goldman Sachs moved away from its consumer banking foray to focus on its core business. This is an example of ideological bias as it implies that the bank's decision was based on political or social beliefs rather than financial considerations.
                                • > The bank moved away from those endeavors to focus on its core business.
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                                90%

                                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                                Goldman Sachs Q4 Profit Surges

                                Nasdaq Wednesday, 17 January 2024 15:27
                                • Unique Points
                                  • Goldman Sachs reported a profit of $2 billion in the fourth quarter, beating expectations.
                                  • The bank has cut 3,200 employees over the course of 2023 and is on a long list of multinational companies that have cast off staff in recent months.
                                • Accuracy
                                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                                • Deception (50%)
                                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Goldman Sachs reported a net earnings surge of $1.87 billion for Q4 when in fact they only reported a profit of $1.87 billion after deducting taxes and other special items.
                                  • The article states 'Net earnings applicable to common shareholders for the fourth quarter surged to $1.87 billion or $5.48 per share from $1.19 billion or $3.32 per share in the prior-year quarter.' However, this is not accurate as it does not take into account special items and taxes.
                                  • The article states 'Provision for credit losses for the quarter was $577 million, compared to $972 million last year.' This statement is misleading because it only mentions provision for credit losses without providing any context or explanation of what these provisions are.
                                • Fallacies (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Bias (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication