Gemini is designed to be more powerful and versatile than its predecessor Bard.
Google has released a new AI chatbot called Gemini.
The app can perform a wide range of tasks, including serving as a personal tutor, helping with coding tasks, and preparing job hunters for interviews.
Google has recently released a new AI chatbot called Gemini, which is designed to be more powerful and versatile than its predecessor Bard. The app can perform a wide range of tasks, including serving as a personal tutor, helping with coding tasks, and preparing job hunters for interviews. It is immediately available in over 150 countries and territories worldwide.
Google has rebranded its AI chatbot Bard to Gemini
Gemini is Google's most advanced large language AI model called Ultra 1.0
The premium version of the chatbot, Gemini Advanced allows longer and more detailed conversations with a better understanding of context from previous prompts.
Screenshot of Gemini app acting as a personal assistant
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title mentions that Bard has been rebranded to Gemini but does not mention anything about Ultra 1.0 being a large language AI model or its capabilities. This creates confusion and implies that Gemini is just another name for Bard when it's actually an advanced version of it with new features and capabilities. Secondly, the article mentions that Google claims to have outperformed human experts on MMLU but does not provide any evidence or specific details about this claim. This creates a false impression of superiority without providing concrete information to back up the statement. Thirdly, the article mentions that Gemini faces competition from OpenAI's ChatGPT but does not mention anything about how they compare in terms of performance or capabilities.
Gemini faces competition from OpenAI's ChatGPT but no comparison in terms of performance or capabilities is mentioned
The title mentions Bard being rebranded to Gemini without any mention of Ultra 1.0
Google claims to have outperformed human experts on MMLU but no evidence is provided
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when stating that the technology underlying Gemini Advanced will eventually be able to outthink even the smartest people when tackling many complex topics.
> Google claims its Ultra version achieved state-of-the-art performance across 30 out of 32 academic benchmarks used in large language model development. <
> The firm will work with Adobe, BBC, Microsoft, Sony and others on technical standards for these digital credentials through the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity. <
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes those who disagree with the company's decision to rebrand Bard to Gemini.
> On Feb. 8, vice president and general manager for Google Assistant and Bard, Sissie Hsiao, announced that the firm’s 11-month-old AI chatbot has now adopted the same name as its multimodal large language model.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Martin Young has a conflict of interest with Google Assistant and Bard as he is the vice president and general manager for these products. He also reports on their new product Gemini which has a $20 per month subscription fee.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Martin Young has a conflict of interest on the topics of Google and Bard as he is vice president and general manager for Google Assistant and Bard.
Google has retired its Bard chatbot and released a more powerful app called Gemini.
, The new app is designed to do an array of tasks, including serving as a personal tutor, helping computer programmers with coding tasks and even preparing job hunters for interviews.
, Immediately available to English speakers in more than 150 countries and territories, including the United States.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Google has retired its Bard chatbot and released a more powerful app called Gemini. However, this statement is false as Bard was not retired but rather replaced by Gemini. Secondly, the author states that Gemini can serve as a personal tutor to help computer programmers with coding tasks and even prepare job hunters for interviews. This claim is also false as there is no evidence in the article to support this statement.
The sentence 'Google has retired its Bard chatbot' is deceptive because it implies that Bard was removed from service when in fact, it was replaced by Gemini.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Google's new Gemini app is designed for tasks ranging from serving as a personal tutor to preparing job hunters for interviews. The author does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim.
Bias
(80%)
The article is biased towards the new product release of Gemini by Google. The author uses language that depicts Gemini as a powerful and advanced AI-driven chatbot and voice assistant that can perform various tasks. This portrayal creates an extreme or unreasonable view of the capabilities of Gemini, which may not be entirely accurate.
Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant
responding to voice and text requests, it can answer questions, write poetry, generate images,
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author of the article has a conflict of interest with OpenAI and ChatGPT as they are products developed by his employer Google. The author also has a financial stake in Google through his employment.
. . . ,. . .
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Google as they are an employee at OpenAI and have previously written about their work with ChatGPT. The article does not disclose this conflict.
Google launched Gemini this week with the new AI experience set to replace Assistant for many users.
<br>Any Android device with 4GB of RAM or more and Android 12 or higher is eligible to get going with Gemini. Just download the Gemini app from the Play Store to get started.<br>
To tell the difference between the two apps, you need to view the 'App Info' page for both Gemini apps from your app drawer or go to the Google Assistant app listing in Play Store and remove it.
<br>Since these two apps function exactly the same, one of them should be called Gemini while other will say Google Assistant. You can delete the latter.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is misleading in several ways. Firstly, it states that Google has updated the app for Google Assistant with Gemini's namesake and logo. However, this is not true as there are only two apps on the device - one called 'Gemini' and another called 'Google Assistant'. Secondly, it suggests that users can delete either of these apps without any consequences. This is also incorrect as deleting the app used as a shortcut for Google Assistant will disable access to all Google services including voice commands. Lastly, the article implies that Gemini only supports Assistant commands when using voice but this is not true.
The suggestion to delete either of these apps without any consequences is incorrect as deleting the app used as a shortcut for Google Assistant will disable access to all Google services including voice commands.
The statement that Gemini only supports Assistant commands when using voice is false.
The statement 'Google has updated the app for Google Assistant with Gemini's namesake and logo.' is false as there are two apps on the device - one called 'Gemini' and another called 'Google Assistant'.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an example of a false dilemma fallacy. The author presents the reader with two options: either to delete one of the Gemini apps or not use them at all. However, there is no evidence presented in the article that using both apps will cause any issues.
The author states 'If you do go out and enable Gemini on your Android device, though, you might find that there are two Gemini apps on your device.' This implies a false dilemma where the reader has to choose between deleting one of the apps or not using them at all.
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Google Assistant as they are an employee at Gemini. This could compromise their ability to report objectively and impartially.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Gemini as they are an affiliate partner with the company.
Google is bundling Gemini Ultra with other consumer products it sells for a fee through Google One subscription service.
Deception
(80%)
Google's decision to only make the Gemini chatbot powered by Ultra available through Google One is a form of selective reporting. The article mentions that OpenAI charges $20 per month for the most advanced version of ChatGPT without additional productivity features, but it does not mention any other pricing options or comparisons with Microsoft's Bard. This creates an incomplete picture and implies that Google's bundle is a better deal than OpenAI's when in fact there may be more affordable alternatives available.
Google only mentions the price of its Ultra-powered chatbot as part of a mish-mash bundle with cloud storage, but does not provide any information on other pricing options or comparisons with Microsoft's Bard. This creates an incomplete picture and implies that Google's bundle is a better deal than OpenAI'S when in fact there may be more affordable alternatives available.
The article mentions the price of OpenAI's most advanced version of ChatGPT without any additional productivity features, but does not provide any information on other pricing options or comparisons with Microsoft's Bard. This creates an incomplete picture and implies that Google's bundle is a better deal than OpenAI'S when in fact there may be more affordable alternatives available.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Google's Gemini Ultra performs better than OpenAI's GPT-4 on some benchmarks without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Secondly, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either consumers buy into Google One and pay $19.99 per month for access to Gemini Ultra or they do not have access to it at all. This ignores other potential competitors in the market and presents a limited view of consumer choice. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that
Bias
(75%)
Google's decision to only make their Gemini chatbot powered by Ultra available through Google One subscription service is a form of monetary bias. The new tier costs $19.99 per month which doubles the cost of the current premium bundle and effectively prices Ultra at $10 per month, making it less accessible for consumers who may not be willing to pay that much for additional productivity features.
Google is bundling Gemini Ultra with other consumer products they sell for a fee
The new tier will cost $19.99 per month, double the cost of the current premium bundle.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Google has a financial stake in OpenAI and Microsoft through their investments in the company. This could potentially influence Google's coverage of these topics.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of large language models as they mention their price point ($19.99 per month) in the article.
