Google's $20 Billion Deal with Apple: A Closer Look at the Antitrust Trial's Controversial Partnership

Washington D.C., District of Columbia United States of America
Google argues these deals create a better user experience, while DOJ contends they are anticompetitive practices
Google paid Apple $20 billion in 2022 to be the default search engine in Safari browser
Google spent $26.3 billion in 2021 to secure its position as a default search engine on mobile phones and web browsers
Judge Amit P. Mehta presiding over the trial is known for being smart, careful, hardworking and a voracious learner
This deal sets Google as the default search engine for the most used smartphone in the US
Trial began in October 2020, closing arguments scheduled for May 2024, judge expected to issue ruling later this year
Google's $20 Billion Deal with Apple: A Closer Look at the Antitrust Trial's Controversial Partnership

In a landmark antitrust case, Google and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) are set to present their closing arguments after a five-month hiatus. The trial, which began in October 2020, centers around allegations that Google has illegally monopolized the online search market through multibillion-dollar deals with partners like Apple and Samsung.

According to court documents unsealed ahead of the closing arguments, Alphabet Inc., Google's parent company, paid Apple $20 billion in 2022 for Google to be the default search engine in Safari browser. This deal is significant as it sets the search engine for the most used smartphone in the US.

Google argues that these deals are aimed at creating a better user experience, while the DOJ contends that they are anticompetitive practices meant to protect Google's monopoly. The trial has been closely watched as it could set a precedent for other antitrust cases against companies like Amazon, Apple, and Meta.

Judge Amit P. Mehta, who presided over the trial, is known for being smart, careful, hardworking, and a voracious learner. He has limited antitrust rulings but his conduct suggests that whatever he decides in U.S. et al. v. Google will most likely be difficult to overrule on appeal.

Google spent a total of $26.3 billion in 2021 to secure its position as a default search engine on mobile phones and web browsers, according to various sources.

The trial began in October 2020 and the closing arguments are scheduled for May 2024. The judge is expected to issue a ruling later this year.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Are there any other significant deals between Google and Apple that have not been disclosed?
  • Is it confirmed that $20 billion was paid in 2022?

Sources

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Google paid Apple $20 billion in 2022 for Google to be the default search engine in the Safari browser.
    • Google paid 36% of its revenue from search ads to Apple.
    • Apple first agreed to use Google in the Safari browser in 2002 for free, but later decided to share revenue made from search advertising.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

97%

  • Unique Points
    • Google spent a total of $26.3 billion in 2021 to ensure it was the default search engine on phones and web browsers.
    • Google's parent company Alphabet controls roughly 90% of the U.S. search engine market.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

96%

  • Unique Points
    • Google paid $26 billion in 2021 to secure its position as a default search engine on mobile phones and web browsers.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states 'Google was hit with a worldwide outage impacting thousands of users Wednesday morning.' This statement is not an assertion by the author, but rather a report of an event. Additionally, there are no dichotomous depictions or formal logical fallacies present in the article.
    • Google was hit with a worldwide outage impacting thousands of users Wednesday morning.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

98%

  • Unique Points
    • Alphabet Inc. paid Apple Inc. $20 billion in 2022 for Google to be the default search engine in the Safari browser.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Judge Amit P. Mehta will issue a landmark antitrust ruling against Google.
    • Mehta became a federal judge in late 2014 and gained experience in antitrust cases during the Sysco trial.
    • The Justice Department and a group of state attorneys general sued Google for illegally protecting its monopoly in internet search by paying billions to persuade companies to use its search engine as default.
    • Google countered that it did so to create the best experience for consumers.
    • Mehta ruled that the government could proceed with their allegation of Google’s illegal shielding of its monopoly through multibillion-dollar deals.
    • The trial is significant and likely to set a precedent for other antitrust cases against companies like Amazon, Apple, and Meta.
    • Mehta is known for being smart, careful, hardworking, and a voracious learner who makes genuine efforts to thoroughly weigh both sides of a case.
    • He has limited antitrust rulings aside from the Sysco case but his conduct suggests that whatever he decides in U.S. et al. v. Google will most likely be difficult to overrule on appeal.
    • The trial began in October 2020 and closed arguments are scheduled for May 2024.
    • Mehta asked occasional questions during the trial and deployed humor, but his major role came before the trial with a ruling that narrowed its scope to core issues.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication