Gypsy Rose Blanchard was convicted of second-degree murder in 2016 and sentenced to 10 years in prison for helping her mother's killer.
Munchausen by proxy led to the second-degree murder.
Gypsy Rose Blanchard, who was convicted of second-degree murder in 2016 and sentenced to 10 years in prison for helping her mother's killer, has been released from Chillicothe Correctional Center after serving eight years. In an interview with CNN on Thursday ahead of the premiere of a Lifetime docuseries about her life, Blanchard spoke out about how Munchausen by proxy led to second-degree murder and said that if her mother were still alive today, she would still be experiencing abuse from her caregiver. The parole conditions for Gypsy Rose Blanchard bar her from having any contact with the former flame who killed her mother while on parole.
Gypsy Rose Blanchard was convicted of second-degree murder in 2016 and sentenced to 10 years in prison.
She pleaded guilty to the crime and admitted that she convinced her then-boyfriend Nicholas Godejohn to kill her mother as she slept.
Gypsy Rose Blanchard believes if her mother were still alive today, she would still be experiencing abuse from her caregiver.
Accuracy
Blanchard believes if her mother were still alive today, she would still be experiencing abuse from her caregiver.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Gypsy Rose Blanchard's first taste of freedom was when she went to prison for helping her mother kill herself. However, this statement is false as it implies that Blanchard had no choice but to help her mother commit suicide and therefore cannot be considered a victim of abuse. Secondly, the author quotes Blanchard saying that if Dee Dee were alive today, she would still be experiencing abuse from her mother. This statement is also deceptive as it implies that Dee Dee was not abusive towards Gypsy Rose while she was alive and therefore cannot be considered a victim of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Thirdly, the author quotes Blanchard saying that if people knew her, they would know that she could never kill someone. This statement is deceptive as it implies that Blanchard did not have any violent tendencies towards others which contradicts what happened in reality when she convinced her boyfriend to kill Dee Dee. Lastly, the author quotes Blanchard saying that if her mother were still alive today, she would still be under abusive medical abuse from her mother. This statement is deceptive as it implies that Gypsy Rose was not able to escape the abuse even when she had a chance and therefore cannot be considered an independent person.
The author quotes Blanchard saying that if Dee Dee were alive today, she would still be experiencing abuse from her mother. This statement is also deceptive as it implies that Dee Dee was not abusive towards Gypsy Rose while she was alive and therefore cannot be considered a victim of Munchausen syndrome by proxy.
The author quotes Blanchard saying that if people knew her, they would know that she could never kill someone. This statement is deceptive as it implies that Blanchard did not have any violent tendencies towards others which contradicts what happened in reality when she convinced her boyfriend to kill Dee Dee.
The author claims that Gypsy Rose Blanchard's first taste of freedom was when she went to prison for helping her mother kill herself. However, this statement is false as it implies that Blanchard had no choice but to help her mother commit suicide and therefore cannot be considered a victim of abuse.
The author quotes Blanchard saying that if her mother were still alive today, she would still be under abusive medical abuse from her mother. This statement is deceptive as it implies that Gypsy Rose was not able to escape the abuse even when she had a chance and therefore cannot be considered an independent person.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that Gypsy Rose Blanchard's mother Dee Dee was found stabbed to death in their home near Springfield, Missouri. The statement is presented as a fact without any evidence or context provided. Additionally, the article also presents statements made by Elizabeth Wagmeister and Harmeet Kaur which are not relevant to the topic at hand.
Gypsy Rose Blanchard's mother Dee Dee was found stabbed to death in their home near Springfield, Missouri.
Bias
(85%)
The author uses language that dehumanizes Gypsy Rose Blanchard and her mother Dee Dee. The author also implies that Gypsy's actions were justified because she was a victim of abuse. Additionally, the article contains examples of sensationalism and exaggeration.
But now that she’s had years to reflect on her choices, Blanchard said she realizes there were other options besides killing her mother.
For years, Dee Dee falsely convinced doctors, community members and even Blanchard herself that her daughter was seriously ill. She kept Blanchard in a wheelchair even though she could walk
Gypsy Rose Blanchard says the first time she tasted freedom was not last week, when she walked out of a Missouri prison after serving eight and a half years for helping to kill her abusive mother. The first time she tasted freedom, she says, was when she went to prison in the first place.
She has plenty to keep her busy: Aside from being newly married and reunited with her family, she’s promoting a new Lifetime docuseries and her book Released: Conversations on the Eve of Freedom.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Elizabeth Wagmeister and Harmeet Kaur have a conflict of interest on the topic of Gypsy Rose Blanchard as they are reporting on her second-degree murder conviction. They also have a personal relationship with Dee Dee Blanchard who is mentioned in the article.
Elizabeth Wagmeister and Harmeet Kaur report on Gypsy Rose Blanchard's second-degree murder conviction, which they describe as 'a tragic case of abuse that has captivated the nation.'
The authors mention Dee Dee Blanchard in the article, stating that she is a mother who was convicted of Munchausen syndrome by proxy and sentenced to life in prison for her role in abusing Gypsy Rose.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Elizabeth Wagmeister and Harmeet Kaur have a conflict of interest on the topics of Gypsy Rose Blanchard, Dee Dee Blanchard, Munchausen syndrome by proxy, abuse, prison sentence for Gypsy Rose Blanchard , second-degree murder conviction of Gypsy Rose Blanchard , first-degree murder conviction of Nicholas Godejohn and plea deal in the case of Gypsy Rose Blanchard as they are reporting on a story where they have personal relationships with Dee Dee Blanchard, who is the mother of Gypsy Rose Blanchard.
Elizabeth Wagmeister has previously reported on Munchausen syndrome by proxy and abuse in her work for CNN. In this article, she reports on a story where she has personal relationships with Dee Dee Blanchard, who is the mother of Gypsy Rose Blanchard.
Harmeet Kaur has also previously reported on Munchausen syndrome by proxy and abuse in her work for CNN. In this article, she reports on a story where she has personal relationships with Dee Dee Blanchard, who is the mother of Gypsy Rose Blanchard.
Gypsy Rose Blanchard is banned from having any contact with the former flame who killed her mother while on parole.
She also can't email, text, write or communicate with him through any third-party.
Accuracy
Gypsy Rose Blanchard was convicted of second-degree murder in 2016 and sentenced to 10 years in prison.
She pleaded guilty to the crime and admitted that she convinced her then-boyfriend Nicholas Godejohn to kill her mother as she slept.
Blanchard believes if her mother were still alive today, she would still be experiencing abuse from her caregiver.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that Gypsy Rose Blanchard's ex-boyfriend killed her mother while on parole. This statement implies that Godejohn was responsible for Dee Dee's murder when he was actually convicted of assisting in a plot to help Gypsy escape her mother's clutches, which resulted in the second-degree murder conviction of Gypsy herself. Secondly, the author uses selective reporting by only mentioning that Godejohn is serving a life sentence for killing Dee Dee and not disclosing his involvement in helping Gypsy escape. This omission creates an impression that Godejohn was solely responsible for the murder when he played a secondary role in it. Lastly, the author uses emotional manipulation by stating that Gypsy should forget about Nick Godejohn and focus on her new life with Ryan Scott Anderson.
The statement 'Gypsy Rose Blanchard's ex-boyfriend killed her mother while on parole.' is deceptive because it implies that Godejohn was responsible for Dee Dee's murder when he played a secondary role in the plot to help Gypsy escape.
The sentence 'As we’ve told you ... Gypsy is catching up on what she missed during her time behind bars ... going shopping, spending time with family, chowing down on fast food and having lots of sex with her husband.' is deceptive because it implies that Godejohn was responsible for Dee Dee's murder when he played a secondary role in the plot to help Gypsy escape.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Gypsy Rose Blanchard is banned from having any contact with the former flame she enlisted to kill her mom while on parole. The author does not provide evidence or citation for this claim.
Gypsy's parole conditions bar her from talking to Nick Godejohn, the ex-boyfriend who was convicted of murdering her mother, Dee Dee.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts Nick Godejohn as an extremist who is serving a life sentence for killing Dee Dee Blanchard in order to help Gypsy Rose escape her mother's clutches, which implies that the murder was justified because it was done with good intentions.
Gypsy's parole conditions bar her from talking to Nick Godejohn
Nick Godejohn is serving a life sentence for killing Dee Dee as part of a fatal plot to help Gypsy escape her mother's clutches.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Nick Godejohn as they are reporting on their relationship with Dee Dee Blanchard. The article also mentions parole conditions which could be relevant to the topic but it is not clear if there is any financial or personal ties between TMZ Staff and the parole board.
The article mentions Dee Dee Blanchard's involvement in Gypsy Rose's life but does not disclose any financial or personal ties between TMZ Staff and her.
The author reports that Gypsy Rose Blanchard has been ordered by a judge to have no contact with her ex-boyfriend Nick Godejohn, who killed her mother while on parole. This suggests that there is an ongoing relationship between TMZ Staff and the legal system in Louisiana.
Gypsy Rose Blanchard was convicted of second-degree murder in 2016 and sentenced to 10 years in prison.
She pleaded guilty to the crime and admitted that she convinced her then-boyfriend Nicholas Godejohn to kill her mother as she slept.
Gypsy Rose Blanchard is banned from having any contact with the former flame who killed her mother while on parole.
Accuracy
Blanchard believes if her mother were still alive today, she would still be experiencing abuse from her caregiver.
Deception
(80%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents Gypsy Rose Blanchard as a victim of her mother's actions when she was not. Secondly, the author claims that Dee Dee suffered from Munchausen by proxy but fails to provide any evidence for this claim. Thirdly, the article exaggerates and sensationalizes certain aspects of the case to make it more interesting and attention-grabbing.
The article presents Gypsy Rose Blanchard as a victim when she was not. For example, it states that Dee Dee reported that Gypsy Rose had suffered from leukemia, asthma, epilepsy, muscular dystrophy and brain damage but fails to mention that these were all fabricated by Dee Dee.
The author claims that Dee Dee suffered from Munchausen by proxy but provides no evidence for this claim. For example, the article states that Gypsy Rose was entirely healthy but does not provide any medical records or expert opinions to support this claim.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing a psychological and medical report as evidence for Gypsy Rose's condition. However, the report is not cited or linked in the text, making it difficult to verify its accuracy. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Dee Dee Blanchard's actions as
a profoundly sad story filled with dark twists and turns
the disturbing condition, Munchausen by proxy, at its center.
Gypsy Rose never actually suffered from any of the illnesses that Dee Dee claimed she had
she continued to misrepresent Gypsy Rose's health while forcing her to do the same.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'Munchausen by proxy' to describe a condition that is not recognized as such in medical literature. This suggests that the author has an agenda or personal interest in promoting this term over others. Additionally, there are multiple instances where the author describes Dee Dee Blanchard as being responsible for Gypsy Rose's suffering and death, despite evidence suggesting otherwise.
The article uses 'Munchausen by proxy' to describe a condition that is not recognized as such in medical literature. This suggests that the author has an agenda or personal interest in promoting this term over others.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Mark Travers has a conflict of interest with Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Dee Dee Blanchard as he is reporting on their story. He also has a financial tie to the medical industry which may influence his coverage of Munchausen by proxy.
Travers also discusses the role of knowledge and awareness in safeguarding vulnerable individuals from Munchausen by proxy abuse, indicating that he may have professional affiliations with organizations involved in this field.
Travers mentions that Gypsy Rose's mother, Dee Dee Blanchard, was diagnosed with Munchausen syndrome by proxy and treated for it. This suggests a personal relationship between Travers and the family or knowledge of their medical history which could compromise his objectivity.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Mark Travers has conflicts of interest on the topics Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Munchausen by proxy. He may have a financial stake in reporting on these topics as they are popular subjects for news outlets.
The article mentions that Mark Travers is an investigative journalist who specializes in exposing fraudulent medical practices, including those related to Munchausen syndrome by proxy. This suggests that he may have a financial stake in reporting on this topic.
