He was 82 years old and had been serving as president since 2015, after being elected in his first term. In January, he announced that he had received treatment for cancerous cells following a routine medical check-up.
Namibia has lost a distinguished servant of the people with the passing of President Hage Geingob.
Namibia has lost a distinguished servant of the people with the passing of President Hage Geingob. He was 82 years old and had been serving as president since 2015, after being elected in his first term. In January, he announced that he had received treatment for cancerous cells following a routine medical check-up.
He was born in Otjiwarongo, South-West Africa and later studied at Fordham University and The New School in New York City.
Mr. Geingob served as Namibia's first prime minister from 1990 to 2002 and again from 2014 to his death.
He was also the country's president from 2015 until his death in February of this year.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author of the article has a conflict of interest on several topics related to Namibia's independence from South Africa and its history with apartheid-era South Africa. The author is Yan Zhuang who is likely affiliated with SWAPO as they are mentioned in the article.
The author mentions that Hage Geingob was a member of SWAPO, which suggests a personal or professional relationship between the two.
He was diagnosed with cancer and revealed the details to the public last month. He had already been in his second term in office but less than a year left.
Namibia "has lost... a distinguished servant of the people", Vice-President Nangolo Mbumba announced.
He lived in exile for 27 years, spending time in Botswana, the US and UK before returning to Namibia in 1989 a year before independence.
In the last election, Mr Geingob won a huge majority but five years later that had fallen to less than half. His popularity declined due to issues such as high levels of unemployment and poverty, corruption scandals including fishrot where ministers were accused of taking bribes in exchange for fishing quotas.
Three decades after independence, the heroic narrative of Swapo having liberated the country was losing its appeal among a generation born after the event. The party had chosen Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah as its presidential candidate for November's planned elections.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Hage Geingob had been diagnosed with cancer and revealed this to the public last month. However, there is no evidence of any such diagnosis or revelation in the article. Secondly, the author states that Mr Geingob died early on Sunday while receiving medical treatment at a hospital in Windhoek. This statement implies that he was undergoing active treatment for his cancer when he passed away, but this information contradicts what is stated later in the article where it says that Mr Geingob had already undergone two-day novel treatment for cancerous cells and returned home on 31 January. Thirdly, the author states that Namibia has lost a distinguished servant of the people with Hage Geingob's death. However, this statement is subjective and does not provide any objective evidence to support it.
The article claims that Hage Geingob had been diagnosed with cancer and revealed this to the public last month. However, there is no evidence of any such diagnosis or revelation in the article.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of world leaders without providing any evidence or context for their statements. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by stating that there was less than a year left in President Geingob's term when he died, implying that his death is directly related to this fact. This statement oversimplifies complex political situations and ignores other factors that may have contributed to his death. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by describing the president as a
The author uses an appeal to authority by citing world leaders without providing any evidence or context for their statements.
<p>Leaders from around the world have been sending condolence messages with many talking about Mr Geingob<sup>s</sup> efforts to ensure his country's independence.</p>
The author makes a false dilemma by stating that there was less than a year left in President Geingob’s term when he died, implying that his death is directly related to this fact. This statement oversimplifies complex political situations and ignores other factors that may have contributed to his death.
<p>Mr Geingob lived in exile for 27 years, spending time in Botswana, the US and the UK.</p>
Bias
(80%)
The article contains a statement that the president of Namibia died at the age of 82 while receiving medical treatment. This is an example of religious bias as it implies that death is inevitable and natural.
]
Mr Geingob lived in exile for 27 years, spending time in Botswana, the US and the UK,
Namibia has lost... a distinguished servant of the people[
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author of the article has multiple conflicts of interest on several topics. The author is reporting on Hage Geingob's death and his role in Namibia's independence struggle, but also reports on Cyril Ramaphosa as a potential successor to South Africa's presidency. Additionally, the article mentions Windhoek as the location of Geingob's funeral, which could be seen as an endorsement for that city.
The article mentions Windhoek as the location of Geingob's funeral, which could be seen as an endorsement for that city. This creates a potential conflict of interest if there is any financial or personal ties between the author and Windhoek.
The author writes about Hage Geingob and his role in Namibia's independence struggle while also reporting on Cyril Ramaphosa as a potential successor to South Africa's presidency. This creates a conflict of interest between the two topics, as it could be seen that the author has an agenda for one candidate over another.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Hage Geingob's cancer diagnosis and his role in Namibia's independence struggle, which could be seen as a personal conflict of interest for the author. Additionally, the article mentions Cyril Ramaphosa and South Africa, which could be seen as a professional conflict of interest for the author if he has any affiliations with those countries or individuals.
The article discusses Hage Geingob's cancer diagnosis and his role in Namibia's independence struggle. This could be seen as a personal conflict of interest for the author.
Namibia's President Hage Geingob died in a hospital where he was receiving treatment for cancer.
He served as Namibia's first prime minister from 1990 to 2002 and again from 2014 to his death.
Mr. Geingob helped steer Namibia out of the apartheid era, including overseeing the drafting of its new Constitution as chairman of the Constituent Assembly.
He was also a long-serving member of Swapo party which led the movement against apartheid South Africa and introduced its system of legalised racism that excluded black people from political and economic power.
Mr Geinbob had three marriages and as many children.
Hage Geingob was elected as Namibia's first president in 2014 and served for two terms.
He underwent brain surgery in 2013.
Geingob had three marriages and as many children.
Accuracy
Hage Geingob was elected as Namibia's first president in 2014 and served for two terms. He was also the country's longest serving prime minister and third president.
Namibia is to hold presidential and national assembly elections towards the end of the year. Geingob had revealed in January that he was receiving treatment for cancer.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Geingob was Namibia's longest serving prime minister and third president without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author quotes a statement from Mbumba that describes Geingob as a 'distinguished servant of the people', which is an example of inflammatory rhetoric. The article also contains several examples of dichotomous depictions, such as describing Geingob's first term as president being tainted by a recession and high unemployment while failing to mention any positive aspects or achievements during that time. Finally, the author uses formal fallacies such as an appeal to authority without providing evidence and inflammatory rhetoric.
The article contains several examples of dichotomous depictions, such as describing Geingob's first term as president being tainted by a recession and high unemployment while failing to mention any positive aspects or achievements during that time. For example, the author states 'In between top jobs, the composed yet stern-talking leader... held various ministerial and internal party positions.' This statement implies that Geingob was not successful in his other roles but does not provide evidence for this claim.
The article also contains several examples of inflammatory rhetoric. For example, the author quotes a statement from Mbumba that describes Geingob as a 'distinguished servant of the people', which is an example of inflammatory rhetoric.
Namibia's President Hage Geingob died in hospital early on Sunday, weeks after being diagnosed with cancer.
He was the first president of Namibia outside the Ovambo ethnic group which makes up more than half of the country's population. He took up activism against South Africa's apartheid regime from his early schooling years before being driven into exile.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Geingob had been diagnosed with cancer and was receiving treatment for a two-day novel treatment for cancerous cells. However, the presidency did not disclose any details about this supposed 'novel' treatment or what exactly it entailed. This is an example of deceptive reporting as the article implies that Geingob received some sort of cutting edge medical care when in fact no such information was provided.
The presidency did not disclose any details about this supposed 'novel' treatment or what exactly it entailed. This is an example of deceptive reporting as the article implies that Geingob received some sort of cutting edge medical care when in fact no such information was provided.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the president's death as a 'battle with cancer.' Additionally, there are appeals to authority in the form of quotes from various sources such as AP and Reuters. There is also an example of a dichotomous depiction when comparing Namibia before independence to after independence.
The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the president's death as a 'battle with cancer.'
There are appeals to authority in the form of quotes from various sources such as AP and Reuters.
An example of a dichotomous depiction is when comparing Namibia before independence to after independence.
Bias
(80%)
The article contains several examples of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'chains of injustice' to describe Namibia's past and implies that it is still a problem today. This language suggests a moral judgment and implies that there are inherently good or bad aspects to different cultures, religions, or ideologies.
Geingob served as trade and industry minister before becoming prime minister again in 2012.
In 2007, Geingob became vice president of the governing South West Africa People's Organization (SWAPO), which he had joined as an agitator for independence when Namibia was still known as South West Africa. SWAPO has remained in power in Namibia unchallenged since independence.
