Harvard Overrules Faculty, Denies Degrees to 13 Students for Pro-Palestine Protest

Cambridge, Massachusetts United States of America
At least 60 students were called before the Administrative Board for their involvement in the pro-Palestine encampment in Harvard Yard
Faculty members argue that this move was a violation of an agreement made between administrators and students to clear their encampment from Harvard Yard
Harvard overruled Faculty of Arts and Sciences and denied degrees to 13 students for pro-Palestine protest
Protests have developed outside Harvard University's commencement ceremony demanding penalties against the students be removed and for divestment from companies doing business with Israel
Syd D. Sanders, a senior, was suspended for three semesters and may not receive his degree until December 2025
Harvard Overrules Faculty, Denies Degrees to 13 Students for Pro-Palestine Protest

On May 21, 2024, Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences recommended that 13 students disciplined for protesting against the war in Gaza be allowed to receive their degrees. The faculty group described Monday's vote as a 'repudiation' of the Administrative Board's actions. However, on May 22, Harvard's governing board, the Harvard Corporation, overruled the faculty and barred the 13 pro-Palestinian students from receiving their degrees. The university had previously indicated it will not consider divestment from Israel.

The controversy began when at least 60 students were called before the Administrative Board, according to organizers with Harvard Out of Occupied Palestine. Syd D. Sanders, a senior set to graduate just one week later, was suspended for three semesters following his involvement in the 20-day pro-Palestine encampment in Harvard Yard. At least five students were suspended, and 20 others were placed on probation.

College policy allows the students to obtain their degrees, but only after their disciplinary matters resolve and they return to 'good standing.' However, the Harvard Corporation's decision means that these students may not receive their degrees until December 2025, despite having completed their required credits.

The decision by Harvard's governing board shocked faculty who feel strongly that student protesters are being unfairly punished, largely because of political pressure on university leaders. Ryan Enos, a professor of government, expressed his disappointment and stated that the Corporation's decision was 'pure hubris' and 'not worthy of leading the university.'

The Harvard Corporation, in a statement explaining its decision, cited the Harvard College handbook, which says that a 'degree will not be granted to a student who is not in good standing.' However, faculty members argue that this move was a violation of an agreement made between administrators and students to clear their encampment from Harvard Yard.

Protests have developed outside Harvard University's commencement ceremony, with supporters of a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas lining up by the entrance to Harvard Yard with signs calling for an end to the war in Gaza. Protesters are demanding that penalties against the students be removed and that Harvard take action on their demands for divestment from companies doing business with Israel and from the Israeli government itself.

The controversy caps a year in which Harvard became central to a national debate over how universities have handled student protests over the Israel-Hamas war. The incident has raised questions about freedom of speech, civil disobedience, and the role of universities in political debates.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Is there any evidence that political pressure was applied to the Harvard Corporation's decision?
  • Were all 13 students involved in the encampment or were some falsely accused?

Sources

96%

  • Unique Points
    • Syd D. Sanders was suspended from Harvard College for three semesters following his involvement in a 20-day pro-Palestine encampment in Harvard Yard.
    • At least 60 students were called before the Administrative Board, according to organizers with Harvard Out of Occupated Palestine.
  • Accuracy
    • Harvard’s governing board barred 13 pro-Palestinian students from receiving degrees.
    • At least 60 students were called before the Administrative Board, according to organizers with Harvard Out of Occupied Palestine.
    • Thirteen students were barred from Harvard University’s commencement ceremony on Thursday for protesting against the Israel-Hamas war.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (90%)
    The article contains some inflammatory rhetoric from the author and the interviewee Syd D. Sanders, but no formal or informal fallacies are explicitly stated. The author's use of words like 'draconian,' 'harsh,' and 'unheard of' to describe the disciplinary actions taken by Harvard against protesters is an example of inflammatory rhetoric, which can influence readers emotionally but does not necessarily constitute a logical fallacy.
    • ]The school went back on that so intensely and so insanely, and with such harsh punishment[
    • I think it's draconian. I think it's harsh.
    • I think it's just totally unheard of in the history of Harvard protests and presidents.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

74%

  • Unique Points
    • Harvard’s governing board barred 13 pro-Palestinian students from receiving degrees.
    • The university previously indicated it will not consider divestment from Israel.
  • Accuracy
    • Thirteen students were barred from Harvard University’s commencement ceremony on Thursday for protesting against the Israel-Hamas war.
    • At least 60 students were called before the Administrative Board, according to organizers with Harvard Out of Occupied Palestine.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position. The author quotes several faculty members expressing their opinions about the situation and implies that Harvard is unfairly punishing students for political reasons. However, the article does not provide any information about what disciplinary actions were taken against the students or what they had allegedly done, making it unclear if their punishment was justified or not. The author also uses emotional manipulation by quoting faculty members who are upset and expressing strong opinions about the situation.
    • The decision Wednesday shocked faculty who feel strongly that student protesters are being unfairly punished, largely because of political pressure on university leaders.
    • In my opinion, the Corporation is not worthy of leading the university.
    • The lack of accountability is infuriating.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an example of an appeal to authority. The author cites the Harvard College handbook as the reason for the decision made by the Harvard Corporation. This is a secondary source and not a direct argument from the author themselves.
    • The Harvard Corporation, in a statement explaining its decision, cited the Harvard College handbook...
  • Bias (80%)
    The article reports on the Harvard Corporation's decision to bar 13 pro-Palestinian students from receiving their degrees due to disciplinary actions taken against them during a protest encampment. The author quotes several faculty members expressing their disappointment and frustration with the decision, some of whom question the fairness of punishing students for peaceful protests. While there is no overt bias in the article, it does lean towards sympathizing with the students and criticizing Harvard's actions as heavy-handed and unfair. The author also mentions that conservative politicians, donors, and alumni have pressured Harvard to take disciplinary action against the protesters.
    • Correspondent Alexa Coultoff contributed to this report. Hilary Burns can be reached at hilary.burns@globe.com. Follow her @Hilarysburns.
      • Many within the Harvard community want to see the student protesters held accountable.
        • Several faculty members who attended Monday’s faculty meeting said they felt Harvard should uphold the essence of the deal they believe Garber made with students to persuade them to take down the encampment.
          • The faculty vote on Monday was unusual in that 115 faculty members among the roughly 900 in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences attended. An amendment was added to the agenda to grant degrees to 13 undergraduate seniors who learned last week that they would be prevented from receiving their diplomas at graduation because of their participation in the encampment.
            • The Harvard Out of Occupied Palestine coalition, the main pro-Palestinian student group at Harvard, assailed the Corporation’s decision.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            97%

            • Unique Points
              • Thirteen students at Harvard University were denied degrees due to their participation in a pro-Palestinian encampment on campus.
              • Harvard’s top governing board overruled faculty who wanted the students to be allowed to graduate.
              • Protesters outside Harvard demanded that penalties against the students be removed and that Harvard take action on their demands for divestment from companies doing business with Israel and from the Israeli government itself.
            • Accuracy
              • Thirteen students were denied degrees due to their participation in a pro-Palestinian encampment on campus.
              • At least 25 students were suspended or placed on probation in relation to the pro-Palestine encampment.
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            96%

            • Unique Points
              • Thirteen students were barred from Harvard University’s commencement ceremony on Thursday for protesting against the Israel-Hamas war.
              • Students walked out of the ceremony in protest, with hundreds chanting ‘Let them walk!’
            • Accuracy
              • ,
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            98%

            • Unique Points
              • Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences recommended that 13 students disciplined for protesting against the war in Gaza be allowed to receive their degrees.
              • The faculty group described Monday’s vote as a ‘repudiation’ of the Administrative Board’s actions.
            • Accuracy
              • Thirteen students were barred from Harvard University’s commencement ceremony on Thursday for protesting against the Israel-Hamas war.
              • At least five students were suspended, and 20 others were placed on probation last Friday.
              • Harvard College Administrative Board suspended or placed on probation a total of at least 25 students in relation to the pro-Palestine encampment.
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication