The Future of the House Select Committee on Chinese Communist Party: A Short-Lived Legacy?

Washington, DC, District of Columbia United States of America
The committee may not have much of a future, but it has been successful in passing legislation that would ban TikTok and force ByteDance to divest from the platform within 165 days if passed by Congress. This is due to growing public alarm over Chinese threats to US security and economy.
The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party is facing a potential short-lived future as there is little consensus among members about extending its mandate past this year or pursuing more policy recommendations beyond the TikTok bill.
The Future of the House Select Committee on Chinese Communist Party: A Short-Lived Legacy?

The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party is facing a potential short-lived future as there is little consensus among members about extending its mandate past this year or pursuing more policy recommendations beyond the TikTok bill. The committee may not have much of a future, but it has been successful in passing legislation that would ban TikTok and force ByteDance to divest from the platform within 165 days if passed by Congress. This is due to growing public alarm over Chinese threats to US security and economy.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if there will be any other policy recommendations beyond the TikTok bill.
  • The committee's mandate may not be extended past this year.

Sources

65%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Americans sound off on TikTok ban in viral rants: 'Embarrassing to be a US citizen'

Fox Business Network Taylor Penley Monday, 18 March 2024 16:31
  • Unique Points
    • The House of Representatives voted in favor of proposed legislation that would force Chinese-owned company ByteDance to divest from TikTok.
    • TikTok faces the threat of a looming ban if the proposed bill passes Congress and forces its parent company ByteDance to divest within 165 days.
    • The bill also requires TikTok to be purchased by a country that is not a U.S. adversary.
  • Accuracy
    • TikTok is a social media platform with 170 million users in the US.
    • TikTok collects personal data from its users, including their location, and sends it to a company based in Beijing that is beholden to the Chinese Communist Party.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the views of a few individuals as representative of all Americans' opinions on TikTok ban. This is misleading because not everyone shares these sentiments and there are many who support the proposed bill or do not have strong feelings about it. Secondly, some statements made by individuals in the article are taken out of context to make them seem more extreme than they actually are.
    • The text from one of TikToker Lauren Ramos' recent videos read:
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of political bias and religious bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes US citizens who are frustrated with the proposed TikTok ban. They also use quotes from individuals to further their own narrative without providing context or counter-arguments.
    • . . . Ramos railed against the measure that, if passed, would block the platform in the U.S. if its parent company ByteDance fails to divest within 165 days of passage.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      The article by Taylor Penley contains multiple examples of conflicts of interest. The author has a personal relationship with the source Lauren Ramos and may be hesitant to report on negative side effects of TikTok's ban. Additionally, the site Fox Business is owned by News Corporation which has financial ties to ByteDance through its ownership stake in Sky Group.
      • The author mentions their personal relationship with Lauren Ramos and quotes her directly:
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      61%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Opinion | Mike Pence Rues the Day

      The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Gail Collins, Monday, 18 March 2024 09:06
      • Unique Points
        • TikTok is a social media platform with 170 million users in the US.
        • TikTok collects personal data from its users, including their location, and sends it to a company based in Beijing that is beholden to the Chinese Communist Party.
        • The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to require TikTok's parent company to sell the company or face a ban in the US.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (50%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the authors use TikTok as an example of a foreign agent and potential conduit of disinformation without providing any evidence to support this claim. Secondly, they make assumptions about Mike Pence's decision not to support Trump for president based on his previous actions rather than giving him a chance to explain himself. Lastly, the authors use emotional language such as
        • <br>
        • The article is deceptive in several ways.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when the authors state that TikTok is a potential conduit of disinformation and cite countries that have banned or curtailed it. They also use inflammatory rhetoric by describing TikTok as a 'gigantic vacuum cleaner' and comparing it to George Orwell's Big Brother. The article also contains an example of the dichotomous depiction fallacy when the authors describe TikTok in two ways, one being a threat and the other not.
        • TikTok is a gigantic vacuum cleaner of personal data possibly including your location that goes directly from unsuspecting eyes, thumbs and minds of its 170 million users in America to a company based in Beijing and beholden to the Chinese Communist Party.
      • Bias (85%)
        The authors use language that dehumanizes and demonizes Trump supporters. They also make a false comparison between TikTok's data collection practices and the surveillance state in China.
        • > I think of TikTok in two ways. First, as a gigantic vacuum cleaner of personal data <br> possibly including your location <br> that goes directly from the unsuspecting eyes, thumbs and minds of its 170 million users in America to a company based in Beijing and beholden to the Chinese Communist Party.
          • Speaking of our friend Donald, what did you think of Mike Pence<sup>?</sup><em>? On one hand, pretty obvious given the murderous anti-Pence uprising Trump helped stoke after he lost the election. On the other hand, there are so many other people you’d think would be opposed to Trump’s return to power who are throwing in the towel.
            • That's why it has been banned in India and curtailed in France, Canada and other countries. That's why I'm glad the House voted overwhelmingly to require TikTok<sup>’</sup><em>’</em><sub>’</sub><ins></ins>‘s Chinese parent company to sell the company or else face a ban in the United States.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            95%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            For committee behind TikTok bill, influence may be short-lived

            Politico News Site Name: POLITICO Full Legal Name of News Site: Politico LLC Location of News Site: Washington D.C., USA Monday, 18 March 2024 00:00
            • Unique Points
              • The committee may not have much of a future as there is little consensus among members about extending its mandate past this year or pursuing more policy recommendations beyond the TikTok bill.
              • TikTok faces the threat of a looming ban if the proposed bill passes Congress and forces its parent company ByteDance to divest within 165 days.
              • Senators should also vote for a ban on TikTok despite opposition from President Trump.
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the committee's work and its impact on US-China relations. They also use an appeal to authority by citing former Speaker Kevin McCarthy as saying that he is glad the committee worked in a bipartisan fashion, without providing any evidence of this statement. Additionally, there are several instances where the author uses dichotomous depictions when describing the committee's work and its impact on US-China relations.
              • The Select Committee on Chinese Communist Party Chair Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.) speaks with reporters outside the U.S. Capitol after the House passed a bill that could result in a U.S. ban on TikTok over national security concerns on March 13, 2024.
              • The committee may not have much of a future.
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication