Houston Texans Acquire Joe Mixon from Cincinnati Bengals in Trade for Undisclosed Pick

Houston, Texas United States of America
Joe Mixon had 1,034 rushing yards and nine touchdowns for the Cincinnati Bengals in 2023.
The Houston Texans have acquired running back Joe Mixon from the Cincinnati Bengals in a trade.
Houston Texans Acquire Joe Mixon from Cincinnati Bengals in Trade for Undisclosed Pick

The Houston Texans have acquired running back Joe Mixon from the Cincinnati Bengals in a trade. The terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it is believed that an undisclosed pick was traded to acquire him. Mixon had 1,034 rushing yards and nine touchdowns for the Bengals in 2023.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear what undisclosed pick was traded to acquire him.

Sources

72%

  • Unique Points
    • The Cincinnati Bengals are trading running back Joe Mixon to the Houston Texans
    • Joe Mixon had 1,034 rushing yards and nine touchdowns in 2023
    • Devin Singletary agreed to a three-year, $16.5 million deal with the New York Giants on Monday
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article suggests that Joe Mixon has been traded to the Houston Texans for an undisclosed pick when in fact he was released by Cincinnati Bengals and then signed with Houston later on.
    • In this sentence 'Mixon was expected to be released after the Bengals reached a deal with free agent running back Zack Moss on Monday.' is deceptive as it implies that Joe Mixon will be released, but he wasn't.
    • The title of the article is deceptive as it implies that Joe Mixon has been traded to the Houston Texans, but he was actually released by Cincinnati Bengals before being signed with Houston.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the Bengals and their fans by saying 'surprising turn of events' when referring to Mixon being traded instead of released. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that money is more important than human lives or emotions.
    • The Cincinnati Bengals are trading running back Joe Mixon to the Houston Texans instead of releasing the veteran back, a source told ESPN on Tuesday.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    67%

    • Unique Points
      • Zack Moss was a running back that Dallas brass kicked around the idea of signing.
      • Joe Mixon had four 1,000-yard rushing seasons with the Bengals
      • Dameon Pierce had a promising rookie year in 2022 for the Texans but his production dropped precipitously in 2023 when he tallied just 416 yards and was benched in favor of Singletary
    • Accuracy
      • The Cowboys front office watched the first day of legal tampering but didn't do any buying.
      • <br>
    • Deception (30%)
      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it implies that the Cowboys are actively looking for a running back to fill their roster when they have not made any moves yet. Secondly, it suggests that Zack Moss was considered by the team as a potential signing but this information is not backed up by any concrete evidence or quotes from sources other than Jane Slater's tweet. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalism and emotional manipulation to make readers feel frustrated about the Cowboys' lack of action in free agency.
      • It was frustrating to watch for fans as marquee names at one key position- running back- came off the market, one at a time, all day long.
      • The first day of legal tampering came and went Monday
    • Fallacies (70%)
      The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by citing a team insider as the source of information. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing how frustrating it is for fans to watch their favorite running backs leave the Cowboys and sign with other teams.
      • ]We are looking at any player that can improve us in range that we can afford. We have talked to any guy who has called and listened to what their wishes or ranges are[
      • The development suggests that the Cowboys are taking a purely passive approach and may be limiting themselves to bargain-bin roster adds only.
    • Bias (85%)
      The article contains a statement from Todd Brock that the Cowboys are considering signing Zack Moss. This is an example of monetary bias as it suggests that the team may be limiting themselves to bargain-bin roster adds only due to their inability or unwillingness to pay $8 million for him.
      • The development suggests that the Cowboys are taking a purely passive approach and may be limiting themselves to bargain-bin roster adds only.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      62%

      • Unique Points
        • , The method of trading has changed from releasing him on Monday, to trading him instead.
        • , Mixon's physical style fits well with the Texans and offensive coordinator Bobby Slowik should be able to milk at least one more positive season out of him.
        • Joe Mixon was drafted by the Bengals in the second round out of Oklahoma in 2017 and started 88 of his 97 appearances for them, making one Pro Bowl (2021)
        • , Zack Moss was a running back that Dallas brass kicked around the idea of signing.
      • Accuracy
        • The Cincinnati Bengals will trade RB Joe Mixon to the Houston Texans.
        • Joe Mixon had 1,034 rushing yards and nine touchdowns in 2023
        • Devin Singletary agreed to a three-year, $16.5 million deal with the New York Giants on Monday
      • Deception (30%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author reports that the Bengals planned to release Mixon on Monday but then switched gears and traded him instead. However, this information was not confirmed by any official sources until Tuesday when Rapoport reported it. Therefore, it cannot be said for certain whether or not the Bengals had indeed planned to release Mixon before trading him.
        • The article reports that the Bengals planned to release Mixon on Monday but then switched gears and traded him instead.
      • Fallacies (70%)
        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing sources without providing any context or evidence for their credibility. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by presenting only two options: releasing Mixon or trading him, when there may have been other possibilities available. The author also commits a hasty generalization by stating that Mixon lost a step last season without providing any data to support this claim.
        • The article cites sources informed of the deal but does not provide any context for their credibility.
      • Bias (75%)
        The article contains examples of both monetary bias and religious bias. The author mentions that the Bengals will save $6.1 million on the cap with $2.75 million in dead money by trading Mixon to Houston instead of releasing him, which is an example of monetary bias.
        • The Bengals saved 6.1M on the cap and 2.75M in dead money.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author is a reporter for the NFL Network Insider and has reported on Joe Mixon before. This could potentially compromise their ability to report objectively on his trade to the Houston Texans.
          • The author, Kevin Patra, is an NFL Network Insider and has previously reported on Joe Mixon.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication