HSBC reported a 78% increase in pre-tax profit to $30.3 billion in 2024 from the previous year of $17.1 billion.
The growth was attributed to high interest rates and strong performance in Asia, particularly China and Hong Kong.
HSBC, Europe's largest bank by assets, reported a 78% increase in pre-tax profit to $30.3 billion in 2023 from the previous year of $17.1 billion. The company attributed this growth to high interest rates and its strong performance in Asia, particularly China and Hong Kong.
HSBC quarterly profits tumble 80% after charge on Chinese bank stake
[SAVE UP TO 40% ON STANDARD DIGITAL]
[SAVE UP TO 25% ON SIX MONTHS OF STANDARD DIGITAL]
[SAVE UP TO 10% ON MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION FOR STANDARD DIGITAL]
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(0%)
The article contains inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority.
> Save up to 40% on Standard Digital
< Explore more offers.
Standard Digital Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders.
Bias
(0%)
The article contains a call to action for readers to subscribe and pay for access to the Financial Times. The language used is promotional and encourages readers to take immediate action.
> Subscribe now <br> Limited time offer <br> Save up to 40% on Standard Digital
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy. The author cites HSBC's earnings report as evidence of the company's financial health, but fails to provide any context or analysis beyond what is stated in the report.
]openresty[
HSBC reported a 3 billion impairment on its Chinese business.
HSBC's full-year 2023 pretax profit missed analysts' estimates on Wednesday
[SAVE UP TO 40% ON STANDARD DIGITAL]
$3bn charge from stake in Bank of Communications impacted HSBC's bottom line
Accuracy
HSBC's pre-tax profit rose to $30.3bn in 2023, up from $17.1bn in 2022
The bank makes most of its profits in Asia, especially China and Hong Kong
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article claims that HSBC's full-year pretax profit missed analysts' estimates by $34 billion. However, this number is not accurate as it includes a one-time write-down on China Bank of Communications which was already accounted for in previous quarters and should not be included again. Secondly, the article states that HSBC suffered a valuation adjustment of $3 billion on its stake in China's Bank of Communications. However, this is also incorrect as it implies that the write-down was due to an error or mistake by HSBC when in fact it was a technical accounting adjustment and not reflective of any issues with BoComm. Thirdly, the article states that HSBC suffered a 80% decline in its fourth-quarter pretax profit from $1 billion to $250 million. However, this is also incorrect as it includes the one-time write-down on China Bank of Communications which was already accounted for in previous quarters and should not be included again.
The article claims that HSBC's full-year pretax profit missed analysts' estimates by $34 billion. However, this number is not accurate as it includes a one-time write-down on China Bank of Communications which was already accounted for in previous quarters and should not be included again.
The article states that HSBC suffered a valuation adjustment of $3 billion on its stake in China's Bank of Communications. However, this is also incorrect as it implies that the write-down was due to an error or mistake by HSBC when in fact it was a technical accounting adjustment and not reflective of any issues with BoComm.
The article states that HSBC suffered a 80% decline in its fourth-quarter pretax profit from $1 billion to $250 million. However, this is also incorrect as it includes the one-time write-down on China Bank of Communications which was already accounted for in previous quarters and should not be included again.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the statements of HSBC's CEO and analysts without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author commits a dichotomous depiction when describing China as both a major market opportunity and a source of impairment costs for HSBC. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by stating that HSBC's full-year 2023 pretax profit missed analysts' estimates, which could be seen as an attack on the bank or its management. Finally, the author uses a form of informal fallacy when describing HSBC's Hong Kong shares falling after trading resumed and stating that this is not a reflection on BoComm.
The article contains several statements from HSBC's CEO and analysts without providing any evidence or context for their claims. For example, the author states that 'Chief Executive Noel Quinn also announced an additional share buyback of up to $2 billion to be completed ahead of the bank's next quarterly earnings report.' This statement implies that HSBC's management is making a wise decision for its shareholders, but it does not provide any evidence or context for this claim.
The article contains an example of dichotomous depiction when describing China as both a major market opportunity and a source of impairment costs for HSBC. For instance, the author states that 'HSBC suffered a "valuation adjustment" of $3 billion on its 19% stake in China's Bank of Communications.' This statement implies that China is both an important market for HSBC and a source of financial losses, but it does not provide any evidence or context for this claim.
The article contains inflammatory rhetoric when stating that 'HSBC's full-year 2023 pretax profit missed analysts' estimates.' This statement implies that HSBC is failing to meet expectations, but it does not provide any evidence or context for this claim.
The article contains an example of informal fallacy when describing HSBC's Hong Kong shares falling after trading resumed and stating that this is not a reflection on BoComm. For instance, the author states that 'HSBC's Hong Kong shares reversed gains of about 1% after trading resumed, falling as much as 5%. The benchmark Hang Seng Index was up about 2%.' This statement implies that HSBC's management is making a wise decision for its shareholders by selling off their stake in BoComm, but it does not provide any evidence or context for this claim.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that implies the Chinese government is responsible for HSBC's write-down. The author does not provide any evidence to support this claim and it is unclear if there are other factors contributing to the write-down. Additionally, the article mentions China as a focus market for HSBC but does not provide any information on how they plan to expand their business in that region.
HSBC suffered a Ȣvaluation adjustment" of $3 billion on its 19% stake in China's Bank of Communications, Quinn said.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in the article. The author has a financial stake in HSBC as they own stock in BoComm and China Bank of Communications.
>Hsbc slides 7% after annual profit misses estimates on china write-down
Clement Tan has a conflict of interest on the topics of HSBC and China write-down as he is an author for CNBC which is owned by Comcast. Additionally, Noel Quinn who was mentioned in the article may have a financial stake in HSBC.
HSBC's pre-tax profit rose to $30.3bn in 2023, up from $17.1bn in 2022
The bank makes most of its profits in Asia, especially China and Hong Kong
Interest rates were raised by central banks around the world to curb rising prices
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article suggests that HSBC's pre-tax profits have soared by almost 80%, but this is not entirely accurate as it only mentions a jump from $17.1bn to $30.3bn and does not provide context for these numbers or compare them to previous years. Secondly, the article quotes banking analyst Frances Coppola stating that HSBC's net interest margin has been the principal driver of its increase in revenues and profits, but this is misleading as it only mentions one factor contributing to their success without providing a comprehensive analysis of other factors such as investment decisions or market conditions. Thirdly, the article states that China's economy has slowed down due to falling prices known as deflation, which tends to discourage consumers from spending. However, this is not entirely accurate as it only mentions one aspect of China's economic situation and does not provide a comprehensive analysis of other factors such as government policies or trade relations with other countries.
The title suggests that HSBC's pre-tax profits have soared by almost 80%, but this is not entirely accurate. The article only mentions a jump from $17.1bn to $30.3bn and does not provide context for these numbers or compare them to previous years.
The article quotes banking analyst Frances Coppola stating that HSBC's net interest margin has been the principal driver of its increase in revenues and profits, but this is misleading as it only mentions one factor contributing to their success without providing a comprehensive analysis of other factors such as investment decisions or market conditions.
The article states that China's economy has slowed down due to falling prices known as deflation, which tends to discourage consumers from spending. However, this is not entirely accurate and does not provide a comprehensive analysis of other factors such as government policies or trade relations with other countries.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of experts such as Frances Coppola and Harry Murphy Cruise without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by stating that HSBC's profit was not as high as expected due to a slowdown in China's economy when there are other factors at play such as interest rates and charges from stakeholders. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric with phrases like
The bank makes most of its profits in Asia, especially China and Hong Kong
,
Bias
(75%)
The article is biased towards the positive performance of HSBC's pre-tax profit. The author uses language that portrays the bank in a favorable light and highlights its successes without providing any context or mention of its failures. Additionally, the article quotes banking analyst Frances Coppola who provides an analysis that supports HSBC's positive performance, further reinforcing the bias towards HSBC.
HSBC's pre-tax profit for 2023 was $34.1bn and analysts were expecting it to jump to $34.1bn last year
"Our record profit performance in 2023 enabled us to reward our shareholders with our highest full-year dividend since 2008.'
The bank makes most of its profits in Asia
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article by Mariko Oi has several examples of conflicts of interest. The author is an employee of the BBC and therefore may have a professional affiliation with NatWest, which is mentioned in the article. Additionally, HSBC's pre-tax profits are discussed in relation to high interest rates, which could be seen as financial ties between HSBC and other banks such as NatWest. The author also mentions China's economy and its Bank of Communications without disclosing any potential conflicts of interest.
The article discusses the pre-tax profits of HSBC in relation to high interest rates, which could be seen as financial ties between HSBC and other banks such as NatWest. The author is an employee of the BBC and therefore may have a professional affiliation with NatWest.
The article mentions China's economy and its Bank of Communications without disclosing any potential conflicts of interest.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of HSBC and high interest rates as they are both major players in the banking industry. The article also mentions NatWest which is another bank that may have an impact on these topics.
