India Abstains from UN Vote on Israel-Palestine Conflict Due to Lack of Mention of Hamas Attacks

New York, New York United States of America
India, along with 13 other nations, abstained from the vote due to the resolution's lack of mention of Hamas' attacks.
The UN General Assembly passed a resolution concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict with 119 votes in favor, 8 against, and 45 abstentions.

On May 20, 2022, the United Nations General Assembly held a vote on a resolution concerning the recent conflict between Israel and Palestine. The resolution, which was primarily focused on Israel's actions, did not mention the attacks by Hamas. India, along with 13 other nations, abstained from the vote. The resolution was passed with 119 votes in favor, 8 against, and 45 abstentions.

The resolution condemned the violence and called for a cease-fire, the protection of civilians, humanitarian access to the Gaza Strip, and respect for international humanitarian law. It also called for the Secretary-General to report back within 15 days with efforts to secure a cease-fire and to help ensure humanitarian access.

India's abstention was noted due to its traditionally supportive stance towards Palestine. However, India's representative at the UN clarified that their abstention was due to the resolution's lack of balance, as it did not mention the rocket attacks by Hamas into Israeli territory.

The conflict between Israel and Palestine escalated in May, with both sides launching attacks. The violence resulted in the deaths of over 200 people, the majority of whom were Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The conflict ended with a cease-fire on May 21.


Confidence

95%

Doubts
  • The exact reasons for each country's vote or abstention are not fully detailed in the sources.

Sources

89%

  • Unique Points
    • India's abstention from the vote is seen as a significant shift in its policy
    • India has traditionally supported the Palestinian cause at international forums
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (90%)
    • The article seems to lean towards India's perspective on the issue
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (70%)
      • NDTV is owned by Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy. The Roys have been accused of financial irregularities and have been involved in legal battles with the Indian government, which could potentially influence their coverage of government-related news.
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      90%

      • Unique Points
        • Hamas' warning of escalation if Israeli police enter Al-Aqsa Mosque
        • The article provides a detailed account of the recent conflict
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (85%)
        • The article seems to lean towards the Palestinian perspective
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (80%)
          • CNN is owned by WarnerMedia News & Sports, a division of AT&T's WarnerMedia. AT&T has been known to donate to both Democratic and Republican parties, which could potentially influence the network's political coverage.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          92%

          • Unique Points
            • The article provides a broad overview of the UN General Assembly's actions
          • Accuracy
            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
          • Deception (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Fallacies (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Bias (95%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (85%)
            • Killeen Daily Herald is owned by Frank Mayborn Enterprises, Inc. The Mayborn family has a history of philanthropy in Texas, which could potentially influence their coverage of local news.
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication